Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

WRA 150 Week 10 Remix and IP Law

on

  • 484 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
484
Views on SlideShare
436
Embed Views
48

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 48

http://www.checkmystyleout.org 48

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

WRA 150 Week 10 Remix and IP Law WRA 150 Week 10 Remix and IP Law Presentation Transcript

  • WRA 150: Lessig, Owning Culture, and Mashing stuff up
    by Phill “DJ FunkyPowerPointz” Alexander
  • A quick lead-in: Lessig on IP law
    Lessig declares that he has the following position:
    He is anti-piracy
    He is anti-war (meaning law vs. creators here)
    He is anti-lawyer and anti-lobbyist (he includes himself here, so he’s anti-Lessig, too)
  • Lessig video here (if you’d like to watch later)
    View slide
  • Lessig is like,
    • “We need to hear less from lawyers and lobbyists and more from artists [about who owns culture].” View slide
    • " This is a relationship between technology and ownership, which is translated to digital technology and copyright.”
  • Pirate Technologies
    player piano – “pirated” sheet music
    radio– “pirated” records
    cable TV– “pirated” network TV betamax– “pirated” TV and movies
    But as these were regulated, the law always waited to see “the potential of the technology.”
  • We Didn’t Start the Fire…
    “...this is not the first time radical new technologies have appeared and changed the way that culture gets made and distributed. This is a constant theme...”
    But… The law favored the pirate in those old cases. It is now "fit the technology to the law" and not "fit the law to the technology."
  • "This architecture demands... the right to remix culture."
    Enter DJ Danger Mouse. He felt that the Beatles’ White Album and Jay-Z’s black album went together.
    So he created “the Grey Album” which you can DL here:http://www.illegal-art.org/audio/grey.htmlbut don’t, because it’s totally illegal. *wink*
    Or is it?
    Or… should it be?
  • Remix
    RemixRemix is the act of taking one or more cultural artifacts-- in this case visual, though video, audio, and alphabetic texts are regularly remixed-- and deliberately mixing elements together to create something new that often specifically mimics one or more of the sources. Many remixes are meant to be satirical or overtly political, though satire is not essential to the genre.
    Remix is the act of taking one or more cultural artifacts-- visual, video, audio, and/or alphabetic texts- and deliberately mixing elements together to create something new that often specifically mimics one or more of the sources. Many remixes are meant to be satirical or overtly political, though satire is not essential.
  • Remix
    +
    =
  • Remix
    =
    +
  • If you’re offended by profanity, plug your ears right about now
    Whose song is this? Whose song is this?
  • Another Example
    The New Yorker ran a piece on Danger Mouse and the idea of mash-ups. You might recognize it. 
    “Mashups find new uses for current digital technology, a new iteration of the cause-and-effect relationship behind almost every change in pop-music aesthetics: the gear changes, and then the music does.”
    So… whose song is this?
  • A Stroke of Genius
    “In October of 2001, a d.j. named Roy Kerr, calling himself the Freelance Hellraiser, sent Temple-Morris [a mash-up show duo] a mashup called “A Stroke of Genius,” laying Christina Aguilera’s vocal from “Genie in a Bottle,” a lubricious pop song, over the music from the Strokes’ “Hard to Explain,” a brittle, honking guitar song. “
  • back to the visual while still looking at music…
    Is it “okay” for Nas to do this?
    Is it okay for FOX to depict Nas in the ways that they have?