Social Media in the Workplace and Beyond
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Social Media in the Workplace and Beyond

on

  • 2,473 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,473
Views on SlideShare
1,456
Embed Views
1,017

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
68
Comments
0

3 Embeds 1,017

http://www.socialbusinessnews.com 994
http://feeds.feedburner.com 22
http://192.168.10.64:15871 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Karen
  • The court held Jasmine retained the standing to sueThe court analogizes to a victim of an automobile accident who does not need to keep her damaged vehicle until trial to recover for the damages caused by a negligent driver
  • The Court avoided deciding whether public employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages sent on employer-owned equipment under the Fourth Amendment and what particular standard ought to apply in making that determination.  It acknowledged that rapid changes in communications and the means by which information is transmitted, as illustrated by advancements in technology and what society views as proper behavior, created significant challenges to setting legal standards for the workplace that would survive the test of time.    So, the Court assumed, without deciding, that Quon had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his text messages and the case could be decided on narrower grounds, i.e., whether the search was reasonable under well-defined Fourth Amendment standards.

Social Media in the Workplace and Beyond Social Media in the Workplace and Beyond Presentation Transcript

  • Social Media In the Workplace and Beyond
    Alexander Nemiroff, Esq.
    Jackson Lewis, LLP
    1601 Cherry Street, Suite 1650
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    267.319.7816
    Alexander.Nemiroff@jacksonlewis.com
  • What is “Social Media”?
    MySpace
    Facebook
    Friendster
    LinkedIn
    Twitter
    Skype
    Blogs
    Digg, Reddit, Technorati
    YouTube
    Unvarnished
    Instant Messaging
    Texting
  • Social NOTworking?
    How many working hours are lost?
    50% of Facebook users log on everyday
    • 22% visit social networking sites 5+ times/week
    Only 52% of employees say they don’t use social networking sites during work hours
    And that’s not counting time spent texting, instant messaging, surfing, making phone calls, etc. …
  • Employee Views on Social Media Use
    Survey says:
    53% of employees say their social networking pages are none of their employers’ business
    74% say it’s easy to damage a company’s reputation on social media
    15% say that if their employer did something that they didn’t agree with, they would comment about it online
  • What Do Employers Do?
    40% of business executives surveyed disagree that what employees put on their social networking pages is not the employer’s business
    30% admit to informally monitoring social networking sites
  • Key Legal Challenges for Employers
    • Negligent hiring/supervision
    • Discrimination/harassment/retaliation
    • Disclosure of trade secrets or proprietary information
    • Reputational harm to employees
    • Reputational harm to employers
    • Privacy pitfalls
    • Legal constraints on employee discipline
  • Would You Hire Him as a Lifeguard?
  • Do You Have the Same Response?
  • Risk Factor: Negligent Hiring/Supervision/Retention
    An employer may be held liable for an employee’s wrongful acts if the employer knew or had reason to know of the risk the employment created
  • Risks for Employers
    Using the Web to Make Hiring Decisions
    Many employers and job recruiters check out potential employees on the Web
    Using search engines such as Google or Yahoo and internet sites such as PeopleFinders.com, Local.Live.com or Zillow.com
    Some studies show more than half of employers use some kind of screening on social networking sites
  • Information Found on Social Networking Sites
  • Hiring Decisions Based Upon Social Networking Activity
    Problem: A search may identify an applicant’s protected characteristics such as age, race, sexual orientation, marital status, arrests or other factors that should not be considered in a hiring decision.
    Solution: Have a non-decision maker conduct the search and filter out protected information. Alternatively, hire a third party to conduct the search and filter out protected information.
  • Hiring Decisions Based Upon Social Networking Activity
    Guidelines for Employers on Internet Search of Applicants
     If you are going to do these searches:
    • Do them consistently; towards the end of the hiring process
    • Screen out protected information
    • Verify information
    • Document the search; and
    • Determine how relevant the information is to the job
  • Risk Factor: Discrimination, Harassment - Employee Use of Social Media
    Electronic communications offer opportunities for misuse
    Can be used as evidence to support a harassment or discrimination claim
  • “Sexting” Concerns
    • 20% of teens and 33% of young adults electronically sent nude photographs of themselves
    • 39% of teens and 59% of young adults sent sexually explicit text messages
    Source: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, 2008 Survey
  • Risk Factor: Reputational Harm to Employees
    • Defamation - plaintiff must prove defendant published a false statement about plaintiff that tends to harm plaintiff’s reputation
    • Employer can be liable if the employee had apparent authority to speak on its behalf – Beware of personal references!!
  • Risk Factor: Reputational Harm to Employers
  • Is this the Image You Want for Your Company?
  • How about this one?
  • Not Laughing Now
  • Risk Factor: Employee Discipline
    • National Labor Relations Act
    • Employees who IM or blog about their working conditions or employers may be protected under the NLRA
    • Employees have a right to engage in "concerted activity“ for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection
    • Applies to both union and non-union employees
  • Legal Constraints on Disciplining Employees for Online Activity
    Unlawful Restrictions:
    Statement that prohibits the sharing of information concerning other employees, such as wages, hours and terms and conditions of employment.
    Lawful Restrictions:
    • Prohibition on disclosing confidential company business information and documents; Prohibition on disclosing “confidential” employee information;
    • Prohibition of conduct which is or has the effect of being injurious, offensive, threatening, intimidating, coercing, or interfering with the Company’s employees.
    22
  • Legal Constraints on Employee Discipline: NLRA
    What is protected activity:
    • Kiewitt Power Constructors Co., 355 NLRB No. 150 (8/27/10)
    Held two employees complained to their supervisor regarding the location of where they were required to take their breaks and then told the supervisor the situation could “get ugly” and supervisor had “better bring [his] boxing gloves” engaged in protected concerted activity under the Act because the statements were spontaneous and not outright threats.
    • Plaza Auto Center, Inc. 355 NLRB No. 85 (8/16/10)
    Held that a salesperson who shouted at his employer’s owner that he was a “f…ing crook” and an “a..hole” during a meeting with management to discuss pay and commissions, among other things, was engaged in protected concerted activity at the meeting and that his outburst was not so egregious so as to lose the protection under the Act.
    23
  • Other Outlets for the Disgruntled Employee
    www.jobvent.com
    www.hateboss.com
    www.workrant.com
    www.fthisjob.com
    www.rantasaurus-rex.com
  • Risk Factor: Employee Discipline
    • Expression of political opinions (e.g. New Jersey)
    • Legal off-duty activities (e.g. California, Colorado, Connecticut, New York)
    • Wrongful termination in violation of public policy (arrests, convictions, bankruptcy, workers’ compensation history)
    • Whistleblowing (SOX, Wage & Hour)
  • Risk Factor: Federal Wiretap Act
    • Prohibits “interception” of electronic communications
    • Most courts hold that acquisition of electronic communications must occur contemporaneously with transmission
    • Is monitoring of Instant Messages “interception”?
  • Risk Factor: Federal Stored Communications Act
    Prevents employers from using illicit or coercive means to access employees’ private electronic communications
    Pietrylo v. Hillstone Rest. Group, 29 I.E.R. Cases 1438 (D.N.J. 2009)
    Jury verdict for employees under the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. §2701(a)(1), affirmed by federal court where managers accessed employee’s blog.
    • Employees of Houston’s restaurant maintained an invitation-only chat room (the “Spec-Tater”) on MySpace for fellow employees to “vent” about their work experiences. It became populated with complaints about the restaurant, customers, and supervisors. One employee told supervisors about the site and they asked for her password.
  • Pure PowerBootCamp v. WarriorFitnessBootCamp LLC (2nd Cir., 2011)
    • Accessing Personal E-mails Can Violate Federal Stored Communications Act Even With No Actual Damages
    • Two employees left to start competing fitness facility.
    • Pure Power learned through 546 e-mails from four personal accounts belonging to the former employees (e.g. Hotmail) that former employees had taken customer lists, training and instruction materials, and solicited customers.
    • How? The former employees had stored their usernames and passwords on company’s computers.
    • Employees countersued under SCA -- $1,000 per count
  • Employee Monitoring and Privacy Issues
    • Key question: Did the employee have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the electronic communication?
    • Ensure monitoring is:
    • based on legitimate needs, and
    • limited in scope to achieve those needs
  • It’s Amazing What Folks Put on the Internet for Everyone to See
  • It’s Amazing What Folks Put on the Internet for Everyone to See
  • WHAT??
  • Employee Monitoring and Privacy Issues
    • Courts are more likely to rule for the employer if:
    • Employer owns the computer and e-mail system
    • Employee voluntarily uses an employer’s network
    • Employee has consented to be monitored (usually based in written personnel policy)
  • Employee Monitoring and Privacy Issues
    • Currently unclear if an employee has a reasonable expectation of privacy in blogs or IMs
    • Courts have split on whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in content maintained on third-party servers (e.g., web-based e-mail accounts)
  • Is There a Right to Privacy in Email, Texts, and Communications on Employer Systems?
    In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the City of Ontario’s review of transcripts of an employee’s text messages sent and received on a City-issued pager was a reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment.  City of Ontario, Calif. v. Jeff Quon, et al., No. 08-1332 (June 17, 2010). 
    The Court disposed of the case on narrow grounds, preferring to avoid the risks of establishing "far-reaching premises" before the role of technology in society and its Fourth Amendment implications becomes clear.”  
    Nevertheless, the Supreme Court outlined principles instructive to all employers that allow employees to use electronic communications devices, including cell phones, i-Phones, and Blackberries.
  • Policy Guidance from Quon
    All employers must be prepared with comprehensive computer and electronic equipment usage policies.  The Court noted that these policies will help shape an employee’s expectation of privacy.  Further, it is critical that practices and policies be consistent, reflect current technologies, and be clearly communicated. Employers also should consider requiring employees to acknowledge in writing that they received and reviewed these and similar policies and procedures, particularly as new technologies are introduced.
  • Methods to Minimize Risk
    Develop a written policy regarding access by HR and hiring managers to applicant and employee social networking sites
    Train HR and IT personnel responsible for monitoring and using electronic information on:
    Avoiding improper access
    Screening out information that cannot be lawfully considered in hiring and disciplinary decisions
  • Methods to Minimize Risk
    Prohibit access to private password social networking sites without proper authorization
    Do not allow any third party to “friend” an applicant to gain access to the applicant’s site
    Ensure employment decisions are made based on lawful, verified information
  • Methods to Minimize Risk
    Consider restriction on professional references via LinkedIn
    Consider blocking or limiting employee access to social networking sites through company computers
  • Drafting an Effective E-Mail and Internet Use Policy
  • Key Elements of Electronic Communications Policies
    • Consider company philosophy and business
    • No expectation of privacy when using company equipment
    • Employees must abide by non-disclosure and confidentiality policies and agreements
  • Key Elements of Electronic Communications Policies
    • Only individuals officially designated may speak on behalf of the Company
    • “Bloggers Beware” - Require a disclaimer:
    “The views expressed in this blog are my personal views and opinions and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of my employer.”
  • Key Elements of Electronic Communications Policies
    • Company policies governing corporate logos, branding, and identity apply to all electronic communications
    • Employees may not make defamatory comments when discussing the employer, co-workers, products, services and/or competitors
    • Based on the FTC’s endorsement guidelines, require employees to obtain prior approval before referring to company products and services and to disclose the nature of the employment relationship
  • Key Elements of Electronic Communications Policies
    Do not prohibit employees from discussing terms and conditions of employment
    If allowed at work, time spent social networking, blogging or texting should not interfere with job duties
    Remind employees expected to comport themselves professionally both on and off duty
  • Terms of an Effective E-Mail and Internet Use Policy
    • Employer should REVIEW AND REVISEpolicies regularly
    • Need to put date on each revision
    • Employer should ACTUALLY MONITORuse of the system and devices to maintain and protect policy’s integrity
    • Guard against violations and
    inconsistent use
    46
  • Employer Overreaching
    The Town of Bozeman, Montana, required job applicants to provide passwords to email (Google, Yahoo!) and social networking sites (MySpace, Facebook) accounts.
    98% of people polled believed this policy to be an invasion of privacy
    On June 22, 2009, the town rescinded the policy
  • 48