Refutation of an argument found in subhaan as subbuh

  • 195 views
Uploaded on

imkan al kidhb defended

imkan al kidhb defended

More in: Spiritual
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
195
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. BIS MIL LA HIR RAH: MA NIR RA H:I:MA LOT OF SITES IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES ARE WORKING AGAINST THE TRUTH OF SELF POSSIBILITY OFFALSEHOODFALSITY IN THE STATEMENTS OF KALAM AL LAFZ:IY:> If one search in any reliable search engine he | she issurprised to see the number of sites< webpages ETC AGAINST THE TRUTH OF SELF POSSIBILITY OF KALAM AL LAFZ:IY.ON THE CONTRARY GREAT SCHOLORS OF SUNNI CREED ARE NOT ON THE INTERNET TO REFUTE THE DOGMA OFSELF ABSURDITY [ISTIHALAH ADH DHA:TI:] OF FALSITYFALSEHOOD. IN SUCH A SITUATION IT IS VERYDIFFICULT TO REFUTE EACH AND EVERY ARTICLE WRITTEN AGAINST THE DOGMA OF SELF POSSIBILITYSTATED ABOVE.THAT IS THE REASON A NUMBER OF SCHOLORS THROUGH OUT THE WORLD HAS BEENMISGUIDED. EVEN THE UNIVERSITY OF DEOBAND IS NOT TAKING THE MATTER SERIOUSLY ,HENCE THENUMARICAL NUMBER OF RESPONCES IS MUCH LESS THAN THE NUMARICAL NUMBER OF SUCH ATTACTS.IT IS NECESSARY TO RESPONSE IN EQUAL NUMBER AND IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES PARTICULARLY INTURKISH, AND SOME OTHER LANGUAGES.NOT JUST IN ENGLISH OR FRENCH.I BELIEVE THAT ALLAH MAY MAKE WAYS TO REFUTE THE DENOUNCERS OF HIS OMNIPOTENCE AND I PRAY OALLAH NULLIFY AND NUTRALIZE ALL OF THERE ATTEMTS WHO TRY TO LIMIT THY OMNIPOTENCE BYINCORRECT ARGUMENTS. FOR THE REST OF TRUEU AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMAAH I REQUEST THAT THEY MUSTPREPAIR THEM SELVES TO STUDY THE BASIC WORKSBOOKS WRITTEN BY THESE DENOUNCERS SO THAT THEYCAN REFUTE THEIR OBJECTIONS AND FALLECIES. ANY HOW WE ARE TRYING TO REFUTE ALL THE PRESENTEDARGUMENTS IN OUR FIRST STAGE OF REFUTATION. IN THE SECOND STAGE WE SHALL RESPONSE TO THEIRARESPONCES IF ANY INSHA ALLAH.IN GENERAL A BAG FULL OF [ INCORRECT] ARGUMRNTS ARE FOUND IN THESE ARTICLES WRITTEN BYDENOUNCERS. SO THE BST WAY IS TO DISCUSS IN DETAIL EACH AND EVERY ARGUMENT INDEPENDENTLY.One of the favourite arguments of the DENOUNCERS OF SELF POSSIBILITY OF FALSEHOODFALSITY IN DIVINESTATMENTS over many years had been that IT IS A DISGRACE FOR THE NECESSARY EXISTENT NOUNLY ALL-H. Theseeds of this argument were sown by the work of THE AUTHOR OF SUBHAAN ASSUBBUH, who divided the THE DIVINELAZIM INTO TWO GROUPS NAMELY LAZIM OF DHAT AND LAZIM OF LAZIM [OF DHAT]. [1] His ideas were useduncritically by later scholars who came to TOOK IT AS AN AXIOM OF THERE SYSTEM. Since THEN THE VIEW OF THEAUTHOR OF SUBHAN ASSUBBUH WAS given a new and unexpected twist by LATTER DENOUNCERS OF SELFPOSSIBILITY OF FALSEHOODFALSITY. . In a series of SITES, books ,SITES, ETC. they claimed that TO CONDIDER TRUTHAS A NON ETERNAL ATTRIBUTE IS TO BELIEVE AL QUR-AN IS A CREATION.. To support this view, they presentedarguments from Different works out of there true context.t. [2] It can justifiably be said that this argument is INCORRECT. IT lies at the heart of PROPAGANDA against TRUEAHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMA-AH today. The popularity of SUBHAN ASSUBBUH idea was given a new breath of life byLATTER DENOUNCERS , WHO CLAIMED INCORRECTLY THAT TO CONSIDER TRUTH AS NON ETERNAL ATTRIBUTE 1
  • 2. IS TO BELIEVE THAT THE ESSENCE DHA:T OF SELF NECESSARY EXISTENT IS LOCUS OFC NON ETERNAL [M-H-LAL H:-Du: TH].SOURCE OF THIS IN ARGUMENT.THE AUTHOR OF SUBHAAN ASSUBUH HAS WRITTEN IN HIS WORK :WHEN DIVINE TRUTH IS CONSIDERED TO BE VOLINTIARY [ VOLITION]AND AL QURAN IS CERTAINLY THE SPEECH /KAMA:M OF HIM [I.E G-D]THE IT IS NECESSARY [ACCORDING TO THIS SUPPOSITION] THAT AL QUR-A:N IS NOT AN IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE [M-QT-DHA:] OF [DIVINE] ESSENCE [DHA:T] ; AND TRUTH IS LAZIM [IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE] OF AL QUR-A:N; AND LAZIM OF LAZIM IS LAZIM,[IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE OF AN IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE IS AN IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE];AND IT IS WRONG[BA:-TIL] THAT AN IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE IS VOLINTARYVOLITION [SUBJECT OF WILLPERTAINING TO WILL] ;V AND BY ‘IJMA:’’ OF ALL MUSLIMS EACH AND EVERY THING WHICH IS OTHER THANTHE [DIVINE] ESSENCE AND (ESSENCIAL) [DIVINE] ATTRIBUTES IS TEMPORAL [NON-ETERNAL] AND CREATED,THEN IT IS PROVED WITH CERTAINITY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RELIGION OF OF LIDEAR OF WAHABIAH IT ISIMPLIED THAT AL QUR-‘A:N IS CREATED.PG 241 SUB-H:A:N ‘AS-SUBBU:H: FATAVA RADVIAH DARUL VOL-6‘‘ULU:M AMJADIAH.[TRANSLATED LITERALLY]Now a days it has become a hidden Axiom of a very large number of denouncers of the SELF POSSIBILITYSELF CONTINGENCTOF FALSEHOODFALSITY IN DIVINE STATEMENTS.SO IT IS REQUIRED TO ANSWERREPLY THIS ARGUMENT LOGICALY ,PHLOSIPHICALY AND THEOLOGICALY.UPGRADATION :-THIS ARGUMENT MAY BE UPGRATED AS FOLLOW.THIS CAN BE EVOLUTED IN AN ULTIMATE FORM :THE NON-ETERNITY AND CREATIVITY OF TRUTH OF QURAN DO IMPLYTHE NON ETERNITY AND CREAVITY OF QUR-‘A:N, SINCE TRUTH OF QUR-‘A:MIS A LAZIM [IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE] OF QUR-‘A:MN.THE NON ETERNITY AND CREAVITY OF QUR-A’n DOES IMPLY THE NON ETERNITY AND CREAVITY OF OF DIVINEESSENCE {WHICH IS GOD|DEITY HIMSELF]. 2
  • 3. THERE FORE NON ETERNITYAND CREAVITY OF GOD IS IMPLIED.AND THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE,AND KUFR.THERE FORE TRUTH IS ETERNAL AND UNCREATED.REFUTATION OF THIS ARGUMENT.FROM THE VERY TIME SUBH:A:N ‘AS-SUBBU:H: WAS FIRST PUBLISHED A NUMBER OF FOLLOWERS OFSUBH:AN ‘ASSUBBU:H: ARE USING THIS ARGUMENT IN A NUBBER OF FORMS , SOME TIME AS AN AXIOM OFTHEIR RESPECTIVE SYSTEMS OF SELF ABSURDITY OF FALSEHOOD/FALSITY.ANSWER /RESPONSE/REPLY TO THIS ARGUMENT.THERE ARE SEVERAL RESPONCES AND SOME OF THEM ARE DIVEN BELOW.1] ACCORDING TO PHILOSO[HICAL MINDED AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMAAH OF DEOBAND ,EACH AND EVERYESSENTIAL ATTRIBUTE OF DIVINE ESSENCE [ GOD/DEITY] IS IDENTICAL TO THE DIVINE ESSENCE. THEYDISBELIEVE IN ANY LAZIM [IMPLIES ATTRIBUTE], RATHER OPINE THE SELF ABSURDITY OF LAZIM ORLAZIM BIDH DHA:T [SELF LAZIM]. ACCORDING TO THEM LAZIM CONTRADICTS IDENTITY [‘‘AINIAH]SO TRUTH AS ACCORDING TO THEM IS AN ACTIVE ATTRIBUTE , NEITHER A LAZIM OF DIVINEESSENCE[ PRIMERY LAZIM] NOR A LAZIM OF LAZIM OF DIVINE ESSENCE [ IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE OFIMPLIED AN IMPLIED ATTRIBUTE OF ESSENCE /SECONDARY LAZIM].EVEN THE STATEMENTNESS IS AN ACTIVE ATTRIBUTE.2] ACCORDING TO THEOLOGICAL MINDED ‘AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMAA-‘AH OF DEOBAND, DIVINE SPEECHIS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ESSENCE, SUBSISTWITH THE ESSENCE,SUSTAINS WITH THE ESSENCE [QA:-‘IM BIDHA:-TIL BARI] .{ SELF ASSOCIATED,SELF ASSOCIATION = DIS ASSOCIATION IS SELF ABSURD}IT IS COMMUNICABLE TO THE DIVINE ESSENCE, AND IS NEITHER IDENTICAL NOR SEPARATE [LA: ‘‘AIN WA LA: GHAIR] .THEY DONOT BELIEVE THAT AN ATTRIBUTE OF ATTRIBUTE OF GOD IS SUSTAINED WITH THE ATTRIBUTE OF GOD.AN ATTRIBUTE OF AN ATTRIBUTE OF GOD[A POSATIVE ATTRIBUTE OF AN ATTRIBUTE OF GOD] IS EITHER A RELATIVEATTRIBUTE OR AN ACTIVE ATTRIBUTE OF GOD.THEY ALSO BELIEVE THAT STATMENTNESS IS AN ACTIVE ATTRIBUTE OR A RELATIVE ATTRIBUTE.3]MODERATE MINDED ‘AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMA:-‘AH OF DEOBAND TRY TO UNIFY BOTH BELIEVES BY CLAIMING THAT IT ISJUST A VERBAL DISBUTE.ATTRIBUTE IS IDENTICAL TO THE DIVINE ESSENCE IN THE SENSE /MEANING OF NON-ABSOLUTE IDENTITY, AND NOT IDENTICALTO THE ESSENCE IN THE SENSE /MEANING OF ABSOLUTE IDENTITY]SIMILARLY IT IS NOT SEPARATE IN THE SENSE/MEANING OF ABSOLUTE SEPERATION, AND BUT SEPARATE IN THE SENSE/MEANING OF NON ABSOLUTE SEPERATION/SEPEBERABLITY] 3
  • 4. HOW EVER ESSENCE OF GOD IS ABSOLUTELY IDENTICAL TO GOD [ THAT IS IDENTICAL IN MISDA:Q/SUBJECT ANDMAFHUM/MA’NA:/MEANING/SENSE}An other term is self identical.Absolute separate means separate in misdaq and mafhum.Non Absolute Identity means identical im MISDA:Q and separate in mafhum.Which is also Non Absolute Seperation/seperablity.Absolute separation means separate inboth mafhum and misdaq.IN THESE SENSES/MEANING THE DISPUTE IS CLEARLY A VERBAL ONE.OBJECTION:-A NUMBER OF THEOLOGIANS/THEOLOGISTS BELIEVE THAT DIVINE SPEECH IS AN ETERNAL STATEMENT.SO IF IT IS NOT TRUE THEN IT IS FALSE. AND THAT IS KUFR.ANSWER TO THIS OBJECTION. is as follow:A LARGE NUBBER OF ‘AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMAA_’AH do believe that ETERNAL SPEECH IS NEITHER AN INSHA [NON STATMENTALSPEECH] NOR A KHABAR[STATEMENT].SO BOTH INSHA:IAH AND KHABARIAH ARE RELATIVE ATTRIBUTES. THERE IS NO TRUTH OR FALSEHOOD WHICH IS SELFPOSSIBLE WITH OUT KABAR.SO ETERNAL SPEECH IS NEITHER FALSE NOR TRUE IN ETERNITY SINCE IT IS NOT A STATEMENT.A SMALL MINORITY DOES BELIEVE THAT ETERNAL SPEECH IS AN STATEMENT. IF SOME ONE DOES HOLD THIS OPENION THENACCORDING TO THIS OPENION THE RESPONSE HAS BEEB GIVIEN IT IN OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS SITE .IN A NUT SHELL THE RESPONSE IS AS FOLLOW.IF IT IS A STATEMENT THEN IN REGARD TO ETERNAL REALITIES AND SELF POSSIBILITY OF FALSEHOOD IS IN REGARD TO NONETERNITY.THIS IS A SELF POSSIBILITY OF NON ETERNAL CONNECTION ,NOT IN ACCORDANCE TOOCCURRANCES . THE ACTUALIZATION OR EXISTENCE OF THESE CONNECTIONS AT MOST IMPLY THEANNHALIATION OF TRUTH OF THE SUPPOSED ETERNAL STATEMENT IN REGARD TO ETERNAL REALITIES ANDNON TEMPORAL TRUTHS.BUT THIS IMPLICATION IS NOT A SELF IMPLICATION [LUZUM BIDH DHAN OR IST-LZAM BIDH DHA:T] BUT IS LUZUM GHAIR ADHDHA:TI AND IST-LZAM GHAIR ADH DHA:TI:.[ A NON SELF IMPLICATION ]SO EXISTENCE OF THESE CONNECTIONS ARE ABSURD WITH SEPARATE.IF OCCURRENCE OF A SEPARATE IMPLIES A SELF ABSURD AND IMPLICATION IS NOT A SELF IMPLICATION THEN THE SELFABSUDITY OF ONE THAT DOES OMPLY CAN NOT BE PROVED.SO IF FALSHOOD IN REGARD TO ETERNAL REALITIES IS SELF ABSURD THE SAID CONNECTIONS CAN NOT BE PROVED AS SELFABSURD.EVEN THE AUTHOR OF SUBH:AN ‘ASUUBBU:H: ACCEPT THIS FACT.A DETAIL DISCUSSION IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS ARTICLE ,HOW EVER IT SHALL BE DISCUSSED LATTER.A GOOD PORTION OF THE MATTER IS DISCUSSED IN SOME OF THE PREVIOUS ANSWER.IT IS ADVISED TO SEE THEMSOME DISCUSSIONS ARE LEFT DUE TO the reason the present article is not supposed to be a detailed discussion.THERE FORE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT KALAM AL ALAFZI AND KALAM AN NAFSI ARE LEFT BEHIND.ONE OF THE BASIC REASON IS ONE THAT THE AUTHOR OF SUBHAN AS SUBBU:H: DID NOT BELIEVED IN DISTICTION B/WKALAM AL LAFZI AND KALAM AN NAFSI AS HE HAS CONFESSED IN MALFUZAAT PART 04.THAT IS A REASON AMONG SOME OTHER REASON THAT WE HAVE ALSO NOT DISCUSSED THEM .HOW EVER A DETAIL DISCUSSION SHALL SOON BE ON LINE INSHA ALLAH. 4