Biosafety Regulations of Asian Countries 2013
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Biosafety Regulations of Asian Countries 2013

on

  • 1,279 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,279
Views on SlideShare
422
Embed Views
857

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
10
Comments
0

5 Embeds 857

http://192.168.0.112 647
http://www.asianfoodreg.com 169
http://asianfoodreg.com 31
http://localhost 9
http://www.slideee.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Biosafety Regulations of Asian Countries 2013 Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Jawahir L. Karihaloo Coordinator, Asia-Pacific Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology (APCoAB), APAARI, New Delhi, India Kavita Gupta National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India 1 Biosafety Regulations of Asian Countries FAO Regional Workshop on Strengthening Regional Cooperation and National Capacity Building on Biosafety in Asia - 17-20 June 2013
  • 2. Diversity of Asian region ! 26 countries ! Southeast Asia ! South and Southwest Asia ! North & CentralAsia ! East Asia Diverse economies and experiences in adoption of biotechnology in agriculture Source: FAO-RAP (2012) Selected Indicators of Food and Agricultural Development in the Asia-pacific Region 2001-2011
  • 3. Agriculture is important to Asian region 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Southeast Asia South & Southwest Asia North & Central Asia Japan World Percent Regions Agricultural population Source: FAO-RAP (2012) Selected Indicators of Food andAgricultural Development in the Asia- pacific Region 2001-2011
  • 4. Policy support to biotechnology INDIA: “The strategy will lay a strong foundation for discovery and innovation, effectively utilizing novel technology platform with potential to contribute to long term benefits in agriculture, animal productivity, human health, environmental security and sustainable industrial growth”.
  • 5. GM crops approved and under cultivation Country Approved for food /feed* Approved for cultivat ion* Under cultivation* Area (Mha) (2013) China 7 8 cotton, papaya, tomato, sweet pepper 4.0 India 1 1 cotton 10.8 Japan 9 8 -- -- Korea 6 3 -- --- Malaysia 2 -- -- --- Myanmar 1 1 cotton 0.3 Pakistan 1 1 cotton 2.8 Philippines 7 1 Maize 0.8 Thailand 2 ---- --- --- Source: htpp://bch.cbd.int/database/decisions;ISAAA* As on 14.06.2013
  • 6. GM crops - some successes ! GM crops are under commercial cultivation in China, India, Pakistan, Philippines and Myanmar. ! China, Japan, Korea, the Philippines and Thailand have approved GM crops for food and livestock feed. ! In India the area under Bt cotton reached 10.8 million hectares in 2012, which constitutes nearly 90% of the total cotton area of the country. ! In Pakistan, Bt cotton covers 2.8 million ha. ! In Philippines, GM corn covers 45% of 1.2 million ha potential yellow corn area.
  • 7. Bt cotton in India • Yield increase by 40% • Pesticide spray reduction from 4.2 kg/ac to 2.6 kg/ac • Farmer made net cost saving of USD 20-24/ha • Profitability USD 82-365/ha • Raw cotton export increase from USD16.5 million (2002-03) to USD 2.6 billion (2009-10) Sources: Cotton Corporation of India; Brookes G, Barfoot P (2012) GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996-2010. PG Economics Ltd, UK;ISAAA
  • 8. GM Crops in pipeline Ruane, J. 2013. An FAO e-mail conference on GMOs in the pipeline in developing countries:The moderator’s summary. FAO. http://www.fao.org/biotech/biotech-forum/ From the email conference a picture emerged of a GMO pipeline that contains a considerable quantity and variety of products that may be commercialized in developing countries within the next five years. As noted in the conference, whether or when they actually will be commercialized depends to a large extent on the GMO regulatory framework in the country.
  • 9. International Landmarks in the Development of Biosafety Regulations 1973- Gordon Conference led to a moratorium on recombinant research and led US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to study safety of certain laboratory projects. 1975- First NIH guidelines prepared. 1982- Revision of NIH guidelines and exemption granted for rDNA research; and experiments previously prohibited, were to be reviewed for approval. 1986- OECD International Safety Guidelines for application of biotechnology based on risk assessment and management of GMOs 2000- Cartagena Protocol adopted in Montreal after >1year of inception 2003- Codex Guidelines for GM foods including the analysis of unintended effects 2004- IPPC- International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM)-11 revised to include risks posed by LMOs under its standard on Pest risk analysis
  • 10. Landmarks in the Development of Biosafety Regulations in the Asian Region India – 1990 (Recombinant DNA safety Guidelines);1998; 1999; 2008 Philippines – 1991(Biosafety Guidelines on genetic engineering);1998; 2002; 2004; Thailand – 1992 (Biosafety Guidelines on genetic engineering and field release); Malaysia - 1997 (National Guidelines for the Release of GMOs); 2007; 2010 China - 2001 (Regulation on Administration of Agricultural Transgenic Biosafety); 2002; 2007 Japan - 2003 (Law on conservation and sustainable use of LMOs); 2011 Bangladesh - 2005 (Biosafety Guidelines);2010 Pakistan -2005 (Biosafety Rules) Cambodia - 2008 (Law on Biosafety), 2010 Iran - 2009 (National Biosafety Act) Vietnam – 2010 (Decree on biosafety management of GMOs) Indonesia 2011(Decree No. 61/2011 on evaluating, release of GM crops); 2012
  • 11. Status of Regulatory Preparedness in Asia* ! Countries that have enforced National Biosafety Regulations ! Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar Pakistan, Philippines, Republic of Korea,Thailand andVietnam ! Countries that have Biosafety Regulations at various stages of development ! Bhutan, Cambodia, DPR Korea, Laos Republic and Nepal ! Parties to Protocol: ! Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Iran, India, Indonesia, Japan, DR Korea, R Korea, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Philippines, Lao PDR, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Maldives,Vietnam (22) ! Protocol ratified: ! Iran, India, Indonesia, DR Korea, R Korea, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Philippines, Lao PDR * as on 14 June 2013 Source: http://bch.cbd.int/protocol/
  • 12. National Biosafety Policy A stand-alone policy on biosafety/ part of policy(ies) on o Biotechnology o Agriculture o Biosecurity and/or quarantine o Biodiversity/ Environmental protection… Regulatory Regime Legislation/ laws/ acts/ decrees/ guidelines General Provisions Operational Provisions Administrative System • Competent Authority/ies • System(s) for Risk assessment • Meeting obligations under BCH and national participation in BCH Mechanisms for public awareness, education and participation • Public access to information • Public involvement in decision-making • Awareness and Education • BCH Systems for follow up • Monitoring for environmental and effects on human, animal, plant • Enforcement • Offences and Penalties Components of a National Biosafety Framework (UNEP-GEF)
  • 13. UNEP-GEF Support for NBF Status of Countries in Asia ! Countries with National Biosafety Framework (NBF) ! Countries with NBF and draft Biosafety Regulations ! Countries with NBF and notified Biosafety Laws ! Bhutan, Mongolia, Nepal ! DPR Korea, Kazakhstan, Laos, Sri Lanka, Syria, Thailand ! Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Iran, Philippines, Republic of Korea
  • 14. A Typical Regulation on GMOs A typical National Biosafety Framework includes ! A national policy for biosafety as a stand alone document or a part of larger biotechnology/ biosecurity strategy ! The regulatory system including mechanisms for risk assessment and management ! A system for monitoring and inspection to ensure transparency and accountability ! Information sharing as an important component for regional cooperation in risk assessment,evaluation and management
  • 15. Provisions for Risk Assessment and Risk Management ! China- risk assessment called “safety assessment system”, risk management system “safety system” with clear-cut implementation bodies ! Indonesia- mechanism outlined in GM regulation defines risk assessment on environment, human and animal health ! Korea- two separate systems for obtaining food safety approvals and for conducting environmental risk assessments for biotech crops ! Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Philippines- the risk assessment on case-by-case basis based on level of risk and end use and several ministries/ committees notified ! Japan- details of risk assessment modalities??? ! Thailand- risk assessment of GMO categorized as (1) work bearing no risk; (2) work bearing low risk; (3) work with high risk.
  • 16. Monitoring and Inspection System ! China- regulations stipulate authorities, coordination mechanisms, emergency handling system for monitoring of GMOs. ! India, Philippines- monitoring system with specific committees defined under various Ministries for effective monitoring and inspection. ! Thailand, Pakistan- institutional arrangements for monitoring and control similar to India, with several organizations involved ! Indonesia- Biosafety Commission monitors the biosafety testing and assessment and results publicized by mass media for 60 days ! Korea- No crops using biotechnology commercialized to date ! Bangladesh- only reporting mechanism spelt out ! Japan- regulation is silent on mechanism for monitoring and inspection.
  • 17. Trade Policies concerning GM plants ! China- GMOs require permission for trade and transit ! India, Thailand- Import and export of GM plants or products allowed for research ! Philippines, Indonesia, Japan biosafety law allows import of GMOs ! Korea import of biotechnology crops and products permitted ! Bangladesh- Guidelines silent on exchange ! Pakistan - import, export of LMOs permitted
  • 18. Bt eggplant (Brinjal) Global distribution of eggplant fruit and shoot borer
  • 19. Review Bt brinjal safety Three High level Technical Committees that reviewed the safety of Bt brinjal: Committees constituted by GEAC 1. RCGM 2. Expert Committee of 13 members - 2006 3. Expert Committee of 15 members - 2009 On the 14th October 2009,GEAC concluded that Bt brinjal is safe for environmental release
  • 20. Ministry decision ! Post GEAC recommendation, Minister of E&F invited comments on the Bt brinjal reports ! Seven Nationwide consultations conducted in Jan and Feb 2010 ! On Feb, 9th 2010 – moratorium on the release of Bt brinjal ! Parliamentary Committee Report on GM Food Crops
  • 21. EFSA proactive response to emerging issues
  • 22. Regional Collaboration in Regulatory Management - EFSA (one- door- one- key approach) Applicant submits to National Authority European Food Safety Authority • Use of GMOs for food and feed • Deliberate release into Environment EFSA informs EU members and public and establishes “Opinion” within 6 months National Food Safety Authority food safety or environmental risk assessment as per EU Guidelines “EFSA Opinion” to EU Commission, Member State and Applicant European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technology Draft decision Standing Committee on Food Chain and Animal Health EU CouncilApproval of GM product (valid for 10 yrs)
  • 23. Workshop on Biosafety Regulations in the Asia-Pacific Region
  • 24. ! Asia is too large and diverse (socially, ecologically, economically, politically) ! Regional and sub-regional efforts may be initiated with ! Mutual understanding of regulatory systems ! Sharing of information including risk assessment dossiers ! Capacity strengthening for risk assessment, management, handling and detection of LMO’s, communication systems Is the EU set-up applicable to Asian Region?
  • 25. ! Biosafety and related acts, rules, regulations and guidelines of 39 countries. ! Key features of the regulations. ! Status of national legislative preparedness with respect to Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. ! Additional chapters on status of biotechnology, biosafety issues and international instruments on biosafety. 26
  • 26. Biosafety Regulations of Asia-Pacific countries
  • 27. http://www.apcoab.org/modules.php?name=Co ntent&pa=showpage&pid=75
  • 28. Stakeholders’ Dialogue on Biosafety Regulations in the Asia-Pacific Region, Bangkok, (16-17 April 2013) • Prioritization of GM R&D for smallholders • Enhancing Communication for PublicAwareness • Regional Cooperation for Biosafety Management
  • 29. Preamble and Justification ! Cooperation in biosafety management should be based on basic and practical national cooperation before expanding it to the sub-regional and regional levels ! The lack of appropriate science-based and cost effective regulatory systems continues to be the major constraint to adoption of modern biotechnology. Rigorous but not onerous regulation management is needed for small and low income developingAsia-pacific countries ! Asia Pacific countries are highly diversified in terms of R & D, human resources development,basic infrastructure, facility etc., and capacity building mechanism which are urgently needed in the whole region. Different A & P countries are also at different stages of biotechnology and biosafety adoption.
  • 30. Recommendations ! Cooperation, collaboration, linkages and networking in modern biotechnology/ biosafety among the Asia Pacific countries need to be initiated, implemented and strengthened. ! There is a need on the alignment and synergies of the existing policies under different national component authorities in each Asia Pacific country and sub-regional or regional economic/ political associations
  • 31. ! There exists an acceptable resolution on the co-existence issues among conventional agriculture, organic farming and biotech crop cultivation.A settlement is urgently needed in each and other Asia Pacific countries concerned. ! In order to accomplish these aims and make them sustainable there is a need of an effective financial mechanism and assistance such as financial mechanism under GEF.
  • 32. Collaborative Strengthening Biosafety Systems ! Resources sharing ! technical ! material ! expertise ! Experience sharing ! methodologies ! materials ! Information sharing ! Regional capacity building ! Regional Centers of Excellence