Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Modern english grammar
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Modern english grammar

8,227
views

Published on

Modern English Grammar and Usage

Modern English Grammar and Usage

Published in: Education, Technology

2 Comments
6 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
8,227
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
464
Comments
2
Likes
6
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • PPT prepared for Ph.Dcourse work in English
  • Transcript

    • 1. MODERN ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND USAGE Dr. Abha Pandey 1
    • 2. WHAT IS GRAMMAR  Boring or interesting?  Etymologically “grammar” related to “glamour”.  An interesting, exciting subject of study.  Dictionary defines “ grammar as the rules by which words change their forms and are combined in other senses.  English grammar is the body of rules that describe the structure of expressions in the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses, and sentences. 2
    • 3. GRAMMAR Use of word grammar in other senses: As a subject A book of grammar Proficiency/ mastery in the language Transformational generative grammar as a linguistic theory Consciously learned explicit set of rules for learning a foreign language. In mother tongue rules are subconsciously internalised. 3
    • 4. GRAMMAR IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT Unacceptable sentences Due to wrong use of plural, article, preposition, noun etc One who can make acceptable sentences but cannot explain why they are unacceptable has implicit knowledge of grammar. Those who can distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable and also explain the rule that have been violated has explicit knowledge of grammar. 4
    • 5. LINGUISTIC ABILITY Ability to use the language and produce acceptable sentences- Grammar A Implicit or internalized knowledge of rules (native speakers) Use the metalanguage to explain the rules and process involved- Grammar B explicit knowledge of rules formal or technical talk -Grammar B (native /foreign language learners) 5
    • 6. PRESCRIPTIVE GRAMMAR Speech of educated native speakers of English. Unacceptable or rejected as incorrect or bad English by some grammars. Other grammars consider them as acceptable -found in current usage. Prescriptive grammar lays down the rules for use of a language. 6
    • 7. DESCRIPTIVE GRAMMAR States the facts of a language as they exist and are spoken by a large number of people. Contains rules / conventions that actually underlie the usage of native speakers. Records the violations or deviant features in an objective way as a part of changing or current usage. Distinctions like the natural laws and the laws of the government. 7
    • 8. TYPES OF GRAMMAR Linguist’s grammar  Study language as a system of signs. Learner’s grammar  Is meant to help the learner to learn the language. Teacher’s grammar  Contains more information than a learner, higher knowledge.  Occupies a middle ground between the linguist and the learner. 8
    • 9. NEED TO STUDY GRAMMAR  Why should teacher’s/ research scholar’s study grammar?  There has been a debate  Should formal grammar be taught to the learner’s (in Indian situation)?  How much of grammar is to be taught?  How is grammar to be taught?  The knowledge of grammar may be useful in teaching, testing, writing research papers, locating problem areas in learning designing a syllabus . 9
    • 10. RECOMMENDED READING  Quirk, Randolf. “On Conceptions of Good Grammar”, in The English Language and Images of Matter. London: Oxford University Press. 1972.  Quirk, Randolf, et al. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman. 1972.(Sections 1.8to 1.14) 10
    • 11. USAGE: GRAMMATICALITY  In Linguistics, conformity to the rules of a language as formulated by a Grammar based on a theory of language description.  The concept became prominent with the rise of Generative Grammar in the 1960s, whose primary aim has been the construction of rules that would distinguish between the grammatical or well- formed sentences and the ungrammatical, deviant, or ill- formed sentences of a language. 11
    • 12. GRAMMATICALITY AND ACCEPTABILITY  Grammaticality should not be confused with notions of correctness or acceptability as determined by prescriptive grammarians.  Grammaticality has been differentiated from ACCEPTABILITY, which is based on the judgements by native speakers as to whether they would use a sentence or would consider it correct .  Judgements about what is acceptable may reflect views that a sentence is nonsensical, implausible, illogical, stylistically inappropriate, or socially objectionable. 12
    • 13. CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABILITY We expect a grammar of a language to clearly say what is “acceptable” and “unacceptable” in the language? “Correct” and “incorrect” suggest absolute norms, deviations in black and white. “Acceptable” and “unacceptable” suggest relative norms, fluid and variable according to usage, suggests the possibility of many grey areas. 13
    • 14. DIFFERENT LEVELS OF UNACCEPTABILITY.  Sentences: Ungrammatical not well formed, violating some rule or convention of grammar.  Inappropriate: Linguistic Factors:  Use of non standard English – dialects.  Informal/ inappropriate registeral variations.  Collocational devices. Use of derogatory words  Non linguistic Factors: Psychological, Sociological, Aesthetic- Ambiguous statements.  Semantically odd: not appropriate to the situation. 14
    • 15. CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABILITY  Grammar books generally give us the idea of “grammaticality” i.e. What constitutes acceptable sentences on the basis of grammatical rules and conventions.  For dialect, register features, and collocations, standard dictionaries generally give some help for exhaustive knowledge we have to depend on our familiarity with the language.  Social cultural or aesthetic appropriateness is a relative and variable criteria. 15
    • 16. GRAMMAR AND USAGE  Grammar is, or should be, a description of usage.  Grammar and usage are not different.  Traditional prescriptive school grammar presents rules which militate against actual usage.  Modern descriptive grammar has another handicap- usage is various and keeps on changing. Difficult to furnish all the details of usage.  As teachers/ scholars of English we should be conversant with the facts of English usage. 16
    • 17. RECOMMENDED READING  Hosali, Priya and Ray Tongue. A Dictionary of Collocations for Indian Users of English. 1989  Leech, Geoffery, et al. English Grammar for Today. London: Macmillan. 1982. (Part A Introduction)  Nihalani, P, et al. Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation. New Delhi: OUP. 1979  Trudgill, Peter and Joan Hannah. International English: A guide to Varieties of Standard English. London: Edward Arnold. ( pages 106-111.) 17
    • 18. THANK YOU Dr. Abha Pandey Professor and Head Department of UG, PG and Research in English Govt. Mahakoshal Arts and Commerce Autonomous College , Jabalpur english_dept1@yahoo.co.in 18

    ×