Comparative Survey of EA frameworks

2,046 views
1,834 views

Published on

Published in: Education, News & Politics
1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • ++++++++++++++++++++++
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,046
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
8
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
91
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Comparative Survey of EA frameworks

  1. 1. Jaap Schekkerman, B.Sc. President of the Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments (IFEAD) Thought Leader Business Technology Strategy & Enterprise Architecture, Capgemini A Comparative Survey of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
  2. 2. Agenda <ul><li>About the speaker </li></ul><ul><li>EA Survey 2003 Results – EA Framework Usage </li></ul><ul><li>EA Frameworks Comparison </li></ul><ul><li>Conclusion </li></ul>
  3. 3. Speaker Qualifications - Jaap Schekkerman <ul><li>Founder & President of the Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments, The Netherlands. </li></ul><ul><li>Thought Leader Business Technology Strategy & Enterprise Architecture, Capgemini, The Netherlands. </li></ul><ul><li>Professional Associations: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Advisory board member of the Federal Enterprise Architecture Certification Institute, USA. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Co-Founder & Alliance member of the Global Enterprise Architecture Organisation, New Zealand. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Member of the 'MANYWORLDS' knowledge network of Business Thought Leaders, USA. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Member of the IEEE 1471 (Recommended Practice for Architectural Description) working group, USA. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Member of the World Wide Institute of Software Architects (WWISA), USA. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Member of the Netherlands Society of Information Architects (GIA), NL. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Member of the SWEBOK (Software Engineering Body of Knowledge) working group of the University of Québec, Montréal. </li></ul></ul>For more info about my books & publications, visit: http://www.enterprise-architecture.info Author / Co-Author of several Architecture books & publications
  4. 4. Combining EA Research & Best Practices
  5. 5. Survey Question: What kind of EA Frameworks are you using? Source: EA Survey 2003, © Copyright: IFEAD All Industries / Governments Financial & Insurance Industry Source: EA Survey 2003, © Copyright: IFEAD All Others except the Financial & Insurance Industry Source: EA Survey 2003, © Copyright: IFEAD
  6. 6. Enterprise Architecture Frameworks & the Holistic Perspective <ul><li>Holistic Architecture : By 2006, 20% of Global 2000 organizations will integrate holistic enterprise architecture , enterprise program management , enterprise strategy/planning , and IT portfolio management into a common set of IT management processes under the auspices of the CIO’s office. Ten percent will operate these integrated management disciplines outside the IT organization. </li></ul><ul><li>Value of Integrated Architecture : By 2007, 50% of Global 2000 enterprises will move beyond a pure technology architecture focus to include enterprise business architecture , enterprise information architecture , and enterprise solution architecture . Architecture teams that fail to move beyond the technical focus will come under increasing pressure to demonstrate business value. </li></ul><ul><li>Source: META GROUP RESEARCH ~ EA TRENDS 2004 – 2005. </li></ul>Trends So, EA Frameworks has to support the holistic perspective……… and more..
  7. 7. Enterprise Architecture Frameworks History PERA CIMOSA SAGA
  8. 8. Enterprise Architecture Framework (Zachman) <ul><li>Characteristics : </li></ul><ul><li>Positioning Framework </li></ul><ul><li>Categorizing Deliverables </li></ul><ul><li>Limited usefulness EA </li></ul><ul><li>History in Manufacturing </li></ul><ul><li>Broad Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>Limited Holistic Perspect. </li></ul><ul><li>Planning Tool </li></ul>
  9. 9. Integrated Architecture Framework ( Cap gemini ) <ul><li>Characteristics : </li></ul><ul><li>Positioning Framework </li></ul><ul><li>History in Enterprise Planning </li></ul><ul><li>Separation of Concerns </li></ul><ul><li>Categorizing Aspects </li></ul><ul><li>Limited Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>Proprietary </li></ul><ul><li>Holistic Perspective. </li></ul><ul><li>Communication Tool </li></ul>
  10. 10. NATO Architecture Framework / C4ISR / DoDAF <ul><li>Characteristics : </li></ul><ul><li>Positioning Framework </li></ul><ul><li>History in Defence </li></ul><ul><li>Broad Defence Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral </li></ul><ul><li>Limited Holistic Perspective. </li></ul><ul><li>Process / Planning Tool </li></ul>Business Organization Model Systems Conceptual Model Software Component Model Information Flow Diagram System Physical Model Implementation Model Node Connectivity Model Systems Logical Model Integration Model
  11. 11. Extended Enterprise Architecture Framework (IFEAD) <ul><li>Characteristics : </li></ul><ul><li>Positioning Framework </li></ul><ul><li>History in (Extended) Enterprise Frameworks </li></ul><ul><li>Focusing on Collaboration </li></ul><ul><li>Separation of Concerns </li></ul><ul><li>Broad Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral / Open </li></ul><ul><li>Complete Holistic Perspective. </li></ul><ul><li>Communication Tool </li></ul>
  12. 12. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Open Systems Architecture (CIMOSA) <ul><li>Characteristics : </li></ul><ul><li>Process Framework </li></ul><ul><li>History in Manufacturing </li></ul><ul><li>Focusing on Views </li></ul><ul><li>Definition of Models </li></ul><ul><li>Limited Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>European Initiative </li></ul><ul><li>Limited Holistic Perspective </li></ul><ul><li>Process Planning Tool </li></ul>CIMOSA
  13. 13. The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF v8.x) Enterprise Edition <ul><li>Characteristics : </li></ul><ul><li>Enterprise Architecture Development Methodology </li></ul><ul><li>History in Defence </li></ul><ul><li>Open Standard </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral </li></ul><ul><li>Broad Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>Holistic Perspective. </li></ul><ul><li>Process / Planning Tool </li></ul>
  14. 14. US - Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF) <ul><li>Characteristics: </li></ul><ul><li>Enterprise Architecture Reference Framework </li></ul><ul><li>History in Enterprise Architecture Planning </li></ul><ul><li>US-Gov Standard </li></ul><ul><li>Broad US-Gov Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>Holistic Perspective. </li></ul><ul><li>Planning & Communication Tool </li></ul>
  15. 15. US - Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework (TEAF) <ul><li>Characteristics: </li></ul><ul><li>Positioning Framework </li></ul><ul><li>History in FEAF </li></ul><ul><li>US-Treasury Standard </li></ul><ul><li>Broad US-Treasury Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>Limited Holistic Perspective. </li></ul><ul><li>Planning & Communication Tool </li></ul>Functional Information Organisational Infrastructure Enabler Who and Why What, How Much, and How Frequently How, Where, and When
  16. 16. Conclusion <ul><li>Most EA Frameworks have different evolutions </li></ul><ul><li>Most EA Frameworks serve different Purposes </li></ul><ul><li>Most EA Frameworks are different in Scope </li></ul><ul><li>Most EA Frameworks are based on different Principles </li></ul><ul><li>Most EA Frameworks have different Structures </li></ul><ul><li>Most EA Frameworks are supported by different approaches </li></ul><ul><li>Most EA Frameworks are different in compliancy with the Clinger Cohen Act </li></ul>http://www.enterprise-architecture.info or http://www.trafford.com/robots/03-1984.html or at the author ISBN 1-4120-1607-X So, the Question is: Do You Create or Choose your Enterprise Architecture Framework

×