SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 15
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Flight #1420 KDFW-KLIT
Aakash Bhagat
Kirby Cole, Susan Read
Accident Overview
 June 1, 1999. 2350:44 AA Flight #1420 KDFW-KLIT Runway 4R
 McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) N215AA
 145 Souls
 Scheduled 2028-2141
 Departure Delayed to 2240 (2 hours 12 minutes late)
 Time Pressure
 KDFW & KBNA diversion options (FO quote)
 Received Warnings
 Weather Advisory – WDLY SCTD TSTMS
 Two NWS in-flight weather advisories SVR TSTMS
Accident Overview
• 2254 – ACARS message received, weather in Little Rock possible factor.
• Dispatcher suggestion, expedite!
• 2258 – 1420 handed off to Fort Worth ARTCC
• 2304 – Fort Worth center issued NWS Convective SIGMET
• 2325 – CAM1 “we got to get over there quick.”
• 2326 – Crew reported Little Rock in sight
• 2327 – Center cleared flight to descend to 100
• 2328 – Flight 1420 was transferred to Memphis ARTCC
• 2334 – Flight 1420 contacted KLIT tower
• Controller advised crew about Thunderstorm
• 2336 – Crosswind Discussion
• Crosswind limitation
Accident Overview
 2339 – KLIT tower cleared 1420 to descend to 030
 Aircraft radar vs KLIT tower’s radar, 22L
 2339:45 – KLIT tower advised 1420 of windshear
 Change to 4R
 2340:20 – Vectored to 4R, turned away from airport
 2342:19-24 – CAM1 “do you have the airport? Is that it right there? I don’t see a runway”
 2342:27 – second thunderstorm moving through, 340o at 16 kts
 2342:40 – short approach, CAM1 “yeah, if you see the runway. ‘cause I don’t quite see it.” CAM2
“yeah it’s right here, see it?” CAM1 “you just point me in the right direction and I’ll start slowing
down here.”
 2342:55 – CAM2 “it’s going over the field.”
 2343:11 – Cleared for visual 4R
Accident Overview
 2343:35-38 – CAM1 – lost visual while FO tried to assist
 2343:59 – Cleared to land visual 4R, winds 330o at 21 kts
 2344:30 – CAM2 stated they lost visual with airport
 Vectors for ILS 4R
 2345:47 – CAM2 “we’re getting pretty close to this storm. We’ll keep it tight if we have to.”
 2346:39 – aircraft 3 miles from OM
 2346:52 – “we’re going right into this”
 2347:08 – 1420 cleared to land ILS 4R, winds 350o at 30kts to 45 kts
 2347:22 – CAM1 “three thousand RVR. We can’t land on that.”
 CAM2 indicated RVR 2,400 ft, CAM1 “okay fine”
Accident Overview
 2347:53 – second windshear alert, winds 350o at 32 kts gusts 45 kts
 2348:12 – runway 4R RVR 1,600ft.
 2348:24 – CAM2 stated they were on inbound ILS
 Cleared to land winds 340o at 31 kts.
 2349:24 – CAM2 “there’s the runway off to your right, got it?” CAM1 “no”
 2349:57 – “aw.. we’re off course” (unidentified)
 2350:00 – CAM2 “we’re way off”
 2350:13-14 – GPWS “sink-rate”
 2350:20 – Touchdown
 2350:22 – CAM2 “we’re down, we’re sliding.”
Accident Overview
 Landing
 Crosswind limitations
 Low RVR
 Improper use of checklists and verification
 Improperly configured for landing
 Came to a stop 800’ beyond departure end of runway
Accident Overview
Accident Overview
Accident Overview
Background
 Captain
 48
 Hired in 1979
 First class medical with no restrictions
 Qualified captain July 31,1991.
 Lt. Col. Air Force Reserves
 TT: 10,234 hours, 5,518 hours MD-80
 First Officer
 35
 Hired in January 1999
 1st class no restrictions
 Qualified FO on MD-80 February 22, 1999
 TT: 4,292 hours
 182 hours with AA
Human Factors
 Stress Reduction
 Scheduled Late at night
 2 hour delay (unhappy pay; elected to get new aircraft)
 Pilots fatigued, close to busting duty day
 Severe get-there-it is
 Crew did not discuss alternate
 Group Climate
 Inadequate assertion from FO
 Unable to properly communicate concerns about weather
 Binder
 Inadequate Leadership from Captain
 Bad workload management
 No briefings, no bottom line discussion or personal minimums
Human Factors
 Situational Awareness
 No preparation, planning or vigilance (due to inadequate workload management and
communications)
 Lead to loss of SA of the crew as Captain requested to switch runways and FO
accepted ILS approach.
 Captain continued visual although he had accepted ILS approach
 FO became overwhelmed
 Weather updates
 Visually identification of airport
 Checklists
 Final Items
Human Factors
 Safety & Decision Making
 Decision to Land in Adverse Weather
 Should have established a bottom
 Alternate (an early plan could’ve reduced the chance of busting duty day)
 GO-AROUND anytime
 Captain or FO decision
 Never stabilized
 Should’ve realized personal minimums
QUESTIONS

More Related Content

What's hot (13)

Cells of the immune system
Cells  of the immune systemCells  of the immune system
Cells of the immune system
 
The complement system
The complement systemThe complement system
The complement system
 
Aircraft manufacturing
Aircraft manufacturingAircraft manufacturing
Aircraft manufacturing
 
bharathyar university msc microbiology syllabuss
bharathyar university msc microbiology syllabussbharathyar university msc microbiology syllabuss
bharathyar university msc microbiology syllabuss
 
Rc helicopter
Rc helicopterRc helicopter
Rc helicopter
 
Immunology and immunodiagnostics mcq
Immunology and immunodiagnostics mcqImmunology and immunodiagnostics mcq
Immunology and immunodiagnostics mcq
 
Black Fungal Disease (Mucormycosis) After Covid Slideshare ppt
Black Fungal Disease (Mucormycosis) After Covid Slideshare pptBlack Fungal Disease (Mucormycosis) After Covid Slideshare ppt
Black Fungal Disease (Mucormycosis) After Covid Slideshare ppt
 
ILS
ILSILS
ILS
 
Antibody Structure & Function
Antibody Structure & FunctionAntibody Structure & Function
Antibody Structure & Function
 
Complement system
Complement systemComplement system
Complement system
 
Immune response to infection by Virus
Immune response to infection by VirusImmune response to infection by Virus
Immune response to infection by Virus
 
Innate immunity
Innate immunityInnate immunity
Innate immunity
 
Theory of flight final
Theory of flight finalTheory of flight final
Theory of flight final
 

Similar to AMERICAN AIRLINES PPT.pptx (1)

NTSB presents: General Aviation Personal Flying, How Safe Do You Want to Be?
NTSB presents: General Aviation Personal Flying, How Safe Do You Want to Be?NTSB presents: General Aviation Personal Flying, How Safe Do You Want to Be?
NTSB presents: General Aviation Personal Flying, How Safe Do You Want to Be?FAA Safety Team Central Florida
 
Accident Investigation Report Of FlyDubai Flight 981 (FDB981)
Accident Investigation Report Of FlyDubai Flight 981 (FDB981)Accident Investigation Report Of FlyDubai Flight 981 (FDB981)
Accident Investigation Report Of FlyDubai Flight 981 (FDB981)Steven Wallach
 
The Go/No-Go Decision: Real-time decision making for pilots
The Go/No-Go Decision: Real-time decision making for pilots The Go/No-Go Decision: Real-time decision making for pilots
The Go/No-Go Decision: Real-time decision making for pilots Sporty's Pilot Shop
 

Similar to AMERICAN AIRLINES PPT.pptx (1) (7)

NTSB presents: General Aviation Personal Flying, How Safe Do You Want to Be?
NTSB presents: General Aviation Personal Flying, How Safe Do You Want to Be?NTSB presents: General Aviation Personal Flying, How Safe Do You Want to Be?
NTSB presents: General Aviation Personal Flying, How Safe Do You Want to Be?
 
Accident Investigation Report Of FlyDubai Flight 981 (FDB981)
Accident Investigation Report Of FlyDubai Flight 981 (FDB981)Accident Investigation Report Of FlyDubai Flight 981 (FDB981)
Accident Investigation Report Of FlyDubai Flight 981 (FDB981)
 
NTSB presents: Weatherwise
NTSB presents: Weatherwise NTSB presents: Weatherwise
NTSB presents: Weatherwise
 
Flying for Freedom - Keynote
Flying for Freedom - KeynoteFlying for Freedom - Keynote
Flying for Freedom - Keynote
 
SUN N FUN 2014 NOTAM - 3-21-2014
SUN N FUN 2014 NOTAM - 3-21-2014SUN N FUN 2014 NOTAM - 3-21-2014
SUN N FUN 2014 NOTAM - 3-21-2014
 
Crew resource
Crew resourceCrew resource
Crew resource
 
The Go/No-Go Decision: Real-time decision making for pilots
The Go/No-Go Decision: Real-time decision making for pilots The Go/No-Go Decision: Real-time decision making for pilots
The Go/No-Go Decision: Real-time decision making for pilots
 

AMERICAN AIRLINES PPT.pptx (1)

  • 1. AMERICAN AIRLINES Flight #1420 KDFW-KLIT Aakash Bhagat Kirby Cole, Susan Read
  • 2. Accident Overview  June 1, 1999. 2350:44 AA Flight #1420 KDFW-KLIT Runway 4R  McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) N215AA  145 Souls  Scheduled 2028-2141  Departure Delayed to 2240 (2 hours 12 minutes late)  Time Pressure  KDFW & KBNA diversion options (FO quote)  Received Warnings  Weather Advisory – WDLY SCTD TSTMS  Two NWS in-flight weather advisories SVR TSTMS
  • 3. Accident Overview • 2254 – ACARS message received, weather in Little Rock possible factor. • Dispatcher suggestion, expedite! • 2258 – 1420 handed off to Fort Worth ARTCC • 2304 – Fort Worth center issued NWS Convective SIGMET • 2325 – CAM1 “we got to get over there quick.” • 2326 – Crew reported Little Rock in sight • 2327 – Center cleared flight to descend to 100 • 2328 – Flight 1420 was transferred to Memphis ARTCC • 2334 – Flight 1420 contacted KLIT tower • Controller advised crew about Thunderstorm • 2336 – Crosswind Discussion • Crosswind limitation
  • 4. Accident Overview  2339 – KLIT tower cleared 1420 to descend to 030  Aircraft radar vs KLIT tower’s radar, 22L  2339:45 – KLIT tower advised 1420 of windshear  Change to 4R  2340:20 – Vectored to 4R, turned away from airport  2342:19-24 – CAM1 “do you have the airport? Is that it right there? I don’t see a runway”  2342:27 – second thunderstorm moving through, 340o at 16 kts  2342:40 – short approach, CAM1 “yeah, if you see the runway. ‘cause I don’t quite see it.” CAM2 “yeah it’s right here, see it?” CAM1 “you just point me in the right direction and I’ll start slowing down here.”  2342:55 – CAM2 “it’s going over the field.”  2343:11 – Cleared for visual 4R
  • 5. Accident Overview  2343:35-38 – CAM1 – lost visual while FO tried to assist  2343:59 – Cleared to land visual 4R, winds 330o at 21 kts  2344:30 – CAM2 stated they lost visual with airport  Vectors for ILS 4R  2345:47 – CAM2 “we’re getting pretty close to this storm. We’ll keep it tight if we have to.”  2346:39 – aircraft 3 miles from OM  2346:52 – “we’re going right into this”  2347:08 – 1420 cleared to land ILS 4R, winds 350o at 30kts to 45 kts  2347:22 – CAM1 “three thousand RVR. We can’t land on that.”  CAM2 indicated RVR 2,400 ft, CAM1 “okay fine”
  • 6. Accident Overview  2347:53 – second windshear alert, winds 350o at 32 kts gusts 45 kts  2348:12 – runway 4R RVR 1,600ft.  2348:24 – CAM2 stated they were on inbound ILS  Cleared to land winds 340o at 31 kts.  2349:24 – CAM2 “there’s the runway off to your right, got it?” CAM1 “no”  2349:57 – “aw.. we’re off course” (unidentified)  2350:00 – CAM2 “we’re way off”  2350:13-14 – GPWS “sink-rate”  2350:20 – Touchdown  2350:22 – CAM2 “we’re down, we’re sliding.”
  • 7. Accident Overview  Landing  Crosswind limitations  Low RVR  Improper use of checklists and verification  Improperly configured for landing  Came to a stop 800’ beyond departure end of runway
  • 11. Background  Captain  48  Hired in 1979  First class medical with no restrictions  Qualified captain July 31,1991.  Lt. Col. Air Force Reserves  TT: 10,234 hours, 5,518 hours MD-80  First Officer  35  Hired in January 1999  1st class no restrictions  Qualified FO on MD-80 February 22, 1999  TT: 4,292 hours  182 hours with AA
  • 12. Human Factors  Stress Reduction  Scheduled Late at night  2 hour delay (unhappy pay; elected to get new aircraft)  Pilots fatigued, close to busting duty day  Severe get-there-it is  Crew did not discuss alternate  Group Climate  Inadequate assertion from FO  Unable to properly communicate concerns about weather  Binder  Inadequate Leadership from Captain  Bad workload management  No briefings, no bottom line discussion or personal minimums
  • 13. Human Factors  Situational Awareness  No preparation, planning or vigilance (due to inadequate workload management and communications)  Lead to loss of SA of the crew as Captain requested to switch runways and FO accepted ILS approach.  Captain continued visual although he had accepted ILS approach  FO became overwhelmed  Weather updates  Visually identification of airport  Checklists  Final Items
  • 14. Human Factors  Safety & Decision Making  Decision to Land in Adverse Weather  Should have established a bottom  Alternate (an early plan could’ve reduced the chance of busting duty day)  GO-AROUND anytime  Captain or FO decision  Never stabilized  Should’ve realized personal minimums