• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
1ff
 

1ff

on

  • 298 views

5 files from Gd

5 files from Gd

Statistics

Views

Total Views
298
Views on SlideShare
298
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    1ff 1ff Document Transcript

    • DescriptionTest test TFTHistorians write in the context of their own time, and with due regard to the currentdominant ideas of how to interpret the past, and sometimes write to provide lessons fortheir own society. In the words of Benedetto Croce, "All history is contemporaryhistory". History is facilitated by the formation of a true discourse of past through theproduction of narrative and analysis of past events relating to the human race.[12] Themodern discipline of history is dedicated to the institutional production of this discourse.All events that are remembered and preserved in some authentic form constitute thehistorical record.[13] The task of historical discourse is to identify the sources which canmost usefully contribute to the production of accurate accounts of past. Therefore, theconstitution of the historians archive is a result of circumscribing a more general archiveby invalidating the usage of certain texts and documents (by falsifying their claims torepresent the true past).The study of history has sometimes been classified as part of the humanities and othertimes as part of the social sciences.[14] It can also be seen as a bridge between those twobroad areas, incorporating methodologies from both. Some individual historians stronglysupport one or the other classification.[15] In modern . In the 20th century, Frenchhistorian Fernand Braudel revolutionized the study of history, by using such outsidedisciplines as economics, anthropology, and geography in the study of global history.Traditionally, historians have recorded events of the past, either in writing or by passingon an oral tradition, and have attempted to answer historical questions through the studyof written documents and oral accounts. For the beginning, historians have also used suchsources as monuments, inscriptions, and pictures. In general, the sources of historicalknowledge can be separated into three categories: what is written, what is said, and whatis physically preserved, and historians often consult all three.[16] But writing is themarker that separates history from what comes before.Archaeology is a discipline that is especially helpful in dealing with buried sites andobjects, which, once unearthed, contribute to the study of history. But archaeology rarelystands alone. It uses narrative sources to complement its discoveries. However,archaeology is constituted by a range of methodologies and approaches which areindependent from history; that is to say, archaeology does not "fill the gaps" withintextual sources. Indeed, Historical Archaeology is a specific branch of archaeology, oftencontrasting its conclusions against those of contemporary textual sources. For example,Mark Leone, the excavator and interpreter of historical Annapolis, Maryland, USA hassought to understand the contradiction between textual documents and the materialrecord, demonstrating the possession of slaves and the inequalities of wealth apparent viathe study of the total historical environment, despite the ideology of "liberty" inherent inwritten documents at this time.There are varieties of ways in which history can be organized, including chronologically,culturally, territorially, and thematically. These divisions are not mutually exclusive, andsignificant overlaps are often present, as in "The International Womens Movement in anAge of Transition, 1830–1975." It is possible for historians to concern themselves withboth the very specific and the very general, although the modern trend has been towardspecialization. The area called Big History resists this specialization, and searches for
    • universal patterns or trends. History has often been studied with some practical ortheoretical aim, but also may be studied out of simple intellectual curiosity.[17]