Sector planning presentation by Jim Sellen, Mike McDaniel, David Powell & David Hallman

Mike McDanielFAPA Public Policy Workshop Tallahassee, Florida February 8, 2012

 Statutory reference: 163.3245 Purpose • Long Range Planning (20 to 50 years) • Intended for substantial geographic areas • Must have at least 15,000 acres (previously 5,000) • Focus  Urban Form  Regionally significant resources  Regionally significant facilities No longer a pilot program, no limit on number that may be approved (previously 5)

 No longer requires agreement with state land planning agency for authorization to begin Scoping meeting is optional • If held, purpose is to identify  Relevant planning issues  Available data and resources • RPC prepares recommendations to local government and DCA If area is in two or more jurisdictions, they may enter a joint planning agreement to address • Planning issues to be emphasized • Procedures to address extra-jurisdictional impacts • Other issues

 Two levels • Long-Term Master Plan  Adopted by plan amendment  Subject to state coordinated review process  Can exceed planning horizon of plan  Demonstration of need not required • Detailed Specific Area Plans (DSAP)  Adopted by local ordinance; DRI exempt  Must be consistent with long-term master plan  Rendered to state land planning agency; subject to appeal  Must contain 1,000 acres (can be waived)  Can exceed planning horizon  Demonstration of need not required

 Consists of : • A framework map identifying major land uses and land use patterns • Data and analysis and policies addressing:  Water Supplies  Regionally significant transportation facilities  Other regionally significant public facilities  Regionally significant natural resources  Urban form, lands identified for permanent preservation, urban sprawl, housing diversity, multimodal transportation, and jobs  Procedures to address extra-jurisdictional impacts

 Applicant may apply for Master Development Order approval (380.06(29)) to establish build-out date until which approved uses not subject to downzoning or reductions Property owners may initially choose not to be part of Master Plan, but after approval may withdraw from long-term master plan only by plan amendment

 Upon approval of the long-term master plan: • The MPO long-range transportation plan must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible, with the master plan’s projected population and approved uses • The master plan’s transportation facilities must be developed in coordination with the adopted MPO long-range transportation plan • The water supply needs, sources, and development projects shall be incorporated into the regional water supply plan in accordance with water management district requirements • A landowner may request a consumptive use permit commensurate with the long-term planning period

• Detailed analysis and identification, appropriate policies, and capital improvements addressing:  The distribution and densities and intensities of land uses  Water resource development projects and water conservation measures  Transportation facilities  Public facilities, both regional and project-specific  Natural resource protection, including conservation easements  Urban form, housing diversity, multimodal transportation, and jobs  Extra-jurisdictional impacts

 Must establish buildout date until which approved uses are not subject to downzoning or density/intensity reductions Previously approved Sector plans shall have their DSAPs governed by new legislation

 Plan amendments adopted prior to July 1, 2011, and containing at least 15,000 acres may convert to Sector Plans through an agreement with DCA if consistent with criteria for long-term master plan A long-term buildout overlay adopted prior to July 1, 2011, shall be implemented through the new DSAP process A Master DRI development order may be implemented through new DSAP process

 Horizons West (Orange Co) – 21,000 acres • 40,974 dus, 10.3 million sf non-res • 6 DSAPs Clear Springs (Bartow) – 17,466 acres • 11,016 dus, 28.7 million sf non-res • 1 DSAP West Bay (Bay Co) – 72,500 acres • 27,631 dus, 37.9 million sf non-res • 2 DSAPs Mid-West (Escambia Co) – 16,000 acres • 23,000 dus, 12.2 million sf non-res • 2 DSAPs

 NE District (Osceola Co) – 19,140 acres • 29,320 dus • 10.5 million sf non-res East Nassau Community Plan – 22,675 acres • 24,000 dus • 11 million sf non-res Rodina (Hendry Co) – 25,832 acres • 21,000 dus • 4.35 million sf non-res

 Bluehead – (Highlands Co) 50,000 acres • 30,000 dus, 11million sf non-res Farmton – (Volusia/Brevard Cos) 58,000 acres • 25,406 dus, 5.95 million sf non-res Fellsmere – 18,387 ac • 19,750 du, 8 million sf non-res

 Hendry – several, including Alico Lake County – 16,200 acres Alachua Co – Plum Creek - 65,000 acres Washington & Bay Co’s – Knight Family - 55,000 acres

TITLE SLIDE David L. PowellAPA Florida Public Policy Workshop Tallahassee, Florida February 8, 2012

 Large landowners are interested in it Many have wanted a practical planning tool to make long-term decisions about their land Sector planning answers this need • Plan-based tool that doesn’t require immediate mitigation • Intended for gradual, long-term implementation • Allows owner to continue ranching and farming Settles expectations for everyone 18

 Relocation of Panama City Int’l Airport Planning period – 2052 Population at build-out – 71,093 Total size – 74,729 acres Undeveloped acreage – 61% Mixed-use development pattern Right of way reservation for SR 79 Resource protection for West Bay 21

 5 miles to Orlando’s emerging “Medical City” Planning period – 2025 (2039) Population at build-out – 62,800 Total size – 19,140 acres Undeveloped acreage – 70% Planned for multi-modal transportation Right of way reserved for Osceola Parkway Two east-west transportation corridors 23

 Pent-up demand for large-area planning due to the sector plan pilot program’s 5-plan limit Landowners were expected to jump at the chance to do sector planning under new law Instead, they are slow out of starting blocks • Analyzing commitments they would have to make • No demand in real estate market • Some took advantage of conversion process 25

 Mostly landowners, not developers Mostly families and institutions rather than publicly traded companies Owners who expect to hold their land for many years and are patient Owners who are committed to a strong stewardship ethic Families concerned about generational issues 26

 A plan can build long-term value in the land by coordinating land use, water, transportation A plan can create a legacy for good stewards with planned conservation areas and continued ranching and farming A plan can reinforce a family’s commitment to their land through changing generations A plan can be a good defense against unwanted land uses 27

 Long, expensive and complicated process Lots of public scrutiny and perhaps criticism Potential complications for ranching and farming operations Heightens desires that others may have to control the owner’s land Potential questions concerning agricultural use classification for ad valorem taxes 28

 They don’t have experience at modern land use regulation like developers They don’t want a long-term plan to interfere with ranching and farming They won’t provide mitigation since they won’t be the developer They don’t want to grant conservation easements early, without reciprocal benefit They are publicity shy 29

East Nassau Community Planning Area

Nassau CountyDevelopment & Preservation Framework

Nassau CountyDevelopment & Preservation Framework (ENCPA)The East Nassau Community Planning Area Implements the County’s Framework through: Future Land Use Map and Text Amendments Land Use Components:  Conservation and Habitat Network  Employment Center  Regional Center  Transit-Oriented Developments  Resort Development  Village Centers  Neighborhood Centers  Residential Neighborhoods  Tiers 1-3

Context

Land Form. Topography

Land Form. Wetlands

Development Framework

Development Framework Community Pattern 1 mile radius ¼ mile radius

Development Framework Road Network. Two Mile Grid adjusted to site conditions

Development Framework

Sector planning presentation by Jim Sellen, Mike McDaniel, David Powell & David Hallman

by APA Florida

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

Statistics

Sector planning presentation by Jim Sellen, Mike McDaniel, David Powell & David Hallman Presentation Transcript