• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 2
 

9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 2

on

  • 497 views

Michael B. Bomar ...

Michael B. Bomar

Incompatible growth near military facilities can threaten our national defense. Learn what types of development can conflict with military training. Explore the challenges of conducting multi-jurisdictional studies to promote appropriate land uses, around military facilities. Panelists will discuss lessons learned during the course of a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) of four counties
and three cities for the Avon Park Air Force Range, and close coordination with conservation groups. Strategies to develop support from the community and public officials for measures such as transfer of development rights to buffer the public from
the impacts of necessary military activities will be discussed.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
497
Views on SlideShare
497
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 2 9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 2 Presentation Transcript

    • FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE
      Michael Bomar, PE
      Tetra Tech
      September 9, 2011
    • APPROACH
      IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR EACH
      JURISDICTION
      DEVELOP
      POTENTIAL
      STRATEGIES
      PROVIDE JLUS
      RECOMMENDATIONS
    • IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR EACH
      JURISDICTION
      DEVELOP
      POTENTIAL
      STRATEGIES
      PROVIDE JLUS
      RECOMMENDATIONS
      Highlands County
      Avon Park
      Sebring
      Okeechobee County
      Osceola County
      Polk CountyFrostproof
      APAFR
      • Design & Construction Standards
      • Effective Disclosure Measures
      • Lighting Standards
      • Educational Handouts on Radio Frequency
      • Public Awareness Measures
      • Implement Sound Attenuation Construction Requirements
      • Identify Military Operations Areas on Public Documents
      • Military Influence Planning Area (MIPA) Ordinance
      • Small Area Studies
      • Comprehensive Plan & Land Development Code Updates
      • Military and Inter-Governmental Coordination
      • Limit Object Heights
      • Airspace Studies
      • Designate Specific Use Restrictions to Maintain Compatibility
      • Voluntary Land or Development Rights Acquisition Program
      • Additional Noise Study
      • Site Specific R/AICUZ for APAFR
      • Types of Development Near APAFR Boundary
      • Military Operations Areas (MOAs)
      • Aircraft Noise
      • Blast Noise Intensity & Frequency
      • Low Level Flight Area
      • Outdoor Lighting-Night Vision Goggle Training
      • Bird / Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH)
      • Conservation Resources
      • Transportation Corridors & Study Areas
      • Unrestricted Public Access
      • General Aviation & Military Aircraft Conflicts
    • INTEGRATED ROLES
      APAFR JLUS
      Public
      JLUS Technical Working Group
      JLUS Policy Committee
    • APAFR
      F-35
      Joint
      Land
      Use
      Study
      Environmental
      Impact
      Statement
      =
    • RECOMMENDATIONS
      • ENVIRONMENTAL
      • NOISE
      • LAND USE
      • COORDINATION
    • FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE
      Michael Bomar, PE
      Tetra Tech
      September 9, 2011
    • RECOMMENDATIONS
    • MILITARY INFLUENCE PLANNING AREAS (MIPAs)
      • MIPA-I:Focused on addressing compatibility issues in a three mile buffer zone around the perimeter of the Range and those areas where a moderate risk of blast noise complaints occur. It also includes a portion of low level flight training areas and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-I’s are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. The designation of MIPA-I’s are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.
      • MIPA-II: Identified to address compatibility issues related to blast noise, low level flight training and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-II’s are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. MIPA-II designations are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.
      • MIPA-III: Related to Areas of low risk of blast noise complaints, the presence of civilian aircraft operations and this area’s general proximity to MIPA’s I and II. The distance beyond the Range boundary for MIPA-III’s vary but the MIPA-III areas generally exist in the low level of blast noise risk areas outside MIPA’s I and II.