Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

9/9 FRI 2:45 | Tampa Bay Regional Strategic Freight Plan

551

Published on

Danny Lamb …

Danny Lamb
Frank Kalpakis
Robert Cursey
Alex Bell

The Florida Department of Transportation, District Seven has developed a strategic plan for freight mobility in the Tampa Bay region to support economic development and capitalize on the
new trade environment that includes the growth of the region as a distribution hub, the expansion of the Panama Canal, and the eventual opening of free trade with Cuba. The Strategic Freight
Plan includes a policy framework to guide the identification of investment strategies and roadway design that support the primary corridor function and are compatible with the land uses and
associated activities within travel corridors in the region.

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
551
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1.
  • 2. www.tampabayfreight.com<br />
  • 3. Why are we doing this study?<br />Freight mobility, safety and operations <br />Economic development<br />Position region for funding opportunities <br />
  • 4. Why are we doing this study?<br />Trucks are everywhere<br />Trucks are not going away<br />Truck traffic is increasing <br />
  • 5. Florida Average Daily Truck Traffic<br />
  • 6. Why are we doing this study?<br />Trucks contribute to congestion and reduced mobility for all<br />
  • 7. Why are we doing this study?<br />However…<br /> …trucks have unique operating characteristics and needs.<br /> Addressing these needs will improve mobility for both trucks and autos.<br />
  • 8. Wide Turns<br />SR 54 and US 301, Zephyrhills<br />
  • 9. Major Intersection USA<br />
  • 10. Signal Timing Series<br />US 301 and Progress Blvd/Bloomingdale Ave, Tampa<br />
  • 11. Signal Timing Series<br />US 301 at Causeway Blvd, Tampa<br />7<br />
  • 12. Insufficient Turn Lane Length<br />Thru Lane<br />Begin Aux Turn Lane<br />Blocked Thru Lane Northbound 50th at Causeway Blvd. <br />
  • 13. Blocking Traffic<br />
  • 14. Slow Acceleration<br />
  • 15. Why are we doing this study?<br />Congestion costs are rising<br />
  • 16. Average Cost per Hour of Delay<br />Source: <br />Texas Transportation Institute<br />Texas A&amp;M University<br />
  • 17. Why are we doing this study?<br />Support economic development<br />Attract new businesses to region<br />Support port and rail investments <br />Capitalize on new trade environment<br />Growth of region as a distribution hub<br />Panama Canal expansion<br />Free trade with Cuba<br />
  • 18. Regional Freight Related Employment<br />13,000 businesses<br />218,000 jobs<br />$7.3 Billion in annual payroll<br />Includes Transportation/Warehousing, Manufacturing, and Wholesale Trades<br />Source: Info USA; BEBR (2009)<br />
  • 19. Source: <br />Freight Analysis Framework 3.1 (2009)<br />Tampa Bay Metropolitan Area<br />Moving More Than You Think<br />Regionally more than 308.1 million tons of cargo valued at $215 billion originates, terminates or passes through the Tampa Bay region annually<br />Trucks transport over 70% of the total tonnage<br />All other modes depend on trucks at some point in the goods movement process<br />
  • 20. Freight Transportation and Economic Development Policy<br />Federal reauthorization expected to strengthen emphasis on freight transport<br />Expanded and dedicated funding sources<br />Partnerships and collaboration<br />
  • 21. Study Emphasis<br />Accessibility to Freight Activity Centers <br />System mobility<br />Roadway operating conditions<br />Freight and commuter conflicts<br />Freight and land use compatibility<br />Identify priority freight investments<br />
  • 22. Initial Study Efforts<br />Freight Activity Centers<br />Freight Corridors<br />Freight Hot Spots<br />Freight Corridor and Sub Area Study Guidelines<br />Web site<br />
  • 23. Regional Freight Activity Centers<br />Manufacturing and distribution areas<br />Seaports<br />Airports<br />Railroad hubs<br />
  • 24. Freight Network Components<br />Regional Freight Activity Centers<br />26<br />
  • 25. Freight Transportation System<br />Freight Activity Centers<br />
  • 26. Freight Transportation System<br />Freight Activity Centers<br />Strategic Trade Corridors<br />
  • 27. Freight Transportation System<br />Freight Activity Centers<br />Strategic Trade Corridors<br />Regional Freight Mobility Corridors<br />
  • 28. Freight Transportation System<br />Freight Activity Centers<br />Strategic Trade Corridors<br />Regional Freight Mobility Corridors<br />Local Truck Routes<br />
  • 29. Freight Transportation System<br />Freight Activity Centers<br />Strategic Trade Corridors<br />Regional Freight Mobility Corridors<br />Local Truck Routes<br />26<br />
  • 30. Goods Movement Advisory Committee<br />FDOT Districts 7 and 1 <br />MPOs<br />Local government<br />Public Works<br />Economic Development<br />Intermodal entities<br />Trucking/shipping community<br />
  • 31. Transportation Providers Committee<br />Adhoc Committee <br />Share challenges and opportunities<br />Insights on current conditions and issues<br />Identify traffic operational issues<br />Provide unique perspective<br />
  • 32. Freight Needs Assessment Sources<br />
  • 33. Freight Needs Assessment Sources<br />Intermodal entities<br />Local governments<br />White Papers<br />
  • 34. Freight Needs Assessment Sources<br />LRTP Needs Assessment<br />Strategic Intermodal System Needs<br />
  • 35. Freight Needs Assessment Sources<br />Port of Tampa<br />Tampa International Airport<br />St. Petersburg/Clearwater Airport<br />Hernando Regional Airport<br />
  • 36. Freight Needs Assessment Sources<br />Separated grade crossings<br />Intermodal access improvements<br />
  • 37. Freight Needs Assessment Sources<br />Conducted interviews at terminals<br />Distributed surveys to Publix, Walmart, others<br />Identified Freight Hot Spots<br />
  • 38. Freight Needs Assessment Sources<br />263 segments<br />Identified freight operational issues<br />
  • 39. Freight Needs Assessment Sources<br />
  • 40. Strategic Freight Plan<br />Integrated and connected regional freight network<br />Regional freight priorities<br />Implementation plan<br />Long-term infrastructure improvements<br />Short-term operational strategies<br />Economic, transportation and land use policy framework<br />
  • 41. Strategic Freight Plan Schedule<br />
  • 42. Strategic Plan Goal Statement<br />Provide a safe, secure,effective and efficient freight transportation system that fosters the economic vitality and livability of the Tampa Bay Region<br />
  • 43. Freight Objectives<br />Improve safety conditions on the freight transportation system<br />Improve accessibility and connectivity for freight transport to designated freight activity centers<br />Improve mobility conditions and the overall performance of the freight transportation system<br />Improve the security of the freight transportation system, balancing the need for efficient and reliable goods movement <br />
  • 44. Improve safety, accessibility, and mobility conditions where the freight and passenger transportation systems interact<br />Minimize impacts to ecosystems and communities that are impacted by the freight transportation system<br />Maximize the freight transportation system&apos;s contribution to the economic competitiveness of the region and its communities<br />Implement regional and local coordination of plans and policies that encourage an integrated approach to freight and livability issues<br />Freight Compatibility Objectives<br />
  • 45. Types of Freight Strategies<br />
  • 46. Freight Strategy Evaluation Process<br />
  • 47. Corridor-Based Evaluation Criteria<br />
  • 48. Freight Hot Spot Evaluation Criteria<br />
  • 49. Performance Criteria Weighting<br />
  • 50. Objective 1: Improve safety conditions<br />Performance Criteria:<br />% truck crashes / % truck traffic<br />Supporting Data:<br />State and local crash statistics <br />Projected traffic on 2014 loaded road network<br />
  • 51. Example Segment: Chancey Rd. - 20th St. Ext. to Alston Ave. Ext.<br />/= Example segment<br />X= Crash incidents<br />X= Crashes on segment<br />Total crashes: 5 (all at same node)<br />Truck crashes: 3<br />Percent truck crashes (C): 60%<br />Percent truck traffic (T): 7.97%<br />Ratio C/T: 7.53<br />
  • 52. Objective 2: Improve freight accessibility<br />Performance Criteria:<br />Intensity of FAC(s) served by project<br />Emerging or existing FAC<br />Facility provides access from FAC to limited access highway<br />Supporting Data:<br />Designated Freight Activity Centers<br />
  • 53. Example Segment: Chancey Rd. - 20th St. Ext. to Alston Ave. Ext.<br />.= FAC boundary<br />Intensity of FAC: Medium<br />Emerging or existing FAC: Emerging<br />Connection to limited access highway: No<br />
  • 54. Objective 3: Improve freight mobility and reliability<br />Performance Criteria:<br />Future congested to free flow speed ratio<br />Future truck volume<br />Facility type served by project<br />Supporting Data:<br />Traffic projections on 2014 road network<br />Designated freight corridors and truck routes<br />
  • 55. Example Segment: Chancey Rd. - 20th St. Ext. to Alston Ave. Ext.<br />/= 2014 loaded highway network<br />/= Selected model links<br />/ = Regional freight mobility corridor (RFMC)<br />/ = Truck route<br />Future congested to free flow speed ratio: 0.8566<br />Future truck volume: 968<br />Facility type: RFMC<br />
  • 56. Objective 4: Improve travel conditions where freight and commuters interact<br />Performance Criteria:<br />% future truck traffic<br />Supporting Data:<br />Traffic projections on 2014 road network<br />
  • 57. Example Segment: Chancey Rd. - 20th St. Ext. to Alston Ave. Ext.<br />/= 2014 loaded highway network<br />/= selected model links<br />% future truck traffic: 7.97%<br />
  • 58. Objective 5: Minimize impacts to communities<br />Performance Criteria:<br />% of project in livability/freight conflict areas<br />Supporting Data:<br />Livability/freight compatibility analysis<br />
  • 59. Livability and freight compatibility analysis<br />Livability<br />H<br />M<br />L<br />L M H<br />Freight Activity<br />
  • 60. Example Segment: Chancey Rd. - 20th St. Ext. to Alston Ave. Ext.<br />.= Livability/freight conflict areas<br />% of project in livability/freight conflict areas: 5.58%<br />
  • 61. Objective 6: Maximize economic competiveness<br />Performance Criteria:<br />Future industrial employment served by project<br />Supporting Data:<br />2035 industrial employment<br />
  • 62. Example Segment: Chancey Rd. - 20th St. Ext. to Alston Ave. Ext.<br />.= Selected TAZs<br />Industrial employment in project area: 5,376<br />
  • 63. % Truck Crashes/% Truck Traffic: 7.53<br />Intensity of FAC: Medium<br />Tenure of FAC: Emerging<br />Limited Access Highway Connection: No<br />Future congested to free flow speed ratio: 0.8566<br />Future truck volume: 968<br />Facility type: RFMC<br />% future truck traffic: 7.97%<br />% of project in livability/freight conflict areas: 5.58%<br />Industrial employment in project area: 5,376<br />PROJECT RANK: 112<br />Performance Evaluation Summary for Chancey Road<br />
  • 64. Performance Evaluation Summary for Chancey Road<br />Segment Rank - 112<br />
  • 65. Policy Framework - Approach<br />Develop a policy framework for freight planning that supports the economic and quality of life goals for the region<br />Understand the nature and geography of urban form and freight activities<br />Identify where freight activity conflicts with land uses and associated activities<br />Identify freight-specific projects and roadway design guidance that considers corridor function and corridor land use<br />
  • 66. Implementation Strategy Considerations<br />Freight facility functionality<br />Freight and land use compatibility<br />Shared users of corridor<br />Corridor capacity and operational issues<br />
  • 67. Freight Facility Types<br />Limited Access Facilities<br />Regional Freight Mobility Corridors<br />Other Designated Truck Routes<br />Freight Activity Center Streets<br />
  • 68. Freight Roadway Network Functions<br />Mobility<br />Smooth, efficient traffic flow<br />High travel speeds<br />Connectivity<br />Links Freight Activity Centers to Strategic Trade Corridors <br />Links between Freight Activity Centers, where warranted<br />Circulation<br />Local movements and distribution<br />Access<br />Efficient access to destinations<br />
  • 69. Freight Facility Type and Function<br />P = Primary S = Secondary L = Limited<br />
  • 70. Policy Framework<br />Community Oriented Area<br />Diverse Activity Area<br />Livability<br />Strategies and policies address conflicts between freight movements and livability concerns and are sensitive to local contexts<br />Strategies and policies emphasize livability (pedestrian, bicycle, car movements)<br />High<br />Medium<br />Freight Oriented Area<br />Strategies and policies emphasize redevelopment, restoration/conservation, or other future land use goals<br />Strategies and policies emphasize freight movements<br />Low Activity Area<br />Low<br />High<br />Medium<br />Low<br />Freight Activity<br />
  • 71. Livability Areas<br />Station Areas<br />Livable Future Land Uses<br />Secondary Activity Centers<br />Tier 1 Regional Anchors<br />Tier 2/3 Regional Anchors<br />Primary Activity Centers<br />Community Redevelopment Areas<br />High Livability Areas<br />Medium Livability Areas<br />
  • 72. Freight Areas<br />High Intensity FACs<br />Medium Intensity FACs<br />Low Intensity FACs<br />Industrial/Commercial Future Land Uses<br />High Truck Traffic (over 10%)<br />Medium Truck Traffic (5-10%)<br />Low Truck Traffic (3-5%)<br />High Freight Areas<br />Medium Freight Areas<br />Low Freight Areas<br />
  • 73. Livability and Freight Activity Overlay<br />High Freight Areas<br />Medium Freight Areas<br />Low Freight Areas<br />High Livability Areas<br />Medium Livability Areas<br />Livability<br />H<br />M<br />L<br />L M H<br />Freight Activity<br />
  • 74. Livability and Freight Activity Overlay - Corridors<br />Livability<br />H<br />M<br />L<br />L M H<br />Freight Activity<br />
  • 75. Livability and Freight Activity Overlay<br />Livability<br />H<br />M<br />L<br />L M H<br />Freight Activity<br />
  • 76. Roadway Design Guidance<br />Resource that identifies unique design considerations for truck movements<br />Provides engineers and planners guidance for employing design within various contexts<br />Considers design strategies for different users of corridor and affect on freight transport<br />
  • 77. Policy FrameworkDesign Guidance<br /><ul><li>Address conflicts between needs of different users
  • 78. Emphasize primary freight function
  • 79. Accommodate trucks
  • 80. Emphasize needs of non-freight users</li></ul>Livability<br />High<br />Medium<br /><ul><li>Accommodate different users
  • 81. Emphasize freight function
  • 82. Design for trucks
  • 83. Emphasize freight function</li></ul>Low<br />High<br />Medium<br />Low<br />Freight Activity<br />
  • 84. Policy FrameworkDesign Guidelines<br /><ul><li>Address conflicts between needs of different users
  • 85. Emphasize primary freight function
  • 86. Accommodate trucks
  • 87. Emphasize needs of Non-freight users</li></ul>Community Oriented Area<br />Diverse Activity Area<br />Livability<br />High<br />Medium<br /><ul><li>Accommodate different users
  • 88. Emphasize freight function
  • 89. Design for trucks
  • 90. Emphasize freight function</li></ul>Low Activity Area<br />Freight Oriented Area<br />Low<br />High<br />Medium<br />Low<br />Freight Activity<br />
  • 91. Roadway Design Guidance<br />Primary Topics<br />Lane widths<br />Number of departure and receiving lanes<br />Location of fixed objects<br />Turning radii<br />Tapered curbs<br />Turn lane length<br />
  • 92. Roadway Design Guidance<br />Secondary Topics<br />Medians<br />Refuge islands<br />Right turn corner islands<br />Stop bar location<br />Bicycle lanes<br />Bulb-outs<br />
  • 93. Regional Freight Mobility Corridors<br />Strategy Guidance<br />1 = Applicable; 2 = Somewhat applicable; 3 = Limited applicability<br />
  • 94. Priority Freight Investments<br />Capacity Projects<br />US 41 from Madison Avenue to I-4<br />Causeway Boulevard from Maritime Boulevard to east of US 41 CSX<br />SR 60 from US 301 to Falkenburg Road<br />I-275 from Himes Avenue to I-4<br />Orient Road from SR 60 to I-4<br />I-4 from I-4/Selmon Connector to County Line Road<br />I-75 from US 301 to Fowler Avenue<br />
  • 95. Priority Freight Investments<br />Operational Improvements<br />Hillsborough Avenue from Veterans Expressway to I-4<br />Ulmerton Road from Starkey Road to I-275<br />SR 686 (Roosevelt Boulevard) from Gandy Boulevard to Ulmerton Road<br />SR 54 from Little Road to I-75<br />
  • 96. Priority Freight Investments<br />Capacity and Operations<br />SR 50 from Lockhart Road to Hernando County Line<br />US 301from I-75 to I-4<br />SR 686 (Roosevelt Boulevard) from Ulmerton Road to 49th Street<br />Madison Avenue from US 41 to US 301<br />US 41 from Ayers Road to SR 50<br />Big Bend Road from US 41 to US 301<br />
  • 97. Priority Freight Investments<br />Grade Separations<br />SR 60 east of 50th Street over the Palmetto Main Line<br />50th Street over the ‘S’ and ‘A’ Lines and Broadway Avenue<br />Orient Road over the ‘A’ Line<br />Causeway Boulevard over the Palmetto Main Line<br />SR 50 east of US 301 over the ‘S’ Line<br />SR 54 over the Brooksville Sub Line and US 41<br />
  • 98. Priority Freight Investments<br />CSX Intermodal Yard Access Plan<br />
  • 99. Study Products<br />Comprehensive database<br />Strategic Freight Plan<br />Collaborative process<br />Internally<br />MPOs<br />Intermodal entities<br />Private sector<br />
  • 100. Coordination and Continuing Efforts<br />Inform TBARTA Master Plan<br />Integrate Polk, Manatee, and Sarasota<br />Inform MPO and intermodal agency planning processes<br />
  • 101. www.tampabayfreight.com<br />

×