RON PAUL THE MOST DANGEROUS NAZI IN AMERICA

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI1

A. J. WEBERMAN2

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIRon Paul quotations from the back cover:“David Duke was hurt by his past and lost the election. Howmany more Dukes are there waiting in the wings without sucha taint?”“There is plenty of evidence that John Demanjuk — anAmerican deported to Israel who may be executed there – isinnocent. And now there is also evidence that AndrijaArtukovic was not the war criminal he was portrayed by to be.”“Some people even think that the government itself couldhave been responsible for the Oklahoma City bombing.”He would privatize the National Parks: “I would dissolve theDepartment of the Interior.”Paul would legalize NAMBLA “There should be no age ofconsent laws.”3

A. J. WEBERMANRON PAUL:AMERICA’S MOSTDANGEROUS NAZICopyright © 2013INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATES318 3RDAVENUE SUITE 520NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10010All rights reserved.ISBN-13:978-1470014537ISBN-10:147001453XSECOND EDITION JUNE 9, 20134

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICONTENTS:UPDATESRON PAUL AND CRYPTO-NAZISMRON PAUL IS NOTHING MORE THAN A LIBERTY LOBBY NAZIWILLIS CARTO GHOST WROTE THE RON PAUL NEWSLETTERNEO-CONFEDERATE SEGREGATIONIST AND RACISTRON PAUL’S ATTEMPTED BLOODLESS COUPUSING IRAN AS A PROXY TO DESTROY ISRAELISRAEL’S NUMBER ONE ENEMY IN CONGRESSSUPPORTER OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM: SECURITY STRIPPING AMERICA SOTHAT ATTACKS ON JEWS CAN TAKE PLACEREPLACEMENT THEOLOGY: ISRAEL NO LONGER PLAYS A ROLE IN THERESURRECTION OF CHRISTVON MISES – FASCIST ECONOMISTWHAT WOULD RON PAUL’S MAKE BELIEVE AMERICA BE LIKE?NO GLOBAL WARMING TREATIESNO ENVIRONMENTALISMNO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYNO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONNO DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENTPRIVATIZATION OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEMNO MORE GAY RIGHTS5

A. J. WEBERMANLEGAL HEROIN, CRACK AND BATH SALTSNO DEA TO BUST INTERNATIONAL DRUG CARTELSDESTRUCTION OF BLACK COMMUNITY BY LEGALIZING HEROIN, COCAINE,CRACKMEDICAL MARIJUANA?NO INDEPENDENT JUDICIARYRIGGED ELECTIONSBRING HOME THE TROOPS?LEGALIZATION OF CHILD PROSTITUTIONNO FEDERAL LAWS AGAINST CHILD PORNNO AGE OF CONSENT LAWSNO WOMAN’S RIGHTSNO EUTHANASIAREPEAL OF ROE v WADENO ANIMAL RIGHTSA WAVE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST JEWSRON PAUL REACTS TO THIS BOOKRON PAUL’S FAREWELL ADDRESS6

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICRYPTO-NAZISMThe Late Former New York City Mayor Ed Koch:“Ron Pauls candidacy for President, for me, wasthat of a David Duke without an armband.”Ron Paul is no libertarian; he is a crypto-Nazi. Crypto-Nazism isa term implying a secret support for, or admiration of, the genocidalpolitical and economic system invented by Adolf Hitler. The term isused to imply that an individual or group keeps this support oradmiration hidden in order to avoid political prosecution or, in RonPaul’s case, political suicide. Crypto-Nazis maintain covers such as“libertarian” and “populist” to disguise a hidden agenda. They usecode words e.g. “Goldman-Sachs” means Jews.What makes Ron Paul The Most Dangerous Nazi in America ishis immense popularity and the fact that he is part of an electoralresurgence of Fascism and Nazism in other Western democracies.In Greece the Nazi Golden Dawn Party got 7% of the popular voteand in France Marine Le Pen got 19% of the vote. In America Paulgot 11.01% of the Republican Primary vote or 1,821,126 votes. Paul7

A. J. WEBERMANwas able to inspire Edward Snowden to commit a horrific act oftreason that will always be remembered in American history. Thisbook rips the cloak of deception off of Ron Paul and exposes histrue pathological genocidal self, a Nazi swine without a swastika.You can buy Ron Paul, The Most Dangerous Nazi in America onAmazon by clicking here.LIKE HITLER RON PAUL PLAYS ON IRRATIONAL FEAR"Im worried about, somebody in our government might kill himwith a cruise missile or a drone missile. I mean, we live in a badtime where American citizens dont even have rights and that theycan be killed, but the gentlemen is trying to tell the truth aboutwhats going on. Hes not defecting, there are no signs of thathappening. It’s a shame that we are in an age where people who tellthe truth about what the government is doing gets into trouble. No, Idont think for a minute that hes a traitor.” What are the odds ofObama ordering a drone strike on Edward Snowden? Is it in therealm of possibility or is Ron Paul tapping the vast reservoir ofignorance in America as Hitler did in Germany.Having a Nazi like Ron Paul as a Presidential candidate wasdeleterious to America. His constant efforts to make America morevulnerable to a terrorist attack by hamstringing the NSA, CIA andFBI have finally paid off when one of his Paulbots, who, despite lackof a formal education, was able to infiltrate the NSA and stealdocuments which he turned over to Glenn Greenwald, a Jew whowas the in house attorney to The Church of the Creator, a Naziorganization. What kind of a former Congressman would praisesomeone guilty of treason and espionage against his own country?Paul:The Fourth Amendment is clear; weshould be secure in our persons,houses, papers, and effects, and allwarrants must have probable cause.Today the government operates8

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIlargely in secret, while seeking toknow everything about our privatelives – without probable cause andwithout a warrant. The governmentdoes not need to know more aboutwhat we are doing. We need to knowmore about what the government isdoing. We should be thankful forindividuals like Edward Snowden andGlenn Greenwald who see injusticebeing carried out by their owngovernment and speak out, despitethe risk. They have done a greatservice to the American people byexposing the truth about what ourgovernment is doing in secret.The great constitutionalist Ron Paul cherry-picked the U.S.Constitution and omitted the treason clause:SECTION 3. Clause 1. Treasonagainst the United States, shallconsist only in levying War againstthem, or in adhering to their Enemies,giving them Aid and Comfort. NoPerson shall be convicted of Treasonunless on the testimony of twoWitnesses to the same overt Act, oron Confession in open court.Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), called the NSA PRISM program,"an all-out assault on the Constitution." Isn’t what Snowden did aviolation of the constitution? In a Paul Presidency leakingdocuments would be legal and all of America’s secrets exposed toits enemies.THE PAUL SNOWDEN CONNECTION9

A. J. WEBERMANThe first donation from the traitor Snowden to the Paulcampaign came from an address in Columbia, Md., in March 2012,while the second came from Waipahu, Hawaii, two months later.The first contribution describes the donor as an employee of Dell, acompany Snowden has done contract work for in recent years.Snowden is from Maryland, and most recently for Booz AllenHamilton in Hawaii. In addition, Snowden told the Guardian that hesupported a third-party candidate for president in 2008.Snowden believes the Boston Bombing was a criminal act, notan act of terrorism: "We have to decide why terrorism is a newthreat. There has always been terrorism. Boston was a criminal act.It was not about surveillance but good, old-fashioned police work.The police are very good at what they do."Ron Paul: “While the media crowed that the apprehension ofthe suspects was a triumph of the new surveillance state – and,predictably, many talking heads and Members of Congress calledfor even more government cameras pointed at the rest of us – thefact is none of this caught the suspect. Actually, it very nearly gavethe suspect a chance to make a getaway.”Snowden was a Arabist and said he became disillusioned withthe Armed Forces after he heard other soldiers “getting pumped upover killing Arabs.”This is another reason why Ron Paul is the most dangerousNazi in America in or out of office. He inspired a traitor to weakenour defense against terrorism. PRISM was successfully used to stop10

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIa harmful attack on American citizens. House IntelligenceCommittee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) said the NSAsurveillance successfully stopped a terrorist attack “within the lastfew years.” PRISM stopped a terror attack on the NYC subway.Najibullah Zazi was captured by the Feds when an Al Qaeda emailwas traced back to his computer, thanks to the massive data miningthe NSA is doing.RON PAUL’S HOME INDOCTRINATION CURRICULUMIn April 2013 when Ron Paul announced anew online curriculum for home-school-ers, henamed Gary North as director of curriculumdevelopment. North, 71, is not a professionaleducator. He is a leading theorist of ChristianReconstructionism, a Christian Identity spinoffmovement that denounces democracy, thinkssome forms of slavery are OK and wants to impose a draconianversion of biblical law that prescribes the death penalty for gays,adulterers, blasphemers, witches and incorrigible children, amongothers. In a 2003 column, Paul wrote, “The notion of a rigidseparation between church and state has no basis in either the textof the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers.”1North’stheocracy has all the markings of a Nazi-like regime; however Paultries to obscure this by attacking one facet of Nazi education:A common feature of authoritarian regimes is the criminalization ofalternatives to government-controlled education. Dictators recognizethe danger that free thought poses to their rule, and few thingspromote the thinking of “unapproved” thoughts like an educationcontrolled by parents instead of the state. That is why the NationalSocialist (Nazi) government of Germany outlawed homeschooling in1938.Since Ron Paul is supplying the curriculum for home education it isgoing to be him controlling the education rather than the State andthose “unapproved thoughts” or “politically incorrect” thoughts suchas those in found his newsletters would be used to inculcatechildren.1. https://www.au.org/church-state/june-2013-church-state/featured/ron-pauls-appalling-pal11

A. J. WEBERMANTHE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBINGHere Ron Paul intimates that the Federal Government stagedthis event as a practice drill for martial law.Liberty Was Also Attacked in Boston by Ron PaulForced lockdown of a city. Militarized police riding tanks in thestreets. Door-to-door armed searches without warrant. Familiesthrown out of their homes at gunpoint to be searched withoutprobable cause. Businesses forced to close. Transport shut down.These were not the scenes from a military coup in a far off bananarepublic, but rather the scenes just over a week ago in Boston asthe United States got a taste of martial law.This was not martial law. There was no curfew. Most peoplewere happy to go through what they had to go through in order toavoid becoming a victim of Islamist terror.The ostensible reason for the military-style takeover of parts ofBoston was that the accused perpetrator of a horrific crime was onthe loose.Note the use of the word “ostensible.” Represented orappearing as such; ostensive: His ostensible purpose was charity,but his real goal was popularity. A terrorist on the loose was not thereal reason for the lockdown. What was the real reason?The Boston bombing provided the opportunity for the government toturn what should have been a police investigation into a military-style occupation of an American city. This unprecedented moveshould frighten us as much or more than the attack itself.So three people dying, numerous other’s crippled for life, manydeafened, hundreds seriously injured is less frightening than acomprehensive police dragnet for the perpetrators.What has been sadly forgotten in all the celebration of the captureof one suspect and the killing of his older brother is that the policestate tactics in Boston did absolutely nothing to catch them.12

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIAn outright lie. Everyone was on alert and when someone sawthat the covering on their boat had been disturbed they calledpolice.While the media crowed that the apprehension of the suspects wasa triumph of the new surveillance state – and, predictably, manytalking heads and Members of Congress called for even moregovernment cameras pointed at the rest of us – the fact is none ofthis caught the suspect. Actually, it very nearly gave the suspect achance to make a getaway.The police were able to accurately identify the terrorist bypiecing together numerous videos. This is another outright lie butwhat do you expect from a crypto-Nazi?The “shelter in place” command imposed by the governor ofMassachusetts was lifted before the suspect was caught. Only afterthis police state move was ended did the owner of the boat gooutside to check on his property, and in so doing discover thesuspect.Liar. He said he saw it from his window. “Like all Watertownresidents, Henneberry stayed in his Franklin Street home as thehunt for Tsarnaev paralyzed much of eastern Massachusetts onFriday. When he looked out the window at his boat at one pointduring the day, he noticed something was amiss. "I put padsbetween the shrink wrap, and it stopped the chaffing and two ofthose had fallen down to the ground. It was really windy, so I didntthink twice about it," he said.”2No, the suspect was not discovered by the paramilitary troopsterrorizing the public. He was discovered by a private citizen, whothen placed a call to the police. And he was identified not bygovernment surveillance cameras, but by private citizens whowillingly shared their photographs with the police.2http://www.wcvb.com/news/local/metro/Watertown-boat-owner-David-Henneberry-tells-story-of-finding-Boston-Marathon-suspect/-/11971628/19863572/-/mpx0qq/-/index.html#ixzz2RwvfTXlE13

A. J. WEBERMANThe troops were protecting the public, the terrorists wereterrorizing the public. The police in this case was the FBI. Of coursethe Federal Government does not have cameras in Boston.As journalist Tim Carney wrote last week: “Law enforcement inBoston used cameras to ID the bombing suspects, but not policecameras. Instead, authorities asked the public to submit all photosand videos of the finish-line area to the FBI, just in case any of themhad relevant images. The surveillance videos the FBI posted onlineof the suspects came from private businesses that use surveillanceto punish and deter crime on their property.”So the police cameras did not get a good shot of the suspects.Most are used for traffic control, not crime. The photos would havebeen worthless if not for the skill of the FBI, which Paul wants toabolish.Sadly, we have been conditioned to believe that the job of thegovernment is to keep us safe, but in reality the job of thegovernment is to protect our liberties. Once the government decidesthat its role is to keep us safe, whether economically or physically,they can only do so by taking away our liberties. That is whathappened in Boston.Liberty is worthless if you are dead. Anyway Paul’s idea ofliberty is the freedom to kill Jews and segregate Blacks or sendthem back to Africa. He wants to see more terrorist attacks takeplace in America as he basically hates the U.S. which he believes iscontrolled by ZOG, the Zionist Occupational Government. He willnever say this openly but this is his sick mindset.Three people were killed in Boston and that is tragic. But what of thefact that over 40 persons are killed in the United States each day,and sometimes ten persons can be killed in one city on any givenweekend? These cities are not locked-down by paramilitary policeriding in tanks and pointing automatic weapons at innocent citizens.Note how Paul fails to mention those who lost their legs,hearing and more. Over 200. BUT? BUT? He qualifies this tragedyHe is the lowest scum on earth.14

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThis is unprecedented and is very dangerous. We must educateourselves and others about our precious civil liberties to ensure thatwe never accept demands that we give up our Constitution so thatthe government can pretend to protect us.Pretend to protect us? They rounded up the Islamist scumbefore they could set their bombs off in Times Square. Paul wouldhave loved to see NYC attacked because of all the Jews there.RON PAUL INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENTOF CRYPTO-NAZISMFACULTYRon Paul has cleverly chosen certain figures from academia, themedia and the CIA who further his totalitarian political goal. Theseindividuals are all pieces in a puzzle that when assembled displaysa swastika.John Laughland, a British writer who is a prominent defenderof the late Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic. Laughland hasalso defended Ukraine’s Kremlin-backed president ViktorYanukovich whose attempt to steal the 2004 election sparked thatcountry’s peaceful “Orange Revolution”. He lamented the fate ofBelarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, Europe’s last dictator.15

A. J. WEBERMANThe common thread is totalitarianism and its intellectual justificationas in Mein Kampf.Oxford historian Mark Almond: A trustee of a sinister anddeceptively named organization, the British Helsinki Human RightsGroup (BHHRG), which trades on the good name of theinternational civil liberties monitoring organizations founded as aresult of the 1975 Helsinki accords. The BHHRG was an earlydefender of Milosevic and Serbian behavior in the Balkansgenerally. The BHHRG hates gypsies just as the Nazis did.Judge Andrew Napolitano, a former legal analyst for FoxNews who has said that “It’s hard for me to believe that [7 WorldTrade Center] came down by itself” and that the 9/11attacks “couldn’t possibly have been done the way the governmenttold us.” Ron Paul is the new Hitler and he is the new Mussolini.The Nazi Willis Carto is a fan of Judge Andrew Napolitanoand this appeared on his website.“Focusing on FBI claims that since 9-11 it has foiledmultiple alleged terrorist plots to kill Americans,Napolitano pointed out that while there were some 2016

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIsuch incidents, three were interrupted by privatecitizens who observed suspicious activity. But theremaining 17 that were “solved” by the feds all had acommon and reprehensible thread: They wereplanned, plotted, controlled and carried out by thefederal government itself. Not unlike the 1993 firstattack on the World Trade Center, the FBI had agentsor informants befriend young Muslim men by luringthem into cooperation with encouragement aboutbeing “like-minded” and anti-American. Then, ofcourse, they were arrested before any damage couldbe done—followed by great hoopla the next day.Napolitano also tackled Israel’s prime role inpromoting a United States war against Iran, and thismay have been the final straw for those signing hispaycheck. The judge’s final guest and source ofinformation was Michael Scheuer, the former chief ofthe CIA’s Osama bin Laden-watching unit. WhileScheuer accepts the U.S. government claim that binLaden was the architect of 9-11, a point manyresearchers reject, he is a courageous critic of Israeland its U.S. lobby and, as Napolitano’s guest,pointed out that a war against Iran benefits Israel andSaudi Arabia but not the United States.Eric Margolis who says that “conclusive proof still lacks”connecting Osama bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks and hasspeculated that the events could have been “a plot by America’s farright or by Israel or a giant cover-up.” Eric Margolis is the son ofHenry Margolis, a Jewish American industrialist, and NexhmieZaimi, an Albanian Muslim journalist. Margolis supports the IslamicCaucasian Emirate that perpetrated the Boston Massacre. Margolisis a supporter of terrorism and has been singled out by Al Qaeda as17

A. J. WEBERMANsome who can be trusted. He characterizes Hamas and IslamicJihad as “Palestinian resistance groups” whose sole objective is toresist Israeli occupation, not menace America. This despite the factthat Margolis is undoubtedly well aware that the stated goal of bothHamas and Islamic Jihad is the total destruction of Israel and itsreplacement with a radical Muslim theocracy. Under this genocidalscenario, Israeli Jews would be slaughtered and their survivorsforced to live under the brutal rule of their new Islamist overlords.Southwestern Law School professor Butler Shaffer, inan article for Rockwell’s site titled, “9/11 Was a Conspiracy,” asks,“In light of the lies, forgeries, cover-ups, and other deceptionsleading to a ‘war’ in Iraq, how can any intellectually honest personcategorically deny the possibility of the involvement of Americanpolitical interests in 9/11?” The current practice of accusing theIranian government of warlike intentions in order to rationalize onesown desires to attack that country is one example.Shaffer blames Israel and America for 9/11, not the Islamists.“Our wartime suffering is causally connected with the suffering weinflict upon others. If we are to understand the nature of our blood-stained world, we must abandon our self-righteous definitions of“good” and “evil” and see our problems in terms of theirinterconnectedness. Only fools will accept the “they hate us for ourfreedom and our values” rationale for this war. The reality is thatothers hate us for the wrongs our government has inflicted uponthem; and we hate those who retaliate against us for such wrongs.18

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIWalter Block, an neo-Confederate Jewish professor of economicsand fellow at the Mises Institute. He is the mentally ill Jew who hasreplaced Murray Rothbard as the Jew the crypto-Nazis keep aroundfor laughs. Block is nuts and his writing makes little sense. Here hedefends the rights of the Muslims to threaten the artists who didcaricatures of Mohammad.However, there is a plethora of other instances wherethis is not at all true. For example, suppose somecartoons were published that did not depictMuhammad in an unflattering light, but, rather, blackswith big lips shuffling along or tap dancing, Jews withlong noses looking avaricious and holding bags ofmoney, or hordes of Orientals with a "yellow menace"caption. If anything is clear, it is that in most westernnations such caricatures would be deemed"hate speech" and their authors clapped into prisonforthwith. The same applies to the use of such wordsas "nigger," "kike," "spic," "chink," "wop," "greaser,""cunt," when used in an attempt to denigrate certainfavored groups of people. ("Honky" would not likelyresult in the same fate.) And what of holocaustdenial? In many "progressive" nations denying thishistorical event, or making fun of it, is a violation oflaw. David Irving now languishes in an Austrianprison for engaging in his free speech rights on thistopic. An Islamic group in Holland posted a cartoonof Hitler and Ann Frank in bed with each other; but forthe present conflagration, this would have likelyresulted in a jail sentence for them.An argument has been made by Kathleen Parker thatthere is a dis-analogy here. She says: "… the Nazis19

A. J. WEBERMAN… were officially sanctioned enforcers of immoralsocial orders that used caricature to further degradeand dehumanize beleaguered minorities theyultimately murdered. There is no equivalencebetween organized murder on behalf of a malignantsocial system and a-half-dozen nerdy artists,speaking only for themselves, lampooning a fanaticalreligious sect…"But David Irving is not a Nazi. He murdered no one.He merely engaged in press freedom, or free speech.The same applies to those who use the racial andsexual expletives mentioned above. Yes, great evilwas perpetrated by those who used this denigratinglanguage, and by those who sported Nazi regalia.The Nazis murdered millions (the Communistsmurdered tens of millions; when Prince Harry donnedthe swastika he was roundly condemned; had hetreated the hammer and sickle in a similar manner, itwould have passed unremarked, but that is anotherstory). But it is still a logical fallacy to claim that allwho adopt their regalia, mannerisms, goose-stepping, etc., are equally guilty; even that they areguilty of any crime at all. In my own opinion, just as inthe case of prostitution, pornography, addictivedrugs, these are not nice things; but from thelibertarian perspective they are victimless crimes andshould not be punished by law, or through extra-legalsanctions: rioting.Michael Scheuer, a former CIA intelligence officer, who blamesIsrael for Islamism. Block and Scheuer are covered in this book.20

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZILeverett has challenged Western conventional wisdom on theIslamic Republic of Iran’s foreign policy and internal politics,documented the historical record of previous Iranian cooperationwith the United States, and presented the seminal argument inAmerican foreign policy circles for a U.S.-Iranian “grand bargain”.His new book, Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Cometo Terms with the Islamic Republic (also co-authored with HillaryMann Leverett), will be published in 2012.The Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti-Semitism (YIISA) was founded in 2006. Its purpose was to provide ascholarly approach to the study of contemporary and historical anti-Semitism. It was attached to Yales Institution of Social and PolicyStudies. It was fully funded from private contributions. DeputyProvost and Political Science Professor Frances Rosenbluth servedon the faculty committee that reviewed YIISAs performance andconcluded that the university should close the center. In recentyears Rosenbluth appointed Iran-regime apologists Flynt and HillaryMann Leverett to serve as senior fellows at Yales Jackson Institutefor Global Affairs. Last September the Leveretts brought theirstudents to New York to hold a seminar for them with IranianPresident Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Unlike the YIISA conference, themove did not stimulate any significant controversy at the university.21

A. J. WEBERMANCol. Lawrence Wilkerson Blasts Politicized U.S. Intelligence onSyria, Raises Prospect of Obama ImpeachmentAustrian economist Professor Robert Higgs in a recent talk narratesof how US president Franklin D. Roosevelt baited the Japanese intoattacking the US that paved way for America’s participation in WorldWar II.22

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIWho knows why Paul dug up this retread but she might stillhave some connection to the Intelligence Community. Ron Paulknows every facet of American society that exhibits Jew hatingtendencies and he is determined to unite them.PAUL DIVERTS WHAT IS LEFT OF HIS CAMPAIGNCONTRIBUTIONS TO DAUGHTER LORI PYEATTOn March 11, 2012, according to the Center ForPublic Integrity, the Committee to Re-Elect RonPaul donated $150,000 to the Foundation forRational Economics and Education, a nonprofitgroup Paul himself founded in 1976, accordingto documents filed with the Federal ElectionCommission. Carol Paul, his wife, is the groupspresident, IRS documents show. By law,political campaign committees may contributeunlimited surplus funds to 501(c)(3) charitablenonprofits such as the Foundation for RationalEconomics and Education, and theres noprohibition on a former candidate directing those funds to his or herown charity. Although Ron’s Paul’s wife gets no salary his daughter,Lori Pyeatt gets 60K a year for doing nothing.Internal Revenue Code Section 4958. Taxes on excess benefittransactions: Disqualified Persons(4) Family membersThe members of an individuals family shall be determined undersection 4946(d); except that such members also shall include thebrothers and sisters (whether by the whole or half blood) of theindividual and their spouses.GIVE RON PAUL A RAW MILK ENEMARon Paul is a crypto-Nazi and in office or out of office he is athreat. He is not much of a doctor, and will never make any great23

A. J. WEBERMANadvances in medicine as others, such as Louis Pasteur, have. ButRon Paul thinks he knows better than Pasteur. Despite scientificevidence that raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms thatcan pose serious health risks in 2013 Paul tacitly recommended rawmilk to his zombies. On May 11, 2011 Paul introduced H.R. 1830, abill that would effectively overturn the federal prohibition on raw milkfor human consumption in interstate commerce. Paul, who hadintroduced the same bill in the previous session of Congressremarked, “Hard as it is to believe, the federal government isactually spending time and money prosecuting small businesses forthe “crime” of meeting their customer’s demand for unpasteurizedmilk! Americans have the right to consume these products withouthaving the federal government second-guess their judgment aboutwhat products best promote health.” According to an analysis by theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), between 1993and 2006 more than 1500 people in the United States became sickfrom drinking raw milk or eating cheese made from raw milk. Inaddition, CDC reported that unpasteurized milk is 150 times morelikely to cause food-borne illness and results in 13 times morehospitalizations than illnesses involving pasteurized dairy products.This is Paul’s latest Nazi newsletter:WHEN THEY CAME FOR THE RAW MILKDRINKERS…by Ron PaulWhile I oppose most gun control proposals, there isone group of Americans I do believe should bedisarmed: federal agents. The use of force by federalagents to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws isone of the major, albeit overlooked, threats to liberty.Too often Americans are victimized by governmentforce simply for engaging in commercial transactionsdisproved of by Congress and the federalbureaucracy.Of course Paul wants to disarm Federal Agents. He is a neo-Confederate who opposes a strong central government. And whodecides if these laws are unjust, unconstitutional and a threat toliberty? The Courts? No Ron Paul does. He will decide if the lawsare a threat to his version of liberty, “liberty” to commit genocide.24

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIFor example, the offices of Rawesome Foods inVenice, California, have been repeatedly raided byarmed federal and state agents, and Rawesome’sfounder, 65-year old James Stewart, has beenimprisoned. What heinous crime justified this action?Rawesome sold unpasteurized (raw) milk andcheese to willing customers – in a state where rawmilk is legal! You cannot even drink milk from a cowwithout a federal permit!James Stewart jumped bail, havingfailed to show up for two courtappearances. In one of cases, he wasout on a $30,000 bail in Los AngelesCounty on charges of illegally sellingraw milk. In the other, he was out of a$100,000 bail in Ventura County on charges of illegally raising fundsfor Sharon Palmer’s Healthy Family Farms, according to an article inThe Complete Patient. Stewart was into the notion of the ‘sovereignman,’ which urges people to claim their ‘Common Law InherentRights’ and defend themselves against “all levels of abuse fromGovernment and Statutes.” Sharon Palmer supplies RawesomeFoods with raw goat milk and other dairy products from what isknown as a ‘herdshare.’ Under a herdshare arrangement, themembers don’t consider themselves as buying the milk since theyown the animals. Palmer has no license to sell raw milk inCalifornia, a state which does allow retail sales of raw milk but whichalso has very strict laws governing raw-milk production and sales.This is hardly the only case of federal agents usingforce against those who would dare meet consumerdemand for raw milk. In 2011 armed agents of theFood and Drug Administration (FDA) raided thebusiness of Pennsylvanian Amish farmer DanAllgyer. Federal agents wasted a whole year andwho knows how many millions of our tax dollarsposing as customers in order to stop Allgyer fromselling his raw milk to willing customers.25

A. J. WEBERMANOn February 2, 2012 Federal District Court Judge Lawrence F.Stengel ordered a permanent injunction against dairy farmer DanAllgyer prohibiting Allgyer from distributing raw milk and raw milkproducts across state lines; under Judge Stengel’s order, theinjunction was to be in place for a minimum of five years Stengelfound that Allgyer sold raw milk to members of Grassfed On TheHill, a food buyers club, at various distribution points in Marylandand the District of Columbia in violation of federal labeling laws (themilk containers Allgyer distributed were unlabeled) and the federalregulation prohibiting raw milk and raw milk products (other than rawcheese aged at least 60 days) in interstate commerce. As a resultAllgyer closed down his operation.The use of force against individuals making choicesnot approved of by the political elite does not juststop with raw milk. The Natural News website hasdocumented numerous accounts of federalpersecution, including armed raids, of health foodstores and alternative medical practitioners.The Nazi newspaper Spotlight, that supported Ron Paul ranstories like Peroxide for Improved Health by T. Valentine, aninterview with Fr. Richard Willhelm, SPOTLIGHT, August, 1986.They advertisers were the purveyors of quack cures.26

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThese type of police state tactics used against,among others, raw milk producers, and alternativehealth providers is justified by the paternalisticattitude common in Washington, D.C. A member ofCongress actually once told me that, “The peopleneed these types of laws because they do not knowwhat is good for them.” This mindset fuels the growthof the nanny state and inevitably leads to what C.S.Lewis said may be the worst from of tyranny “…atyranny exercised for the good of its victims.”All Americans, even if they do not believe it is a wisechoice to drink raw milk should be concerned aboutthe use of force to limit our choices. This is becausethere is no limiting principle to the idea that thegovernment force is justified if used “for our owngood.” Today it is those who sell raw milk who arebeing victimized by government force, tomorrow itcould be those who sell soda pop or Styrofoam cups.Therefore, all Americans should speak out againstthese injustices.27

A. J. WEBERMANAfrican Americans between the ages of 20 and 39 were shown tohave the most fast food and supersized non-diet soda in their dietwhen compared with their Caucasian and Hispanic counterparts, asone-fifth of their calorie intake came from quick service restaurants.Just another part of Ron’s Paul’s ridden racist agenda.Christopher Scott "Chris" Kyle (April 8, 1974 – February 2,2013) was a Navy SEAL and the most lethal sniper in Americanmilitary history, with 160 confirmed kills (out of 255 claimed kills). Hewas shot and killed in a rifle range on February 2, 2013, in Texas,while trying to help another vet get over PTSD. People wereshocked at this tweet but I was not. I know Paul is a Nazi so for himJews are the cause of all the misery in the world. Since Kyle shotthe enemies of the Jews, Kyle became Paul’s enemy. After he gotheat for this remark he wrote, “As a veteran, I certainly recognizethat this weekends violence and killing of Chris Kyle were a tragicand sad event. My condolences and prayers go out to Mr. Kyle’sfamily. Unconstitutional and unnecessary wars have endlessunintended consequences. A policy of non-violence, as Christpreached, would have prevented this and similar tragedies.” But oneweek later he was back to his original position: “The warning that"he who lives by the sword dies by the sword" goes not only forindividuals but for entire societies. It is a warning to all of us. Acountry or a society that lives with the violence of pre-emptive war infact self-destructs.” If you have info on Ron Paul contact me atajweberman@verizon.net28

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICHAPTER ONERON PAUL IS A LIBERTY LOBBYCRYPTO-NAZII first became aware of the Nazi termite Ron Paul inthe late 1970’s through the Spotlight, a weeklycrypto-Nazi newspaper published by a Nazi frontgroup known as Liberty Lobby. The Spotlightrepeatedly featured Ron Paul. I learned about theexistence of Liberty Lobby through Phil Fellows, a29

A. J. WEBERMANrightwing libertarian who let me crash at Grover Norquist’s NationalTaxpayers Union townhouse. Norquist is now a big Paul supporter3and a supporter of Muslim candidates for political office. At this timein my life I worked as a Congressional investigator in Washington,D.C. It was in this rightwing milieu that, in 1974, Phil took me to theLiberty Lobby office at 300 Independence Avenue so I could displaypictures of two tramps that were picked up from a freight trainparked at the back of the Texas School Book Depository an hourafter the Kennedy assassination. I pointed out their resemblance toCIA contract agent Frank Fiorini Sturgis and CIA official EveretteHoward Hunt. Both of these men had gained notoriety after havebeen involved in Watergate.4In fact the CIA spook Howard Hunt’sidentity and photograph had been revealed for the first time as aresult of Watergate.TRAMP STURGIS3. http://reason.com/blog/2011/12/21/grover-norquist-ron-paul-is-the-most-con4. Spotlight got into a legal battle with E. Howard Hunt about Hunt’s role inthe Kennedy assassination after they published an article by VictorMarchetti that quoted a James Angleton memo that read, “Someday weare going to have to account for Howard Hunt’s presence in Dallas onNovember 22, 1963. This author was also sued by E. Howard Hunt over asimilar issue.30

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIHOWARD HUNT TRAMP HOWARD HUNTThe Liberty Lobby staff was pleased by my discovery as it couldprove highly detrimental to the CIA. After I discovered they wereNazis I realized these vermin hated CIA because some of its agentsand officials had been in the OSS5and because it was pro-Israel.They asked me who I was. When I told them my name was AlanJules Weberman, one man said “You mean Alan Jew Weberman?”This outburst of Jew hatred aroused my interest in Liberty Lobbyand while working for Congressman Henry Gonzalez, a Democratfrom San Antonio, Texas and an associate of Representative RonPaul on the House Banking and Currency Committee, I began tolisten to Liberty Lobby’s radio broadcasts every morning beforegoing to work at the National Archives. I couldn’t believe my ears. Itwas pure Nazi propaganda. The putrid corpses of Father Coughlinand Gerald L. K. Smith had been resurrected!When Liberty Lobby announced it wascoming out with a weekly publicationcalled The Spotlight I sent in a money5. Office of Strategic Services – the precursor to the CIA that fought theNazis during the Second World War31

A. J. WEBERMANorder and subscribed under a fictitious name. I became a weeklyreader of this vile Nazi rag for counter-intelligence purposes. I vividlyremember reading the list of those who attended Spotlight andLiberty Lobby functions and there was always this man with two firstnames, Ron Paul. Republican Congressman Ron Paul this and RonPaul that. Congressman Ron Paul will be at the Populist Party (thepolitical arm of Liberty Lobby) Convention along with DavidDuke the 1988 Populist Party presidential candidate. CongressmanRon Paul will be attending the dinner for Spotlight economist MartinLarson. On and on! It reminded me of an old Jackie Gleason bitwhere he would read a list of names and then add “and of coursethe ever popular Mae Busch!” a silent movie star that few had heardof. Ron Paul was so loyal and supportive of Liberty Lobby that hewas given an honorary dinner by it. That was because Ron Paulshared its Nazi beliefs because he was, and is, a clever calculatingLiberty Lobby / Spotlight type Nazi, a Nazi without a swastika, benton the mass murder of the Jewish people and on sending theBlacks back to Africa. Paul doesn’t look the part no screamingspeeches – no Hitler mustache - and that’s one of the reasons forhis success. Another reason people don’t recognize him for what heis because he is a pediatrician; however Cuban terrorist OrlandoBosch and Islamist terrorist Ayman al-Zawahari were alsopediatricians.Back in the 1970’s I reasoned, ‘Okay the Nazis have onerepresentative in the U. S. Congress that no one has ever heard of.’I wasn’t that worried. At one time the Nazis had many more butwere still unsuccessful: Republican Senator Gerald Nye of NorthDakota, Senator Burton Wheeler of Montana, and Rep. Martin Diesof Texas were all Nazi sympathizers if not Nazis. But in retrospect Ishould have been very worried. A cancer can start as a tiny lump.So I’ve known for over thirty years that the Nazis at Spotlightwere Paul’s greatest supporters and he was their de factoCongressional Representative. After Paul failed to get re-electedand went on a speaking tour Spotlight made sure he got the money32

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIhe needed to finance his campaign by giving them their mailing listso he could return to public office.Spotlight and Liberty Lobby was oldschool Nazi, 1930’s to 1940’s Third ReichNazi, the residue of the Nazi intelligenceand propaganda network that operatedbefore, during and after the Second WorldWar. They were different from swastikawearing neo-Nazis like George LincolnRockwell (seen on the left next to DanBurroughs, a Nazi who turned out to be aJew) and his crew of misfits and in the long run proved to be moredangerous. Many of the Spotlight policy board members had beeninterred, often secretly, as Nazi spies during the war by the JusticeDepartment then released after the war ended as they were nolonger considered a threat to national security and might provevaluable in the Cold War. Ron Paul wrote that he opposed theirinterment:As far back as the Civil War, World War I, and WorldWar II, very often speaking out on political issueswas met with law enforcement officials actuallycharging them with crimes and even havingindividuals imprisoned.The Spotlight scum were spiesright out of the movie The House on92ndStreet. Spotlight contributorConrad Grieb was interred by theJustice Department as a suspectedNazi spy during World War II. Asdocumented in the book Undercoverby John Roy Carlson6Grieb ran theNazi office in Harlem, hoping to recruit “Negros.” Conrad Grieb wasthe author of numerous articles that claimed it was impossible for6. http://www.scribd.com/doc/19926317/Carlson-Undercover-Nazi-133

A. J. WEBERMANtwo million Jews to have been killed by diesel engine exhaust. TheJewish Defense Organization tracked Conrad Grieb down thenpaid him a visit on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Grieb was nolonger a member of New York City’s social elite class as he was inthe 1940’s. He lived on the fifth floor of a six floor walk up. Oneindividual gained entrance to the denied area and pounded on hisdoor. Greib called the cops then went up the fire escape to the roof.He began throwing stuff down at us so we ducked under somescaffolding split up and left before the police arrived.Eustace Mullins, a prominent Spotlightcontributor, was a confident of the traitorousfascist poet and propagandist Ezra Pound.Mullins did a book on Pound and visited himin the mental hospital Pound was sent toafter the war – Pound belonged in a federalprison for the act of treason because Poundhad made anti-American broadcasts fromRome but his influential literary friends had him committed instead.Mullins, who blamed the Federal Reserve Bank for everything evil inthe world, was a classic Jew-hating piece of crap. In The BiologicalJew he wrote thatThis religious ceremony of drinking the blood of aninnocent gentile child is basic to the Jews entireconcept of his existence as a parasite, living off of theblood of the host.7Pro-Paul websites promote Mullins lies:Eustace Mullins Interview! This is quite aninteresting interview from a man who introduced theworld to the reality of the Federal Reserve. At theurging of poet Ezra Pound, Eustace Mullins beganscouring the Library of Congress for two years towrite his book, Secrets of the Federal Reserve.7. http://marucha.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/eustace-mullins-the-biological-jew.pdf34

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIMullins is a bit critical of Ron Paul, and he alsoclaims that G. Edward Griffin has ripped him offtremendously. All in all good, challenging food forthought. Gnostic Media Podcast #045 - A Bona FideConspiracy8Tyler Kent, who was imprisoned in the Tower ofLondon during the war for treason was employedby Spotlight. Kent was born in Manchuria wherehis father was a U.S. Consul. Eventually, throughhis father’s connections, he joined the StateDepartment and was posted to the U.S. embassyin London. There, he became responsible forencoding and decoding Top Secret messages.With a position which required him to encode and decode sensitivetelegrams, Kent had access to a wide range of secret documents,especially the communications between Churchill and Roosevelt,and he stole many of them. He also became politically active insupport of the front group known as The America First Committee.On May 18, 1940, Ambassador Joseph Kennedy was informed ofKent’s treason, and agreed to waive diplomatic immunity againstKent. On May 20, 1940 Kent was arrested in a dawn raid at his flat.When officers of MI5 inspected the flat, they found 1,929 officialdocuments: besides Churchill’s cables, there was a book containingthe names of people under surveillance by Special Branch and MI5.Searchers also found keys to the U.S. Embassy code room. Kentwas specifically charged with stealing documents that “might bedirectly or indirectly useful to an enemy.” On October 23, 1940 Kentwas tried in camera in the Old Bailey. On November 7, 1940 he wasconvicted of treason and sentenced to seven years imprisonment.Ed Delaney indicted for treason amid charges of working with theNazi foreign office worked for Liberty Lobby and Spotlight. Delaneywas a Nazi English-speaking propagandist broadcasting from Berlinso he fit right in at Spotlight the post-war Nazi propaganda organ.98. http://www.dailypaul.com/109751/new-eustace-mullins-interview9. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/SSkentT.htm35

A. J. WEBERMANSpotlight and its Holocaust denying creation, the Institute forHistorical Review, maintained relationships with Nazi officers fromWorld War II. When he died in 1994, the Belgian Nazi Leon Degrelle(seen above with Hitler and Himmler), who commanded an SSDivision during World War II, was memorialized as a "friend ofInstitute for Historical Review." Indeed, until he died, theunrepentant Nazi Degrelle published long essays lauding Hitler inthe Journal of Historical Review. The Journal also published articlesadmiring Hitler by Nazi General Otto Ernst Remer, who wasinstrumental in keeping der Führer in power after the failedassassination attempt against him in 1944, and who was a featuredspeaker at the eighth Institute for Historical Review conference in1987. The Journal featured articles by other, lesser-known Naziscum as well. Another part of the Institute for Historical Review /Spotlight group was Noontide Press. Noontide Press publishes anddisseminates Nazi and anti-Semitic classics such as The Protocolsof the Elders of Zion, Mein Kampf, The Turner Diaries and DavidDukes My Awakening. On audio cassette tape the titles include:Luftwaffe Songs and Stormtrooper Marches. Noontide Presss Website offers full text versions of Mein Kampf and The InternationalJew, and an almost-complete reproduction in English of Nazipropagandist Julius Streichers 1934 German childrens book, ThePoisonous Mushroom, including its caricatured illustrations of Jewsand its obscene nursery rhymes.36

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIJust like Ron Paul, under the guise of libertarianism Spotlight,among other things, railed against the prosecution of Nazi warcriminals, promoted the David Duke Congressional campaign,claimed the Mossad was responsible for everything you canimagine, claimed the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty wasdeliberate, targeted every Jewish politician they could locate andstarted the Holocaust denying Institute for Historical Review. Whileall this propaganda was being disseminated Ron Paul wasprominently featured in the Spotlight as you can see below:37

A. J. WEBERMANThese vermin were the same scum whose masters in Germanywere able to mass murder at least six million of my people includingmy relatives in Hungary. The Jewish race had better take these oldschool Nazis seriously because they have proven to be adept atwhat they do. It is no accident that Paul has become the mostdangerous Nazi in America. These are America’s smartest, mostdevious Nazis. Their longevity makes them even more dangerousas they wait in the wings for their moment to come when theeconomy collapses, when political turmoil becomes the rule. Thesemaggots’ crypto-Nazi identities became a must because mostAmericans don’t want any part of German WW II Nazism since38

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIAmericans died in WWII and Nazism involved the systematic killingwomen and children. As a result Paul has countless Americansfooled into believing he is something other than what he really is,which is a potential genocidal maniac.Unfortunately, the media describes Ron Paul as a “libertarian”when in reality he is as far from liberty as you can get – there isn’tany liberty under Nazism or Fascism unless you call liberty the rightto kill Jews, deport Blacks and other such dark pursuits. Just as RonPaul claims to a libertarian Spotlight claimed to be a “Libertarian”publication thus the name Liberty Lobby. Spotlight threw all theirsupport behind Paul. Do you think Spotlight would support anyoneother than a Nazi? “Liberty” is one of Paul’s favorite words. It is adog whistle term and means right of one, emancipation from allegedJewish political and economic domination and influence that,according to the Nazi Paul, are at the root of all of America’sproblems.Some American Jews realize where Paul is coming from. In1998 the Republican National Committee declared: "There is noroom in the party of Lincoln for a Klansman like David Duke."10TheRepublican National Committee never issued a similar statementregarding Ron Paul, however, the conservative Republican JewishCoalition declined to invite Ron Paul to its presidential candidatesforum. Executive Director Matthew Brooks stated:As Americans who are committed to a strong andvigorous foreign policy, we are deeply concernedabout the prospective presidential campaign ofCongressman Ron Paul. While Rep. Paul plans torun as a Republican, his views and past record placehim far outside of the Republican mainstream. Hiscandidacy, as weve seen in his past presidentialcampaigns, will appeal to a very narrow constituencyin the U.S. electorate. Throughout his public service,10. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/keyraces99/stories/duke122198.htm39

A. J. WEBERMANPaul has espoused a dangerous isolationist vision forthe U.S. and our role in the world. He has been avirulent and harsh critic of Israel during his tenure inCongress. Most recently Paul gave an interview inwhich he voiced his objection to the recent killing ofOsama Bin Laden.11Paul admires Osama. According to Paul:Let there be no doubt, for every terrorist identified,others will see only a freedom fighter. That was thecase when we aided Osama bin Laden in the 1980s.He was a member of the Mujahedeen, and they werethe freedom fighters waging a just war against theSoviet army. Of course, now he is our avowedenemy. A broad definition of terrorism outside theunderstanding of those who attacked the UnitedStates opens a Pandora’s Box in our foreign policycommitments.12Then there is the Republican component to Paul’s Nazi cover.How can someone be a Republican and a Nazi at the same time?Well, Herbert Hoover had a special relationship with Adolf Hitler and11. http://reason.com/blog/2011/12/01/republican-jewish-coalition-bars-ron-pau12. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=369&Itemid=6040

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZImet with him in 1938. Hoover was a covert supporter of the Germanfuehrer. Hoover would oppose America’s involvement in World WarII and fight against FDR’s Lend Lease program to aid Britain. Heassured everyone that Hitler would soon conquer Europe and it wasbetter to be his friend. Hoover was the behind the scenes power ofthe America First Committee, leaving the public face to CharlesLindbergh. According to FDR, there could be no doubt thatLindbergh was a Nazi. Lindbergh was finally exposed when he gavehis famous anti-Semitic, America First speech in Iowa. After thespeech, which blamed the Jews for the world’s unrest, Hooverinvited Lindbergh up to his hotel suite at the Waldorf Astoria andpraised him.1313. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/01/27/444529/-The-Troubling-Legacy-of-Herbert-Hoover41

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICHAPTER TWOSPOTLIGHT PUBLISHER WILLIS CARTOGHOST WROTE THE PAUL NEWSLETTERSAs stated, Ron Paul is a Frankensteinian creation of Spotlightand Liberty Lobby. Willis Carto created both these entities thattrace back to an organization intent on sending American blacksback to Africa. Starting in October 1966 two American journalists,Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson, published a series of storiesunder The Washington Merry-go-round that recounted the findingsof a former Liberty Lobby employee, Jeremy Horne. Horne said hehad discovered a box of correspondence between Liberty Lobbyleader, Willis Carto (photo above) and numerous governmentofficials establishing the Joint Council of Repatriation, a forerunnerorganization to the Liberty Lobby. The Joint Council of Repatriationstated that their fundamental purpose was to "repatriate" blacks"back to Africa.” Ex-Mississippi Supreme Court Justice Tom Bradyand various members of the White Citizens’ Councils who hadworked to establish the Joint Council of Repatriation, alsocontributed to the founding of Liberty Lobby. Justice Tom P. Brady42

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIwas the cracker barrel philosopher of Mississippis racist whiteCitizens Councils and the author of Black Monday, a Negro-baitingtract attacking the U.S. Supreme Courts 1954 school desegregationdecision.14In Black Monday Brady wrote,Whenever and wherever the white man has drunkthe cup of black hemlock, whenever and whereverhis blood has been infused with the blood of theNegro, the white man, his intellect and culture havedied.15Brady, then a state Circuit Court judge, insisted that the Brownv Board of Education decision was "not the law of the land." Othercorrespondence referred to U.S. Congressional support for theemerging Liberty Lobby, such as from South Carolina SenatorStrom Thurmond (Dixiecrat presidential candidate in 1948) andCalifornia U.S. Representative James B. Utt. Utt made nationalnews by suggesting that “a large contingent of barefooted Africans”might be training in Georgia as part of a United Nations militaryexercise to take over the United States. Utt also believed sexeducation was a communist plot!16Willis Carto created Ron Paul. In 1974 Paul started out as adelegate to the Texas state Republican convention and was also anunsuccessful candidate for election to the 94th Congress. In 1976he was elected as a Republican to the 94th Congress, by specialelection to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of UnitedStates Representative Robert R. Casey. He was there from April 3,1976 to January 3, 1977. He was an unsuccessful candidate forreelection to the 95thCongress in 1976. He was elected to the 96thand to the 97th98thCongresses from January 3, 1979 to January 3,1985.He was not a candidate for reelection to the House ofRepresentatives in 1984, but was an unsuccessful candidate for14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Lobby15. http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/CCCitizens.asp16. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_B._Utt43

A. J. WEBERMANnomination to the United States Senate. He was elected to the 105thand to the seven succeeding Congresses from January 3, 1997 tothe present. He was an unsuccessful candidate for the Republicanpresidential nomination in 2008.The Spotlight started publication in September 1975 and wasimmediately successful, increasing in circulation annually until itpeaked in 1981 at an average paid run of more than 330,000 perweek. Paul was unsuccessful at getting re-elected in 1976, but asthe Spotlight became more powerful so did Ron Paul. Ed Crane, thepresident of the Cato Institute, reported that Ron Paul told him that“his best source of congressional campaign donations was themailing list for the Spotlight.”17The Louisiana Coalition againstRacism and Nazism revealed that the Liberty Lobby was a keyDavid Duke backer in his successful 1989 run for the statelegislature, providing him a 100,000-name mailing list and direct-mail expertise. A Liberty Lobby staffer, Trisha Katson, also workedfor Duke around that time.18The Spotlight got Paul back in officeand kept him office – in retrospect for good reason – so that theirprotégée could become the most dangerous Nazi in America.In 1985 Paul began selling newsletters. The main source ofsubscribers to the Ron Paul newsletter came from Spotlight, whereit was heavily advertised. People paid $100 a year to get the viewsof a former United States Congressman and unsuccessfulcandidate for nomination to the United States Senate. Thenewsletters were written from the first person. They had an air of17. http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/who-wrote-ron-pauls-newsletter18. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-01-12/news/9201040093_1_buchanan-and-duke-david-duke-ku-klux-klan-leader44

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIauthenticity about them and contained numerous anecdotes aboutCongressman Paul’s experiences in Washington. It is no stretch forhim to have written them as he has subsequently written numerousbooks. Paul made more than a million dollars from this venture. IfRon Paul didn’t write at least some part of them he would havebeen guilty of mail fraud. But he did have help.In 2001, Paul took “moral responsibility” for the commentsprinted in his newsletter under his name, telling Texas Monthlymagazine that the comments were written by an unnamedghostwriter and did not represent his views.I could never say this in the campaign, but thosewords weren’t really written by me. It wasn’t mylanguage at all. Other people help me with mynewsletter as I travel around. I think the one onBarbara Jordan was the saddest thing, becauseBarbara and I served together and actually she was adelightful lady. We wanted to do something onaffirmative action, and it ended up in the newsletterand became personalized. I never personalizeanything. They were never my words, but I had somemoral responsibility for them. I actually really wantedto try to explain that it doesn’t come from me directly,but they [campaign aides] said that’s too confusing.19Content analysis of the newsletters reveals an uncannycontemporaneous resemblance to articles in the Spotlight leadingme to believe that Spotlight publisher Willis Carto, and not Paul’sassociate Lew Rockwell,20ghost wrote some parts of them. Cartohad plenty of experience writing newsletters and his office was afew blocks from the Capitol and House Office Building. In 1955,Carto began publication of the monthly Right Newsletter and19. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/ron-paul-thought-his-newsletters-were-pretty-great-1995/46548/20. In 2008, Rockwell denied in an interview with the New Republic that hewas Paul’s ghostwriter.45

A. J. WEBERMANestablished the Research Department of Liberty Lobby, whichbegan publication of Liberty Letter in 1960.The newsletters mirrored Spotlight’s often republished Nazipropaganda in regard to the alleged innocence of accused Nazi warcriminals John Demjanjuk and Andrija Artukovic:There is plenty of evidence that John Demanjuk —an American deported to Israel who may be executedthere – is innocent of the crimes with which he wascharged by the U.S. Justice Department’s Office ofSpecial Investigations (OSI), in part with the use ofKGB-generated documents. And now there is alsoevidence that Andrija Artukovic, who died in aCommunist Yugoslavian prison at age 88 after beingdeported, was not the war criminal he was portrayedby the OSI to be. Thanks to Congressman BillDannemeyer and Dave Drier, both CaliforniaRepublicans, the Justice Department’s Office ofProfessional Responsibility is now looking intomisconduct by the OSI. It’s too late for Artukovic, butmaybe we can use it to quench the anti-Germanbigotry that the Nazi specter is used to stir up.After all, the Nazis ruled Germany for 12 years a longtime ago. The Germans are a great people. I’m sick46

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIof anti-Germanism, which is not – needless to say –a hate crime. In fact, it is – like anti-whitism and anti-Christianism – an approved belief. How about aGerman Anti-Defamation League?In May 2011 a German court sentenced John Demjanjuk to fiveyears in prison for his role in the killing of 27,900 Jews at a Nazideath camp but Ron Paul knows better. During World War II AndrijaArtuković was named the Minister of the Interior in the newly formedNazi Serbian puppet government. As such Artuković was closelyinvolved in the mass murder of Serbs, Jews, Roma and the openingof concentration camps such as Jasenovac. There is no doubt as tohis guilt. After the war he escaped via Switzerland to Ireland andthen finally to California, where he lived until the mid-1980s. Hisextradition was requested by the Yugoslav (Serbian) authorities tobe put on the trial for war crimes. The court in Zagreb sentencedhim to death on May 14, 1986. These are the mass murderingvermin Paul claims were innocent. Only someone who condonesgenocide like Paul would have sympathy for these two evilmurderers.47

A. J. WEBERMANAs they did in this newsletter Paul and Carto frequently quotedPauls "old colleague," Representative William Dannemeyer -- whoadvocated quarantining people with AIDS--praising him for"speaking out fearlessly despite the organized power of the gaylobby." Dannemeyer once compared Nelson Mandela to WillieHorton, read graphic homosexual acts on the floor of Congress, andinfamously claimed that airborne spores caused AIDS, a disease hesaid was "God’s way of punishing gays."The Spotlight supported the candidacy of the racist swineDavid Duke and Duke appeared at many of their events. Duke wasa KKK Grand Wizard and a member of the American Nazi Party.Duke:Jews are trying to exterminate our race. I think,probably in a moral sense, the Jewish people havebeen a blight. And they probably deserve to go intothe ashbin of history. But saying that and actuallyshooting or killing people in masses, are two differentthings. Im not advocating extermination. I think thebest thing is to resettle them in someplace wherethey cant exploit others. And I dont think they canlive among themselves, I really dont. Lets put it thisway. I question whether 6 million Jews actually diedin Nazi death camps. There are two major sourcesfor Holocaust stories. One is the Nuremburg war-48

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIcrimes trial, which has been shown by all honesthistorians to be a farce of justice. Another source isthe great body of literature and media work, and atleast 90% of that material is from biased Jewishsources. 21Ron Paul supported David Dukes bid to become a UnitedStates Senator:The Duke VictoryDavid Duke received 44% of the vote in the Senateprimary race I in Louisiana, 60% of the white vote,and 9% of the block vote. This totaled 100,000 morevotes than the current governor when he won.Duke lost the election. but he scared the blazes outof the Establishment. If the official Republican hadntbeen ordered to drop out, he might have won.Certainly there would have boon a run-off.Duke’s platform called for tax cuts, no quotas, noaffirmative action, no welfare and no busing."Tonight, we concede the election" he said. "But wewill never concede our fight for equal rights for allAmericans.”To many voters, this seems like just plain goodsense. Duke carried baggage from his past but thevoters were willing to overlook that. And if he hadbeen afforded the forgiveness an ex-communist gets,he might have von.Liberal columnists like Richard Cohen of theWashington Post say he got so "many votes becauseLouisianans were racist and ignorant. Baloney.21. Evelyn Rich interview, February 198649

A. J. WEBERMANDavid Broder, also of the Post and equally liberal,writing on an entirely different subject, had it right:“No one wants to talk about (race) publicly, but if youask any campaign consultant or pollster privately,you can confirm the sad reality that a great manyworking-class and middle-class white Americans arefar less hostile to the rich and their tax breaks, thanthey are to the poor and minorities with their welfareand affirmative-action programs.”Liberals are notoriously blind to the sociologicaleffects of their own programs. David Duke was hurtby his past. How many more Dukes are there waitingin the wings without such a taint?50

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThe Nazi waiting in the wings with less baggage is Ron Paulhimself, as he never openly donned the swastika or a Klan robe asDavid Duke did, as shown in the photographs on the previous page.Liberty Lobby and Spotlight helped start the Populist Party, whichran Duke as its presidential candidate in 1988. In that race, Dukereceived 48,267 votes across the nation.The Ron Paul Survival Newsletter accused Israel of being theperpetrator behind the bombing of a Berlin Disco.A LEAD BALLOON to the Reagan administration forlying about the bombing of Libya and attemptedkilling of Khadafy. It was clear at the time that thisunconstitutional act of war was a trumped-up affairfor U.S. political reasons, and now it turns out –51

A. J. WEBERMANaccording to the West German police – that there isno “Libyan connection” with the woman who bombedthe disco in Berlin, killing a U. S. soldier andtriggering the Libyan raid. If anything, she was incahoots with Syria, or Israel’s Mossad, which alwaysseeks to stir up anti-Arab feeling here.Paul had the same Spotlight line that the Mossad was behindterrorism and was running false flag operations. Paul knew betterthan a Berlin court that convicted four Libyan-connected terrorists inthe 1986 bombing of a West Berlin disco that killed two U.S. soldiersand a Turkish woman. The court said the bombing was planned bymembers of the Libyan secret service and workers at the LibyanEmbassy in then-East Berlin.The Spotlight constantly ran articles about the USS Libertyaccusing Israel of deliberately attacking the American ship.A Spotlight report of November 21, 1977 purported to implicate theCIAs counter-intelligence chief, James J. Angleton, in havingconspired with Israel in orchestrating the attack on the Liberty.An Israeli loyalist who headed the CIAs liaison withIsraels intelligence agency, the Mossad, and whoalso played a key role in helping Israel develop itsnuclear arsenal (in defiance of President John F.Kennedy), Angleton believed the destruction ofthe Liberty could be used as a "Pearl Harbor" or"Remember the Maine" type incident to inflameAmerican passions against the Arabs.Paul took the same line in his newsletter:52

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIA Hero Honors HeroesMarine hero Pete McCloskey, my former colleague inthe House, has always been a man of courage. Themost recent example was his dedication of a newpublic library in Grafton, Wisconsin.Courage to dedicate a library? Yes, because of amassive and vituperative campaign against theprivate donors who raised more than a million dollarsfor the town’s new library and then named it in honorof the U.S.S. Liberty. This is the first memorial to the34 dead and the 171 wounded American sailors fromthe Liberty, which was deliberately assaulted byIsraeli torpedo rocket, and machine gun fire in 1967to disguise Israel’s sneak attack on Syria.. The U.S.flag was flying, and previous Israeli reconnaissanceflights had identified the ship as American. Not one ofthe survivors, not one U.S. official (at least whentalking off the record), doubts the attack wasdeliberate. It went on for hours, and included strafingof wounded sailors in a lifeboat. But the sailors andtheir ship might have fallen off the edge of the earth,for all the attention they got. It was down the memoryhole.`A 1995 issue of the Ron Paul Survival Report, speculated thatthe federal government bombed the Alfred P. Murrah FederalBuilding in Oklahoma City.22Oklahoma City22. http://www.buzzfeed.com/jamiekirchick/paul-newsletter-ok-city-was-an-inside-job-55m253

A. J. WEBERMANWere far from knowing everything, or even manythings, about the horrific bombing of the OklahomaCity federal building.The latest rumors are tying this to the private militias.Is the government-media combine set to smeareveryone who questions the wonderfulness of thefederal government? That’s clearly their plan,whether or not the criminal responsible turn out to be“right-wing extremists.”Some people even think that the government itselfcould have been responsible. Certainly it has beenworried about its waning authority and respectamong the people, and such an event builds up thecentral government.The government would not use its own agents, thesepeople say. Spy agencies frequently use false-flagrecruitment. That is, the crazed men recruited into aright-wing terrorist cell would not know they wereactually working for the BAT, for example.Spotlight ran a similar story:No Way Truck Bomb Destroyed MurrahBy Mike BlairAn Oklahoma grand jury has heard more evidencesuggesting the federal government has covered upmany facts about the Murrah building bombing.Retired Air Force Gen. Benton K. Partin has told theOklahoma County grand jury there is no way a crudebomb consisting of a mixture of ammonium nitratefertilizer and fuel oil (ANFO) was responsible for the1995 destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah FederalOffice Building in Oklahoma City. Partin said he54

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIbelieves four separate charges, placed within thebuilding, were responsible for the devastation. TheJustice Department contends a single ANFO bombbuilt within a Ryder rental truck and parked in front ofthe building destroyed it.23“Four separate charges, placed within the building?” Soundfamiliar? “Internal demolition?” This is what the 9/11 revisionistsclaimed took place six years later when the World Trade Center wasdestroyed.The Spotlight contained numerous articlesdeclaring the innocence of Ernst Zundel, aHolocaust denying fat Nazi swine. This madesense as Willis Carto had started the Institutefor Historical Review (IHR) the firstorganization dedicated to Holocaust denial.Carto even sent Holocaust denier BradleySmith to Canada in 1984 to cover the trial ofZundel for The Spotlight. Ernst Zundel was deported from Canadaand convicted of Holocaust denial in Germany. He described hiscaptivity to The Spotlight saying, "I was held in solitary confinementwith no windows, a light burning around the clock and apeephole....Sort of how Rudolf Hess was treated." Zundel spoke atnumerous Holocaust denial Nazi conferences sponsored by WillisCarto. This is from the Ron Paul Newsletter:Would the New Republic, which has been sickeninglypompous on Rushdie and in its hymns to secularhumanism, defend things it would find heretical? Theanswer is no. This liberal magazine has pastdefended Canada’s “anti-hate” law, which was usedto fine and jail a Canadian author, Ernst Zundel, whoquestioned the historical reality of the Holocaust.Liberal newspapers like the Washington Post andthe Boston Globe have also praised the Canadian23. http://www.libertylobby.org/articles/1997/19971006murrah_bomb.html55

A. J. WEBERMANlaw and this prosecution. I’ll believe Establishmentliberals are really committed to free speech when Isee Norman Mailer and his cohorts wearing “I amErnst Zundel” buttons and holding readings of hisworks.I personally am offended by writings advocatingfascism, socialism, Communism, and other forms ofspecial-interest big government. Many peopleunderstandably find Zundel’s writings offensive. Buthis case is no different in principle from Rushdie’s,except that Zundel is poor and in jail, and Rushdie isrich and protected.So there it is in black and white, under the guise of “freespeech” Paul defended another Nazi like himself. Note how anti-hate law appears in quotations. He called Zundel a “Canadianauthor who questioned the reality of the Holocaust” and not a Nazi.He wanted to have readings of his works! Note that Paul is offendedby a bunch of other isms but not offended by Nazism. “Specialinterest big government” is another way of saying ZionistOccupational Government.More evidence that Paul parrots theSpotlight, Liberty Lobby line comes from EricRittberg (who is half-Jewish on his mother’s56

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIside). Rittberg was a former Senior Aide to US Congressman RonPaul who defected. From 1997 to 2003 he was CampaignCoordinator for Ron Paul for Congress, from 1995 to 1996 he wasthe National Organizer of Draft Ron Paul for President Committee,and from 1991 to 1992 he was Travel Aide then Personal Assistantto Paul who was the Libertarian Candidate for President from 1987to 1988. Rittberg was a top aide to Ron Paul for 17 years until heleft the fold to run against Paul. Paul wrote this, “Eric, yourenthusiasm for liberty is infectious. Stay that way. Your help isdeeply appreciated-- US Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX).”Mark Lane, a Jew who worked for Spotlight, claimed WillisCarto never said a bad word about Jews. Rittberg stated:Ron Paul is most assuredly an isolationist. He deniesthis charge vociferously. But I can tell you straightout, I had countless arguments discussions with himover his personal views. For example, he strenuouslydoes not believe the United States had any businessgetting involved fighting Hitler in WW II. Heexpressed to me countless times, that saving theJews, was absolutely none of our business. Whenpressed, he often times brings up conspiracy theorieslike FDR knew about the attacks of Pearl Harborweeks before hand, or that WW II was justblowback, for Woodrow Wilson’s foreign policyerrors, and such.24Numerous repetitive articles appeared in Spotlight that claimedPearl Harbor was orchestrated by FDR to get America involved inWorld War II. Over and over again Ron Paul’s thought is nothing butpure Spotlight Nazi ideology. That is why Ron Paul, like theSpotlight scum that created him, is determined to create a situationwhere millions of Jews are murdered. He is a filthy Nazi pig and he24. http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/12/27/ron-paul-extremism-former-aide/57

A. J. WEBERMANmust be stopped. Paul betrayed his Nazism when he told Congressthat America fought on the wrong side during World War II:Any academic discussion questioning the wisdom ofour policies surrounding World War II is met withshrill accusations of anti-Semitism and Nazi lover. Noone is ever even permitted, without derision by themedia, the university intellectuals and the politicians,to ask why the United States allied itself with themurdering Soviets and then turned over EasternEurope to them while ushering in a 45-year saber-rattling, dangerous Cold War period.25America should have aligned itself with theAxis Powers? That is the implication here.There is no doubt in this researchers mindthat if “Herr Von Paul” existed in a differentera he would have been part of The AmericaFirst Committee or the German-AmericanBund two Nazi front groups. The AmericaFirst Committee preached “isolationism”before World War II. The America First Committee was really notisolationist – they were a Nazi-financed front group put in place tokeep America out of World War II so that Germany could defeatRussia and England. One of America First’s leaders was the aviatorLaura Ingalls. During World War II she was arrested and chargedwith being an un-registered agent of the Nazi German government,and though she always claimed she had been acting on her own asan anti-Nazi spy, she was convicted and imprisoned for twentymonths.26Father Thomas Coughlin, another prominent AmericanFirster, was charged with sedition during World War II. Compare theAmerica First Committee four basic principles with those of RonPaul:25. http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/intellectual.html26. The Nazi Hydra in America: Suppressed History of a Century, WallStreet and ... By Glen Yeadon, John Hawkins-page 16158

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI AMERICA FIRST: The United States mustbuild an impregnable defense forAmerica. PAUL: The United States must build an impregnablemissile defense for America. Paul: “Preparedness isa word that has been thrown around a lot recently,but it begs the question ‘prepared for what?’ Nonation attacked ours, no nation has threatened ours,no sane leader would do so as it would be the deathwarrant of his own nation, his own people, and likelyhis own self. We are prepared to repel an attack andmeet force with force but not necessarily to protectour nation and the populace. We are still vulnerableto a missile attack and have done little to protectagainst such a possibility.” AMERICA FIRST: No foreign power, nor group of[Axis] powers, can successfully attack a preparedAmerica. PAUL: No foreign power like Iran can successfullyattack a prepared fortress America. AMERICA FIRST: American democracy can bepreserved only by keeping out of the European war. PAUL: American democracy can be preserved onlyby keeping out of the Israeli-Iranian war. AMERICA FIRST: "Aid short of war" weakensnational defense at home and threatens to involveAmerica in war abroad. PAUL "Foreign Aid to Israel short of war" weakensnational defense at home and threatens to involveAmerica in war abroad.59

A. J. WEBERMANUnder the guise of isolationism the Jew-hating Nazi Ron Paul isattempting to keep America out of a war between Israel and Iran soIsrael can be defeated.The German American Bund was formed in July 1933 from theashes of previous German American societies. Wilhelm Bohle, aGerman undersecretary of state, organized the Nazi support forGermans abroad, consisting of agitation among German immigrantsand German Americans, cooperation with other anti-Semitic groups,and direct espionage. The Pauls’ were Pennsylvanian German-Americans and susceptible to recruitment. Allen Goeppel and AntonFuchs were Bund leaders in Pittsburgh. Peter Gaenger, was head ofthe propaganda section of the Bund there. Although FBI records ofBund membership that have been released list only the Bundleadership evidence suggested that Ron Paul’s grandfather orfather might very well have been a Bund member.Paul’s Nazism runs deep in his German blood. His grandfatherCaspar Paul, born in Hohenzell, Schluchtern, Prussia August 3,1866, died [living 1930] was said to have emigrated from Germanyat the age of 14. Caspar Paul was married on May 4, 1899 toSophia Ziegler, born in Pennsylvania, on September 15, 1874, diedFebruary 22, 1964. Paul’s grandfather became a truck farmer inPittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and eventually started a successful dairyfarm. He had 4 sons and 1 daughter. His second son, HowardCasper Paul, was Ron Paul’s father.Howard Caspar Paul was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania onAugust 19, 1904. He was married on October 23, 1929 to MargaretDumont, who was born in Pennsylvania on March 7, 1908, and whodied on July 10, 2001. Howard Caspar Paul died on May 23, 1997.He had an eighth grade education.27When conscription started in 1940 Howard Casper Paul was 36years old. At this time those aged 18 to 45 were immediately liablefor induction yet there is nothing that I can find that indicatesHoward performed any military service. Interestingly enough, Paul27. http://www.wargs.com/political/paul.html60

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIclaims that it was his father who first made him aware of the plight ofPalestinians:Though I was not active in politics in high school orcollege, I recall attending a Rotary Club meeting inthe early 1950s with my father. The speaker was acollege student from Palestine studying in the UnitedStates. Her story was about how her family had beenforced from their property, which had been in thefamily for centuries, but was then used for Israelisettlements. I can recall thinking at the time that thisdid not seem fair to me, and it doesnt seem fair tome today.28This story is made up. I can’t see a Rotary Club having muchinterest in Palestinians in the early 1950’s nor do I believe therewere Palestinian exchange students all over the United States.“Settlements” didn’t start until Israel annexed the West Bank in the1970’s.Grandpa Casper Paul may have visited Nazi Germany. He hadleft Germany before the war, but he and his wife returned there after28. Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our FreedomBy Ron Paul61

A. J. WEBERMANthe armistice. How long after the armistice that ended World War I?Were they there when Hitler was coming to power or was in power?During one of his speeches in Congress Paul stated, “Thefoolish entrance into World War I to satisfy Wilson’s ego led to adisastrous peace at Versailles, practically guaranteeing World WarII.” Patrick Buchanan had a similar analysis:It was Wilsonism, liberal interventionism, not“isolationism” that created the moral political swampin which fascism, Hitlerism, and Stalinism werespawned. Unable to deal with the truth – that theirown heros produced the disasters that may yet ringdown the curtain on the Western Civilization.In Promoting Democracy--An Obsession Whose Time HasPassed he stated:Promoting democracy is now our nation’s highestideal. Wilson started it with his ill-advised drive tofoolishly involve us in World War I. His utopian dreamwas to make the world safe for democracy. Instead,his naiveté and arrogance promoted our involvementin the back-to-back tragedies of World War I andWorld War II. It’s hard to imagine the rise of Hitler inWorld War II without the Treaty of Versailles.Hitler called the Germans who signed the Treaty of Versaillesthe November criminals and called for their death. The Nazi line isthat it was the harsh treatment of Germany that was to blame for therise of Hitler, not economic chaos or the threat of Communism orthe inherent evil of the German Nazis. Paul stated:Mr. Speaker, I have come forward in the past tosuggest that the history of this century has shown usthat the foreign policy of so-called “pragmaticinterventionists” has created a disastrous situation.Specifically, I have pointed to the unintended62

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIconsequences of our government’s interventions.Namely, I have identified how World War One helpedcreate the environment for the holocaust and how itthus helped create World War Two andthermonuclear war. And, I’ve mentioned how theSecond World War resulted in the enslavement ofmuch of Europe behind an iron curtain setting off thecold war, and spread the international communismand then our own disastrous foray into Vietnam. Yes,all of these wars and tragedies wars hot and cold,were in part caused by the so-called “war to end allwars.”29There is something strange about the following sentence takenfrom the above. “I have identified how World War One helped createthe environment for the holocaust and how it thus helped createWorld War Two and thermonuclear war.” “It” can refer to World WarI or “it” can also refer to “the holocaust” which would imply WorldWar II was fought for the Jews, a common anti-Jewish canard. Inthe rest of this speech Paul focused on the Communists, rather thanthe Nazis. Spotlight publisher Willis Carto agreed with Paul:Hitlers defeat was the defeat of Europe. And ofAmerica. How could we have been so blind? Theblame, it seems, must be laid at the door of theinternational Jews. It was their propaganda, lies anddemands which blinded the West to what Germanywas doing.30CARTO AND FRANCIS PARKER YOCKEYRon Paul would not have gotten theSpotlight mailing list had he not met withWillis Carto. Carto has long been at the29. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1999-05-13/html/CREC-1999-05-13-pt1-PgE953.htm30. http://www.adl.org/holocaust/carto.asp63

A. J. WEBERMANforefront of the Nazi movement in the United States and the Nazisponsored Holocaust denial movement worldwide. Willis Carto wasemployed by the John Birch Society as a Major Coordinator forapproximately 4 months in 1959. He was fired by JohnBirch Society founder, Robert Welch for anti-Semitism.Carto would soon join forces with Dr.William Pierce a senior research scientist ata Connecticut aerospace firm. In 1965Pierce quit the John Birch Society andjoined the American Nazi Party (GeorgeLincoln Rockwell’s group). In 1970, Pierce,a former American Nazi Party officer andformer editor of the National Socialist World, left the NationalSocialist White Peoples Party, the successor to the American NaziParty, to join the National Youth Alliance which was originallyestablished by Willis Carto as the "Youth for Wallace" campaign insupport of the 1968 Presidential bid of racist Alabama GovernorGeorge Wallace. After Wallace lost the Presidential race, Cartorenamed his organization the National Youth Alliance and attemptedto recruit activists to his group. Pierce, like Paul, was a highlyeducated man, and that is what made both of them extremelydangerous Nazis.Pierce is perhaps best known for his 1978 book, The TurnerDiaries, which depicts the violent overthrow of the “Jew-controlled” U.S. government. The book served as an inspiration forvarious right-wing terrorists who grasped, admired, and attempted toimplement its message including Timothy McVeigh (1995 OklahomaCity Federal Building bombing) and Robert J. Mathews (whosegroup, The Order, was patterned upon the white revolutionarygroups in Turner Diaries.)The Order was responsible for a crime spree in 1983 to 1984which included counterfeiting, bank and armored car robberies,bombing a synagogue, and murder – all in the service of their anti-Semitic, racist ideology.64

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIt should be noted that some of the major participants in TheOrder were introduced to conspiracy theories about U.S. historythrough their membership in the John Birch Society – e.g. RobertMathews and David Lane. Mathews also joined William Pierce’sgroup, National Alliance.Paul was a Bircher but denies ever belonging to the group,though he was listed as a subscriber to its magazine, AmericanOpinion, according to Birch records in Brown University’s archives.31And when he planned his first run for office in 1974, he has said, thefirst person he called for advice was Larry McDonald, a right-wingcongressman who was later president of the John Birch Society.Paul and the John Birch Society are also 50-50 co-owners of a 3.8-acre property in Sweeny, Texas that was bequeathed to them by aconstituent of the congressman who died in 2010. On April 4, 2008Congressman Ron Paul endorsed The John Birch Society in astatement from his office. His statement also congratulated theSociety on being “a great patriotic organization” now in its 50th year.Paul stated,The John Birch Society is a great patrioticorganization featuring an educational program solidlybased on constitutional principles. I congratulate theSociety in this, its 50th year. I wish them continuedsuccess and endorse their untiring efforts to foster‘less government, more responsibility … and withGod’s help … a better world.’32Paul also agreed to be the keynote speaker at the Society’s50th anniversary celebration, October 2ndthrough the 5th, 2008 inAppleton, Wisconsin.31. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/us/politics/for-ron-paul-a-distinctive-worldview-of-long-standing.html?pagewanted=all32. http://iowajohnbirchsociety.com/2008/07/24/membership-opportunities-with-jbs/65

A. J. WEBERMANLet Willis tell you more about himself:Willis Allison Carto was born July 17, 1926 in FortWayne, Indiana. After graduation from high school in1944, he went into the Army to fight for the gloriousdemocracy of his country, the survival of Sovietcommunism, a third and fourth term for Roosevelt, achance to kill Germans by the thousands as desiredby Churchill, Eisenhower and the Zionists, part ofPalestine for them as a bonus, vast riches for thebankers and war suppliers, coffin makers and flagmakers. He earned a Purple Heart when he receiveda memento from a Jap infantryman on Cebu Island,P. I. on May 5, 1945. In 1953, with Aldrich Blake, hefounded Liberty & Property, Inc. and published thefirst edition of seven which followed of the FirstNational Directory of “Rightist” Groups andOrganizations in the United States and SomeForeign Countries. In 1955, he began publication ofthe monthly Right newsletter and established theResearch Department of Liberty Lobby, which beganpublication of Liberty Letter in 1960.66

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIn 1964 he published Western Destiny magazine untilhe merged it with The American Mercury in 1966. In1975 he began publication of The Spotlight weeklynewspaper and in 1979 he founded the Institute forHistorical Review and began publication of thescholarly Journal for Historical Review and organizedthe first International Revisionist Conference in LosAngeles, which was followed by ten others until 1993.The first issue of the monthly Institute for HistoricalReview Newsletter was published in January 1981,followed by 90 others until late 1993. He publishedand edited the Washington Observer Newsletter fromAugust 15, 1965 through September 15, 1976. In1994 he founded The Barnes Review, a bimonthlymagazine of authentic history, of which he is thepublisher. In 2001, he began publication ofthe American Free Press, a weekly newspaper.Throughout his career, he has published over 200titles of patriotic, nationalist books dealing withdifferent subjects. He has written under variouspseudonyms as well as his own name.33What Carto omitted from his autobiography is that Carto was aclose associate of Francis Parker Yockey, a post-war Naziintelligence agent. Yockey killed himself rather than reveal thestructure of ODESSA, the organization of Nazi SS murderers whoescaped the post war dragnet of the Allies. After Yockey wasarrested for passport violations Willis Carto visited him in jail andslipped him the cyanide he used to commit suicide. Aside from hiscellmate, Carto was the last person to see Parker alive. Check theend of the New York Times (June 18, 1960) article that I havereprinted below for his motivation in committing suicide.33. http://www.williscarto.net/html/about_willis.html67

A. J. WEBERMANCarto wrote this about Yockey:In 1952 the State Department refused to renew hispassport. Repeatedly, he applied; each time he wasrejected. A game then developed between the FBIand Yockey, for the FBI had received orders to keephim under surveillance at all times. When he droppedtemporarily from sight, as he did frequently, hisfriends and relatives and contacts were constantlyinterrogated by agents who—they kept repeating—“just want to talk to him.”The FBI and CIA wanted to talk to Yockeyabout ODESSA an organization that Yockey wasa courier for: The outcome of a post war Nazimeeting in Strasbourg was the genesis of anorganization; well-financed and well-organized,with the express purpose of helping fleeing Nazisescape justice. This organization was called theOrganization Der Ehemaligen SS-Angehörigen(The Organization of former SS members)ODESSA. Nazi Hunter Simon Wiesenthal learned68

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIof ODESSA accidentally during conversations with a formermember of German counter-espionage who he met during theNuremberg trials. The source said the organization was set up in1946 after many Nazis already had been imprisoned. Those in jailcontacted friends and aid committees that had been established topromote the welfare of prisoners. The assistance went beyondhumanitarian aid, a subterfuge, to abetting their escape. In shortorder, ODESSA, built a large and reliable network geared to achieveits ends, and began operations. Routes were mapped and contactswere established. Influential Nazis vanished as they were secretlyushered out of Germany and assisted in starting new lives underfalse names in foreign countries. At the end of the war, only ahandful of high-ranking Nazi officials stood trial. Many who wereguilty of war crimes escaped with the help of ODESSA.As Yockey’s early association with the Brownshirts of WilliamDudley Pelley and the Father Coughlin movement indicated,Yockey was from an early age drawn to Fascism and Nazism.Pelley was arrested in April 1942 and indicted in May for violation ofthe Espionage Act. He was convicted and sentenced to 15 yearsimprisonment. In 1944, he was again indicted on practically identicalcharges. Yockey had himself discharged from the military duringWorld War II (he was diagnosed as having paranoid type dementiapraecox), and as a successful lawyer and District Attorney in Detroitobtained a job with the prosecution team of the Nuremburg WarCrimes Tribunals in Germany, for the purposes of infiltration and ofseeking out diehard Nazis in post-War Germany for exfiltration.Yockey was the first Nazi to deny the existence of the gas chambersand mass murder in his book Imperium.These fact-creations were as nothing, however, tothe massive, post-war, "concentration-camp"propaganda of the Culture-distorting regime based inWashington. This propaganda announced that6,000,000 members of the Jewish Culture-Nation-State-Church-People-Race had been killed inEuropean camps, as well as an indeterminate69

A. J. WEBERMANnumber of other people. The propaganda was on aworld-wide scale, and was of a mendacity that wasperhaps adapted to a uniformized mass, but wassimply disgusting to discriminating Europeans. Thepropaganda was technically quite complete."Photographs" were supplied in millions of copies.Thousands of the people who had been killedpublished accounts of their experiences in thesecamps. Hundreds of thousands more made fortunesin post-war black-markets. "Gas-chambers" that didnot exist were photographed, and a "gasmobile" wasinvented to titillate the mechanically-minded.Keep this in mind if you doubt Ron Paul is a Nazi: Ron Paultraced back to Carto who traced back to Yockey who traced back toODESSA and ODESSA traced back to Hitler so Paul can be tracedback to Hitler, because that is where this mild mannered pediatricianis really coming from. But the way Carto describes Liberty Lobby ithas no connection with Hitlerism and German Nazism:Liberty Lobby: A united voice for patriotic Americans.Liberty Lobby was conceived in 1955 as a pressuregroup for patriotism -- a lobby to fight the organized,special-interest lobbies (both foreign and domestic)that proliferate in the nations capital. Since then,numerous other lobbies and groups have tried toemulate that basic concept.A decade after the war ended the Nazis began to regroup as alobby against Israel [foreign special interest lobbies] and againstAmerican Jews [domestic special interest groups].Not only was Liberty Lobby intended to function as alobbying force in the nations capital, but also as asource of information and as a clearing house forgrassroots patriotic efforts around the country, bothcomplementing and uniting their efforts. From 1955-70

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI1958 intensive coast-to-coast fund-raising effortswere undertaken. Patriotic leaders from around thenation closed ranks, eager to set the populistInstitution in motion.The Nazis were offering their services to other racist, Jew-hating groups such as the KKK and wished to form a broad coalitionagainst the Jews and Blacks.A major advance came when on June 23, 1958,Liberty Lobbys Research Department wasestablished. The Washington beachhead was thusbroached. On August 30, 1958, another milestone:Liberty Lobby published the first congressional votinganalysis ever issued by a patriotic organization,laying the groundwork for thousands of similar votingrecords compiled yearly by others. Liberty Lobbycontinues to issue its own Liberty Ledger, compilingthe voting records of all senators and congressmen.The Nazis were conducting statistical analysis in order todetermine which members of Congress could be co-opted by them.Liberty Lobbys first legislative victory came on March6, 1959 - the fledgling populist lobby orchestrateddefeat of a Senate bill (drawn up by RockefellerRepublican Senator Jacob Javits of New York) thatwould have barred from the mails all citizen groupswhich disagreed with the liberal Supreme Court.Senator Javits wanted the U.S. Postal Service to declare Naziliterature as obscene and not allow it to be disseminated throughthe U.S. mail.By mid-1959, a formal office for Liberty Lobby wasestablished in the nation’s capital. Col. EugenePomeroy agreed to serve as the Washingtonsecretary of the office.71

A. J. WEBERMANAt a meeting in Washington’s Army-Navy Club in 1953, GeneralPedro del Valle, Lieutenant Colonel John H. Coffman, USMC (Ret.);and Lieutenant Colonel Eugene Cowles Pomeroy (Ret.) createdDAC, the Defenders of the American Constitution, electing del Valleas president to spread the “anti-New World Order gospel” into thehighest ranks of the U.S. military hoping to instigate a military coupagainst the Eisenhower Presidency. DAC claimed its main goal wasto purge the United States of any communist influence. The ideabehind the group was to allegedly organize the citizens in each stateas vigilantes against sabotage, terrorism and other forms of treason,and give them a national voice. Actually these officers hoped toform their own army just as Hitler had formed his own private armycalled Sturm Abteilung (Storm Section). The SA (also known asStormtrooper or Brownshirts) were instructed to disrupt themeetings of political opponents and to protect Hitler from revengeattacks. Another thing that may have been going through Carto’sevil mind was the possibility of a putsch, such as Hitler’s did with thehelp of the military in the infamous Beer Hall Putsch. Cartocontinues:Shortly thereafter, the populist Institutions foundingBoard of Policy (BOP) was set in motion, composedof a group of highly selected patriots of nationalstature. Founding chairman of the BOP was the lateCol. Curtis B. Dall who assumed the post in 1960.Spotlight’s publisher and editors, like allNazis, hated FDR because he institutedlend-lease and ultimately brought America towar against the Axis powers. Spotlightcontained numerous so-called exposesabout FDR and even hired Col. Curtis B.Dall, the former son-in-law of FDR, as itsfront man. Dall was active in New York City’ssocial life hosting cotillions and fund raisersfor various causes as he was married to FDR’s daughter when FDRwas Governor of New York. Dall had become active in politics in the72

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI1940s and in 1948 campaigned for Dixiecrat Strom Thurmond, whowas the Presidential nominee of the racist States Rights Party. InJuly 1964 Dall was the head of the Constitution Party that supportedthe racist George Wallace when he ran for president.34Asdocumented later in this book Ron Paul was a supporter of theConstitution Party. Because of his social position the New YorkTime’s obituary for Dall described Spotlight as “an anti-Communistorganization.” Carto continues:Treasurer of Liberty Lobby is Willis A. Carto. He hasheld that office since he founded the Institution in1955. On November 24, 1960 the first issue of themonthly Liberty Letter (a newsletter which ultimatelyevolved into the weekly Spotlight newspaper) wasreleased. The purpose of Liberty Letter was unique,in that it was designed to promote political action, notjust education. At this time there were just 2,000subscribers. On January 22, 1966, control of LibertyLobbys Board of Policy was turned over toAmericans who signed an oath of loyalty to the U.S.constitution and who pledged regular financialsupport to Liberty Lobby.What does the last part of this paragraph mean? Why would themembers of the Board of Policy have to be Americans and loyal tothe U. S. Constitution. Loyalty oaths were for communists. Carto ishinting that he began receiving foreign funding for Liberty Lobby,possibly from the Saudis. The Saudis quietly passed along moneyto a variety of anti-Jewish groups, including those who purveyHolocaust-denial literature. To take just one example, WilliamGrimstad, author of The Six Million Reconsidered, worked after1977 as a registered Saudi agent. Noontide Press published theAnti-Zion by William Grimstad.34. http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F10813F83E591A728DDDA00994DF405B848AF1D373

A. J. WEBERMANAnother possible source of Liberty Lobby and Spotlight fundingmight have been Nazi gold. Raubgold, "stolen gold" is the goldtransferred by Nazi Germany to overseas banks during the SecondWorld War. The present whereabouts of Nazi gold that disappearedinto European banking institutions in 1945 is unknown. In addition tothe gold the Nazis also stole silver from the nations they conquered.In 1973 Liberty Lobby established its popular silver minting andselling division, Liberty Trust, today the oldest private mint in theU.S. specializing in pure silver.Since coming to Washingtonin 1961, Liberty Lobby grewexponentially: From 2,000 tosome 100,000 paid membersand subscribers at present(although for several yearsduring the early 1980s paid circulation actuallysurpassed one-third of a million readers); From oneunpaid employee to over 60 employees; From arented desk in the National Press Building to its ownheadquarters two blocks from the Capitol Building;From an annual operating budget of $10,000 to $5million. Numerous major outreach efforts were alsoundertaken during the subsequent several decades:Issuance of a special 1964 campaign report, LBJ: APolitical Biography, which made history for this typeof publication by distributing 14 million copies,published and they were distributed from severallocations around the country. As a result of the LBJreport, Liberty Lobbys monthly The Liberty Letterskyrocketed to some 150,000 subscribers - aphenomenon unlike anything yet seen in the populistmovement.LBJ: A Political Biography was a smear sheet that was put as apaid insert in many local U.S. newspapers or distributed for free74

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIdoor to door. Post-war Nazi literature had never received suchwidespread dissemination before!Publication of 48 special Emergency Liberty Lettershighlighting major legislative emergency campaigns,urging patriots to take action on important mattersbefore Congress. Lobbying congressional offices andappearing before congressional committees on aregular basis. In 1965 a Liberty Lobby spokesmanappeared before congressional committees no lessthan 15 times.In the mid-1970s Liberty Lobby launched a dailynational radio program which, at its peak, a decadelater, was heard over more than 400 radio stationsaround the country. Entitled This is Liberty Lobby, thebroadcast reached millions of Americans on a regularbasis and helped the populist Institution grow byleaps and bounds.In 1973 Liberty Lobby established its popular silverminting and selling division, Liberty Trust, today theoldest private mint in the U.S. specializing in puresilver.In 1975 the BOP voted to establish a national weeklynewspaper, now known as The Spotlight, to replacethe monthly Liberty Letter. (The Liberty Letter hassince re-emerged as a regular special green wrap-around newsletter sent exclusively to members of theBOP.) The Spotlight, received free by all BOPmembers in good standing, soon evolved into "must"reading for tens of thousands of Americans whosubscribe yearly.In 1990 Liberty Lobby established the Populist ActionCommittee, a non-partisan, Constitutionally-oriented,America First PAC dedicated to helping patriots75

A. J. WEBERMANseeking office not only on the Populist Party ticket,but as independents and in the ranks of the majorparties.The above is just a sketchy overview of some of thepopulist Institutions major efforts over the years.Throughout its history, Liberty Lobby has beenengaged in some of the big battles in officialWashington and around the country. Just to mentiona few: [Carto’s words now appear in bold type so wecan compare them to those of Ron Paul]The fight against NAFTA and GATT for protectionof American jobs and industry;Ron Paul co-sponsored this legislative bill:SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF THE U.S. FROMTHE NAFTA.To provide for the withdrawal of the United Statesfrom the North American Free Trade Agreement. Beit enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United States of America inCongress assembled,(a) Withdrawal of Approval - Notwithstanding anyother provision of law, the approval of the NAFTA bythe Congress provided for in section 101 (a) of NorthAmerican Free Trade Agreement Implementation Actshall cease to be effective beginning on the date thatis six months after the date of the enactment of thisAct.35Derailing the proposed Conference of the States,another high-level scheme to dismantle theAmerican republic;35. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr29/text76

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIEfforts to expose Bilderbergers and Trilateralistsand the Council on Foreign Relations and theirinsidious influence on world affairs.On February 18, 2001, Ron Paul appeared on Radio FreeAmerica, a show founded by Willis Carto. Radio Free America ispart of Carto’s American Free Press, which is labeled as a Nazigroup by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The American FreePress, which markets books like “The Invention of the JewishPeople” and “March of the Titans: A History of the White Race,”urged its subscribers to help it send hundreds of copies of RonPaul’s collected speeches to voters in New Hampshire. The book, itpromises, will “Help Dr. Ron Paul Win the G.O.P. Nomination in2012!” Paul discussed several conspiracy theories. A transcript ofthe show was made available through Spotlight.Here’s Mack calling from Georgia: The TrilateralCommission and the Council on Foreign Relationshave a lot of power in choosing the AmericanPresident. Do you think our elections are just a fraudon the people?Paul: Almost no one gets elected who isn’t friendlywith the Trilateral Commission and the Council onForeign Relations. If you are not in tune with them,the national media will crucify you. So you wouldn’twin. I think the people allow themselves to bedeceived.36The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the TrilateralCommission plays into all sorts of conspiracy theories about worldgovernment and control by the elite. This elite is often identified asInternational Bankers, the Rothschild’s, Kuhn-Loeb, GoldmanSachs; dog whistle words for Jews. Ron Paul:You referred to who really pulls the strings. For yearsnow, its been claimed by many, and theres pretty36. If you are not in tune with them, the national media will crucify you.77

A. J. WEBERMANgood evidence, that those who are involved in theTrilateral Commission and the Council on ForeignRelations usually end up in positions of power. And Ibelieve this is true. If you look at the FederalReserve, if you look at key positions at the WorldBank or the IMF, they all come from these groups. Ifyou have national television on, you might see a bigdebate about the Far East crisis, and you haveBrzezinski and Kissinger talking about how to do it.One says dont invade today, invade tomorrow. Andthe other says, invade immediately. Thats the onlydifference you find between the Rockefellertrilateralists.37Defeat of the proposed Constitutional conventionto rewrite the supreme law of the land;Combating encroaching power grabs by UnitedNations and other global government bodies thatundermine American sovereignty;In 2006 Ron Paul opposed America’s membership and financing ofthe United Nations and stated,This new [UN Peacekeeping] commission will createthe beginning of a global UN army. It will claim theright to intervene in any conflict anywhere on theglobe, bringing the World Bank and the IMF formallyinto the picture as well. It is a complete new worldorder...3837.http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/12/23/ron_paul_on_the_trilateral_commission.html38.http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/international_monetary_fund.html78

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIPromotion of an America First foreign policy,particularly in the realm of Middle East affairs;That meant cutting off all economic aid to Israel and siding withits enemies. Ron Paul of course has proposed cutting off ALLeconomic aid.Defeat of the Atlantic Union, the purpose ofwhich was to merge the United States withWestern Europe;Advancement of the concept of a "Taxpayers Billof Rights" (ultimately enacted into law);On November 20, 2008 Ron Paul also expressed hisdispleasure with the IRS in a New York Times interview:I want to abolish the income tax, but I don’t want toreplace it with anything. About 45 percent of allfederal revenue comes from the personal income tax.That means that about 55 percent — over half of allrevenue — comes from other sources, like excisetaxes, fees, and corporate taxes. We could eliminatethe income tax, replace it with nothing, and still fundthe same level of big government we had in the late1990s. We don’t need to “replace” the income tax atall. I see a consumption tax as being a little betterthan the personal income tax, and I would vote forthe Fair-Tax if it came up in the House ofRepresentatives, but it is not my goal. We can dobetter.Spearheading the drive for audit reform and theultimate abolition of the Federal Reserve bankingmonopoly;Ron Paul has stated:79

A. J. WEBERMANAbolishing the Federal Reserve will allow Congressto reassert its constitutional authority over monetarypolicy. The United States Constitution grants toCongress the authority to coin money and regulatethe value of the currency. The Constitution does notgive Congress the authority to delegate control overmonetary policy to a central bank. Furthermore, theConstitution certainly does not empower the federalgovernment to erode the American standard of livingvia an inflationary monetary policy.39The fight for tougher immigration laws andcontrol of illegal aliens.Ron Paul,Illegal immigrants enter the country for the expresspurpose of giving birth. But illegal immigrants alsouse emergency rooms, public roads, and publicschools. In many cases they are able to obtainMedicaid, food stamps, public housing, and evenunemployment benefits. We must end the perverseincentives that encourage immigrants to come hereillegally, including the anchor baby incentive.40These again are just a few of the highlights, butthey illustrate the essence of Liberty Lobbyspopulist and nationalist agenda, a record ofconsistency and success.The Spotlight folded in 2001, due a dispute with the Institute forHistorical Review over the money left to Carto by Jean FarrelEdison, the granddaughter of Thomas Edison and the heir toThomas Alva Edison’s fortune. Jean Farrel Edison died in 1985,39. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul504.html40. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1124&Itemid=6980

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIleaving conflicting instructions about thedispersal of her estate. A handwritten willbequeathed the money then estimated at $40million to a South African-born woman who wasEdisons neighbor in Switzerland. CartosHolocaust denial institutes parent corporation,the Legion for the Survival of Freedom also hada claim to the money because Edison left furtherinstructions that only a Legion representative could open the foursafe deposit boxes in Europe, Asia and the United States thatcontained cash certificates for the money. Three of the boxes and$20 million in certificates were found, according to Irwin Suall of theADL, who said the fourth box in Singapore was never located. TheLegion and the neighbor fought over the money in Swiss courts,finally splitting the estate in 1990.The Nazi Paul’s columns were then featured for several yearsin the American Free Press - a publication of Willis Carto containingthe same crap that appeared in Spotlight. The American Free Presssponsored a “First Amendment Festival” in Washington DC. OnlyAmerican Free Press subscribers could attend the event thatfeatured David Duke. Duke lambasted Jews throughout his speechnoting at one point that “the racial policies of Israel are moreextreme than the policies of National Socialist Germany.”The bottom line here is that Ron Paul is part of a group ofcrypto-Nazis Carto determined to create a situation where millionsof Jews are murdered. He is a potential Adolf Hitler, a Nazi bent ongenocide. He must be stopped.81

A. J. WEBERMAN82

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICHAPTER THREENEO-CONFEDERATE, SEGREGATIONISTAND RACISTAnother reason for Ron Paul’s success is that he is the racist ina country with a long history of racism. He is more dangerous thanthe third party racist candidate Governor George Wallace. But, likeGeorge Wallace, Ron Paul is a neo-Confederate, and proudmember of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, which has been labeledas a neo-Confederate organization. In a video with a Confederateflag behind him Paul claimed that the North should have paid to buyslaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than theSouth renouncing slavery. Paul also failed to bring up the fact that itwas the South that started the war by attacking the North in 1861.Paul had this to say about the Civil War and Civil Rights onDecember 23, 2007:Tim Russert: I was intrigued by your comments aboutAbe Lincoln. "According to Paul, Abe Lincoln shouldnever have gone to war; there were better ways ofgetting rid of slavery."83

A. J. WEBERMANPaul: Absolutely. Six hundred thousand Americansdied in a senseless civil war. No, he shouldnt havegone to war. He did this just to enhance and get rid ofthe original intent of the republic. I mean, it was theiron fist…Russert: Wed still have slavery.Paul: Oh, come on, Tim. Slavery was phased out inevery other country of the world. And the way Imadvising that it should have been done is do like theBritish Empire did. You buy the slaves and releasethem. How much would that cost compared to killing600,000 Americans and where it lingered for 100years? I mean, the hatred and all that existed.So every other major country in the world got rid ofslavery without a civil war. I mean, that doesnt soundtoo radical to me. That sounds like a prettyreasonable approach.Paul believed that slavery was only an ancillary issuein the Civil War:While all Americans should be grateful that thiscountry finally extinguished slavery following the CivilWar, many scholars believe that the main issue in theCivil War was the proper balance of power betweenthe states and the federal government. PresidentLincoln himself made it clear that his primarymotivation was to preserve a strong centralgovernment. For example, in a letter to New YorkTribune editor Horace Greeley in 1862, Lincoln said:“My paramount object in this struggle is to save theUnion, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery.If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, Iwould do it; and if I could save it by freeing some andleaving others alone I would also do that. What I do84

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIabout slavery, and the colored race, I do because Ibelieve it helps to save the Union.”41You can find this quotation on numerous racistwebsites to demonstrate that Lincoln hated Blacks.What Paul was trying to tell Congress here was theAbraham Lincoln was a racist who did not care aboutslavery but used the issue to save the Union. TheRussert interview with Paul continues:Let me ask you about race, because I, I read aspeech you gave in 2004, the 40th anniversary of theCivil Rights Act. And you said this: "Contrary to theclaims of supporters of the Civil Rights Act of 64, theact did not improve race relations or enhancefreedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated bythe Civil Rights Act of 64 increased racial tensionswhile diminishing individual liberty." That act gaveequal rights to African-Americans to vote, to live, togo to lunch counters, and you seem to be criticizingit.Rep. Paul: Well, we should do this at a federal level,at a federal lunch counter itd be OK or for themilitary. Just think of how the government, you know,caused all the segregation in the military until afterWorld War II. Tim, youre, not compelled in yourhouse to invite strangers that you dont like. So its aproperty rights issue. And this idea that all privateproperty is under the domain of the federalgovernment I think is wrong. So this -- I think evenBarry Goldwater opposed that bill on the sameproperty rights position and now this thing is totallyout of control. If you happen to like to smoke a cigar,you know the federal governments going to comedown and say youre not allowed to do this.41. http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/lincoln.html85

A. J. WEBERMANRussert: But you would vote against...Russert: You would vote against the Civil Rights Actif, if it was today?Paul: If it were written the same way, where thefederal governments taken over property has nothingto do with race relations. It just happens, Tim, that Iget more support from black people today than anyother Republican candidate, according to somestatistics. And I have a great appeal to people whocare about personal liberties and to those individualswho would like to get us out of wars. So it hasnothing to do with racism, it has to do with theConstitution and private property rights.On July 3, 2004, Ron Paul was the only Congressman to voteagainst a bill hailing the 40th anniversary of the 1964 Civil RightsAct.Mr. Speaker, I rise to explain my objection to H. Res.676. I certainly join my colleagues in urgingAmericans to celebrate the progress this country hasmade in race relations. However, contrary to theclaims of the supporters of the Civil Rights Act of1964 and the sponsors of H. Res. 676, the CivilRights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations orenhance freedom. Instead, the forced integrationdictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increasedracial tensions while diminishing individual liberty.The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the federalgovernment unprecedented power over the hiring,employee relations, and customer service practicesof every business in the country. The result wasa massive violation of the rights of private propertyand contract, which are the bedrocks of freesociety. The federal government has no legitimateauthority to infringe on the rights of private property86

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIowners to use their property as they please and toform (or not form) contracts with terms mutuallyagreeable to all parties. The rights of all privateproperty owners, even those whose actions decentpeople find abhorrent, must be respected if we are tomaintain a free society. This expansion of federalpower was based on an erroneous interpretation ofthe congressional power to regulate interstatecommerce. The framers of the Constitution intendedthe interstate commerce clause to create a free tradezone among the states, not to give the federalgovernment regulatory power over every businessthat has any connection with interstate commerce.The Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only violated theConstitution and reduced individual liberty; it alsofailed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racialharmony and a color-blind society. Federalbureaucrats and judges cannot read minds to see ifactions are motivated by racism. Therefore, the onlyway the federal government could ensure anemployer was not violating the Civil Rights Act of1964 was to ensure that the racial composition of abusiness’s workforce matched the racial compositionof a bureaucrat or judge’s defined body of potentialemployees. Thus, bureaucrats began forcingemployers to hire by racial quota. Racial quotas havenot contributed to racial harmony or advanced thegoal of a color-blind society. Instead, these quotasencouraged racial balkanization, and fostered racialstrife. Of course, America has made great strides inrace relations over the past forty years. However, thisprogress is due to changes in public attitudes andprivate efforts. Relations between the races haveimproved despite, not because of, the 1964 CivilRights Act. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I join insponsors of H. Res. 676 in promoting racial harmonyand individual liberty, the fact is the Civil Rights Act of87

A. J. WEBERMAN1964 did not accomplish these goals. Instead, thislaw unconstitutionally expanded federal power, thusreducing liberty. Furthermore, by prompting race-based quotas, this law undermined efforts to achievea color-blind society and increased racial strife.Therefore, I must oppose H. Res. 676.42Ron Paul’s lifelong friend and close political associate, LewellenRockwell argued that the Civil War "transformed the Americanregime from a federalist system based on freedom to a centralizedstate that circumscribed liberty in the name of public order."Desegregation in the civil rights era, he says, resulted in the"involuntary servitude" of white business owners. In the past,Rockwell has praised the electoral success of European neofascistslike Joerg Haider in Austria and Christoph Blocher in Switzerland.Both Rockwell and Von Mises Institute research director JeffreyTucker are listed on the racist League of the Souths Web page asfounding members. Tucker has written for League publications, andmany League members have taught at the Von Mises Institutesseminars and given presentations at its conferences. One foundingLeague member who still sat on the board of directors in 2007 isJack Kershaw, a lifelong segregationist who once was an official inthe Klan sponsored racist White Citizens Councils of the 1950s and1960s. Kershaw has never hidden his racist views. “Somebodyneeds to say a good word for slavery,” Kershaw told a reporter in1998. “Where in the world are the Negroes better off today than inAmerica?” Martin Luther King assassination patsy James Earl Rayhired Jack Kershaw as his appeals attorney. Kershaw promotedRays claim that he was not responsible for the shooting, which wassaid to have been the result of a conspiracy of the otherwiseunidentified man named "Raoul."42. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul188.html88

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThis amalgamation of neo-confederates hides their racismunder the worn-out guise of State’s Rights. Paul warned hisfollowers that this dog whistle term has been recognized as such:We must not allow the term "states rights" to besmeared and distorted into code words forsegregationist policies or racism. States’ rights simplymean the individual states should retainauthority over all matters not expressly delegated tothe federal government in Article I of the Constitution.Most of the worst excesses of big government can betraced to a disregard for states rights, which meansa disregard for the Ninth and Tenth amendments.The real reason liberals hate the concept of statesrights has nothing to do with racism, but ratherreflects a hostility toward anything that would act asa limit on the power of the federal government. (WhatReally Divides Us? December 24, 2002).The Ninth Amendment stated “The enumeration in theConstitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny ordisparage others retained by the people.” The Tenth Amendmentstated, “The powers not delegated to the United States by theConstitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to theStates respectively, or to the people.” The Articles of Confederationand the Constitution of the Confederate States both containedsimilar language to these Amendments. Confederate racists likeRon Paul not only want to kill Jews but they also want to bring backsegregation, lynchings and Jim Crow or better yet send AfricanAmericans back to Africa. Ron Paul has a redneck crackermentality.John Patrick Bedell, the man who shot two police officers at thePentagon before being killed was a conspiracy theorist and fan ofthe Ludwig von Mises Institute Facebook group. In an Internetposting, a user named JPatrickBedell wrote he was determined tosee justice for the 1991 death of a Marine in California. The death89

A. J. WEBERMANwas ruled a suicide but has long been the source of cover-uptheories. The writer said the case would be a step toward revealingthe truth behind 9/11.Paul opposes basic civil rights law - he maintains his oppositionto the 1964 Civil Rights Act and opposes restrictions on the“freedom” of business owners to refuse service to blacks. So Paul’sidea of freedom is the right to be racist. Paul is a faux libertarianwhose real agenda is not individualism but to prevent the federalgovernment from restraining the darker racist impulses at work atthe state and local levels. The following is from the Ron Paulnewsletter:The Double StandardWe know about the crimes at Bensonhurst andHoward Beach because of press propaganda andbecause great oddities took place in each: white onblack crime. Virtually all inter-racial crime is black onwhite, not white on black.When blacks kill whites, however, its not defined asnews. A month after the Bensonhurst killing, pointsout Jared Taylor, an almost identical crime wascommitted in the Bronx. A white got out of his car touse a phone. Two blacks asked him what a honkeywas doing on Tremont Avenue, shouted at him, andthen shot him in the stomach.There were “no marches, no outbursts, nohandwringing, and hardly any press coverage.” Whena black minister who helped stir up the Bensonhurst-omania was asked about it, he said it wasn’t racism itwas “revenge.”Race and CrimeWe hear lots about black-on-black crime. But whatabout interracial crime? One out of ten of those90

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIcrimes is white on black, whereas nine out of ten isblack on white. This is even more impressive, in anegative sense, where you realize that blacks areonly 12% of the population.Criminologist Jared Taylor reports that if you subtractthe crimes committed by blacks for the overall U.S.crime rate, we have no more crime proportionatelythan Western Europe and less than Britain.Who is Jared Taylor? Jared Tayloris a follower of the eugenicistWilliam Shockley who stated “Myresearch leads me inescapably tothe opinion that the major cause ofthe Americans Negros intellectualand social deficits is hereditary andracially genetic in origin and thusnot remediable to a major degree by practical improvements inenvironment.”43Shockley believed that the Nazi’s picked the wrongrace to mass murder as the Jews were intellectually superior tomost Germans. If you watch the Nazi propaganda film The EternalJew you will find that some of the German hatred for Jews is basedon the fact that they came over to Germany with nothing and wereable to accumulate wealth by first starting out selling merchandisefrom their pockets, then from a tray, then from a pushcart and finallyfrom a store or chain of stores. They became professionals likedoctors and lawyers while the German dunkoffs remained peasants.Jared Taylor claims he has no problem with Jews and that they areWhite however the Jewish Defense Organization of which I am amember opposes all forms of racism. I have personally had JaredTaylor’s racist meetings cancelled for two years in a row. Taylorwants to sterilize Black women and has received grants from thePioneer Fund as has Willis Carto. The Pioneer Fund was started in1937 and was closely aligned with Nazi Germany. Jared Taylor is43. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/jared-taylor91

A. J. WEBERMANdescribed as a “criminologist” by Ron Paul and his newsletter gaveout subscription information about Taylor’s publications. LlewellynRockwell published Jared Taylor’s article “Hate Crimes Laws Missthe Point Indeed, They are Instruments of Totalitarianism.”Another way to get rid of people with African blood is to refusemedical aid to Africa while it is experiencing an AIDS epidemic. OnJuly 24, 2008 Ron Paul stated:Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this irresponsiblelegislation, which will ship $48 billion overseas asforeign aid at a time when Americans are feeling thepressure of rapidly increasing inflation and aweakened dollar. It is particularly objectionable toship money to fund healthcare overseas when somany Americans either struggle with high healthcarecosts or avoid seeking medical assistance altogetherdue to lack of insurance or funds. As we know, thefederal government does not have $48 billion to sendoverseas so it will have to print the money. It is acruel irony that this will add to inflation at home whichwill increase even further the costs of healthcare inthe United States. Mr. Speaker, I am saddened bythe prevalence of disease in impoverished countriesoverseas. I certainly encourage every Americanconcerned about HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malariaoverseas to voluntarily provide assistance to helpalleviate the problem. But I do not believe it isappropriate -- nor is it Constitutional -- to forcibly takemoney from American citizens to send abroad. I urgemy colleagues to reject this and all foreign aidlegislation.44More Haitians?44. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=104&Itemid=6092

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIf there is one thing we don’t need in this country, itsmore Haitians immigrants with AIDS. Congratulationsto the Senate for stopping, at least temporarily,Clinton’s plan to have the AIDSians move here to dieat $100,000 a pop, courtesy of the taxpayers. Butwhat does it tell us about Clinton that he would like allthe Haitians, AIDS carriers and otherwise, to go onU.S. welfare in Florida? That he hates the realAmerica.Jesse Jackson went on a hunger strike to protest theidea of keeping the Haitians in Haiti, or at least out ofthe U.S. Unfortunately he went off the diet. As usualhis motive seems to be pure malice toward whitepeople.Paul didn’t want to help the Haitians out after a devastatingearthquake. On January 21, 2010 he claimed that this was forfinancial reasons but as you can see from the above excerpt fromhis newsletter he hated Haitians long before this national disasterstruck:I rise in reluctant opposition to this resolution.Certainly I am moved by the horrific destruction inHaiti and would without hesitation expresscondolences to those who have suffered andcontinue to suffer. As a medical doctor, I havethrough my career worked to alleviate the pain andsuffering of others. Unfortunately, however, thisresolution does not simply express our condolences,but rather it commits the US government “to beginthe reconstruction of Haiti” and affirms that “therecovery and long-term needs of Haiti will require asustained commitment by the United States….” I donot believe that a resolution expressing our deepregret and sorrow over this tragedy should be used tocommit the United States to a “long-term” occupation93

A. J. WEBERMANof Haiti during which time the US government willprovide for the reconstruction of that country. I amconcerned over the possibility of an open-ended USmilitary occupation of Haiti and this legislation doesnothing to alleviate my concerns. On the contrary,when this resolution refers to the need for a long termUS plan for Haiti, I see a return to the failed attemptsby the Clinton and Bush Administrations to establishHaiti as an American protectorate. Already we areseeing many argue that this kind of humanitarianmission is a perfect fit for the US military. I do notagree. Certainly I would support and encourage theefforts of the American people to help the people ofHaiti at this tragic time. I believe that the Americanpeople are very generous on their own and fear thata US government commitment to reconstruct Haitimay actually discourage private contributions. Mr.Speaker, already we see private US citizens andcorporations raising millions of dollars for relief andreconstruction of Haiti. I do not believe the USgovernment should get in the way of these laudableefforts. I do express my condolences but Iunfortunately must urge my colleagues to voteagainst this resolution committing the United Statesgovernment to rebuild Haiti.45In Stay out of Sudans Civil War House Amendments toComprehensive Peace in Sudan Act 11/19/04 he stated:The fact is we do not know and cannot understandthe complexities of the civil war in Sudan, which haslasted for 39 of that country’s 48 years of existence.Supporters of our intervention in Sudan argue thatthis is a clear-cut case of Sudan’s Christian minoritybeing oppressed and massacred by the Arab majorityin the Darfur region. It is interesting that the CIA’s45. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul633.html94

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIWorld Factbook states that Sudan’s Christians, whomake up five percent of the population, areconcentrated in the south of the country. Darfur is aregion in the mid-western part of Sudan. So I wonderabout this very simplistic characterization of theconflict.46Paul’s newsletters were filled with racist attacks on blacks:“Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks topick up their welfare checks,” read a typical article from the June1992 “Special Issue on Racial Terrorism,” a supplement to the RonPaul Political Report. Racial apocalypse was the most persistenttheme of the newsletters; a 1990 issue warned of “The ComingRace War.” George Lincoln Rockwell, the neo-Nazi leader of theAmerican Nazi Party:Believed a race war was imminent. He expressedhorror at the prospect of interracial carnage onAmerican soil but actually welcomed it as anecessary element of the social chaos that wouldsweep him to power. “Commander Rockwell waspositive” a follower wrote, that the Blacks were goingto go on an all-out rampage before the decade of theSixties as out, and touch off the race war that somany talked about in those days," To a boyhoodfriend not involved in American Nazi Party politicsRockwell confided: "I am convinced that the world isbuilding to a Race War, in which we are outnum-bered ten to one, we are divided and decadent, whilethe colored races are hard and getting harder.” Theterror of that race war Rockwell believed would drivethe American people to turn to him as the onlypolitician tough enough to protect their interests. For46. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=219&Itemid=6095

A. J. WEBERMANRockwell, the coming race war was but one battle inthe larger war with the Jew.47On August 30, 1979 Paul praised the magazine The AmericanMercury: “Mr. Bruce, I found all the articles you sent me from theAmerican Mercury very interesting.”Russell Maguire, who owned the Thompson SubmachineGun Company, became owner of the American Mercury in August1952. In 1952 George Lincoln Rockwell became its editor. Maguiresold the Mercury to the Defenders of the Christian Faith, Inc.,owned by Reverend Winrod and located in Wichita, Kansas, in1961. Reverend Winrod was known as "The Jayhawk Nazi" duringWorld War II, and was tried and convicted for violations ofthe Sedition Act of 1918. In 1966 the magazine merged with WillisCarto and Roger Pearson’s Western Destiny. Pearson was a wellknown neo-Nazi and pro-Fascist who headed up the World Anti-Communist League during its most blatantly pro-Fascist periods.Pearson was a close associate of Wickliffe Draper, founder of thePioneer Fund and was the largest recipient of Pioneer Fund grantsin history. By then The American Mercury was a quarterly with acirculation of barely 7,000, and its editorial content was composedalmost entirely of attacks upon Jews, African Americans, and otherminorities.A 1978 American Mercury article praised Adolf Hitler as the"greatest Spenglerian." The spring 1980 issue celebrated H. L.Menckens centennial, and lamented the passage of his era, "beforethe virus of social, racial, and sexual equality" grew in "fertile soil inthe minds of most Americans." The issue of The AmericanMercury Paul praised included essays entitled, “You Cant Escapethe Kosher Food Tax,” “Are You Ready for the White MansDoomsday,” and “Racism - Black African Style.” The last issueconcluded with a plea for contributions to build a computer index —47.http://books.google.com/books?id=KAU2E4fFC10C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Simonelli&hl=en&sa=X&ei=R0kcT8jyIaXl0QG1_KjWCw&ved=0CFEQ6AEwAg96

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIwith information about the 15,000 most dangerous political activists,actual or alleged, in the United States.An article the following year in the Ron Paul / Willis Cartonewsletter was about disturbances in the Adams Morganneighborhood of Washington, D.C., and was entitled Animals TakeOver the D.C. Zoo. Another newsletter reported on the heretoforeunknown phenomenon of “Needlin’,” in which “gangs of black girlsbetween the ages of 12 and 14” roamed the streets of New Yorkand injected white women with possibly HIV-infected syringes.“Needlin’”“Needlin’,” a new form of racial terrorism, has struckNew York City streets on the Upper West Side. Atleast 39 white women have been stuck with usedhypodermic needles–perhaps infected with AIDS–bygangs of black girls between the ages of 12 and 14.The New York Times didn’t find this fit to print forweeks and weeks, until its candidate David Dinkinswas safely elected. Even then the story was very lowkey, with race mentioned many paragraphs into it.Who can doubt that if the situation had beenreversed, if white girls had done this to black women,we would have been subjected to months-longnation-wide propaganda campaign on the evils ofwhite America? The double standard strikes again.Another newsletter stated:Today, gangs of young blacks bust into a bank lobbyfiring rounds at the ceiling. We don’t think a child of13 should be held as responsible as a man of 23.That’s true for most people, but black males age 13who have been raised on the streets and who havejoined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary97

A. J. WEBERMANand culpable as any adult, and should be treated assuch.Paul vilified Dr. Martin Luther King Jr:So now even the establishment press admits thatMartin Luther King plagiarized his PhD dissertation,his academic articles, his speeches, and hissermons.He was also a comsymp, if not an actual partymember, and the man who replaced the evil of forcedsegregation with the evil of forced integration.King, the FBI files show, was not only a world-classadulterer, he also seduced underage girls and boys.The Rev. Ralph David Abernathy revealed before hisdeath that King had made a pass at him many yearsbefore.And we are supposed to honor this "ChristianMinister" and lying socialist satyr with a holiday thatputs him on par with George Washington?Congratulations to Arizona! Who could doubt that theresult would be exactly the same if the other 49states could also vote on a holiday for this affirmativeaction saint?Paul attacked Ronald Reagan for signing legislation creatingthe federal holiday in his name, complaining, “We can thank him forour annual Hate Whitey Day.” Paul had this to say about King:St. Martin was a world-class philanderer who beatup his paramours ("non-violence" didnt apply in allspheres, I guess). He was a flagrant plagiarist witha phony doctorate. He replaced forcedsegregation in a few states with forced integration98

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIin all states. And he was a dedicated socialist.What a guy. He probably deserves two holidays.Why, he often asked "is it that people have to paywater bills in a world that is two-thirds water?"(Forget a PhD. Give this man an IQ test.)Capitalism, he said, has "left a gulf betweensuperfluous wealth and abject poverty, hascreated conditions permitting necessities to betaken from the many to give luxuries to the few,and has encouraged small hearted men tobecome cold and conscienceless." Ascompensation, he advocated paying blacks "aboutfifty billion" -- $250 billion in todays dollars -- peryear for ten years, although all the wealth in thecountry "could not adequately compensate itsNegroes for his centuries of exploitation andhumiliation."King advocated racial quotas: "If a city has a 30%Negro population," then "Negroes should have atleast 30% of the jobs in any particular company,and join in all categories."And David Garrows Pulitzer Prize-winningbiography reports that King "made it clear to closefriends" that he considered himself a Marxist."Even his ballyhooed "non-violence" was a tactic.He wanted to take power like Castro did, "but aviolent revolution on the part of American blackswould find no sympathy and support from thewhite population." So he adopted non-violence asa "strategy for change, a tactical program."The official line among some conservatives andlibertarians is that the civil rights movement99

A. J. WEBERMANstarted out well, but went astray after Kings death.In fact, it was bad from the beginning, neverseeking the mere removal of Jim Crow laws,which would have been legitimate, but forcedintegration and wealth redistribution.In 1988 when I ran for president on the LibertarianParty ticket, I was berated for hours by LPmembers because I had refused to vote, while inCongress, for a Martin Luther King nationalholiday.I didnt know then about his plagiarism, but therest of Kings crimes were clear. J. Edgar Hooveronce called his "the most dangerous man inAmerica." Who could have known the dangerwould continue after his death and threaten tostrangle our culture?Perhaps, the most damnable lie that Ron Paultells about race in the US is his claim that MartinLuther King and Rosa Parks are amongst hisgreatest heroes. Of course, theres not an ounceof truth in either claim. For one thing, he votedagainst honoring either of them - twice againstmaking Kings birthday a holiday, and onceagainst honoring Rosa Parks with theCongressional Gold Medal. In 2012 the lying racistpig said this:One of my heroes is Martin Luther King becausehe practiced the libertarian principle of peacefulresistance and peaceful civil disobedience, as didRosa Parks. But also, I’m the only one up here —and the only one in the Republican Party — thatunderstands true racism in this country is in thejudicial system, and it has to do with enforcing thedrug laws. Look at the percentages. The100

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIpercentage of people who use drugs are about thesame with blacks and whites. And yet the blacksare arrested way disproportionately.“Arrested disproportionately?” Paul really believes that they arenot as he stated:Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly callsthe criminal justice system, I think we can safelyassume that 95 percent of the black males in that cityare semi-criminal or entirely criminal. We areconstantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men,it is hardly irrational.After Barak Obama was re-elected by a few populous states somepeople in the states that went for Romney began talking secession.Paul was widely quoted on the subject:Actually, after the Civil War, nobody believes there isa so-called right to secession, but it is a verylegitimate issue to debate because all of the statesthat came into the Union before the Civil Warbelieved they have a right to secede and NewEngland in the early part of the 19th century actuallyconsidered it, and nobody questioned them aboutwhether they had the right to do it or not.Since the Civil War, it’s been sort of a dead issue, buthe brought it up. It stirred the media and believe me,it really stirred some of the liberal media where theystarted really screaming about what is going on here.“This is un-American”, I heard one individual say,“This is treasonous to even talk about it.”101

A. J. WEBERMANCHAPTER FOURPAUL’S ATTEMPTED BLOODLESS COUPRon Paul is estimated to have 150 to 200 delegates bound tohim at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida pluscontrol over four state delegations. According to RNC Rule 40, Paulneeded a plurality of delegates from five states for his name to beput forth for nomination at the convention. Nebraska was the laststate to hold a convention and its 32 delegates were not required to102

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZImatch the primary, where Romney won 70% of the vote. However,prospective delegates must indicate their presidential preferenceand are bound to vote for that candidate for the first two ballots.Paul failed to win a plurality of delegates in Nebraska in fact he onlywon one! Had he succeeded it would have forced a roll call votewhere each delegate of each state would have been polled on thefloor of the convention. If Paul had succeeded in Nebraska it alsowould have meant getting a prime time 15-minute speaking slot,perhaps a promise of a Cabinet position, and, of course, influencingthe GOP platform to further his Crypto-Nazi agenda. Since this wasPaul’s last chance to pull off a bloodless putsch and becomePresident, Nebraska Republican Party officials, for the first time,hired security48for the convention to ward off any disruptions thathave occurred at state conventions such as the one in Arizona,where Paul supporters got into a shouting match with Romneysupporters.DELEGATE POACHING & THE DESTRUCTION JEFFERSONIANDEMOCRACYAlthough he got about 11% of the RepublicanPrimary popular vote49Paul was able to amass adisproportionate number of delegates to theRepublican Convention by poaching the voteswhere the delegates were unbound. In this waythese “libertarians” were able to deprive citizens oftheir liberty to elect the candidates of their choice. The liberty todeprive others of their liberty is the liberty of Ron Paul and hisrobot like storm troopers.In Louisiana Paul’s slime balls did a great job of “spreadingliberty” and deprived people of the right to have their vote count.Paul received only 6% of the popular vote yet Paul dominated the48. http://siouxcityjournal.com/ap/politics/nebraska-gop-hires-security-for-state-convention/article_4244033a-e9d9-51a4-bcba-8044b857707d.html49.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries103

A. J. WEBERMANLouisiana Republican caucuses. He captured 27 of the 46delegates to which Louisiana is entitled. Paul supporters alsoelected one of their own, Henry Herford, to a senior party post.Week after week, Paul forces use GOP rules50to dominate or exerta large influence at state Republican conventions and send pro-Pauldelegates to the national GOP convention.51Louisiana was no fluke.At the Nevada Republican convention Paul won 22 of a possible 25delegates to the national convention yet he came in third with lessthan 19 percent of the vote. In Iowa after what the Des MoinesRegister described as a "two-day tug-of-war marked by bouts ofangry shouting,"52Paul supporters walked away with 23 of 28 totaldelegates to send to Augusts’ Republican National Convention inTampa, Florida.53How do these Ron Paul Stormtroopers manage to round updelegates? Through physical intimidation! In Saint Peters CountyMissouri a Blackman, Eugene Dokes, who, as chairman of thecountys GOP committee, played a key role in leading the caucus.But Dokes said he grew concerned Saturday after supporters ofWhite House hopeful Ron Paul were "beginning to get physical." "Atone point there was four or five people surrounding me," Dokesrecalled Sunday. "I didnt think it was safe." This is how a Nazi whoused the name Lone Guard was there as a Ron Paul supporter andlater posted,The lying, cowardly negro who single handedlyembarrassed the GOP by shutting down the largestcaucus in Missouri because he didnt want any Ron50. http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-Walshs-Washington/2012/06/04/ron-paul-snatches-half-of-louisianas-delegates51. http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-Walshs-Washington/2012/06/04/ron-paul-snatches-half-of-louisianas-delegates52. http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2012/06/16/paul-backers-triumphant-at-iowa-gop-convention/53. http://www.cbsnews.com/8334-503544_162-57454852-503544/does-pauls-iowa-delegate-sweep-indicate-brighter-days-ahead-for-libertarians/104

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIPaul delegates is now claiming Ron Paul supportersare threatening his family, according to BrentStafford, the man who Dokes had arrested.Ron Paul’s followers were able to subvert democracy bymisusing the Electoral College system. This does not bother them.Democracy is something they profess to disbelieve in. Yet, at thesame time, Ron Paul’s storm trooper’s claim they want aJeffersonian democracy.Thomas Jefferson favored a nation with most powers reservedfor the states. He was opposed to a strong central authority andbelieved that the people were the final authority in government.Hamilton believed that the government should be run by those whowere educated and wealthy rather than by “the mob.” Before myDNS was banned from the website the Daily Paul I noticednumerous posts that stated: “This is a Republic not a Democracy.”Republic is a buzzword for where it is permissible for a minority torule over a majority through an Electoral College system. In realityall the word Republic means is that a country is not an aristocracy.We are both a Republic and Democracy. So the Pauloids are elitistsand Hamiltonians, not Jeffersonians. They are also found of thisquotation “James Madison said Democracy is the tyranny of themajority.” This is from The Daily Paul:Even though Ron Paul lost the popular vote in everystate so far, he has now won the majority of thedelegates in 11 states. And the delegate counthappens to be the only thing that matters when itcomes to electing nominees. Thank you FoundingFathers for the Electoral College system. And thankyou Ron Paul people who have used that system asthe Founding Fathers intended.54Ron Paul supporters have no compunctions about theiractivities because they are not libertarians. Libertarians would not54. http://www.dailypaul.com/231888/ron-paul-has-won-11-states-video105

A. J. WEBERMANbe depriving people of their liberty, their freedom to choose politicalleaders by depriving them of their vote. The Founding Fathersintended to use the Electoral College System to protect democracyfrom the Irish urban poor turning it into mob rule. The voters thePauloids disenfranchised were middle class Republican voters, notthe illiterate Black Irish the Founding Fathers had in mind. ThePauloids are not using the system, they are playing the system.The Nazis are old hands at subverting democracy. They did it inGermany with the passage of the Enabling Act. The Enabling Actwas passed by Germanys Reichstag and signed by President Paulvon Hindenburg on March 23, 1933. It was the second major step,after the Reichstag Fire Decree, through which Chancellor AdolfHitler legally obtained plenary powers and established hisdictatorship. It received its name from its legal status as an enablingact granting the Cabinet the authority to enact laws without theparticipation of the Reichstag. If the Pauloids took control ofCongress they could conceivably do it here, although it wouldrequire a Constitutional Amendment. What sociological groupscomprise Ron Paul’s supporters? One group of Ron Paul Slimeballs is comprised of hardcore Nazi scum, like Don Black and hisson see with Paul on the following page.106

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThe mass murderer of six people in Wisconsinat a Sikh temple, Wade Michael Page, was aparticipant in bands that performed Nazi andskinhead music. Page started two bands –Definite Hate and End Apathy. These bandswere heavily advertised on Don Black’swebsite, Stormfront. Interestingly enough theslogan end apathy is often used by Ron Paulfollowers as you can see HERE. This group of Ron Paul supportersconsists of racists, fascists, eugenicists, Skinheads, Klansmen andNazis. They realized that a vote for Ron Paul, even though hedoesn’t spell it out, is a vote to kill Jews and deport Blacks. Thesevermin know that the only difference between Ron Paul and AdolfHitler is that Hitler put his platform forward in plain German, shoutedit at the German people and made it clear to them that all the Jewsin Europe were going to die under his rule. Millions of Germansunderstood what the final solution to the Jewish problem meant andsupported it. These post-war hardcore Jew-haters understand thatPaul can’t announce that publically here and get away with it. Themedia, the ADL, WWII veterans would be all over him. It would bepolitical suicide. These wanna be mass murderers know that RonPaul is forced to candy-coat his Nazi beliefs using dog whistlewords like “no foreign entanglements” when he means disown Israeland let it be destroyed.Dog-whistle politics, also known as the use of code words, is aterm for a type of political campaigning or speechmaking whichemploys coded language that appears to mean one thing to thegeneral population but has a different or more specific meaning fora targeted subgroup of the audience. The term is used to refer tomessages with an intentional subtext. The key to its use is tomaintain the option of "plausible deniability." For example the107

A. J. WEBERMANphrase "states rights", although literally referring to powers ofindividual state governments in the United States, are "code words"for institutionalized segregation and racism.In January 2012 Ron Paul was a hot topic on the talk radioshow hosted by Nazis Don Black and his son Derek. But Paul andBlack go back further than that. In 1981, a lawyer tried to subpoenaRon Paul to testify in the trial of Black,55then a Grand Wizard for theKu Klux Klan who would later go on to found the white supremacist,neo-Nazi website, Stormfront. Black was charged along with twoother Klansmen with planning to violently overthrow the smallCaribbean country of Dominica in what they called Operation RedDog. An examination of Operation Red Dog revealed that in 1981 agroup of American and Canadian White supremacists led byKlansman and mercenary, Michael (Mike) Perdue planned on takingover a small West Indian country called Dominica by overthrowingthe government and Prime Minister Eugenia Charles and restoringits previous prime minister, Patrick Johns into power. The groupplanned to create an Aryan paradise in Dominica and make moneythrough casinos, cocaine and brothels.56On the day the group of white supremacists was supposed totravel to Dominica, they were arrested by ATF agents and werefound with over thirty automatic weapons, shotguns, rifles,handguns, dynamite, ammunition, a confederate flag and a Naziflag. The plan would be dubbed The Bayou of Pigs after the failedinvasion of Cuba.The leader of the group, Michael Perdue, would plead guilty toplanning the coup and turned state’s evidence. Perdue would testifythat several other people helped organize and fund the coup andthat two Texas politicians were aware of the plan. Among thosePerdue implicated were David Duke, former Texas Governor, JohnConnally and Congressman, Ron Paul whom he claimed knew55. http://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/14/us/judge-denies-connally-subpoena-in-trial-of-3-alleged-mercenaries.html56. The Ku Klux Klan in Mississippi: A History By Michael Newton Page 192108

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIabout the plot. Connally was credited with helping Paul win his firstcongressional election.57A judge refused to subpoena Paul and Connally despite the factthat Perdue had claimed that both of them were aware of the plot.Don Black’s friend and fellow KKK Grand Wizard, David Duke wascalled to testify before a grand jury but claimed that he would takethe Fifth Amendment and never appeared. While Duke was nevercharged with a crime, several books points to Duke as the organizerwho connected Perdue to the other mercenary Klansmen and thepeople who funded their endeavor.58Everyone else implicated byPerdue was charged with the plot.Perdue implicated three men as funders of the plot, L .E.Matthews of Jackson, Mississippi, James C. White of Houston, andDavid Duke’s close friend and backer, J. W. Kirkpatrick. Kirkpatrickwould kill himself before he could stand trial and White andMatthews would be acquitted in court. Former Prime Minister ofDominica, Patrick Johns would be sentenced to 12 years in prisonfor his part of the plot. Michael Perdue, Don Black and seven otherKlansmen would be sentenced to only 3 years in prison. Ron Paulhas never made a statement denying knowledge of the plot despitethe fact that he was implicated by Perdue and almost subpoenaed.Paul was photographed with Black and his son by David Duke’sformer assistant, Jamie Kelso59who was an organizer for RonPaul and the owner of white supremacist sites, WhiteNewsNow.comand TheWhiteRace.com and a moderator for Black’s neo-Naziwebsite, Stormfront.6057. http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F30A12FA395F167493CAAB178FD85F428785F958. The Rise of David Duke By Tyler Bridges page 9859. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/jamie-kelso60. http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/ron-paul-was-implicated-in-attempted-white-supremacist-island-invasion/109

A. J. WEBERMANBlack would become one of Paul’s most enthusiastic supportersand helped rally the white supremacist community around Paul,through Stormfront. Black said he received Paul’s Nazi newsletterswhen they were first published and described how the publicationswere perceived by members of the Nazi movement. KKKGrand Wizard and former Louisiana Congressman David Dukephoned in to Don Black’s internet radio show and explained whyhe’s voting for Paul. Black told him:Everybody, all of us back in the 80’s and 90’s, feltRon Paul was, you know, unusual in that he hadactually been a Congressman, that he was one of usand now, of course, that he has this broaddemographic–broad base of support.Black donated to Mr. Paul in 2007 and in 2011 it was revealedthat Black donated $500 dollars to the Ron Paul Presidentialcampaign. Black told The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur that hesupported Paul’s presidential candidacy.61Ron Paul’s campaignrefused to reject the donation and return it. This is from Stormfront:Re: Is Ron Paul listening to David Dukes radio in hiscloset? Ron Paul could certainly be a WhiteNationalist, but if he ever made any sign of this hewould be done. The second the public hears "whitenationalist", they immediately think of "NAZI""RACIST" "HOLOCAUST", and Ron Paul would beover with. Regardless of his views though; he iscertainly on our side.Paul was asked about this: “If they want to endorse me, they’reendorsing what I do or say — it has nothing to do with endorsingwhat they say.” But if the Nazis are endorsing what Paul has to saythere must be some areas of agreement between them.61. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/28/stormfront-founder-ron-pauls-views-coincide-with-ours-on-most-issues/110

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIPaul received support from other White Supremacist groups:When Anonymous hacked a white supremacist website known asAmerican 3rdPosition (A3P) the anti-Nazi fighters discovered:In addition to finding the usual racist rants andinteractions with other white power groups, we alsofound a disturbingly high amount of members whoare also involved in campaigning for Ron Paul.According to these messages, Ron Paul hasregularly met with many A3P members, evenengaging in conference calls with their board ofdirectors. We put extra effort in ruining the life of A3Pwebmaster Jamie Kelso. On top of being on theboard of directors of A3P, former scientologist, andhigh ranking Ron Paul organizer, he also is theaccount owner of German Nazi forums and store nsl-forum.org, rhs-versand.com. We went ahead andwiped those websites off the internet as well,dumping private messages and order information.Paul met with Bill Johnson, the chairman of A3P. Johnsonwrote a 1989 book, under the name James O. Pace, called"Amendment to the Constitution," backing what became known asthe Pace Amendment. Here it is, in part:No person shall be a citizenof the United States unlesshe is a non-Hispanic white ofthe European race, in whomthere is no ascertainabletrace of Negro blood, normore than one-eighthMongolian, Asian, Asia Minor, Middle Eastern,Semitic, Near Eastern, American Indian, Malay orother non-European or non-white blood. Hispanicwhites, defined as anyone with an Hispanic ancestor,may be citizens if, in addition to meeting the111

A. J. WEBERMANaforesaid ascertainable trace and percentage tests,they are in appearance indistinguishable fromAmericans whose ancestral home is the British Islesor Northwestern Europe. Only citizens shall have theright and privilege to reside permanently in the UnitedStates.Ron Paul endorsed Bill Johnson for a seat on the Los AngelesSuperior Court in 2008. Paul would retract his endorsementafter Johnson’s racist views were made public. In e-mails JamieKelso boasted of being asked to be Johnson’s “personal assistant”and referred to Johnson as “Ron Paul’s top man in SouthernCalifornia for the last 3 years.”Bill Johnson and I will be meeting with Ron Paul. Ihave a teleconference call with Bill (and Ron Paul)tonight. Much more later. Things are starting tohappen (thanks to folks like you). I’ll be at CPAC fromFeb. 9 to Feb. 12. I’ll send back reports to you frompersonal meetings with Ron Paul and many others.It’ll be here on WhiteNewsNow, a place that is reallystarting to get interesting because of the presence offolks like you. Birds of a feather flock together, andwe are really gathering some quality here.The militia types also support Paul: Three months before far-right terrorists killed 168 Americans in Oklahoma City; Paul’snewsletter praised the “1,500 local militias now training to defendliberty” as “one of the most encouraging developments in America.”And he offered specific advice to antigovernment militia members,such as, “Keep the group size down,” “Keep quiet and you’re harderto find,” “Leave no clues,” “Avoid the phone as much as possible,”and “Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, letit begin here.” Timothy McVeigh, using the alias "T. Tuttle,"advertised for sale a military style launcher in the crypto-Nazinewspaper The Spotlight that repeatedly featured Paul. The ad,which appeared in the August 16, 1993 issue and two subsequent112

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIissues, offered for sale a "LAW launcher replica" which "fires 37 mmflares," as well as the flares themselves which can be modified forexplosive use. (LAW stands for "light anti-tank weapon.")Paul, a Nazi who is planning hate crimes beyond most people’scomprehension, opposed Hate Crimes legislation:Last week, the House of Representatives acted withdisdain for the Constitution and individual liberty bypassing HR 1592, a bill creating new federalprograms to combat so-called “hate crimes.” Thelegislation defines a hate crime as an act of violencecommitted against an individual because of thevictims race, religion, national origin, gender, sexualorientation, gender identity, or disability. Federal hatecrime laws violate the Tenth Amendments limitationson federal power. Hate crime laws may also violatethe First Amendment guaranteed freedom of speechand religion criminalizing speech federal bureaucratsdefine as “hateful.”There is no evidence that local governments arefailing to apprehend and prosecute criminalsmotivated by prejudice, in comparison to theapprehension and conviction rates of other crimes.Therefore, new hate crime laws will not significantlyreduce crime. Instead of increasing the effectivenessof law enforcement, hate crime laws undermineequal justice under the law by requiring lawenforcement and judicial system officers to givepriority to investigating and prosecuting hate crimes.Of course, all decent people should condemncriminal acts motivated by prejudice. But why shouldan assault victim be treated by the legal system as asecond-class citizen because his assailant wasmotivated by greed instead of hate?113

A. J. WEBERMANHR 1592, like all hate crime laws, imposes a longersentence on a criminal motivated by hate than onsomeone who commits the same crime with adifferent motivation. Increasing sentences because ofmotivation goes beyond criminalizing acts; it makes ita crime to think certain thoughts. Criminalizing eventhe vilest hateful thoughts — as opposed to willfulcriminal acts — is inconsistent with a free society.HR 1592 could lead to federal censorship of religiousor political speech on the grounds that the speechincites hate. Hate crime laws have been used tosilence free speech and even the free exercise ofreligion. For example, a Pennsylvania hate crime lawhas been used to prosecute peaceful religiousdemonstrators on the grounds that their public Biblereadings could incite violence. One of HR 1592ssupporters admitted that this legislation could allowthe government to silence a preacher if one of thepreachers parishioners commits a hate crime. Moreevidence that hate crime laws lead to censorshipcame recently when one member of Congresssuggested that the Federal CommunicationsCommission ban hate speech from the air waves.Hate crime laws not only violate the FirstAmendment, they also violate the Tenth Amendment.Under the United States Constitution, there are onlythree federal crimes: piracy, treason, andcounterfeiting. All other criminal matters are left tothe individual states. Any federal legislation dealingwith criminal matters not related to these three issuesusurps state authority over criminal law and takes astep toward turning the states into mereadministrative units of the federal government.6262. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1093&Itemid=69114

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIOn September 7, 2000 Paul opposed the creation of the UnitedStates Holocaust Memorial Museum while at the same timepretending to denounce Hitler:Mr. Chairman, I rise today in hesitant opposition toH.R. 4115, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial MuseumAuthorization Act. We as vigilant Americans mustnever forget the horrific lessons of the past and thoseattendant consequences of corporatism, fascism, andtyrannical government; that is, governmentaldeprivation of individual rights. A government whichoperates beyond its proper limits of preserving libertynever bodes well for individual rights to life, libertyand property. Particularly, Adolph Hitler’s tyrannicalregime is most indicative of the necessaryconsequences of a government dominated by so-called ‘government-business’ partnerships, gun-confiscation schemes, protectionism, abandonmentof speech and religious freedom in the name of‘compelling government interests.’63Hitler was a socialistic gun-confiscating liberalwilling to abandon freedom of speech and religion inthe name of ‘compelling government interests”another word for national security. The Nazis nevernationalized the German means of production andcompanies like Mercedes Benz and General Anilinethrived under Hitler. Hitler had the socialist wing ofthe Nazi Party exterminated during the Night of theLong Knives.Paul continued to characterize Hitler as a socialist ratherthan a National Socialist:63. Congressional Record, V. 146, Pt. 12, July 27, 2000 to September 13,2000 page 17229115

A. J. WEBERMANThe 20th century has produced socialist dictators theworld over, from Stalin, Hitler, and Mao to Pol Pot,Castro, and Ho Chi Minh. More than 200 millionpeople died as a result of bad ideas of these evilmen. Each and every one of these dictators despisedthe principle of private property ownership, whichthen undermined all the other liberties cherished bythe people.Paul had this to say about the resurgence of Nazism in Europe:This legislation refers to the rise of anti-Semitism inEurope as if it’s a purely homegrown phenomenon,as if native residents of European countries aresuddenly committing violent crimes against Jews. ButI think we are only getting part of the story here.What is absent from the legislation is mention of thewell reported fact that much of the anti-Jewishviolence in Europe is perpetrated by recentimmigrants from Muslim countries of the Middle Eastand Africa. Reporting on a firebombing of aSynagogue in Marseille, France, for example, theNew York Times quotes the longtime president ofthat region’s Jewish Council, Charles Haddad, assaying, “This is not anti-Semitic violence; it’s theMiddle East conflict that’s playing out here.”The national police state mentality has essentiallytaken over crime investigation throughout thecountry. Our local sheriffs are intimidated andfrequently overruled by the national police. Anythingworse than writing traffic tickets prompts swarms ofFederal agents to the scene. We frequently see theFBI, the DEA, the CIA, the BATF, Fish and Wildlife,the IRS, Federal marshals and even the Armyinvolved in local law enforcement. They do not cometo assist, but to take over. The two most notorious116

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIexamples of federal abuse of police powers wereseen at Ruby Ridge and Waco, where non-aggressive citizens were needlessly provoked andkilled by government agents. At Waco, even Armytanks were used to deal with a situation that the localsheriff could have easily handled. These twoincidents are well-known, but thousands of othersimilar abuses routinely occur with little publicity. TheFederal police state seen in the action the RubyRidge and Waco hopefully is not a sign of things tocome, but it could be, if we are not careful.In a speech reprinted in the Spotlight Paul remarked: “This fearhas come from the police state mentality that prompted Ruby Ridge,Waco and many other episodes of an errant federal government.” In1992, in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, white separatist Randy Weaver, withhis wife, four children, and a family friend, resisted well over onehundred law enforcement authorities after federal marshalsattempted to arrest him for failing to make a court date stemmingfrom illegal gun sales. Protestors for the Weavers included AryanNation members, skinheads, and Order members families.Spotlight ran numerous articles about the incident. After an eleven-day standoff a federal marshal, Weavers wife Vicki and his sonSam were dead and a federal marshal, Weaver, and Weaversfriend shot. Rep. Helen Chenoweth (R-Idaho) introduced legislationin the House requiring federal authorities to secure state and localpermission to conduct law enforcement operations in municipalities.Paul co-sponsored the bill.Every American racist is behind Ron Paul. He is theircandidate! They know where he is coming from and there are plentyof them as historically there was never a shortage of bigots inAmerica.MUSLIMS FOR PAUL117

A. J. WEBERMANA smaller group of Paul supporters consist of Muslims. Thereseveral Facebook pages entitled Muslims for Ron Paul. A scan ofPauls political donors shows many common Muslim names, likeMohammed, Ali and Ahmed.64Yousef al-Khattab, co-founder ofthe Islamist65website and group Revolution Muslim,66endorsed RonPaul.67The Website muslims4liberty, a pro-Paul site, contained this:It looks like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)needs a serious reality check. Last week the SPLCadded long time friend of Muslims 4 Liberty, MichaelBoldin to their list of “30 New Activists Heading Upthe Radical Right.”68Michael is the Founder andDirector of the Tenth Amendment Center69(TAC)and Muslims 4 Liberty stands with him TAC againstthis despicable slander.The TAC believes citizens and states have the right to nullifyfederal law so it has gained wide support among neo-Confederateswho are still angry at the powers the federal governmentaccumulated after the Civil War that allowed it, among other things,to act against segregation, discrimination. In the 1950s, severalstates tried unsuccessfully to resist desegregation by nullifyingfederal laws. The Supreme Court has consistently rejectednullification as unconstitutional.7064. http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/can_ind/P80000748/10/M/65. http://www.examiner.com/topic/islamist66. http://www.examiner.com/topic/revolution-muslim/articles67. http://www.examiner.com/article/co-founder-of-islamist-group-and-former-bin-laden-supporter-endorses-ron-paul68. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/summer/30-to-watch69. http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/118

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZILOUIS FARRAKHAN of the Nation of Islam also supports RonPaul:Brother Farrakhan is not anti-Semitic. But I have tosay these people [those who established the FederalReserve Bank in 1913] claim to be Jews. And no theFederal Reserve Bank really don’t have nobodyoverseeing them. Congressman Ron Paul is tryinghis best but he is like a man crying in the wildernessto try and scrape the Federal Reserve and bring theright to print money back to the U.S. Congress.71Farrakhan went on the say that it was no coincidence that theAnti-Defamation League was formed in 1913 as its purpose was tostop anyone from criticizing the Federal Reserve Bank. Out of sixbankers present at the formulation of the Fed, one, Paul Warburg ofKuhn & Loeb was Jewish.72Another large group of rank and file RonPaul supporters are young Whites. Inthe results of a Gallup73poll brokendown by age of respondents, Ron Pauldoes disproportionately well with votersaged 18-34, being the preferred choiceof 20% of that demographic nationally.Some of these kids have no idea what Paul represents and have noidea of his hidden agenda. They are dupes. They are generally theyoung Paulbots who don’t realize Paul is a Nazi and instead believehe is a Libertarian who wants to free the Prisoners of Weed (POW)and legalize marijuana. Paul plays them like a violin. I assume theybelieve he is as far from Nazi totalitarianism as you can get because70. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/michael-boldin718. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmt5-1yrwmQ&feature=player_embedded729. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Act73. http://www.gallup.com/poll/151547/Gingrich-Running-Strong-Traditionally-Reliable-Voters.aspx119

A. J. WEBERMANhe attacks the power of the State, however, he does this for severalcovert reasons. The main reason is that it is part of his crypto-Nazipolitics. Paul is a neo-confederate and if this were American CivilWar times he would be labeled a traitor to the Union. Paul says thathe wants to weaken the Federal Government and wants certainpowers returned to State Governments just as the Confederatesdid. This way the Southern states could re-institute the right tosegregate and discriminate. “States’ Rights” as in J. B. Stoner’sNational States Rights Party is a dog whistle term for the impositionof Jim Crow. These younger Paulbots are programmed with thesame buzz words such as “constitution” and “freedom” as they trollthe internet looking for negative comments about Paul. Freedomand Bread," was the slogan used by Hitler togreat effect during the Nazi electoral campaignagainst tired old President Hindenburg.THE SILENT MAJORITYBut not all of Paul’s youthful followers areNazi dupes. Judging from World War II andhow America refused to bomb the Nazi deathcamps, there will always be a residual undercurrent of Jew hatred inAmerica for demagogues like Paul to tap into for support. That iswhy, although they have had no Nazi affiliation in the past, manyRon Paul supporters have held racist and Jew-hating sympathiesthat they were forced to suppress otherwise they would have riskedsocial ostracism in a politically correct world. This group caught onto the fact that Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi and jumped at the chanceto finally express their hatred for Blacks and Jews in a sociallyacceptable way and politically correct way.LEFTISTS FOR RON PAULJew-hating “Progressives” are also supporting Ron Paul. AtTruthdig, Robert Scheer calls him “a profound and principledcontributor to a much-needed national debate on the limits of120

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIfederal power.” When former White House correspondent HelenThomas said that Jews should leave Palestine and go back toPoland and Germany Scheer defended her. Salon’s GlennGreenwald (photo left) is so outraged that progressives haven’tabandoned Obama for Paul that he accuses them of supporting themurder of Muslim children. Greenwald had to stop practicing lawafter it was revealed that he had smuggled outmessages from prison on behalf of Nazi MattHale. There’s a Paul fan base in the Occupymovement and at Counterpunch, whereAlexander Cockburn is a longtime admirer.Cockburn was fired from the Village Voice fortaking money from anti-Israeli Araborganizations. Paul is a regular guest ofJonathan Stuart Leibowitz (Jon Stewart), who has yet to ask him atough question. Stewart minimizes the threat posed by radical Islamand has often been labeled a traitor to the Jews. The leftist CodePink endorsed him. Jewish celebrities like Oliver Stone, HowardStern and Bill Maher also support Paul for reasons that are beyondmy understanding, although Oliver Stone showed that despite theindisputable fact that Adolf Hitler would have sent him to a gaschamber Stone had sympathy for him: “Hitler is an easy scapegoatthroughout history and it’s been used cheaply.”Stone, who met with the Iranian Hitler Ahmadinejad, went on tosay that the Jewish Lobby is preventing an open discussion aboutthe truth of the Holocaust. Stone’s son recently traveled to Iran andconverted to Shiite Islam. In the early 1980’s Stone was going tobase his move JFK on a book I co-authored Coup D’Etat in America– The CIA and the Assassination of John Kennedy however ColonelFletcher Prouty talked him out of it. Prouty was on the Board ofDirectors of Spotlight. The Jew haters on the Left know that Paul isa dedicated, incorruptible enemy of the State of Israel as any Naziwould be. That is why they rally behind him.SELF-HATING JEWS FOR PAUL121

A. J. WEBERMANJews on the far Right also support Paul. In his book, LibertyDefined Paul expressed his pleasure that an anti-Zionist self-hatinggroup called the American Council for Judaism allegedly hasgrowing support.Other American Jews have spoken out againstIsrael’s treatment of the Palestinians as well. TheAmerican Council for Judaism is growing in influencein the American Jewish community, especially withthe younger generation. Although it’s argued thatJews are motivated to immigrate to Israel becausethey were exiled from Palestine, only a small fractionof American Jews ever moved to Israel.The American Council for Judaism is opposed the concept ofJewish nationality and a Jewish state. The editor of its publications,Allan C. Brownfield, told the New York Times that “While we wishIsrael well, we don’t view it as our homeland.” In the fall of 2010,Brownfield wrote a glowing book review of The Dark Side ofZionism, a book that equates Zionism with Nazism.74Brownfield’sarticle Zionism and Anti-Semitism - A Strange Alliance ThroughHistory was reprinted by the Nazi Institute for Historical Review.75Allan C. Brownfeld received his B.A.degree from the College of William andMary, his J.D. degree from the Marshall-Wythe School of Law of the College ofWilliam and Mary and his M.A. inGovernment and Politics from theUniversity of Maryland. He has served onthe faculties of St. Stephens EpiscopalSchool, Alexandria, Virginia, and the University College of theUniversity of Maryland. He is not much of a Jew; in fact it appearsas if he has converted to Catholicism somewhere along the line.74. http://www.acjna.org/acjna/articles_detail.aspx?id=55875. http://www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/18/1/Brownfeld22.html122

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIBrownfeld is a columnist for the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation,76a bunch of Jew hating anti-abortion Catholics that include theHolocaust denier and Spotlight golden boy Patrick Buchanan. TheFoundation recently honored Joe Sobran, a Jew hating piece oftrash who was fired by William F. Buckley from the National Reviewfor his anti-Semitic columns. In 1985 a six-member federal juryfound that Spotlight libeled National Review in the early 1970s byprinting that National Reviews editor, William F. Buckley Jr., had aclose working relationship with George Lincoln Rockwell, founderof the American Nazi Party. This was a clever ploy and a big lieused to discredit Buckley. The Nazi’s considered Buckley a kosherconservative and a threat to the racist right.The founder of the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation, Fran Griffin,and a big pro-lifer, supports Ron Paul despite Paul’s having saidthat abortion laws should be left up to the States, rather thanabortion being outlawed on a federal level as murder. If this were tobe the case women in states where it was illegal could always travelto states where it was not to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.The American Council for Judaism wasfounded by Lessing J. Rosenwald. Rosenwaldwas a pathological piece of work who wanted tosee his own people destroyed, thinking the Naziswould overlook him or maybe he believed that theNazis were right and he also should bedestroyed? Born in Chicago, Rosenwald was theson of Julius Rosenwald, a clothier who becamepart-owner and was president of Sears, Roebuck andCompany from 1908 to 1923, and chairman from 1923 to 1932.Lessing went to work for Sears in 1911 as a shipping clerk, and in1920, was given the important responsibility of opening a catalogsupply center for the growing mail-order. Succeeding his father, hewas Chairman of Sears from 1932 until 1939. Rosenwald was thebest known Jewish supporter of the America First Committee thatwas led by his successor at Sears-Roebuck and lifelong76. http://www.fgfbooks.com/123

A. J. WEBERMANfriend Robert E. Wood. He finally resigned from the Committeesboard in December 1940 over concerns about anti-Semitism, butstated that he remained "fully in accord with the Committeesobjectives." In 1943, Rosenwald accepted the invitation to becomePresident of the American Council for Judaism, a position he helduntil 1955; after that he remained Chairman of the Board.77Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal was anotherprominent member of the American Councilfor Judaism. Lilienthal was the first Jew todenounce Israel in Readers Digest articleentitled “Israel’s Flag is Not Mine.” The NaziDuke praised Lilienthal for having dared toexpose the truth about Jewish supremacism.Lilienthal signed a petition that supportedFrench Holocaust denier Robert Faurissons right to publish his filthylies in France. Lilienthal was published by Regnery Press. HenryRegnerys grandfather, William H. Regnery, was the founder of theAmerica First Committee. Lilienthal, the dirty low life piece of scumwrote this about, Anne Frank, an innocent Jewish girl killed by theNazi pigs:The Diary of Anne Frank may be a fraud. It was soldas the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died ina Nazi concentration camp after two years of abuseand horror. Any informed literary inspection of thisbook would have shown it could not possibly havebeen the work of a teenager.78Paul favors self-hating Jews becausethey are easier to deceive and toultimately murder than the militantvariety. Ron Paul shook a hand thatshook Achmadinajad’s hand. Thehand belonged to Yisroel Dovid77. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lessing_J._Rosenwald78. http://www.radioislam.org/annefrank/124

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIWeiss, a traitorous “rabbi” who leads Neturei Karta, a sect of ultra-Orthodox Jews who want to see Israel destroyed to hasten thecoming of the Messiah. While many Haredim (ultra-orthodox)believe the Jews get the Holy Land when the Messiah arrives, notbefore -- only Neturei Karta actively sides with Israels enemies. Thelate Neturei Karta leader Moshe Hirsh was a close associate ofYasser Arafat, and Rabbi Weiss has traveled with a delegation toTehran more than once, including on a trip to attend an infamousconference on so-called Holocaust revisionism. Weiss told Paul thatJudaism was a religion and "should never be transformed intonationalism." Paul responded by saying that the suggestion was"good advice".Ron Paul’s Jewish senior legal advisor, Bruce Fein, believesthat Paul won’t wait until America is attacked but would take pre-emptive action if the CIA called for it:Ron Paul would close the hundreds of U.S. militarybases abroad, redeploy weapons and soldiers nowdedicated to defending foreigners and foreigncountries to the U.S. to defend American sovereigntyand Americans, and end our multiple treatyobligations that require us to wage war in defense ofother nations. Our government shouldn’t sendAmericans abroad on quests to secure the liberty offoreigners.Candidate Paul favors the collection of intelligenceon potential adversaries, trade between the UnitedStates and other nations, and cultural exchanges andembassies abroad. Like President Thomas Jefferson,he would seek “peace, commerce, and honestfriendship with all nations, entangling alliances withnone.”The cornerstone of peace and the common defenseis deterrence. Ron Paul would embrace a retaliatorycapability sufficient to destroy every living thing in125

A. J. WEBERMANany country complicit in an actual or imminent attackon the United States. He would deploy troops andweapons systems capable of foiling any acts of wartargeting Americans on American soil.79Ron Paul, however, said he would never launch a pre-emptiveattack:Why are we in Korea? We’ve been there since I’vebeen in high school. Why are we in Japan? We’vebeen there since World War II. Why are we inGermany, subsidizing their welfare state by payingfor their defense by staying in Germany? And whyare we in five wars in the Middle East? We’d bemuch better off. We are less safe because of this.We’re going broke. And it undermines our nationalsecurity. So why stay any of those places? There’sno economic or military advantage for us to be soinvolved, trying to make other people live the way wedo. If we have—Fox News: Well, yeah, but some would say,Congressman, that there’s a difference in beingdefensive or being offensive, when it comes toprotecting our country. Some believe that we canmore defensive, and when there’s a threat we candefend against it. Others believe that we should beoffensive, which is part of the reason why there aresome military bases overseas, so that we’re “leading”in those areas.Ron Paul: Right!Fox News: Why do you believe that that’s not theway to go?79. http://www.objectivistliving.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=11456126

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIRon Paul: Because that’s the way dictators work. Tosay it casually that we should consider beingoffensive, that’s what dictators do. This whole ideathat was encapsulated with the last administrationthat “we endorse preventive war, pre-emptive war;we go to war to prevent somebody from attackingus,” that is endless war—and for casual reasons,without declaration. I think that is so dangerous. Weshould have a defense; we should defend ourcountry. But when you talk about bases because wemight need an offensive war, I consider thatabsolutely un-American.80Fein was raised in an Orthodox Jewish home andin 1972 graduated from Harvard Law School withhonors. Fein served as an associate deputyattorney and general counsel to the FederalCommunications Commission under RonaldReagan. He served as Research Director forRepublicans on the Joint CongressionalCommittee on Covert Arms Sales to Iran. He has been a VisitingFellow for Constitutional Studies at the Heritage Foundation and anadjunct scholar at American Enterprise Institute. He has advisednumerous countries on constitutional reform, including South Africa,Hungary and Russia. Sounds like a rational individual until wediscover that he drew up baseless articles of impeachment forPresident Obama. But now the plot thickens.Fein’s wife, Mattie, an Iranian Jew, took an interventionist pro-Israel position when she ran for Congress in Venice, California.Mattie Fein was asked “Would you support Israel taking militaryaction to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons? Under whatcircumstances?” and she responded “The United States should80. http://www.ronpaul.com/2011-06-22/ron-paul-offensive-war-is-un-american-close-all-u-s-military-bases-around-the-world/127

A. J. WEBERMANsupport whatever Israel believes is justified by national securityworries over Iran.” As a result many of the Jew-hating Paulbots arecalling for the removal of Fein as they have labeled this JewishUncle Tom, this token Jew, this schick dreck, as a Zionist infiltrator.Ron Paul stated he would not have helped Jews escape theHolocaust. Fein wrote:That Kissinger is devoid of moral scruple or noblecharacter is confirmed by a recently released OvalOffice tape recording his volunteered advice to thenPresident Richard M. Nixon regarding the freeemigration of Soviet Jews to Israel to escapepersecution: "And if they put Jews into gas chambersin the Soviet Union, it is not an Americanconcern. Maybe a humanitarian concern."81Ron Paul is against criminalizing hate speech but Fein is not:The ugliest marks in the history of the United Stateshave stemmed from the incitements to racialprejudice practiced by Theodore Bilbo, OrvilleFaubus, the Ku Klux Klan, and the producers of TheBirth of a Nation. Diatribes of these types create anexplosive social nitroglycerine waiting for an epithetor racial incident to spark violence. ...It is said that ifracially or religiously bigoted speech is squelched,there will be no stopping point to prevention ofgenuine free speech. Nonsense! The progress ofcivilization has been the progress of makingrefinements and differentiations in the law.Prohibitions on racially or religiously derogatoryspeech have existed in the United States, Canada,Great Britain, West Germany, and elsewhere withoutundermining democracy, political dissent ordebate. ...Prohibiting racially and religiously bigoted81. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-fein/henry-kissinger-moral-mid_b_799341.html128

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIspeech is praiseworthy because it seeks to elevate,not to degrade, because it draws from humanexperience, not from woolly dogmas or academicslogans, because it salutes reason as the backboneof freedom and tolerance. Is that clear enough?82When Fein parrots Paul’s line about cutting off foreign aid henever mentions the word “Israel” but lists other countries like theSudan. He is afraid his family might disown him. There are so manycontradictions about Fein that I have to question whether is apublicity seeker who would sell out his own people to get on cableor something more sinister. Anyway you want to look at it he isserving the Nazis.LYNDON LAROUCHE SUPPORTS RON PAULNumerous Ron Paul web pages carry stories that alleged thatRon Paul is the victim of massive vote fraud. Researcher DennisKing reported that when crypto-Nazi Lyndon LaRouche candidatesmade a poor showing,The national office strives to maintain their morale bytelling them its a result of "vote fraud." The USLP(LaRouches political party) has become, in fact, quiteexpert on the vote fraud issue. In 1976 it persuaded82. http://books.google.com/books?id=iluL7WFV9lYC&pg=PA134&lpg=PA134&dq="from+woolly+dogmas+or+academic+slogans"&source=bl&ots=RKFiVZEJ4V&sig=PVIVa8PXBdXHuPpkoaCo6slcqEA&hl129

A. J. WEBERMANlocal Republicans in four states, and also a top Fordadvisor, to cooperate in court challenges againstCarters victory. According to defectors, the USLPvote fraud experts have also been hired on occasionas consultants to mainstream politicians.83This claim of vote fraud is not the only connection between RonPaul and Lyndon LaRouche and his zombie-like followers. In themid-1970s LaRouche and his group were close with Ron Paulassociate Willis Carto, according to LaRouches deposition in a libelcase and one by Carto in another lawsuit. Carto said in his 1980deposition that his group, Liberty Lobby, never endorsed theLaRouche’s group but that he was "quite impressed" with itsmembers and that his organizations newspaper, Spotlight, hadpraised it. LaRouche met with Carto in Wiesbaden, Germany.Questioned about this meeting during a 1984 deposition, LaRoucherecalled that they had discussed "the Jewish question" as well asthe "abomination" of Americas postwar occupation of Germany.LaRouche knows Paul is a crypto-Nazi like him and sings hispraises:Going into the final Republican Presidential debate ofthe pre-primary series, Rep. Ron Pauls support issurging, based on the response to his principledstands against Obamas wars, and against Obamasviolent attacks on U.S. constitutional principles andcivil rights. Paul has reportedly worked with attorneyBruce Fein, who has circulated a bill of impeachmentagainst Obama. Lyndon LaRouche commented thatshould Paul win in Iowa and/or New Hampshire, it will"trigger a crisis" for the British-directed perpetual warparty.84According to Dennis King “British” is LaRouche’s dog whistle termfor Jew. LaRouche stated:83. http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/ourtown2.htm84. http://larouchepac.com/node/20809130

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIn addition to Ron Pauls statements that an"impeachment process would be possible" againstObama in the killing of American citizens Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Kahn, are condemnations fromother leading figures. Already on Sept. 30,Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) made astatement condemning the administration for what itcalled "the extrajudicial killing" of Anwar al-Awlaki, anAmerican citizen. In the larger context, the fact thatObama has boasted that he is responsible for theassassinations of two American citizens, with no dueprocess and a "state secret" blanket claim, is thestrongest corroboration to date of LyndonLaRouches April 11, 2009 diagnosis of Obama as anextreme narcissist in the tradition of Emperor Neroand Hitler in the bunker. On Friday, Obama provedthat LaRouche was absolutely correct. As of Friday,Obama is a lot closer to being removed from office byimpeachment or the invoking of Section 4 of the 25thAmendment than most people realize.85LaRouche agrees with Ron Paul when it comes to the Fed:“The Fed prefers to please the British, rather than defend theinterests of the United States. These people have betrayed thecountry," LaRouche concluded. "They should get the credit forbetraying the country." He agrees with Paul on 9/11 revisionism andwith Willis Carto on Holocaust denial: In a Carto-influenced articleLaRouche later tried to suppress, LaRouche stated:America must be cleansed for its righteous war bythe immediate elimination of the Nazi Jewish Lobbyand other British agents from the councils ofgovernment, industry, and labor. Zionist cultism isamong the most worthless, most contemptible ofcauses.8685. http://larouchepac.com/node/19716131

A. J. WEBERMANWhat LaRouche is saying here is that America must makeamends for its role in World War II by purging the variousprofessions of Jews, just as Hitler did in Nazi Germany.We shall now examine the cult character of Zionismat successive levels, beginning with thecommonplace delusions of the American Zionist orZionist fellow traveler. The contemptible butimpassioned sophistry that the Zionist demagogueoffers to all foolish enough to be impressed with suchhoaxes is the ‘holocaust’ thesis. It is argued that theculmination of the persecution of the Jews in the Naziholocaust proves that Zionism is so essential to‘Jewish survival’ that any anti-Zionist is therefore notonly an anti-Semite, but that any sort of criminalaction is excusable against anti-Zionists in memory ofthe mythical ‘six million Jewish victims’ of the Nazi‘holocaust.’ This is worse than sophistry. It is a lie.True about a million and a half Jews did die as aresult of the Nazi policy of labor-intensive‘appropriate technology’ for the employment of‘inferior races,’ a small fraction of the tens of millionsof others - especially Slavs - who were murdered inthe same way Jewish refugee Felix Rohatynproposes today.So there weren’t any gas chambers – Jews were worked todeath at menial jobs and was only a small fraction of the others whowere murdered. Then LaRouche brings in Felix Rohatyn to illustratethat today the Jews are worse murderers than the Nazis were.Even on a relative scale, what the Nazis did toJewish victims was mild compared with the virtualextermination of gypsies and the butchery ofCommunists. The point is that Adolf Hitler was put86.http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/essays&editorials/larouche2.html132

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIinto power largely on the initiative of the Rothschilds,Warburgs and Oppenheimers, among others.According to LaRouche the Jews brought on their own destructionby financing Hitler.The murderers of the million and a half or more Jewswho died in the ‘holocaust’ are any group, Jewish ornon-Jewish, which supported then or now the policiesadvocated by Felix Rohatyn or Milton Friedman.Either you, as a Jew, join with the U.S. Labor Party tostop Rohatyn and Friedman or you are implicitly justas guilty of the death of millions of Jews as AdolfHitler.Here LaRouche says “a million and a half or more” Jews werekilled in the so-called Holocaust rather than “a million and a half”and again attributes their death to the Jewish economists Rohatynand Friedman then he tells us you have to join him in his effort to“stop” (kill) these Jews or you will be labeled “a Nazi” (confusingcode word for a Jew) and you will die like the rest of the Jews whenthe big day comes and LaRouche takes power. All these codewords and bizarre theories caused LaRouche to be less of a threatthan Paul, although long as he is alive LaRouche will remain athreat. In 1976, LaRouche campaigned for the first time in apresidential election as a U.S. Labor Party candidate, polling 40,043votes (0.05 percent). He received 25,562 votes in the 1988presidential election, standing under the banner of the "NationalEconomic Recovery" party. In the 1988 Presidential Election Paulplaced third in the popular vote with 431,750 votes (0.47%), behindRepublican Bush and Democrat Michael Dukakis.THE RON PAUL FAREWELL SPEECH IN TAMPA133

A. J. WEBERMANIn July 2012 Ron Paul spoke at a rally on Sunday, August 26,2012 at the University of South Florida’s Sundome. This event wasgoing to be the biggest Nazi rally since the German-American Bundat Madison Square Garden in New York City, on February 20, 1939pictured on the left, however on twenty-thousand people attended.The speakers included Doug Weade, Paul’s campaignmanager (the closest Paul will ever come to weed) and Ron Paul’sformer chief of staff Lew Rockwell. Rockwell reprinted hundreds ofPatrick Buchanan’s articles on his blog. Rockwell is thereincarnation of neo-Nazi leader George Lincoln Rockwell. Hewrote,What happened was that when the Nazis first learnedof the fire, they assumed that it was carried out bythe Communists and, therefore, that it would be agreat piece of political propaganda to use to go afterthe Communists. When they later learned that it wasa lone arsonist, they decided to ignore the truth andstill claim the Communists were behind the fire.And that is the lie about the Reichstag Fire—not thatit was a False Flag operation carried out by theNazis.87Rockwell has a history of defending Nazis and wrote, “WhenNazi Germany occupied France during WW2, did the evil Germansforbid the French from going to church?”88In a 1990 column87. http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/85364.html88. http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/112801.html134

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIdefending Nazi War Criminal John Demjanjuk Buchanan denied thatJews had been mass murdered using diesel engine fumes:Diesel engines do not emit enough carbon monoxideto kill anybody. In 1988, 97 kids trapped 400 feetunderground in Washington, D.C. tunnel while twolocomotive spewed diesel exhausts into the car,emerged unharmed after 45 minutes. Demjanjuk’sweapon of mass murder cannot kill.The Paulfest featured at least one Jew so itwould not seem like an anti-Jewish, anti-Israelevent. Professor Walter Edward Block (seeillustration for his book Thinking theUnthinkable on the left) spoke. Block lecturedabout the rights of a woman to stop anunwanted pregnancy. He explained that thelibertarian theory of abortion leads to the rightof the woman to evict an unwanted fetus, butnot to kill that fetus, a theory he refers to as "evictionism." Blockstated that in the event of an unwanted pregnancy, a fetus becomesto its mother what a trespasser is to the owner of the property inquestion. The problem here is that the “trespasser” is afforded norights, no liberty, from this so-called libertarian. If the pregnancy isterminated in the six month of gestation he would remove it and let itdie a horrible death rather than perform a Dilation and Curettage.This crackpot is one of the leading Jewishdefenders of voluntary slave contracts89arguing that aslave contract is "a bona fide contract whereconsideration crosses hands; when it is abrogated,theft occurs." He argues that his position shows "thatcontract, predicated on private property [can] reach to the furthestrealms of human interaction, even to voluntary slave contracts.”9089. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_slavery90. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Block#cite_note-6135

A. J. WEBERMANAside from the re-legalization of slavery, the Pauloids will be rallyingfor more strip mining as Block has written,To say of a thing that it is “natural” or “unnatural” is not to sayanything about that thing’s intrinsic value. A thing’s value dependsupon whether or not it satisfies our needs, and contributes to ourwell-being. Strip mining, when evaluated rationally, fulfills thesemore rational criteria. Block made some stupid Jewish joke thatstereotyped Jews. wblock@loyno.eduOf course the main speaker was Ron Paul. The former LibertyLobbyist repeatedly used the word “Liberty” in an ambiguousfashion as in “the cause of liberty.” What he precisely meant by theword was never defined but his audience comprised of 99% Whitesknew what he meant, Paul was unhappy with the RNC becausemany of his delegates had been disqualified because of a rulechange and because he was not going to be given a speaking slotat the convention. He never mentioned Israel by name however itwas referred to by implication when he used the term “my foreignpolicy.” He recalled that other “mainstream republicans” had toldhim:We like you but if you would change your foreignpolicy you would have a lot more success. You needto change your foreign policy. And of course if I didn’thave the policy that I do have I don’t believe wewould be here tonight. This is something theyobviously do not understand; those who dounderstand it fear it because of the powerful specialinterests behind a foreign policy of intervention in themilitary industrial complex but its complex but theystrongly resent this.The term “military industrial complex” was invented by theLeftist sociologist C. Wright Mills and first used in his book ThePower Elite (1956) then picked up by President Eisenhower in hisfarewell address (1960) in which he stated that it was a threat todemocracy. So the dirty Jews are the “powerful special interests”136

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIwho pull the strings behind the scenes and control the armamentsindustry so they can profiteer from the wars they instigate. Later onPaul would state, “The media is part of the military industrialcomplex.” In other words the Jews control the media. Another codeword for Jew is “neo-con” because many of the neo-cons wereJewish. “Right now we still have neo-cons all over the place they arenot just in one party either.”Paul traced America’s troubles to 1913 but refused to admit thata Republican was President at the time. Paul continues his historicalnarrative but is hesitant to use the word “Nazi.” He skipped over afew decades then stated that it was in the “1930’s where we had somuch Fascism and Keynesianism.” Earlier he had said that in the1930’s “the fascism of Hitler and Mussolini, and they contributed toanother 25 million people that died” then made reference to the“fascism of Europe” and how we “ended up” in World War II. Paul isnot going to blame the Nazis because he is a crypto-Nazi.Paul knows by this time he will get nowhere with the Americanpeople unless there is a catastrophic economic event that can beblamed on Israel: “The downfall of the economy will provide moreexcuses to crack the whip and crackdown on our civil liberties.” Hemakes it seem as if the present administration would be responsiblewhen it would more likely be crypto-Nazis like himself.Terrorism is a result of “blowback” and the chances of anyonebeing killed by a terrorist are one in 25 million. He claimed thatAmerican soldier had up to a 20% chance that he would be killed byfriendly fire. Paul said he heard someone remark that if Paul’speople were in charge Osama Bin Laden would still be alive. Paulcountered “but you know that I think the answer is so would the3,000 people still be alive.” So America was to blame for 9/11 notIslam. Prior to this Paul hinted 9/11 was an inside job. Paul said hehad also be accused of not being patriotic – he cited pre-op traitornot only to his country but to his sex, Bradley Manning and WikiU.S. security document publisher Julian Assange as patriots. RonPaul ended his farewell address with this thought:137

A. J. WEBERMANIn 1935 Sinclair Lewis wrote a novel It Can’t HappenHere and that novel essentially was a warningbecause he believed that it could happen here; it wasan anti-Fascist novel because he was veryconcerned about Mussolini and the Nazis and hiswhole argument was that it can happen here. But Iwould like to turn that around and say it canhappen here.Paul qualified this statement saying something for the good canhappen here but his more cognizant followers caught on to the realdrift of his statement.Currently Ron Paul supporters are a minority. But remember,Hitler’s "National-Socialist Freedom Movement" polled 3% of thevote in the December 1924 Reichstag elections, and this fell to 2.6%in 1928. State elections produced similar results. But two yearslater, after the results were in for the September 1930 Reichstagelections, the Nazis won 18.3% of the vote, and became thesecond-largest party in the Reichstag. This was a result of the 1929stock market crash and the subsequent Great Depression duringwhich Germany became the hardest hit country with unemploymentreaching 6.5 million. As long as Ron Paul runs for public office he isa threat. Hitler was elected to public office; there was no coup orpower grab and Ron Paul is still a viable candidate waiting in thewings to take power when the economic and political circumstancesare right. Pauls campaign chairman Jesse Benton stated that Paulwas not considering running under a third-party candidacy barring"some sort of financially catastrophic event in this country." Paulwas hoping that an American-Israeli attack on Iran launched beforethe 2012 elections will cause an economic crisis that will catapulthim to power just as Hitler benefited from the 1929 Stock Marketcrash and the Great Depression that followed.91Paul is bettingagainst America. Ron Paul is a defeatist and traitor to his country91. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57363432-503544/ron-paul-gears-up-for-the-long-haul/138

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIwho wants to accomplish what Hitler failed to do – defeat the UnitedStates.For every generation of Jews there is going to be some politicalfigure out to mass murder the Jewish people and this time it is RonPaul, in league with his proxy, Ahmadinejad, the Hitler of Iran.CHAPTER FIVEUSING IRAN AS A PROXY TO DESTROYISRAEL139

A. J. WEBERMANPaul knows that it would be impossible to goad America intoattacking the Jewish state. He needs a proxy and he sees Iran ashis best hope because the leader of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,is a Holocaust denier and Holocaust deniers are Nazis like himself.As reported, Holocaust denial (Holocaust Revisionism is aeuphemism) was an invention of Francis Parker Yockey, a Nazi spy.Yockey was linked to Ron Paul through Paul’s associate Spotlightpublisher Willis Carto.Where are Holocaust deniers reallycoming from? Holocaust deniers arecrypto-Nazis not revisionist historians.First of all they all know the Holocausttook place but deny it in order to furtherNazism. Most people were disgusted byNazism due to its insane genocidalnature so the Nazis want to convincepeople that this pathology did not exist so people will be attracted toNazism once again. They are well aware that unlike themselves, nottoo many people are into gassing babies. Holocaust deniers alsowant to deny the last Holocaust so when they perpetrate a new onethey can deny that one too. Another motivation of the NaziHolocaust denier is to de-legitimatize the necessity for the existenceof Israel, because the Holocaust was what convinced the world togive the Jews their own State. The Nazi despises Israel because theexistence of Israel makes it much harder for the Nazi insect to killJews since, unlike the Jews in Nazi Germany Jews in Israel are notunarmed. Nazism is about - among other things - the killing of Jews;it is a criminal conspiracy to commit mass murder. Finally thesevermin want to desecrate the memory of those who perished.They’ve taken everything from these Jews and now they want totake their deaths from them and make them into non-persons.The first part of Paul’s plan to destroy Israel then wipe out theJewish race is to protect the political interests of Ahmadinejad, theHitler of Iran, by ending sanctions against Iran (Paul was one of four140

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICongressmen who voted against sanctions) so that the regime doesnot capitulate and give up its bomb making program. Paul wants tohelp the Iranians get atomic weapons and the means to deliverthem to Tel Aviv any way he can.JUSTIN AMASHRep. Justin Amash was one of the four. Justin Amash is the sonof a Palestinian father, and Syrian mother. The father of this first-generation Arab-American is a Palestinian whose family was drivenfrom its home by Israel during its war of liberation and lived in arefugee camp. Amash is chairman of the House Liberty Caucus.There’s no formal membership list, and Amash said about a dozenregular meetings are held in his office. He hopes the group gets bigenough someday that they need to move to a bigger space.In his Position Paper on U.S. – Israel Relations he stated “TheUnited States has a long and strategically important history ofstrong foreign relations with Israel. As a member of Congress, I willwork to continue and strengthen this relationship. I will also respectIsrael’s sovereignty and will not support counterproductive efforts toimpose agreements or conditions on Israel. Israel must manage itsforeign relations and domestic policies as it deems to be in its ownbest interests as a sovereign nation.” This has caused some otherArabs to label him pro-Israel, however, his affinity for Ron Paulindicates this is merely a ruse. Note the phrase “strategicallyimportant history of strong foreign relations” as to military relations.Then he goes on to state that America must minimize its foreignrelations with Israel and let the Jewish State be on its own. RandPaul also claims to be pro-Israel yet he is in favor of letting Irandevelop the bomb.“Ron Paul was an educational figure. He was out there reallypresenting things that others had not been talking about,” he said.“This next generation of liberty Republicans, like Rand Paul andMike Lee and Thomas Massie and Raul Labrador, we’re interestedin making sure that … we re-brand the Republican Party as a placethat is welcoming to people from across the political spectrum and141

A. J. WEBERMANfollows the founding principles of our country: limited government,economic freedom, individual liberty.” Amash voted against H.R.3783 Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act of 2012 alongwith John Duncan, (R-TN), Walter Jones (R-NC) Dennis Kucinich(D-OH) Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ron Paul (Nazi -TX).The second part of Paul’s plan involves weakening Israel bycutting off all economic and military aid so that it will be easier forIran to destroy it. But he can’t say this; otherwise people would putthis together with his Nazi Newsletter connections and realize whathis hidden agenda is about. So he says cut off all foreign aid. Allforeign aid should end, which is blatantly unconstitutional. Paul hadto admit “While it may be a relatively small part of our federalbudget, for many countries it is a large part of theirs and it createsperverse incentives for both our friends and enemies.”In February 2012 Paul asked for House vote on an amendmentthat would cut $6 billion of U.S. aid. Paul was trying to build supportfor an amendment to the fiscal 2011 funding bill that would end allforeign assistance to Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Pakistan. If Paulsamendment gets a vote, it would be the first time the entire Housewould vote on whether or not to give $6 billion to these foreigngovernments. The vote would come in the midst of the largestAmerican fiscal crisis in a generation, which could increase thechance that it would attract significant support.92Paul knows well that Israel is the number one recipient ofmilitary foreign aid. Egypt and Pakistan are next but unlike Israelthey are not threatened with annihilation from numerous hostilenations. He fooled the New York Times which wrote, “His votesagainst support for Israel follow quite naturally from his opposition toall foreign aid. There is no sign that they reflect any special animusagainst the Jewish state.”9392.http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/02/16/ron_paul_seeks_vote_to_end_foreign_aid_to_egypt_israel_jordan_and_pakistan142

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThe third part of the plan involves bringing all the military backfrom abroad, not just from the Middle East. This would also make itmore difficult to come to the aid of Israel (which would be highlyunlikely under a Paul regime anyway) and more importantly it wouldremove a deterrent to war. But it has plausible deniability due to theword all. His blanket statements shield his real purposes.The Paulbots are fond of quoting Benjamin Netanyahu out ofcontext to show that Paul is a friend of Israel and is doing Israel afavor by cutting off aid:My friends, you dont need to do nation building inIsrael. Were already built. You dont need to exportdemocracy to Israel. Weve already got it. You dontneed to send American troops to defend Israel. Wedefend ourselves. Youve been very generous ingiving us tools to do the job of defending Israel onour own.The rest of this quotation reads:Thank you all, and thank you President Obama, foryour steadfast commitment to Israels security. Iknow economic times are tough. I deeply appreciatethis. Support for Israels security is a wise investmentin our common future. 94In no way was Netanyahu saying that Israel no longer wantsAmerican economic and military aid. If this were the case Israelwould refuse it.Ron Paul is Israel’s avowed enemy but he has to be low keyabout it so his soft line on Israel is basically “let’s take Jefferson’sadvice and not get involved in foreign entanglements.” He wants93. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/22/magazine/22Paul-t.html?pagewanted=all94. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/israeli-prime-minister-binyamin-netanyahus-address-to-congress/2011/05/24/AFWY5bAH_story.html143

A. J. WEBERMANAmerica to stay neutral. This is reminiscent of The Neutrality Acts,laws that were passed by the United States Congress in the 1930s,in response to the growing turmoil in Europe and Asia thateventually led to World War II. They were spurred by the growth inisolationism and non-interventionism in the US following its costlyinvolvement in World War I, and sought to ensure that the US wouldnot become entangled again in foreign conflicts. The legacy of theNeutrality Acts in the 1930s was widely regarded as having beengenerally negative: they made no distinction between aggressor andvictim, treating both equally as "belligerents"; and they limited theUS governments ability to aid Britain against Nazi Germany.Ron Paul is also fond of saying thatIsrael can defend itself because ithas 300 nukes. The Nazi Paul hopesto see the State of Israel reach apoint where it would become sodesperate thanks to a nuclear Iran ithave to employ these atomicweapons and exercise what isknown as the Samson Option. The Samson Option is a term thatdescribes the Israeli deterrence strategy of massive retaliation withnuclear weapons as a “last resort” against nations whose militaryattacks threaten its very existence.The use of nuclear weapons by Israel almost became a realitywhen, on the afternoon of October 6, 1973, Egypt and Syriaattacked Israel in a coordinated surprise attack, beginning the YomKippur War. Caught with only regular forces on duty, augmented byreservists with a low readiness level, Israeli front lines crumbled. Byearly afternoon on October 7, no effective forces were in thesouthern Golan Heights and Syrian forces had reached the edge ofthe plateau, overlooking the Jordan River. This crisis brought Israelto nuclear alert.Defense Minister Moshe Dayan told the Prime Minister GoldaMeir that “this is the end of the third temple,” referring to an144

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIimpending collapse of the state of Israel. “Temple” was also thecode word for nuclear weapons. The Israelis assembled 13 twenty-kiloton atomic bombs. The Jericho missiles and the nuclear strike F-4s were armed and prepared for action against Syrian and Egyptiantargets. They also targeted Damascus with nuclear capable long-range artillery. U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was notifiedof the alert several hours later on the morning of October 9. TheU.S. decided to open an aerial resupply pipeline to Israel, and Israeliaircraft began picking up supplies that day.95There are other aspects of the Samson option that coulddestroy the world. Aside from destroying enemy troops andfortifications the enemy’s oil fields might be targeted. Exercising theSamson option would raise the price of gasoline to $50 a gallon. Itwould also raise radiation levels and cancer rates throughout theworld and contaminate the food supply. The West has a strategicinterest, like it or not, in making sure there is not going to be anotherHolocaust, this time a nuclear Holocaust, not only out of moralconsiderations but out of practical ones, because an atomic war inthe Middle East could destroy Western Civilization. This is anentirely different ballgame than when the West stood by and let theNazis slaughter at least 6 million defenseless Jews, something Jewswill never let happen again. That is why Paul’s Iranian policy ofusing Iran as a proxy to destroy Israel is irrational because of theIsraeli nuclear arsenal. The only way it makes sense is if the massmurder of Jews, despite the consequences, is your main goal.The United States has no choice. It must join Israel if Israeldecides to destroy the Iranian bomb factories: If Israel strikes Iran’sbomb factories unilaterally it is unlikely it could cripple Iran’sretaliatory capacity. Iran looks at Israel as an American proxy andwould retaliate against the United States even if the United Stateshad no involvement in the strike. But if American and NATO joinedin a strike against Iran, Iran could be brought to its knees and itwould be much more difficult for it to retaliate. I must reiterate. If itmeans the destruction of Israel, Ron Paul doesn’t care what the95. http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/farr.htm145

A. J. WEBERMANconsequences are for America. Hatred for Jews is in his blood justas it was in Adolf Hitler’s and Hitler ultimately destroyed Germany.One has to understand his mentality which was best articulated byWillis Carto “If Satan himself, with all of his superhuman genius anddiabolical ingenuity at his command, had tried to create apermanent disintegration and force for the destruction of thenations, he could have done no better than to invent the Jews.”RON PAUL: “THE THREAT FROM IRAN IS OVERBLOWN”Ron Paul is Iran’s best friend in Congress. Paul’s pro-Iranianstance dates back to at least December 1979 when he votedagainst awarding compensation to the hostages who had justreturned from Iran. In Big-Government Solutions Don’t Work(September 7, 2006) Paul said,In 1953, the U.S. and British overthrew thedemocratically elected Mohammed Mossadegh andinstalled the Shah. His brutal regime lasted for over25 years and ended with the Ayatollah taking powerin 1979. Our support for the Shah incited theradicalization of the Shiite clerics in Iran, resulting inthe hostage takeover.146

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIEverything is America’s fault, radical Islam has no responsibilityfor Iran becoming a theocracy. During Paul’s appearance on theAlex Jones bogus conspiracy show, Paul called allegations that Iranhad attempted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the UnitedStates a “propaganda stunt” of the Obama administration. Paul:Well, obviously, if we’re doing it [assassinating theIranian nuclear scientists] we shouldn’t be doing it.But this is an act of terrorism and we sympathize withthem, they’re victims of terrorism and we condemn allterrorism.Obviously the Iranian government wouldn’t be killingtheir own scientists, so we should have greatempathy for them. If we haven’t done it, we shouldprove to them or give them all reassurance that wehave not done it.In answer to your questions, if we are doing it, weought to quit. That wouldn’t make any sense. Youknow, participating in violent acts that would beequivalent to terrorism. At the same time, that’s allwe talk about, going around the world in the globalwar on terrorism, so there’d be no consistency there.Well, it’s a real mess; we should have done a lot lessa lot sooner. Everybody knows we have CIA that’s[sic] maneuvering in Iran. We had a drone shot down– maybe 2 drones shot down over Iran. We’re gettingready to put very punishing sanctions on them anddisrupting the oil market. And you know, they’re avery weak nation. They’re responding in a naturalway. But they don’t want trouble because they knowthey can be annihilated in about 40 minutes either byIsrael or the United states. This whole idea that theywant a fight, I think that is all concoction of the Westto prepare the people for a war that is likely to comewhen we have a policy like this. I think it makes the147

A. J. WEBERMANperfect argument for my non-interventionist foreignpolicy when we shouldn’t be engaged and stirring uptrouble.And all these things we do to try to get rid of theregime in Iran right now actually plays into theirhands because once we interfere and put onsanctions, this brings the Iranian people together.They’re having elections in a few months andAhmadinejad is not that strong politically. But whenwe interfere as outsiders, those who are struggling toget control of their government and have a moresensible government, we have to drive them into thearms of the government. Just as we were broughttogether after 9-11, where there were no dissenters,we came together, there were no Republicans orDemocrats, so we have to try to understand how ourpolicies actually do the opposite of what we intendthem to do.96Paul sympathized with the Iranians. He didn’t want to see theirscientists killed as he wanted them alive so they could produce anatomic device that will be used to wipe Israel off the face of themap. He is acting as a propagandist for Israel’s enemies. The last96. http://www.redstate.com/paulkib/2012/01/13/crazy-uncle-ron-iranians-want-to-occupy-strait-of-hormuz/148

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIthing he wants to see is Iran’s bomb factories destroy by the UnitedStates due to some concocted idea that Iran wants a war. Paulopposed sanctions against Iran because he wants to see themeconomically strong with plenty of funds for their “destroy Israel”plans. In 2009 he stated:I rise in strongest opposition to this new round ofsanctions on Iran, which is another significant steptoward a US war on that country. I find it shockingthat legislation this serious and consequential isbrought up in such a cavalier manner. Suspendingthe normal rules of the House to pass legislation is aprocess generally reserved for “non-controversial”business such as the naming of post offices. Are weto believe that this House takes matters of war andpeace as lightly as naming post offices?97Statement on Mark-up of HR 1905, the Iran Threat ReductionAct of 2011 House Foreign Affairs Committee - Rep. Ron Paul, M.D.November 2, 2011:I would like to express my concerns over the IranThreat Reduction Act of 2011 and my opposition to itbeing brought to the Floor for a vote. Let us be clearon one critical matter: the sanctions against Iranmandated by this legislation are definite steps towarda US attack on Iran. They will also, if actually applied,severely disrupt global trade and undermine the USeconomy, thereby harming our national security. I amsurprised and disturbed that the committee viewedthis aggressive legislation to be so bipartisan anduncontroversial that a recorded vote was not evencalled. Some may argue that we are pursuingsanctions so as to avoid war with Iran, but recenthistory teaches us otherwise. For how many yearswere sanctions placed on Iraq while we were told97. http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-12-15/ron-paul-no-sanctions-on-iran/149

A. J. WEBERMANthey were necessary to avoid war? Thousands ofinnocent Iraqis suffered and died under US sanctionsand still the US invaded, further destroying thecountry. Are we safer after spending a trillion dollarsor more to destroy Iraq and then rebuild it? Thesenew sanctions against Iran increasingly target othercountries that seek to trade with Iran. The legislationwill severely punish foreign companies or foreignsubsidiaries of US companies if they do not submit tothe US trade embargo on Iran. Some 15 years afterthe Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 failed to bring Iran toits knees, it is now to be US foreign policy to threatenforeign countries and companies.The Iran Threat Reduction Act authorizes what willno doubt be massive amounts of US taxpayer moneyto undermine the Iranian government and fomentanother "Green Revolution" there. We will establishand prop up certain factions over others, send themenormous amounts of money, and attempt to fix anyresulting elections so that our preferred candidateswin. Considering the disturbing aftermath of our"democracy promotion" operations in places likeEgypt, Iraq, Libya, where radical forces haveapparently come out on top, it may be fair toconclude that such actions actually undermine USnational security rather than bolster it.150

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIOn July 18, 1994, a terrorist attack was mounted on the Jewishcommunitys AMIA building in Buenos Aires, Argentina, killing 85and injuring over 250 people. The AMIA building was totallydestroyed and heavy damage was caused to the surroundings. Theattack was perpetrated by a suicide terrorist driving a car bombcontaining hundreds of kilograms of explosives. On July 15, 2008pretending to condemn the attack on the AMIA Jewish CommunityCenter in Buenos Aires in July 1994 and for other purposes RonPaul had this to say to Congress:Madam Speaker, as one who is most consistentlyopposed to war and violence, I join my colleagues incondemning the brutal and unjustified attack on aJewish community center in Argentina 14 years ago.I do not support this resolution; however, as itmisuses a tragedy 14 years ago in a foreign countryto push for US war against Iran today. Although thisresolution clearly blames Iran and Hezbollah for thebombing, in fact the investigation is ongoing and farfrom conclusive. In an article titled “U.S. Uses Probeto Pressure Iran” the Wall Street Journal earlier thisyear suggested that renewed US interest in this 14year old case is more related to politics than agenuine desire for justice.Reported the Journal,151

A. J. WEBERMAN“As tensions between the U.S. and Iran persist,Washington and its allies are using an investigationinto a 1994 terrorist attack in Argentina to maintainpressure on the Iranian regime. Behind the scenes,Bush administration officials are encouraging theprobe, which centers on the bombing of a Jewishcommunity center in Buenos Aires. One U.S. goal isto cause legal problems for some of Irans politicalleaders. Administration officials also hope to use thematter to highlight Irans alleged role in financing andsupporting terrorism around the world.Those pushing for a Unites States attack on Iran areusing this tragic event to foment fear in the UnitedStates that Iran and Hezbollah are perpetratingterrorist acts in the Western Hemisphere. This isanother in an ongoing series of resolutions we see onthe House floor pushing us toward war against Iran. Ihave no doubt that we will see another similarresolution on the floor next week, and the week after,and so on until we find ourselves making anothertragic mistake as we did in 2002 with H J Res 114giving the president the authority to attack Iraq. I urgemy colleagues to resist this push to warwith Iran before it is too late.98Once again Paul defended Iran by saying that there is noconclusive evidence that they were involved in the terrorist attack.Argentinean authorities conducted an extensive investigation intothe AMIA attack, with significant international cooperation, andconcluded that "the decision to carry out the AMIA attack was made,and the attack was orchestrated, by the highest officials of theIslamic Republic of Iran at the time, and that these officialsinstructed Lebanese Hezbollah -- a group that has historically beensubordinated to the economic and political interests of the Tehranregime -- to carry out the attack." Iran and Hezbollah each had their98. http://lewrockwell.com/paul/paul465.html152

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIown reasons for wanting to attack Israeli or Jewish targets inArgentina in 1994, as they had just two years earlier when theybombed the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires. At the time, Tehranwas furious over Buenos Aires decision to cease all nuclearcooperation with Iran in 1992 for fear that Irans nuclear programwas not limited to peaceful purposes. In 1994, Argentina terminatedits nuclear cooperation. Hezbollah, meanwhile, sought to avengethe Israeli assassination of its leader, Abbas Moussawi, in 1992,and then Israels capture of Hezbollah ally Mustapha Dirani inSouthern Lebanon in May 1994. But Ron Paul knows better, hisinvestigation was more far-reaching than that of the ArgentineGovernment. On April 5, 2006 Paul delivered this pro-Iranianspeech entitled Iran - The Next Neocon Target:If Iran had a nuclear weapon, why would this bedifferent from Pakistan, India, and North Koreahaving one? Why does Iran have less right to adefensive weapon than these other countries? If Iranhad a nuclear weapon, the odds of her initiating anattack against anybody-- which would guarantee herown annihilation -- are zero. And the same goes forthe possibility she would place weapons in the handsof a non-state terrorist group. There’s been a lot ofmisinformation regarding Iran’s nuclear program.This distortion of the truth has been used to pump upemotions in Congress to pass resolutionscondemning her and promoting UN sanctions.IAEA Director General Mohamed El-Baradi has neverreported any evidence of “undeclared” sources orspecial nuclear material in Iran, or any diversion ofnuclear material.We demand that Iran prove it is not in violation ofnuclear agreements, which is asking them impossiblyto prove a negative. El-Baradi states Iran is in153

A. J. WEBERMANcompliance with the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT) required IAEA safeguard agreement.We forget that the weapons we feared SaddamHussein had been supplied to him by the U.S., andwe refused to believe UN inspectors and the CIA thathe no longer had them. Likewise, Iran received herfirst nuclear reactor from us. Now we’re hystericallywondering if someday she might decide to build abomb in self interest.There are some who may not agree strongly with anyof my arguments, and instead believe thepropaganda: Iran and her President, MahmoudAhmadinejad, are thoroughly irresponsible and havethreatened to destroy Israel. So all measures mustbe taken to prevent Iran from getting nukes-- thus thecampaign to intimidate and confront Iran.First, Iran doesn’t have a nuke and is nowhere closeto getting one, according to the CIA. If they did haveone, using it would guarantee almost instantaneousannihilation by Israel and the United States.Hysterical fear of Iran is way out of proportion toreality.99Paul wants to see Iran get nuclear weapons more than anythingin the world. He calls them “defensive weapons.” But what country isIran threatened by? Paul quotes El-Baradi the former head of theInternational Atomic Energy Agency as saying that Iran is notdeveloping a bomb. IAEA has now joined the ranks of those whoare warning of the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran. Iran is quitepossibly developing nuclear bombs -- with this assessment, theIAEA has taken a clear stance against Tehran for the firsttime. Under former director general, Egypts Mohamed El-Baradi,who headed the IAEA from 1997 to 2009, the reports from theVienna-based agency always read the same: The IAEA had asked99. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 358154

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIran for more cooperation and transparency, but Tehran had turneda deaf ear and only granted limited access to IAEA inspectors. Yearafter year, the conclusions that El-Baradei drew from the briefreports sounded similar: There was no proof against the Iranians, sothey were left alone. In 2009, he was succeeded by Yukiya Amanoof Japan who reported that a weapons program was indeedunderway. Paul wants Israel to wait until Tel Aviv is destroyed thenretaliate. During a town hall meeting in December 2011 Paul wasasked what President Paul would do about Iran:Well I’d be provoking them a lot less because they’rereacting to the provoking of the West saying “we’regonna put on sanctions.” We have them surroundedwith nuclear weapons and we’re claiming that they’regonna build a nuclear weapon and there’s noevidence for this. So we’re just looking for trouble.We’re building the war propaganda against Iran justas we did against Iraq. And people want to go to waragainst Iran. And I think they’re reacting to theprovocations of so many other people saying that“we’re liable to bomb you because you are building anuclear weapon.” But our CIA doesn’t confirm thatnor does the UN confirm that. So they’re actingactually in a rational manner because they’re saying“they’re gonna attack us and start bombing us.” Theyhave to say “well, we don’t have any nuclearweapons, we can’t really defend ourselves. So wemight sink a boat, sink a ship out there in the PersianGulf”, hoping that we might back off. I just think we’retreating the whole thing wrong.Paul knows that Iran is attempting to construct an atomicweapon to use against Israel so he does everything he can tofacilitate this project. He twists the truth and accuses America ofprovoking a peaceful Iran. By the time Paul gave this speech therewas plenty of evidence Iran is building the bomb from the UNinspectors yet he disregards it. Is Paul on some intelligence155

A. J. WEBERMANcommittee in Congress that makes him privy to classifiedinformation? This is a lie that Paul knows to be untrue. But what doyou expect from a lying Nazi scum? Notice how Paul nevermentions Israel by name but says “so many other people.” If heused to word Israel too often people would get a better idea ofwhere he is really coming from. Paul says that the threat to sinkships passing through the Straits of Harmuz with conventionalweapons means Iran lacks atomic weapons. There is no logic therejust propaganda. Paul’s most convincing argument is that Americais “building the war propaganda against Iran just as we did againstIraq.” This is why a lot of Iraqi vets support Paul.THE BOYS WHO CRIED WOLFOWITZThere is an Aesop fable about a shepherd boy who pretendedthat his flock was threatened by a wolf. When the villagers came tohelp him he told them “I was just puttin’ you on” and laughed. "Dontcry wolf, shepherd boy," said the villagers, "when theres no wolf!"They went grumbling back down the hill back to their village. Whena real wolf came along and the boy shouted Wolf! Wolf! no onebelieved him and the boy was eaten alive. The neo-cons cried“wolfowitz” when it came to the dangers emanating from Iraq andnow when a real danger of WMDs comes from Iran, their warningsand the warning of others are discredited.The New York Times reported “[Those who believe Iran isdeveloping a bomb] criticize the C.I.A. for being overly cautious in itsassessments of Iran, suggesting that it is perhaps over-compensating for its faulty intelligence assessments in 2002 aboutIraq’s purported weapons programs, which turned out not to exist.”The Times also reported:Haunting such discussions [of Iran’s nuclearweapons program] is the memory of the Iraq war.The intelligence on weapons of mass destruction,which was one of the Bush administration’s mainrationales for the invasion, proved to be devastatinglywrong. And the news media, including The New York156

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZITimes, which ultimately apologized to readers forsome of its coverage of claims of Iraqi weapons ofmass destruction, are again under scrutiny by criticswary of exaggerated threats.100The neo-cons are responsible forthe rise of Ron Paul and Nazismin America. When they instigatedthe war in Iraq they played rightinto the hands of the Nazis whoclaimed that the Jews werebehind almost all major wars.Neo-con Paul Wolfowitz and hiscrew followed the wishes of the rightwing Likud Party, that wantedrevenge for the SCUD missiles that hit Israel during the Gulf War,missiles that had the potential to turn Israel into one big gaschamber, missiles that could have killed Wolfowitz’s sister who livesin Israel, or could have killed Wolfowitz himself, who was visitingIsrael during these attacks.101Israelis had to drape plastic acrosstheir windows and wear gas masks not knowing what thosewarheads contained. They were terrorized by Saddam who shouldhave been taken out immediately however the US did not wantIsrael involved in the war. Later there was no reprisal against Iraqfor this act of war and this made Israel appear weak. In 1992, whilehe was working under then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney,Wolfowitz, upset by President George H. W. Bush’s decision toleave Saddam Husseins regime in place after the 1991 Gulf Warargued in a draft version of a Defense Policy Guidance paper thatthe U.S. should use pre-emptive force to prevent countries fromdeveloping weapons of mass destruction, and act alone ifnecessary. Although the draft guidance was quashed soon after itwas leaked to the New York Times, these doctrines later found their100. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/world/middleeast/in-din-over-iran-echoes-of-iraq-war-news-analysis.html101. George Bush, A World Transformed, Knopf September 14, 1998.157

A. J. WEBERMANway into George W. Bush’s national security strategy.102Wolfowitzhad planned this war years in advance. Jewish neo-cons wereplaced in key positions in the Department of Defense.Obama’s choice of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense is hisanswer to the neo-cons. Ron Paul remarked:Many who object to our continued foreign policy ofendless war and empire overseas feel encouragedby Obama’s choice of Senator Hagel to head theDefense Department. Hagel has shown someadmirable willingness to advise caution overseas. Heis seen as unenthusiastic over the prospects of a USwar on Iran, which is certainly to be welcomed.Nevertheless because he does represent a moremoderate voice in foreign policy than the neo-conservatives can tolerate, they are dragging hisname through the mud. In choosing Hagel, then, wecan hope the president is signaling that he willpursue a less aggressive foreign policy in his secondterm.A massive propaganda operation wasbegun. The people involved in this op were toosmart to believe the lies they generated. Forexample Dr. Laurie Mylroie the descendant ofHolocaust survivors received her Ph.D. inPolitical Science from Harvard University andher B.A. from Cornell. She was an Assistant Professor in HarvardsPolitical Science Department. In 1990 she co-wrote, with New YorkTimes reporter Judith Miller, the pro-war book “Saddam Husseinand the Crisis in the Gulf.” Next, she became an AssociateProfessor in the Strategy Department at the U.S. Naval WarCollege. Subsequently, she was a member of the staff of theWashington Institute for Near East Policy with Martin Indyk. Mylroie102. Interhemispheric Resource Center Profile of Lewis Libbyhttp://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/libby/libby_body.html158

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIand Eleanor Wolfowitz, the former wife of Paul Wolfowitz, who lostmost of his extended family in the holocaust, wrote Study ofRevenge that alleged Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind of the firstWorld Trade Center bombing, was an Iraqi mole. Deputy Secretaryof Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who pretended that he bought thisnonsense, asked Bush to declare Ramzi Yousef an enemycombatant and transfer him to a U.S. military installation to forcehim to confess that he was actually an Iraqi intelligence agent. Thiscaused a top Bureau of Prisons official to make an unauthorizedentry to Yousefs cell at Florence, Admax Penitentiary to see if hewould go along with this sham in order to lessen the harshness ofhis prison conditions. By 2003 this theory had been dismissed asone that was concocted to link Saddam Hussein with 9/11, since, asa result of the arrest of Ramzi Yousef’s uncle, Khalid ShaikhMuhammed, his family tree was revealed, and it was demonstratedthat Yousef was not a mole but KSM’s nephew. But Mylroiecontinued the deception and even did a piece for the neo-con WallStreet Journal claiming this new evidence proved she was right.When the CIA failed to find a link between Saddam’sIraq and Al-Qaeda Wolfowitz had Douglas J. Feith,Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, form a specialunit in the Pentagon to link the two. Feith’s unit wasknown as the Office of Special Plans; actually it wasthe Office of War Propaganda. Before he becamepart of the Wolfowitz Pack Feith “represented a leading Israeliarmaments manufacturer (the IDF – the Israeli Defense Forces) inestablishing joint ventures with leading U.S. aerospacemanufacturers for manufacture and sale of missile systems, to theU.S. Department of Defense and worldwide.”103A report by thePentagons acting inspector general, Thomas F. Gimble, statedFeith, developed, produced and then disseminated alternativeintelligence assessments on the Iraq and Al Qaeda relationship,which included some conclusions that were inconsistent with theconsensus of the Intelligence Community, to senior decision-103. James Zogby “Revolving Door Poses Danger to Defense” BaltimoreSun August 7, 2001.159

A. J. WEBERMANmakers. Eric S. Edelman, an undersecretary of defense, attackedthe Gimble Report. Feith was pleased that the inspector generalhad cleared him of violating laws or Defense Department policies.Richard Perle and David Wurmser aided Feith.Richard Perle, a former aide to the pro-Israel Senator from Washington “Scoop”Jackson was an assistant secretary ofdefense in the Reagan administration, and aformer member of George W. Bush’sDefense Policy Board who had strong ties toLikud. Pearle served as a consultant to Douglas Feith when Feithran a firm that was involved with the secular government ofTurkey.104Richard Perle resigned from the Defense Policy Board inFebruary 2004,105after he called for the head of the CIA andDefense Intelligence Agency to step down due to the fact that noweapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.106I encounteredPerle while working as a researcher for Senator Richard Schweiker,(R- Penn). My associate, Michael Canfield had visited ScoopJackson’s office and displayed the tramp shots to Perle, who washis aide. Perle in turn called the FBI and offered to act as aninformer on Canfield.It was no coincidence that Iraqi War Hawk David Wurmser wasmarried to an Israeli terrorism expert at the Hudson Institute, MeyravWurmser. Her Ph.D. thesis was on the ideas that formed the LikudParty. Dr. Wurmser taught political science at the United StatesNaval Academy. She writes articles for such neo-con pro-Israelpublications as the Weekly Standard.107David Wurmser was aspecial advisor to Vice President Cheney and a former Director of104. James Zogby New Questions About Feith Washington Watch May 13,2001.105. Wall Street Journal Review and Outlook February 26, 2004.106. Eric Rosenberg “Advisor Want U.S. Intelligence Chiefs to Quit” TheToronto Star February 18, 2004107. http://www.sipr.org/default.aspx?action=PublicationDetails&id=178160

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIMiddle East Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, which wasbehind the Iraqi National Congress. The AEI had published a bookwritten by a man who claimed to be a former Iraqi nuclear scientistwhich stated the Iraq was hard at work building an atomic bomb.This Attack Iraq Pack cooked upnumerous other stories of Iraq’s potentialdeployment of WMD’s and attempts byIraq to purchase yellow cake uranium inNiger. In his State of the Union speech onJanuary 28, 2003 Bush said, “The Britishgovernment has learned that SaddamHussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium fromAfrica.” WMD investigator Joseph C. Wilson debunked this lie inFebruary 2002 and as a result neo-con “Scooter” Libby released thefact that Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, was a CIA agent108to thepress as a reprisal against Wilson. Wolfowitz had hired Libby in1981 as a speechwriter and an Asia analyst at the StateDepartment under President Ronald Reagan and in 1989 as astrategist in the Defense Department, headed by Cheney in theadministration of George H. W. Bush. Between government stints,Libby practiced law with the firm of Leonard Garment, counsel toPresident Richard M. Nixon. Libby was convicted for perjury inconnection with the Plame Affair. Before his sentence wascommuted he was hired by the Hudson Institute.109This grouping thought it represented the interests of Israel butultimately these deceptions could be a contributing factor to thedestruction of the Jewish State. The neo-cons removal of Saddamshifted the balance of power to Iran. It also shifted the balance ofpower in the Republican Party. These know-it-alls gave Ron Paul, aNazi intent on the destruction of Israel, ammunition to use against108. http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/rn20030714.shtml109. http://www.hudson.org/learn/index.cfm?fuseaction=board_of_trustees161

A. J. WEBERMANhis Republican rivals. Now Paul can put forth the irrational argumentthat if Iran had nuclear weapons it might contribute to world peace:I do not quite have the concern that others haveexpressed that Iran is on the verge of having anuclear weapon. They have never been found inviolation. There has been a lot of talk and a lot ofaccusation, but technically they have never beenfound in any violation. There has been no talk, it hasbeen implied, but there has been no serious talk thatIran is a threat to our national security. There is noway. Even if they had nuclear weapons, they are notgoing to be a threat to our national security. Pakistan,that is not a democratic nation. It happens to be amilitary dictatorship. They have nuclear weapons.India has nuclear weapons. As a matter of fact, thenuclear weapons serve as a balance of powerbetween two countries. The Soviets, had 30,000nuclear weapons, and we followed a policy ofcontainment. We did not say we have to go into theSoviet Union and bomb their establishment. No.Finally that problem dissipated. And yet we createunnecessary problems for ourselves. We go lookingfor trouble, and I see this as very detrimental for whatwe are doing with this resolution.110Shi‘a teachings promise the return of a messiah. For someShi‘a the messiah will be Muhammad al-Mahdi the Twelfth Imam,who went into occultation in 874 AD and is expected to return beforethe Day of Judgment to lead the righteous against the forces of evil.The Soviets did not believe that the destruction of Israel will bringabout the return of the Mahdi, the Iranians do, nor did the Sovietsbelieve in an afterlife in an Islamic paradise.Iran has made it very clear that it wishes to destroy Israel. Thisis from the semi-official Iranian news agency.110. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/Z?r109:H16FE6-0016:29301:4489:162

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZITehran, October 26 – Iran’s President MahmoudAhmadinejad called for Israel to be “wiped off themap.” “The establishment of the Zionist regime was amove by the world oppressor against the Islamicworld,” the President told a conference in Tehranentitled The World without Zionism. “The skirmishesin the occupied land are part of a war of destiny. Theoutcome of hundreds of years of war will be definedin Palestinian land,” he said. “As the Imam said,Israel must be wiped off the map,” said Ahmadinejad,referring to the late founder of the Islamic Republic ofIran, Imam Khomeini.111The “wiped off the face of the map” quotation is a transliterationof vanish from the page of time. The remark was made at aconference titled World Without Zionism, a play on Karl Marx’sWorld Without Jews. But when the Nazis like Stormfront and Pauland their self-hating Jewish puppets translate it they claim that itmerely means regime change in Israel to a “non-Zionist” state. Sodon’t worry about Ahmadinejad: he is not another Hitler but justsomeone who wants to help out the Jews with regime change.111. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/26/world/africa/26iht-iran.html163

A. J. WEBERMANOn Al-Quds Day 2012 (also known as Death to Israel Day) theIranian Hitler made it quite clear that if millions upon millions of Jewsdied in an Atomic Holocaust the world would be free of evil:It is quite clear to everyone today that Zionismcounters human perfection and human societies andis the main cause of human decline. A minority groupthat is anti-humane and corrupted and is againstdivine values has been organized and is counteringall the divine values. These are deviated personswho merely think about wealth and power anddominating others. For more than two thousandyears, and at least four hundred years, that a smallnumber of Zionists have caused turbulence in humansocieties and have caused irreparable loses.Slavery, colonialism have been mainly planned bythese Zionists. World War I and II - based on cleardocuments - have been aimed at domination and thewars have been planned and designed by behind thescenes Zionists. The Zionists since they dominatedthe US administration they have brought under thecontrol all the affairs of the world. A few peopleacting behind the scène of US administrations andthey have under the control all the points of power inthe world and they dominate all the banking systemof the world and also they have dominated the worldmedia. And they are using all these tools fordestroying values, cultures, nations and theexistence of countries. You see that wherever thereis a major moral destruction and decadence. Yousee there are Zionists companies and corporationsand wherever there is massacre and a slaughter theZionists are involved.The formation of the Zionist regime is apretext and an opportunity for actually supportingcertain governments, the governments that serve the164

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIZionists. They want to create convergence becauseinstead of religion, instead of God [Allah], instead ofthe prophet [Mohammad], the divine book [theQur’an] and all the perfect values they want todestroy all these and instead create thosegovernments that serve the Zionists. And the Zionistregime is the tool that is used by the Zionists fordominating the Middle East, and the region, and theworld. The existence of the Zionist regime is an insultto all humanity and the destruction of the personalityand character of nations and human beings. Youknow they are involved in the inter-racial [racist]teachings. They only consider themselves ashumans and they consider others as animals. Theyactually, the Zionists, consider [as] authorized thekilling of humans and the Zionist plundering thewealth of others. You see the Western governments,they tolerate being insulted, but they do not tolerateany criticism of the Zionist regime and they justify allthe crimes committed by the Zionist regime, becausethey rely on the Zionists and the Zionists pay themmoney for propaganda. And it’s a party comprisingseven to eight thousand people and they are runningall the affairs. It’s a Satanic party today.Fighting the Zionist regime is equal toprotecting the rights of all humans and alsodefending human dignity and opening the way forsaving humans from colonialism and arrogance andsaving humans from poverty and misery. The wholeworld should know, with the grace of God, protectingthe Zionist regime has turned into a commitment bymany countries, Western powers, on the other side.On the other hand you see that with the grace of godworld al-Quds day has turned into a focal point forunity and solidarity of Muslims aimed at eliminatingthis fake Zionist regime. For several hundred years165

A. J. WEBERMANhumanity has been just countering the Zionists andfor several hundred for almost one hundred yearsyou see the nations have been captivated by theZionist management. You see in a big country likethe US the presidential hopefuls they have to bowbefore the Zionists and show their commitmentotherwise they will not have the chance inparticipating in the American elections…Dominating Palestine has been a historicalwish by the Zionists; tens of conflicts have been setup in order to attain this wish. And close to seventyyears designs have been made and crimes havebeen committed for setting up this fake regimeZionist regime and all the human boundaries havebeen trampled upon so that the Zionist regime wouldbe imposed on the region. And all the might andcapabilities of the arrogant powers were used andthey managed to obtain success to some extent,[however] exactly at a time when they thought theZionist regime has been stabilized and it has beenaccepted by the regional nations due to a majormove by the Iranian nation known as the IslamicRevolution guided by a divine man and subsequentlywith the awareness of nations and their movementagainst Zionists and the revitalization of Palestinianresistance in the past two or three decades thefoundations of the Zionist regime has beenjeopardized and the philosophy behind its formationhas been put to question. The Zionists they felt thedanger and you see the Western nations are aftersaving the Zionist regime and prior to this they weresaving the Zionist so they would have the [?] ofrestoring themselves…Most dictators trample upon the rights onnations. The majority of these dictators depend on166

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIthe Zionists and the arrogants. These dictators haveno way but to be dependent on them. But hopefullythe nations have been awakened and they aredemanding their rights. All nations have beencaptivated even in the United States and Europe.Most governments in the West are affiliated to theZionists and the people have no right to choose.They [the Zionists] have formed several parties andin fact when they become tired of one party theyhave no choice but to depend on, resort to, anotherparty and all these parties are after serving theZionists. And you see the people are shouting in theUS and Europe but there is no one to save thepeople.And of course the existence of the Zionistregime is a guarantee for this plundering. It’s a base,it’s a focal point. The arrogant powers overlook thedignity and respect of all humans including Muslims.A Muslim nation can destroy all these arrogantpowers and justice is the opposite aside of arroganceand they will victimize everything and in order toobtain power and wealth and any negligence cancause irreparable losses. Any negligence will cause afailure.Today they are engaged in a complicatedscheme and that means a two state plan. The Zionistregime is a cancerous tumor. Even a singlecancerous cell in an inch of the Palestine land thesame situation will continue in the future. TheZionists are domineering elements and want to theyare after expansionism. An academic colleague ofours who is at the US met me in one of my tripsoverseas. I mean an Iranian met me he said that youare right concerning the Zionists. He said we wereworking in an academic team and there was a single167

A. J. WEBERMANperson who was a pro-Zionist he wanted to becomea member and the other 15 members opposed hismembership and he just kept coming and going and Ifelt pity and I asked the other members for this pro-Zionist person to become a member of the academicboard after six or seven years I returned and I sawnone of the members are present there and all of themembers are new and find one of those old membersand I say what happened to the team and he saidthat single pro Zionist person has in fact led to theexpulsion of all the other members and he hasbrought his pro-Zionist friends to become membersof that academic board.The presence of the Zionist in a single inch ofthe Palestinian lands is dangerous let alone having agovernment there. This is my understanding of theongoing situation. This is my personal understandingand this is my understanding this is the scheme thathas been designed do not level any allegationsagainst me later on this is my personal understandingand in fact the Zionists are after just having atheatrical performance and they later would say thatokay we going accept a two state government, aperson over the line would be granted to Palestiniansthe Zionists would become independent and even iften percent of the land is given to the Zionist thatwould still be dangerous and a two state solutionmeans a historical for the Zionists to restorethemselves and in fact accepting the two statesolution means just losing and eliminating all theefforts that have been made for hundreds of years.And any person who accepts that two state solutionhe won’t be in line with the interest of world nations.All world nations must pay attention to this - thecriterion for the honesty of rulers and politicians iscontingent on restoring the rights of nations and also168

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIcombating the Zionist regime. One cannot say thathe is that he is after restoring the rights of nationsand he is in line with the Zionist policies then onecannot believe in him. It is not possible to have aperson who doesn’t combat the Zionist regime whoreconciles and compromises with the Zionist regimeand at the same time he cannot claim to be anadvocate of freedom. So one should be cautious sothat the NATO forces will not claim to be advocatesof freedom and freedom will not be established withthe bullets of NATO forces. What matters is theindependence and the basic rights of nations.In conclusion I want to address the arrogantpowers and the Zionists. Open your ears! The springyou spoke about is not merely an Arabist spring. Thisis a starting point. An Arabist spring is good but youshould know that the spring of humanity will unfold.The Western and American springs will be unfoldedsoon with the grace of Allah.The nations are going through the process ofawaking. How much longer can you engage in acts ofdeception? He said that I want to make a change andeverybody thought that he wants to make a changeeveryone thought he wants to make changes withinin the US and later he said that he meant thechanges in the Middle East. I am telling you it is toyour benefit to set the Zionists aside and recognizethe rights of nations and also recognize your interestsand pursue your interests within your owngeographical borders. You should know that a newspring will be unfolding if you do not pay attention tothis piece of advice. The nations will in fact contributeto your decline.169

A. J. WEBERMANStop supporting the Zionist regime and theywill be of no use for you. The regional nations havebeen awakened. Perhaps though instigating tribaldifferences you may have a chance for a short periodof time. This will be for the short term. You shouldhonestly help the regional nations. You should knowthat very soon the nations will soon eliminate and putan end to the Zionist regime.You are after a new Middle East and we arealso after a new Middle East. A new Middle East willdefinitely take shape but with the grace of Allah andthe help of nations there will be no trace of theexistence of the Americans and the Zionists.Stop insulting the Iranian nation and correct yourliterature. You should be friends of the Iranian nationthat is your benefit and the Iranian nation has alwaysmanaged to bury all its ill wishes in the course ofhistory and you are the weakest and the same willhappen to you and this will only bring aboutembarrassment for you will bring about shame foryou and the domination of the Zionists will bedestroyed and we have bright prospect ahead.Communism is gone and capitalism will also bedestroyed and the Imam of the time will establish thedivine governance and the true prosperity ofhumanity will be materialized and we hope for such aday.Let’s dispense with the theory, put forth by many self-hatingJews on the Left, that Ahmadinejad only hates Zionists and notJews. Ahmadinejad made it clear that he is referring to Jews whenhe uses the word Zionist.For more than two thousand years, and at least fourhundred years, that a small number of Zionists have170

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIcaused turbulence in human societies and havecaused irreparable loses – Ahmadinejad.There was no Zionist movement 2,000 years ago however therewere Jews. Hitler:Today, after two thousand years,with deepest emotion I recognizemore profoundly than everbefore - the fact that it was forthis that He had to shed Hisblood upon the Cross. As aChristian I have no duty to allow myself to becheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truthand justice. And as a man I have the duty to see to itthat human society does not suffer the samecatastrophic collapse as did the civilization of theancient world some two thousand years ago - acivilization which was driven to its ruin through thissame Jewish people. - Munich April 12, 1922It is quite clear to everyone today that Zionismcounters human perfection and human societies andis the main cause of human decline – Ahmadinejad.In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote that the Jews were responsible for allthe evil and troubles in the world. This idea was reflected in thepropaganda pamphlet (1930) of the Nazi propagandist Goebbels:Why do we oppose the Jews? Weare enemies of the Jews, becausewe are fighters for the freedom ofthe German people. The Jew isthe cause and the beneficiary ofour misery…he is the real causefor our loss of the Great War…that is the reason whywe, as nationalists and as socialists, oppose the Jew.He has corrupted our race, fouled our morals,171

A. J. WEBERMANundermined our customs, and broken our power. TheJew is the plastic demon of the decline of mankind. . ..We are enemies of the Jews because we belong tothe German people. The jaw is our greatestmisfortune. .The Nazi Rudolph Hess expressed the same viewsaccording to the retired medical superintendent of a British Prison,Dr N. R. Phillips, “In my experience Hess’s strongest delusion wasin regard to the Jews. He regarded them as responsible for all thetroubles in the world. He thought they exercised a hypnotic influenceover everyone and had a hand in everything unpleasant thathappened, even to himself.”112World War I and II - based on clear documents -have been aimed at domination and the wars havebeen planned and designed by behind the scenesZionists – Ahmadinejad.Who triggered the first and second world wars, thatleft seventy millions killed and hundreds of millionsinjured or homeless? Who used nuclear bombagainst defenseless people, and stockpiledthousands of warheads in their arsenals? –Ahmadinejad UN Speech 2011Ahmadinejad objected to the A-bomb being droppedon Nazi ally Japan. What these statements reveal is that weare dealing with someone who is totally insane. Hitlerbelieved in conspiracy theories that regarded the Jews asCommunists and claimed that they had deliberately madeGermany lose World War I by causing strikes, subversionand revolution on the home front. He also said that they haddeliberately caused the Great Depression. Hitler never saidthe Jews CAUSED World War I. He also blamed the Jews112. The Madness of Rudolph Hess - and the Places It Led HimSuite101.com http://suite101.com/article/the-madness-of-rudolph-hess---and-the-places-it-led-him-a372724#ixzz241RKtDfv172

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIfor the surrender of the Germans and the Treaty ofVersailles and for the disarmament that followed.But the politicians of the Rightdeserve exactly the samereproach. It was through theirmiserable cowardice that thoseruffians of Jews who came intopower in 1918 were able to robthe nation of its arms. The conservative politicianshave neither right nor reason on their side when theyappeal to disarmament as the cause whichcompelled them to adopt a policy of prudence (that isto say, cowardice). Here, again, the contrary is thetruth. Disarmament is the result of their lack of spirit. -Mein Kampf.You see that wherever there is a major moraldestruction and decadence. You see there areZionists companies and corporations and whereverthere is massacre and a slaughter the Zionists areinvolved – Ahmadinejad.What soon gave me cause forvery serious consideration werethe activities of the Jews incertain branches of life, into themystery of which I penetratedlittle by little. Was there anyshady undertaking, any form of foulness, especiallyin cultural life, in which at least one Jew did notparticipate? On putting the probing knife carefully tothat kind of abscess one immediately discovered, likea maggot in a putrescent body, a little Jew who wasoften blinded by the sudden light - Mein Kampf.A few people acting behind the scène of USadministrations and they have under the control all173

A. J. WEBERMANthe points of power in the world and they dominateall the banking system of the world and also theyhave dominated the world media – Ahmadinejad.I gradually discovered that theSocial Democratic Press waspredominantly controlled by Jews.But I did not attach specialimportance to this circumstance,for the same state of affairsexisted also in other newspapers. But there was onestriking fact in this connection. It was that there wasnot a single newspaper with which Jews wereconnected that could be spoken of as National, in themeaning that my education and convictions attachedto that word - Mein Kampf.The function of the so-called liberal Press was to digthe grave for the German people and REICH. Nomention need be made of the lying Marxist Press. Tothem the spreading of falsehood is as much a vitalnecessity as the mouse is to a cat. Their sole task isto break the national backbone of the people, thuspreparing the nation to become the slaves ofinternational finance and its masters, the Jews - MeinKampf.From the political point of view it is not in the interestsof Great Britain that Germany should be ruined evenstill more, but such a proceeding would be very muchin the interests of the international money-marketsmanipulated by the Jew - Mein Kampf.A minority group that is anti-humane and corruptedand is against divine values has been organized andis countering all the divine values – Ahmadinejad.Their very existence is an incarnate denial of the174

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIbeauty of Gods image in His creation. - Mein Kampf.Slavery, colonialism have been mainly planned bythese Zionists – Ahmadinejad.That is why the Jewish people,despite the intellectual powerswith which they are apparentlyendowed, have not a culture--certainly not a culture of theirown. The culture which the Jewenjoys to-day is the product of the work of others andthis product is debased in the hands of the Jew -Mein Kampf.And it’s a party comprising seven to eight thousandpeople and they are running all the affairs. It’s aSatanic party today – Ahmadinejad.By presenting his doctrine as partand parcel of a just re-vindicationof social rights, the Jewpropagated the doctrine all themore effectively. But at the sametime he provoked the opposition of decent peoplewho refused to admit these demands which, becauseof the form and pseudo-philosophical trimmings inwhich they are presented, seemed fundamentallyunjust and impossible for realization. For, under thecloak of purely social concepts there are hidden aimswhich are of a Satanic character - Mein Kampf.He will stop at nothing. His utterly low-down conductis so appalling that one really cannot be surprised ifin the imagination of our people the Jew is picturedas the incarnation of Satan and the symbol of evil -Mein Kampf.175

A. J. WEBERMANAnd the Zionist regime is the tool that is used by theZionists for dominating the Middle East, and theregion, and the world. The existence of the Zionistregime is an insult to all humanity and the destructionof the personality and character of nations andhuman beings – Ahmadinejad.The Jewish domination in theState seems now so fully assuredthat not only can he now afford tocall himself a Jew once again, buthe even acknowledges freely andopenly what his ideas are onracial and political questions. A section of the Jewsavows itself quite openly as an alien people, but evenhere there is another falsehood. When the Zioniststry to make the rest of the world believe that the newnational consciousness of the Jews will be satisfiedby the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine,the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe thesimple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightestintention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine soas to live in it. What they really are aiming at is toestablish a central organization for their internationalswindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, thiscannot be controlled by any of the other States.Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers whohave been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other swindlers - MeinKampf.You see that wherever there is a major moraldestruction and decadence. You see there areZionists companies and corporations and whereverthere is massacre and a slaughter the Zionists areinvolved – Ahmadinejad.176

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIOn April 1, 1933, a week after Hitler became dictator of Germany,he ordered a boycott of Jewish shops, banks, offices anddepartment stores.They want to create convergence because instead ofreligion, instead of God [Allah], instead of the prophet[Mohammad], the divine book [the Qur’an] and all theperfect values they want to destroy all these andinstead create those governments that serve theZionists – Ahmadinejad.Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordancewith the will of the Almighty Creator: by defendingmyself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work ofthe Lord - Mein Kampf.The existence of the Zionist regime is an insult to allhumanity and the destruction of the personality andcharacter of nations and human beings. You knowthey are involved in the inter-racial [racist] teachings.They only consider themselves as humans and theyconsider others as animals. They actually, theZionists, consider [as] authorized the killing ofhumans and the Zionist plundering the wealth ofothers – Ahmadinejad.The Nazis are found of making reference to the Talmudicpassage known as Baba Mezia 114a-114b. This is made referenceto in the Jew hating forgery, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, oneof Hitler’s favorite books.To what extent the wholeexistence of this people is basedon a continuous lie is shownincomparably by the Protocols ofthe Wise Men of Zion, so infinitelyhated by the Jews. They arebased on a forgery; the Frankfurter Zeitung moans177

A. J. WEBERMANand screams once every week: the best proof thatthey are authentic. What many Jews may dounconsciously is here consciously exposed. And thatis what matters. It is completely indifferent from whatJewish brain these disclosures originate; theimportant thing is that with positively terrifyingcertainty they reveal the nature and activity of theJewish people and expose their inner contexts aswell as their ultimate final aims. The best criticismapplied to them, however, is reality. Anyone whoexamines the historical development of the lasthundred years from the standpoint of this book will atonce understand the screaming of the Jewish press.For once this book has become the common propertyof a people, the Jewish menace may be consideredas brokenThe Protocols claimed this is a Talmudic passage: "The Jews arehuman beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings,but beasts." Here is an accurate translation:R. Shimon b. Yochai said: Graves of non-Jews donot transmit ritual impurity, as it is written, "And you,my flock, the flock of my pastures, you are Adam"(Ezekiel 34:31) --only you are called "Adam."We learn the law of ritual impurity from another verse that usesthe word "Adam." "Only you are called Adam" means that the term"Adam"-"man"-in particular applies to Jews. Other words, such as"Haadam" - "the man" - also apply to non-Jews. So the Gomorra issaying that the word "Adam" without the definite article only refers toJews. This passage in the Talmud says nothing at all about who is ahuman being. Genesis states that we are all descendants of Adamand Eve making everyone human. And besides that, the supposedquote contains a completely fabricated sentence: "They are beasts."It was Hitler who labeled people as sub-humanuntermenchen, not the Talmud or Gomorra. During a speech in May178

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI1923, Hitler had said, "The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but nothuman. They cannot be human in the sense of being an image ofGod, the Eternal. The Jews are the image of the Devil.”Today they are engaged in a complicated schemeand that means a two state plan. The Zionist regimeis a cancerous tumor. Even a single cancerous cell inan inch of the Palestine land the same situation willcontinue in the future – Ahmadinejad.In 1941 Hitler proclaimed “The Jews are a cancer on thebreast of Germany.” On September 16, 1919, Hitler issued his firstwritten comment on the so-called Jewish Question. He defined theJews as a race and not a religious community, characterized theeffect of a Jewish presence as a “race-tuberculosis of the peoples,"and identified the initial goal of a German government to bediscriminatory legislation against Jews.You are after a new Middle East and we are alsoafter a new Middle East. A new Middle East willdefinitely take shape but with the grace of Allah andthe help of nations there will be no trace of theexistence of the Americans and the Zionists.The ultimate goal must definitely be the removal ofthe Jews altogether! – Hitler 1919.And it’s a party comprising seven to eight thousand people and theyare running all the affairs. It’s a Satanic party today.At the beginning of the War, oreven during the War, if twelve orfifteen thousand of these Jewswho were corrupting the nationhad been forced to submit topoison-gas, just as hundreds ofthousands of our best German workers from everysocial stratum and from every trade and calling had179

A. J. WEBERMANto face it in the field, then the millions of sacrificesmade at the front would not have been in vain. Onthe contrary: If twelve thousand of these malefactorshad been eliminated in proper time probably the livesof a million decent men, who would be of value toGermany in the future, might have been saved. But itwas in accordance with bourgeois statesmanship tohand over, without the twitch of an eyelid, millions ofhuman beings to be slaughtered on the battlefields,while they looked upon ten or twelve thousand publictraitors, profiteers, usurers and swindlers, as thedearest and most sacred national treasure andproclaimed their persons to be inviolable. Indeed itwould be hard to say what is the most outstandingfeature of these bourgeois circles: mental debility,moral weakness and cowardice, or a mere down atheel mentality. It is a class that is certainly doomed togo under but, unhappily, it drags down the wholenation with it into the abyss - Mein Kampf.The whole world should know, with the grace of God,protecting the Zionist regime has turned into acommitment by many countries, Western powers, onthe other side – Ahmadinejad.And the same is true of democracy. In general evenin the early days both England and France hadalready been bound with the fetters of slavery. With, Imight say, a brazen security these States are fetteredwith Jewish chains.113– Hitler 1922Slavery, colonialism have been mainly planned bythese Zionists. World War I and II - based on cleardocuments - have been aimed at domination and thewars have been planned and designed by behind thescenes Zionists – Ahmadinejad.Although the Jews were lurking unseen as wire-113http://www.hitler.org/speeches/07-28-22.html180

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIpullers in the background - Mein Kampf.It is clear that Ahmadinejad is a follower of Adolf Hitlerand considers himself the new Hitler, but according to PaulAhmadinejad poses no threat to the United States or Israel,even with nuclear weapons. Paul wants to lift economicsanctions on Iran. He wants to re-establish diplomaticrelations with Iran. Paul loves Ahmadinejad because heknows he is a Nazi who wants to murder millions of Jewsand Paul is also a Nazi who wants to murder millions ofJews so Paul uses him as his proxy.Paul has to use code words but just as Hitler made itclear to German people what he had in store for the JewsAhmadinejad does the same: May 11, 2006 to a studentrally in Jakarta, Indonesia “Israel is a regime based on evilthat cannot continue and one day will vanish.” This is fromthe Iranian Hitler’s speeches to Irans Holocaust ConferenceJanuary 30, 2008:I warn you to abandon the filthy Zionist entity, whichhas reached the end of the line. It has lost its reasonto be and will sooner or later fall. The ones who stillsupport the criminal Zionists should know that theoccupiers days are numbered. … Accept that the lifeof Zionists will sooner or later come to an end.Thanks to peoples wishes and G-ds will the trend forthe existence of the Zionist regime is downwards andthis is what G-d has promised and what all nationswant…Just as the Soviet Union was wiped out andtoday does not exist, so will the Zionist regime soonbe wiped out!!114Representatives Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) werethe only two lawmakers who voted against a resolution condemning114. http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/02/ahmadinejad-i-warn-you-to-abandon-the-filthy-zionist-entity-which-has-reached-the-end-of-the-line-it.html181

A. J. WEBERMANAhmadinejad for his statements calling for the destruction of Israeland genocide of the Jews.Mr. Speaker, I join with my colleagues here incondemning the statement reportedly made byIranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that “Israelmust be wiped off the map.” I reject this statementand any such statement by any governmentanywhere because I reject the notion that the use orthreat of violence is an appropriate way to solveinternational disputes. While rejecting comments byIran that seem to advocate the use of force, I mustalso strongly object to using Achmadinajad’sstatement as an excuse to escalate our own rhetoricand strengthen our anti-Iranian and anti-Muslimpolicies. This condemnable statement is neverthelessbeing conveniently used to expand our policy ofremaking the Middle East in our own image. I do findit interesting to hear my colleagues condemningIran’s implied threat of force while in the same breathcalling for the use of force against Iran. Ironically, it issmall step from repeatedly calling Iran “our enemy”with increasingly militaristic rhetoric to calling for Iranto be “wiped off the map.” We should keep this inmind as we condemn the rhetoric of others whilerepeating similar rhetoric ourselves.115The resolution outlined the reasons why the Iranian leader wasin violation of the UN Genocide Convention.Calling On The United Nations Security Council ToCharge Iranian President With Certain ViolationsBecause Of His Calls For Destruction Of IsraelMr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition tothis resolution. This resolution is an exercise in115. Congressional Record, V. 151, Pt. 18, October 27 to November 7, 2005page 24208182

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIpropaganda that serves one purpose: to move uscloser to initiating a war against Iran. Citing variouscontroversial statements by Iranian PresidentMahmoud Ahmadinejad, this legislation demandsthat the United Nations Security Council chargeAhmadinejad with violating the 1948 Convention onthe Prevention and Punishment of the Crime ofGenocide.116Paul opposes all international bodies that investigate andpunish world leader and military men for genocide becausesomeday he might be called before one:Supporters of the International Criminal Court arequick to say that the Court is modeled on theNuremberg tribunal set up after World War II, butnothing could be further from the truth. Nurembergwas a trial initiated and prosecuted by sovereignnations. It was a reassertion of national sovereigntyover the crimes of a regime that disregarded theconcept that saw other sovereign countries as merely“living space” for their own people. As one analystrecently wrote, “the Nuremberg tribunal, unlike theHague tribunal, was not really an internationaltribunal at all. The judges quite specifically stated thatthe act of promulgating the Nuremberg charter was‘the exercise of sovereign legislative power of thecountries to which the German Reich unconditionallysurrendered.’ There was no pretense that the‘international community’ was prosecuting theGermans.”117116. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=156&Itemid=60117.http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa77896.000/hfa77896_0.HTM183

A. J. WEBERMANIn October 2009, Ron Paul and Kucinich were also the only twoMembers of Congress to vote against H. Res. 175 condemning thegovernment of Iran for “state-sponsored persecution of its Bahá’íminority and its continued violation of the International Covenantson Human Rights.”The Iranians made it clear that they want to see Israeldestroyed with nuclear weapons “wiped off the map” but the Nazis,like Paul, want to deny this to prevent Israel from launching a pre-emptive strike. It is also not advantageous for them to admit it as itwould reveal the true nature of the Iranian régime and further alarmcertain righteous Christian elements within the United States118likeCongresswoman Michele Bachmann:We know without a shadow of doubt that Iran willtake a nuclear weapon, they will use it to wipe out ourally Israel, off the face of the map. And they’ve statedthey will use it against the United States of America.We would be fools and knaves to ignore theirpurposes and their plan.This is a posting from Stormfront praising Paul:Paul said that the quote attributed to M. Ahmadinejadof wanting Iran to wipe Israel off the map isntaccurate and that he was talking about a regimechange [Zionist]...This is a very interesting answer(even though Ron Paul was obviously very nervoustalking about that), since the only ones talking aboutthat were White Nationalists (I might be wrong, but Idont think that other politicians or media reported ofthis obvious misquote) So, the question remains...How was Ron Paul aware of that? If hes aware ofthat is he also aware that USA is a ZOG empire?And, most importantly, is he listening to Stormfrontradio in his closet?118. http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/paul-falwell-iran-gay/2011/12/26/id/422121?s=al&promo_code=DCAB-1184

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIn spring 2009, the American Council for Judaism’s Issuespublication carried an article by Yakov M. Rabkin that defended Iranand bashed Israel. Rabkin wrote this about Ahmadinejad andHolocaust denial:The BBC quoted Ahmadinejad saying, “If Europeancountries claim that they have killed Jews in WorldWar II ... why don’t they provide the Zionist regimewith a piece of Europe.” While the “if” is obviouslyprovocative, neither this nor numerous other quotessuggest that his goal is to deny this genocide.Rather, he uses the memory of the mass murder ofJews in Europe to emphasize the plight of thePalestinians and to test the limits of the freedom ofspeech obtaining in the West. He wonders why, inthe name of the freedom of expression, cartoons ofMohammed can be published, while it is against thelaw in several European countries to question ormake fun of the Nazi genocide. The competition ofHolocaust cartoons organized in Iran attracted someplainly anti-Semitic works, complete with imageryborrowed from the rich arsenal of European anti-Semitic iconography. Some could be considered asrevision and even denial of the mass murder ofcivilians committed in Europe in the early 1940s. Thiscompetition caused a furor in many Westerncountries, which was precisely the point the Iranianpresident had wanted to make. But he did not denythe Nazi genocide.In his speech, when the Iranian president reportedlyfirst made the remark, the word “map” does not evenappear. In fact, he was rehashing one of AyatollahKhomeini’s decades-old anti-Zionist diatribes: Esrâ’ilbâyad az sahneyeh roozégâr mahv shavad, whichmeans “Israel must vanish from the page of time.”After the canard about “wiping Israel off the map”185

A. J. WEBERMANcircled the world and entered the public mind, someIsraeli instigators of the anti-Iran campaign quietlydropped it from further use. A recent report aboutIran published by the Jerusalem Center for PublicAffairs (JCPA), a Zionist think tank particularly activein stirring the anti-Iran campaign, attributes theoffensive quote to Khomeini and translates itcorrectly, insisting, however, that the quote is“genocidal.” The latter term has become a favorite inrecent Zionist publications: the same report alsorefers to “the failed genocidal 1948 war of severalArab states and Palestinians against Israel.”The American Council for Judaism is the group that Ron Paulspeaks fondly of because they are traitors to the Jewish people, sickJews who hate themselves for being Jewish. Why quibble over thetranslation? During a rare Friday prayer lecture at Tehran UniversityAyatollah Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, saidFrom now onward, we will support and help anynations, any groups fighting against the Zionistregime across the world, and we are not afraid ofdeclaring this. The Zionist regime is a true cancertumor on this region that should be cut off, and itdefinitely will be cut off.119Ron Paul knows that the Shi’ite branch is the brand of Islam ispredominant in Iran. He also knows the Shi’ite branch of Islam hasbeen at odds for centuries, often in violent conflict with the Sunnis.There are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world and roughly 15% areShi’ia. Sunnis belong to the Salafiya branch of Islam, which regardsShiites as little better than non-Muslims. For the Salafist-Wahhabistsbeing a Christian or a Jew, people of the book, is far preferable tobeing Shiite – a rejectionist of the true faith.119. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/iran-says-it-launched-satellite/2012/02/03/gIQARNuDmQ_story.html186

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIRon Paul is well aware that the Salafist-Wahhabists Saudis andthe Shi’ite Iranians will always be enemies. Since he supports theIranians he does all he can to discredit the Saudis. On November29, 2001 in a speech entitled The War on Terrorism Paul made itseem as if the Saudi Royal Family was responsible for 9/11.The predominant nationality of the terrorists wasSaudi Arabian. Yet for political and economicreasons, even with the lack of cooperation from theSaudi government, we have ignored that country inplacing blame. The Afghan people did nothing todeserve another war. The Taliban, of course, isclosely tied to bin Laden and al-Qaeda, but so arethe Pakistanis and the Saudis.120In The Case For Defending America January 24, 2002:Could oil be the reason we have concentrated onbombing Afghanistan while ignoring Saudi Arabia,even though we have never found Osama binLaden? Obviously, Saudi Arabia is culpable in theseterrorist attacks on the United States, and yet little isdone about it.In reality Bin Laden did all he could to bring down the Saudimonarchy: Ibrahim al-Reemy was a Yemeni closely linked toOsama bin Laden and was the organizer of the attempted bombingof the Saudi Interior Ministry building and the Special EmergencyForces headquarters training unit at Riyadh on December 29, 2005.In the late 1960s, Osama Bin Ladens brother Mahrous bin Ladenjoined a Salafist-Wahabist sect opposed to the Saudi regime. Withhis assistance, the dissidents who came to Saudi Arabia fromsouthern Yemen smuggled weapons into Mecca using trucksbelonging to the Bin Laden Group and attempted to take over theAl-Masjid al-Haram ("The Holy Mosque") - the holiest mosque in theworld and the primary destination of the Hajj pilgrimage. Mahrousbin Laden was arrested, but thanks to the familys connections with120. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 162187

A. J. WEBERMANthe Saudi king, he was released after the Saudi Security determinedhe was an unwitting participant. Bakr bin Laden was given acontract to repair the damage that was done to Grand Mosque andsoon rebuilt it. Osama Bin Laden aroused so much enmity in theSaudi Government that it put out a contract on him.In a speech entitled A Sad State of Affairs October 25, 2001Paul argued:Our support for the less-than-ethical government ofSaudi Arabia, with our troops occupying what mostMuslims consider sacred land, is hardly the way tobring peace to the Middle East. A policy driven by ourfear of losing control over the oil fields in the MiddleEast has not contributed to American Security. Toomany powerful special interests drive our policy inthis region, and this does little to help us preservesecurity for Americans here at home.Paul blamed the Jews for the American presence in SaudiArabia just like he blames the Jews for everything else. Presently hehates Saudi Arabia because according to The Times of LondonSaudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defenses toenable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclearfacilities.In his speech entitled Statement Opposing Resolution on Irangiven on June 19, 2009 he argued:Of course I do not support attempts by foreigngovernments to suppress the democratic aspirationsof their people, but when is the last time wecondemned Saudi Arabia or Egypt or the many othercountries where unlike in Iran there is no opportunityto exercise any substantial vote on politicalleadership? It seems our criticism is selective andapplied when there are political points to be made. Ihave admired President Obama’s cautious approach188

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIto the situation in Iran and I would have preferred thatwe in the House had acted similarly.That is why I am introducing the “Terror ImmigrationElimination Act of 2003.” This bill will deny studentand “diversity” visas to anyone coming from a countrycurrently on the State Department’s list of terrorism-sponsoring countries. Further, Mr. Speaker, it is timewe face reality regarding Saudi Arabia. We mustremember that most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudinationals. Also, when al-Qaeda supporters wererounded up from Afghanistan and held at Camp X-Ray, reports showed that of the 158 prisoners morethan one hundred were Saudi nationals. With suchan evident level of involvement from Saudi nationalsin these activities, it is quite obvious that the Saudigovernment is not doing all it can, or all it should, inresolving this urgent problem. Therefore, Saudicitizens will also be denied student and “diversity”visas to the United States under this bill.Ron Paul believes that the electionsin Iran are not rigged by theRevolutionary Guard. The New YorkTimes reported on the 2012 Iranianelections: “Results of the vote havebeen dismissed as meaningless bymany of the opposition supporters who filled the streets during theantigovernment protests set off by the disputed presidential electionof 2009. That was followed by a harsh crackdown, lasting monthsthat effectively destroyed the reformist movement and any alliedopposition.” Paul was trying to damage relations with the Kingdomby placing its citizens on a terrorist blacklist. In November 2010 Paulagain defended Iran and attacked the Saudis in his Texas StraightTalk newsletter:189

A. J. WEBERMANThis month the US Administration notified Congressthat it intends to complete one of the largest armssales in US history to one of the most repressiveregimes on earth. Saudi Arabia has been given thegreen light by the administration to spend $60 billionon some 84 new F-15 aircraft, dozens of the latesthelicopters, and other missiles, bombs, and high-techmilitary products from the US weapons industry.We are told that our increasingly aggressive policiestoward Iran are justified by that country’s rigid Islamiclaws and human-rights violations, while the evenmore repressive Islamic rule in Saudi Arabia is nevermentioned.Paul is far more interested in disarming the Israelis thanhe is in preventing the Iranians from getting the bomb andthe capability to deliver it to Israel. Paul:Today, the Israeli political lobby is a powerful politicalforce. Two to three hundred nuclear weapons, underIsraels control, make Israel more powerful than allthe Arab and Muslim countries put together. Butthats not where the real power lies. The UN canlabor tirelessly in "controlling" one nuclear weapon (inIran) that doesnt exist while the internationalcommunity does not put pressure on Israel to signthe Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. In contrast, theworld community rarely even admits that Israelsnukes exist—and at the same time Iran has neverbeen ruled in noncompliance with the NPT. The factthat Muslim nations become annoyed with this policyis written off by most in the West by charging anti-Semitism.121121Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom190

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIPaul and Liberty Lobby have both denied being anti-Semiticdespite having been accused numerous time of being so. Cartowould claim to be only anti-Zionist and even had Jews like ShermanSkolnick, whose parents were Warsaw Ghetto survivors, on theBoard of Liberty Lobby. Paul has a few token house Jews whosupport him. When journalist Jack Anderson wrote the LibertyLobby was an anti-Semitic neo-Nazi organization Carto went as faras suing Anderson. Liberty Lobby lost this landmark case. Pauldoesn’t come out and say “I am against Zionism” but implies this inhis books, speeches and Congressional votes. “Zionism” hasbecome a dog whistle word for Jews as in Achmadinajad’s “WorldWithout Zionism” conference. In August 2012 Paul voiced hisopposition to sanctions against Iran:I think this bill would be better named if we called itObsession With Iran Act 2012. Because this is whatwe continue to be doing is be obsessed with Iran andthe idea that Iran is a threat to our national security.Iran happens to be a third world nation they have nosignificant navy, air force intercontinental ballisticmissiles. The IAEA and our CIA said they are not onthe verge of a nuclear weapon. It’s so similar to whatwe went though in the early part of the last decadewhen we were beating the war drums to go to waragainst Iraq and it was all a façade; there was nodanger from Iraq. So this is what we are doing,beating the war drums once again. Now since the billhas come back from the conference if we’re going todeal with civil liberties in Syria well I happen to be acivil libertarian I am very concerned about civilliberties. But let me tell you this bill is not going to doanything to enhance the civil liberties of theindividuals in Syria. Now if we were really interestedin civil liberties why wouldn’t we look to ourselves?Why wouldn’t we look to the things we do here. Whatabout our warrantless searches under the PatriotAct? What about the policy of assassination and191

A. J. WEBERMANassassinating American citizens? What about arrestsby the military the National Defense AuthorizationAct. What about the drone warfare that we go on doyou we are protecting civil liberties by arbitrarilydropping drones anyplace in the world with innocentpeople dying? If we want to really care about civilliberties in Syria? What do we care about the civilliberties? What about the secret prisons we have andthe history of torture in this country. What about thefact that kill lists are being made by the executivebranch of government and we sit idly by and approveof it by saying nothing and the American people putup with it and we march in this direction marchinginto a determination to have another war. When youput on sanctions on a country it’s an act of war andthat’s what this is all about. The first thing you dowhen war breaks out between two countries is youput sanctions on the country, you blockade thecountry. So this is an act of war. What would we do ifsomebody blockaded us and put sanctions on us andprevented the importation of any product in thiscountry? We’d be furious; we’d declare war we’d goto war so we are the antagonists. We are over therepoking our nose, poking our nose in other people’saffairs just looking for the chance to start anotherwar. First it’s Syria, than Iran we have too many warswe need to stop these wars we don’t have the moneyto fight these wars any longer. I am still ratherimpressed with the obsession over a weapon that stilldoes not exist and no concern whatsoever aboutmany nuclear weapons that are held by countriesthat never even joined the nuclear non-proliferationtreaty. It is called for in the debate that Iran shouldend all its nuclear programs. But they are permittedto have their programs under the Non ProliferationTreaty/ And the other countries that have weaponsincluding the countries that hold the weapons that192

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIcame from the Soviet Union system, it seems thatthat would be a much greater danger You know theinvestigation by the UN or by the CIA has neverindicated that they never enrich above 20%. And theysaid they would not even do it to 20% if they wouldmerely allow if the west would cooperate and sellthem this material they said we don’t need it. But weneed 20% enrichment for nuclear isotopes, medicalisotopes. So our refusal to deal with them promptsthem to take it up to enrichment to 20%. 5% ofcourse is what they are allowed to do for nuclearenergies. But this idea that we can badger peopleand then defy the law what we are asking them to dois to close down their program is you are asking themto defy international law they agreed to this they havea right to do this under this treaty. For us to say thatthey must quit it I think it is very close to anobsession on a country that is incapable of attackingus. They don’t have a history of invading theirneighboring countries. The last time they were at warwas with Iraq and we bugged Iraq to go to go intoIran. So I find this very distressing that the obsessioncontinues. I find it very very upsetting that this votewill of course be overwhelmingly in support ofcorrecting the civil liberties of Syria and making Irantoe the line and give up on something that they arepermitted to do. A vote for this in my opinion in timewill show that it’s just one more step to another warthat we do not need. We have not been provoked.They are not a threat to our national security and weshould not be going this. We’ve been doing it to long.For the last 10, 15 years we are just obsessed withidea that we go to war and try to solve all theproblems of the world at the same time it isbankrupting us. I strongly urge a no vote on thisresolution.193

A. J. WEBERMANTHE WORST CASE SCENARIOIf Paul were elected President and Israel was destroyed by Iranthere would be no country for American Jews to seek asylum in.President Paul would whip up Jew hatred in America withconspiracy theories and racism. He would eviscerate or destroy allanti-terrorist laws and let the enemies of America regroup overseas.There would be a devastating chemical, biological or radiologicalattack which he would have his FBI Director David Duke and CIADirector Michael Scheuer blame on the remnants of the Mossad oron the American Jews. A State of War or State of NationalEmergency could be declared by President Paul and Jews could beordered sent to concentration camps. There is precedent for this:Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7,1941, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, whichpermitted the military to suspend the constitutional safeguards ofAmerican citizens for the sake of national defense. The order setinto motion the exclusion from certain areas, and the evacuationand mass incarceration of 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestryliving on the West Coast, most of who were U.S. citizens or legalpermanent resident aliens.194

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICHAPTER SIXRON PAUL: AVOWED ENEMY OF ISRAELPaul is a crypto-Nazi and pretends he is not anti-Israel:Israel is our close friend. While President Obama’sdemand that Israel make hard concessions in herborder conflicts may very well be in her long-term195

A. J. WEBERMANinterest, only Israel can make that determination onher own, without pressure from the United States orcoercion by the United Nations. Unlike this President,I do not believe it is our place to dictate how Israelruns her affairs. There can only be peace in theregion if those sides work out their differences amongone another. We should respect Israel’s sovereigntyand not try to dictate her policy from Washington.122The bottom line here is that “respect Israel’s sovereignty” meansPaul wants the US to totally abandon Israel as an ally and notguarantee its existence as it has done since 1948. Israel is on itsown. In a May 24, 1996 Congress Daily article Paul, stating thatlobbying groups who seek special favors and handouts are evil,wrote,By far the most powerful lobby in Washington of thebad sort is the Israeli government and that the goal ofthe Zionist movement is to stifle criticism.This does not sound like a friend of Israel to me! On September7, 2006 in his speech entitled Big-Government Solutions Don’t WorkPaul hinted how the Jews controlled American foreign policy in theMiddle East:I find it amazing that we in this country seemdetermined to completely separate religiousexpression and the state, even to the detriment of thefirst amendment, yet we can say little about howChristian and Jewish religious beliefs greatlyinfluence our policies in the Middle East? It should bethe other way around. Religious expression,according to the First Amendment, cannot beregulated anywhere by Congress or the Federalcourts. But deeply held theological beliefs shouldnever dictate our foreign policy. Being falsely122. http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/05/22/even-ron-paul-unloads-on-obama-for-dictating-to-israel/196

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIaccused of anti-Semitism and being a supporter ofradical fascism is not an enviable position for anypolitician. Most realize it is best to be quiet andsupport our Middle East involvement.Paul has to defend himself against charges of anti-Semitism onmany occasions. This is because he is an anti-Semite. Paul has thesame position on Israel as the Spotlight:The Spotlight is anti-Zionist, a political positionmandated by Liberty Lobbys Policy Position No. 5,"Pro American Foreign Policy." This clearly means apolicy of nonintervention in foreign affairs. LibertyLobby sees that most of this nations problems todayresult from intervention into foreign wars, none ofwhich have served US interests. Nonintervention isthe original policy for America, laid down by ourgovernment from the American Revolution to theSpanish-American War. With two exceptions, ourglorious victories over Grenada and Haiti, everyforeign war has resulted in disaster for this nationand the other belligerents. This policy means hands-off Vietnam, Iraq, Kosovo and the Palestinian no-winmess. It definitely means no more taxpayers moneyfor Israel. Liberty Lobbys position on this has beenconsistent for 45 years, and is the reason for Israelsagents, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)attacking and minimizing Liberty Lobby and theSpotlight at every opportunity. To attain itssubversive aim of unlimited, perpetual financial giftsfor Israel-the most aggressive nation in the world --except perhaps for the USA -- the ADL has made afetish of putting down Liberty Lobby /The Spotlight.123More lies are found in an excerpt from The Revolution: AManifesto, by Ron Paul:123. http://www.libertylobby.org/articles/2001/20010105wac.html197

A. J. WEBERMANI see no reason that our friendship with Israel cannotcontinue. I favor extending to Israel the same honestfriendship that Jefferson and the Founding Fathersurged us to offer to all nations. But that also meansno special privileges like foreign aid – a position Imaintain vis-a-vis all other countries as well. Thatmeans I also favor discontinuing foreign aid togovernments that are actual or potential enemies ofIsrael, which taken together receive much moreAmerican aid than Israel does. Giving aid to bothsides has understandably made many Israelis andAmerican Jews conclude that the Americangovernment is hypocritically hedging its bets.124Paul’s attempt to seem even handed is a smoke screen. Theenemies of Israel don’t need the foreign aid as much as Israel doesbecause countries like Saudi Arabia and Iraq have funds from oilrevenues. The other recipients of foreign aid like Pakistan and Egyptface minimal if any military threats. American military aid has alwaysgiven Israel military superiority. If it stops there is no guarantee thatIsrael can maintain this superiority. Paul is too smart to say, “Let’scut off aid to Israel.” Then people would see where he is comingfrom. So he says let’s cut off aid to all countries including Israelwhich is the largest recipient of it. He has also stated “We shouldshare intelligence for mutually agreed goals. We should honor ourpledge to refuse any arms sales that would undermine Israel’squalitative military edge in the region.”125What does this lastsentence mean? That America will not sell arms to Israel’s enemiesso the balance of power remains static? What about Israel’squantitative edge? And who is going to decide if an arms saleundermines this? President Ron Paul? The same Ron Paul who124. http://www.scribd.com/doc/48821100/The-Revolution-A-Manifesto-Paul-Ron125. http://www.businessinsider.com/ron-paul-israel-republican-jewish-coalition-2011-12#ixzz1ljYylijl198

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIopposed a House resolution condemning terrorism inflicted onIsrael:Mr. Farr. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.Res. 294, condemning the terrorism inflicted onIsrael, expressing solidarity with the Israeli people,and calling on the Palestinian Authority to takeimmediate and effective steps to dismantle theterrorist infrastructure on the West Bank and Gaza. Ialso rise today to express my solidarity with all thosewho support the efforts towards peace betweenIsraelis and Palestinians.Mr. Paul. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to thismeasure. Of course we all deplore terrorism andviolence that any innocents are forced to suffer.There is, sadly, plenty of this in the world today. Butthere is more to this resolution than just condemningthe violence in the Middle East. I have a problem withmost resolutions like this because they have theappearance of taking one side or the other in aconflict that has nothing to do with the United States.Our responsibility is to the American people and tothe Constitution, not to adjudicate age-old conflictshalf-way around the world. When we take sides inthese far off conflicts, we serve to antagonize thepeople affected and end up no closer to peace thanwhen we started. This bill makes reference to theneed to have solidarity with Israel. Elsewhere peoplesay we should have solidarity with the Palestiniansand the Arabs. So, as I have said before when billssuch as this are on the floor, it is sort of a contest:Should we be pro-Israel or pro-Arab, or anti-Israel oranti- Arab, and how are we perceived in doing this? Itis pretty important. But I still believe, through all thesebills attempting to intervene in the Middle East, thatthere is a third option to this that we so often forget199

A. J. WEBERMANabout. Why can we not be pro-American? What is inthe best interests of the United States? We do nothear much talk of that, unfortunately. As I keepsaying when votes such as this come to the floor, thebest foreign policy for the United States is non-interventionism. It is a policy of American interestsfirst, costs much less money, and is in keeping with along American tradition so eloquently described byour Founders. I hope the peoples of the Middle Eastare able to resolve their differences, but becausewhether they decide or not is not our business I urgea no vote on this resolution.126“Non-interventionism” in this context means that we should takethe side of the Arabs not because it is the morally right thing to dobut because it is in America’s best interests. Paul told Congress:Mr. Speaker, this resolution [we are voting on] inseveral places asserts that the United States is“strongly committed” to the security of Israel. I find noprovision in the Constitution that allows the UnitedStates Government to confiscate money from its owncitizens and send it overseas for the defense of aforeign country. Further, this legislation promises thatthe United States “remains committed to Israel,including secure, recognized, and defensibleborders.” So we are pledging to defend Israel’sborders while we are not even able to control ourown borders. Shouldn’t we be concentrating onfulfilling our constitutional obligations in our owncountry first, before we go crusading around theworld to protect foreign borders? I also must object tothe one-sidedness of this legislation. Like so manythat have come before it, this resolution takes sidesin a conflict that has nothing to do with us. Amongother things, it affirms Israel as a “Jewish state.” Is it126. http://ronpaulquotes.com/chapters/2003-70.html200

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIreally our business to endorse a state church in aforeign country? What message does this send fromthe United States to Israeli citizens who are notJewish?127Paul is consistently on the side of Israel’s enemies when itcomes to his voting record in Congress:Statement on H Res 34, Recognizing Israels right todefend itself against attacks from Gaza, Reaffirmingthe United States strong support for Israel, andsupporting the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.Madame Speaker, I strongly oppose H. Res. 34,which was rushed to the floor with almost no priornotice and without consideration by the HouseForeign Affairs Committee. The resolution clearlytakes one side in a conflict that has nothing to do withthe United States or US interests. I am concernedthat the weapons currently being used by Israelagainst the Palestinians in Gaza are made inAmerica and paid for by American taxpayers. Whatwill adopting this resolution do to the perception ofthe United States in the Muslim and Arab world?What kind of blowback might we see from this? Whatmoral responsibility do we have for the violence inIsrael and Gaza after having provided so muchmilitary support to one side?Madame Speaker, this resolution will do nothing toreduce the fighting and bloodshed in the Middle East.The resolution in fact will lead the US to becomefurther involved in this conflict, promising “vigoroussupport and unwavering commitment to the welfare,security, and survival of Israel as a Jewish anddemocratic state.” Is it really in the interest of theUnited States to guarantee the survival of any foreign127. http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/jewish.html201

A. J. WEBERMANcountry? I believe it would be better to focus on thesecurity and survival of the United States, theConstitution of which my colleagues and I swore todefend just this week at the beginning of the 111thCongress. I urge my colleagues to reject thisresolution.128On March 5, 2008 Paul failed to acknowledge the fact thatHamas sent rockets into Israel from Gaza prior to Israel’s retaliation:Madam Speaker: I rise in opposition to H. Res. 951.As one who is consistently against war and violence,I obviously do not support the firing of rocketsindiscriminately into civilian populations. I believe it isappalling that Palestinians are firing rockets thatharm innocent Israelis, just as I believe it is appallingthat Israel fires missiles into Palestinian areas wherechildren and other non-combatants are killed andinjured.129Paul was interviewed by Iranian television about the Israeliretaliation against the Islamists of Gaza:It’s our money and it’s our weapons. But I think weencouraged it. Certainly the president has saidnothing to diminish it. As a matter of fact he justifies iton moral grounds…without even mentioning thetragedy of Gaza, you know the real problems that arethere. To me I look at it like a concentration camp.People are making homemade bombs – like they’rethe aggressors?130128. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=86&Itemid=60129. http://www.davidduke.com/?p=3549130. http://www.therightscoop.com/ron-paul-defends-hamas-blames-israel-for-2009-war-and-more/202

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIn others word if Gaza looks like a concentration camp then thatmakes the Israelis Nazis. No one is being sent to gas chambers inGaza. Paul tends to use the word “concentration camp” and Nazi ina way that waters-down its true meaning. For example he told theHouse “Now we have what I call the ‘Nazification’ of the financialsystem, not only in America but worldwide. I don’t use that termlightly. As a matter of historic fact, the civil forfeiture laws in thiscountry mirror in many major respects the Nazi forfeiture laws thatwere used to confiscate the property of the Jews.” Due process stillexists in America. Ron Paul had this to during the same interview forIranian TV:I think if we weren’t in the Middle East there’d be amuch greeted motivation for Israel to deal with all thepeople and maybe the Arab League. Maybe theywould be talking to the Arab League every single dayand work out problems. But they don’t do that. Theydon’t have the motivation because they know we’llback them up. No matter what happens over there,Israel knows and our government knows, Republicanor Democrat that we’ll do whatever is necessary tobailout Israel.If Israel has a problem they have to deal with it. Idon’t think it should be any of our business. It’s justthat it’s our business and we will be blamed becausewe support Israel blindly so. And we give them themoney and we give them the weapons. …If I personally favor one side or the other side thenit’s really pretty academic because politically I don’twant to be involved. If I wanna say well, you know, Ireally think the Palestinians have been ripped off andtherefore all the blame is on Israel, then I’ve sortastepped in a little bit more than I want to. I can have apersonal opinion but politically my position is that203

A. J. WEBERMANAmerica would be much better off if we just mindedour own business.131Ron Paul wants to weaken Israel so it has to go begging formercy to the Arab League. Ron Paul admits is keeping his trueopinions about Israel to himself as he knows it would be a politicaldisaster if he expressed them openly. Paul’s ex-confident EricRittberg reported,Paul is however, most certainly Anti-Israel andAnti-Israeli in general. He wishes the Israeli state didnot exist at all. He expressed this to me numeroustimes in our private conversations. His view is thatIsrael is more trouble than it is worth, specifically tothe America taxpayer. He sides with the Palestinians,and supports their calls for the abolishment of theJewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to theArabs.132In Liberty Defined Paul claims that the Jews would have trickledinto to Israel a little at a time and would have been welcomed withopen arms by the Muslims and everything would have been ginger-peachy for the Holocaust survivors but that bad old U.N. messedthings up by voting for the establishment of the Jewish State:From the 1890s until 1948, when Israel became asovereign nation carved out of Palestine, immigrationwas mostly voluntary, gradual, and accomplishedwith due respect for existing land titles. Zionism,during the first forty years of this movement, was notabout taking land by force nor was it about militarism,A continual peaceful transformation would probablyhave occurred except for the political actions afterWorld War II in which the United Nations turned a131. http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/PrintArticle.aspx?id=252828132. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/26/former-staffer-ron-paul-wishes-the-israeli-state-did-not-exist/204

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIlocal and demographic issue into an internationaland highly politicized one.Historian Juan Cole has pointed out that Jerusalem(Palestine), through the many centuries, was underJewish rule for only about 170 years. In other words,there are many competing claims for the same land,and it is impossible to decide between them. Dozensof other regimes occupied the land for much longerperiods of time. For instance, Muslims ruledJerusalem for 1,191 years.133What Paul is saying is that the Jewish people have no real claimto the land of Israel. He quotes Juan Cole, a well-known professorat the University of Michigan who believes Israel’s Likud Party iscomprised of fascist Jews. Cole has made a career out of attackingIsrael.Ron Paul sides with the Islamic world against America andblames anti-Americanism on American and Israeli foreign policy. Healso blames the British, a favorite target of Nazis due Britain’s role indefeating Adolf Hitler. Paul:The West has been at war with the Muslim world forover a thousand years. In this century, the British ledthe charge prior to World War II. Since that time ithas been the United States. Although the Britishremain close allies of ours in intimidating the Muslimworld, it is the military strength of the United Statesthat assumes the burden of responsibility for thepolicy. It is justified by claiming a right and need toprotect “our” oil. The fear I have is that our policies,along with those of Britain, the UN, and NATO sinceWorld War II, inspired and have now awakened a133.http://content.yudu.com/Library/A1u7lb/LibertyDefined50Esse/resources/145.htm205

A. J. WEBERMANlong forgotten sleeping giant that of Islamicfundamentalism.134So America and its allies are to blame for the rise of Islam, areligion and political system Paul sees as a potential ally againstIsrael and the Jews. That is why Ron Paul supported theconstruction of a mosque a few blocks from Ground Zero:Is the controversy over building a mosque nearground zero a grand distraction or a grandopportunity?Or is it once again grandiose demagoguery? It hasbeen said, “Nero fiddled while Rome burned.” Are wenot overly preoccupied with this controversy, nowbeing used in various ways by grandstandingpoliticians? It looks to me like the politicians arefiddling while the economy burns. The debate shouldhave provided the conservative defenders of propertyrights with a perfect example of how the right to ownproperty also protects the 1st Amendment rights ofassembly and religion by supporting the building ofthe mosque. Instead, we hear lip service given to theproperty rights position while demanding that theneed to be “sensitive” requires an all-out assault onthe building of a mosque, several blocks from“ground zero.”Just think of what might (not) have happened if thewhole issue had been ignored and the nationaldebate stuck with war, peace, and prosperity. Therecertainly would have been a lot less emotionalism onboth sides. The fact that so much attention has beengiven the mosque debate, raises the question of justwhy and driven by whom?134. http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/paul6.html206

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIn my opinion it has come from the neo-conservatives who demand continual war in theMiddle East and Central Asia and are compelled toconstantly justify it. They never miss a chance to usehatred toward Muslims to rally support for the ill-conceived preventative wars. A select quote fromsoldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq expressing concernover the mosque is pure propaganda and an affrontto their bravery and sacrifice.The claim is that we are in the Middle East to protectour liberties is misleading. To continue this charade,millions of Muslims are indicted and we are obligatedto rescue them from their religious and politicalleaders. And, were supposed to believe that abusingour liberties at home and pursuing unconstitutionalwars overseas will solve our problems.The nineteen suicide bombers didnt come from Iraq,Afghanistan, Pakistan or Iran. Fifteen camefrom our ally Saudi Arabia, a country thatharbors strong American resentment, yetwe invade and occupy Iraq where no al Qaedaexisted prior to 9/11.135So it is the neo-conservatives (code word for Jews) whooppose it and not the Christian evangelical clergy and families ofthose killed on 9/11. Paul had more to say in favor of the GroundZero Mosque:Many fellow conservatives say they understand theproperty rights and 1st Amendment issues and dontwant a legal ban on building the mosque. They justwant everybody to be “sensitive” and force, throughpublic pressure, cancellation of the mosqueconstruction. This sentiment seems to confirm thatIslam itself is to be made the issue, and radical135. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul690.html207

A. J. WEBERMANreligious Islamic views were the only reasons for9/11. If it became known that 9/11 resulted in partfrom a desire to retaliate against what many Muslimssaw as American aggression and occupation, theneed to demonize Islam would be difficult if notimpossible. There is no doubt that a small portion ofradical, angry Islamists do want to kill us but thequestion remains, what exactly motivates thishatred? If Islam is further discredited by making thebuilding of the mosque the issue, then the falsejustification for our wars in the Middle East willcontinue to be acceptable.The justification to ban the mosque is no morerational than banning a soccer field in the sameplace because all the suicide bombers loved to playsoccer. Conservatives are once again, unfortunately,failing to defend private property rights, a policy weclaim to cherish. In addition conservatives missed achance to challenge the hypocrisy of the left whichnow claims they defend property rights of Muslims,yet rarely if ever, the property rights of Americanprivate businesses.Defending the controversial use of property shouldbe no more difficult than defending the 1stAmendment principle of defending controversialspeech. But many conservatives and liberals do notwant to diminish the hatred for Islam — the drivingemotion that keeps us in the wars in the Middle Eastand Central Asia.It is repeatedly said that 64% of the people, afterlistening to the political demagogues, dont want themosque to be built. What would we do if 75% of thepeople insist that no more Catholic churches be builtin New York City? The point being is that majorities208

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIcan become oppressors of minority rights as well asindividual dictators. Statistics of support is irrelevantwhen it comes to the purpose of government in a freesociety — protecting liberty.The outcry over the building of the mosque, nearground zero, implies that Islam alone wasresponsible for the 9/11 attacks. According to thosewho are condemning the building of the mosque, thenineteen suicide terrorists on 9/11 spoke for allMuslims. This is like blaming all Christians for thewars of aggression and occupation because someChristians supported neo-conservatives aggressivewars.The House Speaker is now treading on a slipperyslope by demanding an investigation to find out justwho is funding the mosque — a bold rejection ofproperty rights, 1st Amendment rights, and the Ruleof Law — in order to look tough against Islam. This isall about hate and Islamaphobia. We now have anepidemic of “sunshine patriots” on both the right andthe left who are all for freedom, as long as theres nocontroversy and nobody is offended. Politicaldemagoguery rules when truth and liberty areignored.136Paul’s son, Senator Rand Paul opposed the construction of amosque near Ground Zero:While this is a local matter that will be decided by thepeople of New York, I do not support a mosque beingbuilt two blocks from Ground Zero. In my opinion, theMuslim community would better serve the healingprocess by making a donation to the memorial fundfor the victims of September 11th.136. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100820005843/en/Ron-Paul-Left-Demagogue-Mosque-Islam209

A. J. WEBERMANRand Paul is not Ron Paul: Sen. Rand Paul took what very wellcould be considered his most pro-Israel stance yet, saying in aninterview that an attack on Israel should be treated as an attack onthe United States. Asked in an interview whether the United Stateswould stand with Israel and provide it foreign aid if the Jewish statewas attacked by its enemies, Paul went a step further and said suchan attack should be treated as an attack on the U.S. Well absolutelywe stand with Israel, he said in an interview with Breitbart News,but what I think we should do is announce to the world – and I thinkit is pretty well known --- that any attack on Israel will be treated asan attack on the United States.” On the other hand in a speechbefore the Heritage Foundation Rand Paul seemed to favorcontainment of Iran as opposed to taking out their bomb factories. Ishe going to wait until after Israel is attacked with nuclear weaponsthen attack Iran? Rand Paul is a walking contradiction and thatmakes him dangerous.Because Ron Paul sees the Islamists as an ally in the waragainst the Jews, he has stated the he opposes religious profiling atAmerica’s airports. The Council on American-Islamic Relations(CAIR) the American arm of Hamas, thanked Ron Paul for havingrejected profiling during CNN’s Republican debate, and directedtheir ire at another presidential candidate, Rick Santorum. Duringthe debate, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer noted that Santorum had advocatedprofiling in the past. “Just to be precise, is it ethnic profiling, religiousprofiling, who would be profiled?” Blitzer asked. “The folks that aremost likely to be committing these crimes,” Santorum replied.“Obviously Muslims would be someone you’d look at, absolutely.”“That’s digging our hole for ourselves,” Paul disagreed. “What if theylook like [Oklahoma City bomber] Timothy McVeigh?” This was notthe only issue that Paul and CAIR agreed upon. A CAIR pressrelease read:As we have stated repeatedly in the past, theAmerican Muslim community firmly repudiated Anwaral-Awlaki’s incitement to violence, which occurredafter he left the United States. While a voice of hate210

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIhas been eliminated, we urge our nation’s leaders toaddress the constitutional issues raised by theassassination of American citizens without dueprocess of law.Ron Paul stated:No I don’t think that’s a good way to deal with ourproblems. He was born here, Al-Awlaki was bornhere, he is an American citizen. He was never triedor charged for any crimes. No one knows if he killedanybody. We know he might have been associatedwith the underwear bomber. But if the Americanpeople accept this blindly and casually that we nowhave an accepted practice of the presidentassassinating people who he thinks are bad guys, Ithink it’s sad.137How else could have Paul defended the Imam who inspired somuch violence in the United States including the Fort Hoodmassacre of unarmed soldiers by one of Al-Awlaki’s followers? Howmany American soldiers would have had to die in an attempt tobring Al-Awlaki back to the United States?Paul is in league with Michael Scheueranother Jew-hater. It wasn’t until 1996that the FBI recognized the increasedthreat to the United States posed byOsama Bin Laden and created theOsama Bin Laden Unit to handle al-Qaeda-related matters. From 1996 to1999, the Osama Bin Laden tracking unitwas at the Counterterrorist Center. Post-9/11 it was run by MichaelScheuer. Sheuer attended Canisius College. U.S. News and WorldReport ranked Canisius as 22nd among regional schools in its"North Region." He went on to earn an M.A. from Niagara University137. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/30/news/la-pn-ron-paul-anwar-awlaki-20110930211

A. J. WEBERMANin 1976 and another M.A. from Carleton University in 1982. He alsoreceived a Ph.D. in British Empire-U.S.-Canada-U.K. relations fromthe University of Manitoba in 1986. He was never the brightest lighton the Christmas.Scheuer was an Islamist ideological mole within the CIA and atruly dangerous enemy of the United States. Scheuer pretended togo after Osama Bin Laden but was in reality was protecting him. Inorder to hide this Sheuer blamed the Clinton Administration forCIA’s failure to kill Bin Laden, claiming that he had the chance to doit numerous times but was prevented from doing so by hissuperiors. He offered no evidence to back up these claims otherthan his self serving statements based on his apparent bona fideswhile in the CIA: Scheuer was in charge of the rendition programand was responsible for numerous kidnappings, imprisonment andtorture of 30 lower level Islamists. This researcher believes hecarried out these operations successfully in order to maintain hiscredibility so he could protect the big enchilada, Osama Bin Laden.Scheuer knew that if Bin Laden remained on the loose, he wouldsoon carry out an operation against the United States that wouldmake the other jihadist terrorist acts look like greasy kids stuff.Scheuer never made clandestine contact with Al-Qaeda so the CIACounter Intelligence Section or Office of Security had no reason tosuspect him.In retrospect if Sheuer held the same views while he headedthe Bin Laden Desk that he expressed after he left it, then there isno other explanation other than that he was an enemy ideologicalmole. In his book Imperial Hubris Scheuer called Bin Laden a “greatman” and Bin Laden spoke highly of Scheuer in a video Al Qaedareleased138and said, "If you want to understand whats going on andif you would like to get to know some of the reasons for you’re losingthe war against us, then read the book of Michael Scheuer in thisregard." Additionally Scheuer claimed that repressive governmentslike Algeria, Egypt and especially Saudi Arabia are responsible forthe resurgence of Islamic jihadist fundamentalism in the Moslem138. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZNfuIvtLos212

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIworld and he said that he wanted to see these governmentsoverthrown. He already got his wish in Egypt which will soon betransformed into an Islamic dictatorship by the Muslim Brotherhoodand al-Shahab as they have been voted into office.Scheuer blamed everything on Israel. Even if there was noIsrael these Islamists would still be intent on establishing aCaliphate and making the entire world Islamic, starting with theJews, who Mohammed failed to convert. But Scheuer argues that itis not religious or cultural differences that have made Islam regardAmerica as the enemy. It is solely the result of America’s support forthe State of Israel. Scheuer wants the Islamic world to focus itshatred on Israel rather than the United States. Other CIA and FBIagents may have screwed up when it came to 9/11 but their failurewas unintentional while Scheuer’s was deliberate! He wastransferred out of the UBL Unit in 1999 and he resigned from theCIA in 2004.139After he left the Agency he became an Adjunct Professor ofSecurity Studies at Georgetown University, and was a regularcontributor to the Jamestown Foundations Terrorism Focus until hewas fired in 2009. In 2009, Scheuer reported that he had lost hisposition as a Senior Fellow with the Jamestown Foundation, after"several major financial donors to Jamestown threatened towithdraw funding" if he continued in that role. The funding threatswere pursuant to his criticism of Barack Obamas "dancing the TelAviv two-step" in allegedly kowtowing to the Israeli lobby, as well asScheuers disdaining of Obamas selection as Chief of Staff of RahmEmmanuel, who he called "a U.S. citizen who during the 1991 GulfWar left America to serve in Israels military.” Scheuer has stated,“Israel is not only an unnecessary and self-made liability for theUnited States, it is an untreated and spreading cancer on ourdomestic politics, foreign policy, and national security.” Scheuerpublished two books blaming others for his failure to kidnap or139. Report of the Joint Inquiry into the Terrorist Attacks of September 11,2001 – by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and theSenate Select Committee on Intelligence.213

A. J. WEBERMANmurder Usama Bin Laden. It was Scheuer who trained the CIAStation Chief in Khost who let a triple agent wreak havoc on theCIA. Scheuer stated:Dr. Paul’s non-interventionist policy will allowforeigners to work out their political destiny in theirown way and at their own pace; prevent unnecessaryadditions to America’s growing list of enemies; andsave countless young lives. Electing anyone but RonPaul will further increase the already strong chancesof widespread Islamist-conducted violence inside theUnited States.Ron Paul stated:The pharmaceutical plant in Sudan was just that, apharmaceutical plant, owned by a Muslimbusinessman who was standing up to the Islamicfundamentalists, the same people we pretend tooppose and use as scapegoats for all our Middle-Eastern policies. And now we have the controversialand unconstitutional waging of war in Iraq.140The only known use of EMPTA is as a precursor to Vx a deadlynerve gas; it has no uses in pharmaceuticals. It is not madeaccidentally as a by-product of legitimate pharmaceuticalmanufacturing. A soil sample was taken from the grounds aroundthe Al-Shifa “Pharmaceutical Plant” in the Sudan and EMPTA wasdiscovered. According to former CIA Director George Tenet, the CIAsent a human agent to Al-Shifa who entered the facility grounds,evaded plant guards, and collected the soil sample from adesignated area within the gates of the plant.141He said that a U.S.140. http://www.ronpaulsbrain.com/1998/12/141. Tim Weiner and Steven Lee Myers “U.S. Notes Gaps in Data aboutDrug Plant But Defends Attack; Sudan Envoy Angry” The New York Times,September 3, 1998. Former Shifa export manager Alamaddin al-Shiblidenied that the soil sample could have been taken from Shifa saying, “the214

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIcommercial laboratory analyzed the sample and found a level 2.5times that necessary to be considered a trace presence of EMPTA.Tenet said the operative had submitted to repeated polygraph teststo gain assurance that the informant had carried out the mission asinstructed. But of course Ron Paul has better intelligence than theCIA:Paul continued to defend Islamist terrorists by denying thatjihad is a pillar of Islam.Robert Pape, author of Dying to Win, explains thestrategic logic of suicide terrorism. Pape hascollected a database of every suicide terrorist attackbetween 1980 and 2004, all 462 of them. Hisconclusions are enlightening and crucial to ourunderstanding the true motivation behind the attacksagainst Western nations by Islamic terrorists. Afterhis exhaustive study, Pape comes to some veryimportant conclusions. I, like many, have assumedthat the driving force behind the suicide attacks wasIslamic fundamentalism. Promise of instant entry intoparadise as a reward for killing infidels seemed toexplain the suicides, a concept that is foreign to ourway of thinking. The world’s expert on suicideterrorism has convinced me to rethink this simplisticexplanation, that terrorism is merely an expression ofreligious extremism and resentment of a foreignculture.142University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape argued thatIslam has little to do with suicide bombing. Rather, he suggested,factory was tiled throughout, and there was asphalt everywhere outside thebuildings. Where could anyone have taken a sample?” See Dahne, “Ownerof Sudanese Factory Comes Under Scrutiny.”http://www.vitrade.com/who_is_who/idris/980923_idris_dpa.htm142. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul262.html215

A. J. WEBERMANthat suicide bombers, wherever they are in the world, weremotivated much more by tactical goals. He juxtaposed the suicideterrorism of the (non-Islamic) Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam withIslamist suicide bombing to demonstrate that a desire to endoccupation is the common factor rather than religion. Therefore, hesuggested that focus upon religion is a distraction and thatpolicymakers seeking to stop the scourge of suicide attacks shouldwork instead to address root causes, which he sees as thepresence of troops or interests in disputed or occupied lands. This isjust another way of convincing Americans that if they abandonedIsrael the threat of terrorism would subside. The fact remains thatmost suicide bombings since 1980 in the world in general and in theMiddle East in particular are sponsored by Islamist and not secularterrorist groups. Pape avoids this conclusion by gerrymandering hisdata so that he does not need to include the significant numbers ofsuicide bombings conducted by Sunnis against Shi‘a in Iraq.The following is from a speech by Prime Minister MahathirMohammad of Malaysia to the Tenth Islamic Summit ConferencePutrajaya, Malaysia, October 16, 2003:There is a feeling of hopelessness among the Muslimcountries and their people. They feel that they can donothing right. They believe that things can only getworse. The Muslims will forever be oppressed anddominated by the Europeans and the Jews. It cannotbe that there is no other way. 1.3 billion Muslimscannot be defeated by a few million Jews. Theremust be a way. And we can only find a way if we stopto think, to assess our weaknesses and our strength,to plan, to strategize and then to counter attack. Weare actually very strong. 1.3 billion people cannot besimply wiped out. The Europeans killed 6 millionJews out of 12 million. But today the Jews rule thisworld by proxy. They get others to fight and die forthem.216

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThe enemy will probably welcome these proposalsand we will conclude that the promoters are workingfor the enemy. But think. We are up against a peoplewho think. They survived 2000 years of pogroms notby hitting back, but by thinking. They invented andsuccessfully promoted Socialism, Communism,human rights and democracy so that persecutingthem would appear to be wrong, so they may enjoyequal rights with others. With these they have nowgained control of the most powerful countries andthey, this tiny community, have become a worldpower. We cannot fight them through brawn alone.We must use our brains also.Of late because of their power and their apparentsuccess they have become arrogant. And arrogantpeople, like angry people will make mistakes, willforget to think.This is from a speech Paul gave to entitled Congress onOctober 28, 2003 entitled Shouldn’t Censor Foreign Leaders:A careful reading of the prime minister’s speech didnot find any explicit calls for violence. Actually, Dr.Mahathir called for Muslims around the world tocease using violence to seek their goals. He stated,“Is there no other way than to ask our young peopleto blow themselves up and kill people and invite themassacre of more of our own people?” Also, headvises against “revenge” attacks and urges Muslimsto “win [the] hearts and minds” of non-Muslimsincluding “Jews...who do not approve of what theIsraelis are doing.” While we may agree or disagreewith the cause that Dr. Mahathir espouses, the factthat he calls for non-violent means to achieve hisgoals is to be commended rather than condemned.This is not to agree with every aspect of his address217

A. J. WEBERMAN— and certainly not to agree with some of theridiculous statements contained therein — but ratherto caution against the kind of blanket condemnationthat this legislation represents. Do we not also agreewith his words that Muslim violence in the MiddleEast has been counterproductive? President Bushhimself in May invited Dr. Mahathir to the WhiteHouse to, in the president’s words, “publicly thank thePrime Minister for his strong support in the waragainst terror.”143RON PAUL REACTS TO THE CHARGES AGAINST HIM ABOUTISRAEL IN THIS BOOKRon Paul was sent a copy of this book at his office, CampaignCommittee and PAC. A few weeks later he released a statementthat shocked his constituency. Business insider144reported thatwhen asked about Israel moving its capitol from Tel Aviv toJerusalem Paul told evangelical leaders:The real issue here is not what America wants, butwhat does Israel want? If Israel wants their capital tobe Jerusalem, then the United States should honorthat. How would we like it if some other nation saidWe decided to recognize New York City as yourcapital instead, so we will build our embassy there?’Paul was reacting to this book and to theformation of an organization known as JAP –Jews Against Paul. He is a devious,duplicitous weasel and he released thisstatement so people would think “How couldPaul be a Nazi when he favored a position of143. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul140.html144. http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-04-13/politics/31336407_1_israel-from-tel-aviv-evangelical-leaders-business-insider218

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIthis nature?” A smart move on Paul’s part designed to neutralizeany effect this expose might have. Throughout this expose I neveronce do I say that Ron Paul is dumb, however I do say that hisfollowers who don’t pick up on the dog whistle language andactually believe this man stands for liberty are dumb brainwashedzombies. As for his overt and covert Nazi followers, the only goodNazi is a dead Nazi.219

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICHAPTER SEVENDOMESTIC TERRORISMSECURITY STRIPPING AMERICAWe need no more Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act!No more Violent Radicalization & Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Acts!No more torture!No more Military Commissions Act!No more secret prisons and extraordinary rendition!No more abuse of habeas corpus!No more PATRIOT Acts!What we need is more government transparency and more privacy for theindividual! (Ron Paul March 13, 2008)Paul wrote this in his Texas Straight Talk Newsletter:Some, even conservatives, have offered the exampleof President Franklin Roosevelts use of a militarycourt to try a group of Nazi saboteurs during WorldWar II. It is curious to see FDR as a model for220

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIconservatives, but nevertheless we were in adeclared war and those captured were agents of acountry with which we were in an active state of war.We are not currently in a state of war, despite whatpundits might claim.145For Ron Paul the war between America and Islamist terroristsdoes not exist so it is no surprise that he was one of the threeRepublican members of Congress who voted against the PATRIOTAct.When the PATRIOT Act was passed, it was in thepassions following 9/11, and that bill should havenever been passed. It was brought up carelessly,casually, in a rapid manner. The bill that had beendiscussed in the Committee on the Judiciary wasremoved during the night before we voted. The fulltext of this bill was very difficult to find. I amconvinced that very few Members were able toreview this bill before voting. That bill should havenever passed. We certainly should continue tomaintain the sunset provisions. But that is a long wayoff, and we should be starting to reform and improvethis particular piece of legislation. This is our firstchance to do so.Demanding domestic security in times of war invitescarelessness in preserving civil liberties and the rightof privacy. Frequently the people are only tooanxious for their freedoms to be sacrificed on thealtar of authoritarianism thought to be necessary toremain safe and secure. Nothing would please theterrorists more than if we willingly give up some ofour cherished liberties while defending ourselvesfrom their threat. Many of the questionable provisionsin this bill, such as the expanded pen register145. http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/franklin.html221

A. J. WEBERMANauthority and the expanded use of roving wiretaps,are items for which law enforcement has beenlobbying for years. The utility of these items incatching terrorists is questionable to say the least.After all, terrorists have demonstrated they are smartenough not to reveal information about their planswhen they know federal agents could be listening.146How does Paul know what would please the terrorists more?Do you think that terrorists are happy about laws that make it moredifficult for them to operate? Paul introduced an amendment toweaken the “sneak and peek” provision and had 300 members ofCongress vote and was able to eviscerate that clause. “Sneak andPeak” means to execute search warrants without immediatelyinforming their targets. Thanks to the PATRIOT Act "Sneak-and-peek" searches are now easier to get, legal in all jurisdictions, andthe law contains no practical limit on how long authorities can delaynotifying the subject of a search. But contrary to the impression leftby Ron Paul, they arent new: some federal courts allowed themprior to the USA PATRIOT Act. Paul:The irony is that PATRIOT Act-type regulations wereall proposed before 9-11, and are now becoming acostly burden to American businesses. I’m gettingmore calls every day from constituents who are beingharassed by government bureaucrats for “infractions”of all kinds totally unrelated to national security. Thisimmeasurable cost from the stepped-up activity ofgovernment bureaucrats will further burden oureconomy as it slips toward recession — and do littleto enhance homeland security.147Paul was just following the anti-terrorist legislation Nazi Partyline as put forth by Willis Carto:146. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=386&Itemid=60147. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul218.html222

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThe SPOTLIGHT March 27, 1995ANTI-TERRORISM BILL WOULD ERODECONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTSTheres a move on in Congress to further erodeConstitutional rights and protections in the name of"anti-terrorism." Under the guise of combatingterrorism, a bill has been introduced in both theHouse and Senate that presents furtherinfringements on the rights of Americans asguaranteed by the Constitution. Officially called theOmnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995, the Senateversion of the bill, S. 390, has been introduced bySen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) and Sen. Arlen Specter(R.-Pa.). The House version, H.R. 896, has beenintroduced by Rep. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). Thebill, which was initiated by the FBI, appears to havebipartisan support, which could expedite action to getit to the floor of both houses of Congress for a vote.While it is a federal crime under current law forAmericans to contribute funds for terrorist actionsanywhere in the world, the new act would broadensuch crime to a point where it would even be unlawfulto donate money for peaceful activities, includingcontributions to the operation of a hospital, to a groupthat has also been accused of committing "terroristacts."Under a provision of the bill the president has thepower to designate any group as sponsoringterrorism, which would than make it a crime to donatemoney to the group for even lawful - evenhumanitarian - objectives. The act would impose guiltby association. Permanent resident aliens whosupport a group listed by the president as havingconducted a terrorist act could be classified as "alien223

A. J. WEBERMANterrorists" and be subject to deportation. Specialcourts would be convened, before which thegovernment could appear and show probable causethat an alien has supported terrorism by simply beingassociated in some obscure manner with either agroup listed as terrorist or any of its members. Thecourt could then order deportation based on secretevidence that would not even be made available tothe defendants attorney. The act could provide ageneral charter for the FBI and other federalagencies, including the military, to investigate politicalgroups and causes at will. It is a wide rangingfederalization of different kinds of actions applying toboth citizens and non-citizens. It would allow up to10-year sentences for citizens who are found guiltyby association and deportation of resident aliens.While many provisions of the act could ultimately befound unconstitutional after years of litigation, thedamage could be enormous to the Constitution in themeantime. The First Amendment, guaranteeingfreedom of speech and of the press, and thepresumption of innocence until proven guilty and theright to bail, are deemed most at risk.It seems as if Paul is defending freedom of resident aliensagainst the power of an evil dictatorship doesn’t it? How else couldhe phrase it? “I feel that resident alien terrorists deserve more rightsso they can get the job done? They deserve freedom! That is,freedom from FBI scrutiny.” Freedom? If America would have sidedwith the Nazi during World War II as Paul wished, the Gestapo, thegreatest abusers of individual freedom to ever crawl out from undera rock on the planet earth, would have replaced the FBI. The Nazisecret police tortured and terrorized Jews, gays, Communists andall who opposed them. They sent people to death camps withoutdue process of law and habeas corpus. Paul doesn’t care aboutfreedom. Paul wants to hamstring the FBI, CIA and NSA by notpassing any new anti-terrorist laws and repealing the laws that have224

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIprevented Islamists from launching another devastating attack like9/11. Why would Paul want to see Americans dead? Paul knowsthat Jews and Israelis would be the prime targets of Islamicterrorists. New York City is where they are most likely to strike. Ifnon-Jews were hurt Paul would only consider it collateral damage.And there are other advantages to be gained by Nazis from aterrorist strike: If a devastating terrorist attack occurs in AmericaPaul and his followers could always blame it on “an Israeli false flagoperation” or one perpetrated by the US Government to pass moreanti-terrorist legislation or bring us to war. You think this isfarfetched? This is from a Ron Paul newsletter:The Middle East, in the last forty years, has soakedup billions of dollars in the name of American securityand peace. The more we give Israel, the more wemust give their Arab enemies. The height of this follywas vividly and tragically dramatized on October 23,1981, with the killing of the 241 Marines in Beirutwhen their barracks were destroyed by radicalMoslems. The terrorists probably were aided by Iranand supplied with explosives sold to them by Israel,originating from the United States and paid for byAmerican taxpayers.Paul claimed that his votes are in line with the wishes to thefounding fathers. Would the founding fathers characterize theAmerican Government as a bunch of psychopaths willing to murdermembers of their own armed forces in Beirut by indirectly supplyingthem with explosives? This propaganda is designed to put people ina frame of mind where any terrorist attack can be blamed onanybody despite the absence of facts. It is part of a hidden agendato allow a terrorist incident or incidents to occur here and thenblame them on America’s relationship with Israel or on the Mossadwithout any supporting evidence.What all this boils down to is that Paul regards the FederalGovernment as ZOG – the Zionist Occupational Government and225

A. J. WEBERMANwants to limit its power then destroy it by hamstringing or dissolvingthe FBI, CIA etc. He hopes to do this by promulgating the idea that itis not worth giving up certain civil liberties in exchange for keepingIslamic terrorism out of the United States. He is interested in civilliberties only to security strip America because he wants toempower Jew-hating Islamic terrorists so they can strike Americaagain and drive a wedge between Israel and the war-weary UnitedStates.9/11: AN INSIDE JOBPaul believes in all sorts of screwball conspiracy theories suchas the military is involved in a conspiracy against America as is theCIA. In a March 2009 interview, Paul entertained the bogusconspiracy theorist Alex Jones’s claim that NORTHCOM, the U.S.military’s combatant command for North America, is “taking over”the country. “The average member of Congress probably isn’t aparticipant in the grand conspiracy,”148Paul reassured the feveredhost, essentially acknowledging that such a conspiracy exists. “Weneed to take out the CIA.” In a January 2010 speech, Paulannounced, “There’s been a coup, have you heard? It’s the CIAcoup” against the American government. “They’re in businesses, indrug businesses,” the congressman added.149Eric Rittberg wrotethat that Paul is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist:He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhapsthe attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and thatthe Bush administration might have known about theattacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathieswhatsoever for those who died on 9/11, and prettymuch forbade us staffers from engaging in any sort ofmemorial expressions, or openly asserting pro-military statements in support of the Bushadministration.148. http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/cracker-barrel-or-crackpot/2011/12/28/0/?print149. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul632.html226

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIRon Paul has repeatedly denied that he believes in 9/11conspiracy theories, but in an interview in October 2011, he wasasked why he wouldn’t talk about the “truth” behind 9/11. Heresponded that he “just can’t handle the controversy.”A group called Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth asked Paulwhether he believed the official investigation into the September 11thattacks was credible. “I never automatically trust anything thegovernment does when they do an investigation,” Paul replied,“because too often I think there’s an area that the governmentcovered up, whether it’s the Kennedy assassination or whatever.”Ahmadinejad is the world’s most infamous 9/11 revisionist. Inhis September 22, 2011 UN Speech last year he stated,When the need to form a fact-finding team toundertake a thorough investigation concerning thehidden elements involved in September 11 incidentwas brought up; an idea also endorsed by allindependent governments and nations as well as bythe majority in the United States, my country andmyself came under pressure and threat by thegovernment of the United States. Instead ofassigning a fact-finding team, they killed the mainperpetrator and threw his body into the sea. Would itnot have been reasonable to bring to justice andopenly bring to trial the main perpetrator of theincident in order to identify the elements behind thesafe space provided for the invading aircraft to attackthe twin world trade towers?Very interesting: if Osama Bin Laden had been brought tojustice in the United States he might have revealed that he was inleague with the United States or the Israelis. This makes no senseand is the ranting of a madman who could soon possess nuclearweapons. On August 7, 2010 he stated:227

A. J. WEBERMANNo Jews were killed in the World Trade Center,because one day earlier they were told not to go totheir workplace. They announced that 3,000 peoplewere killed in this incident, but there were no reportsthat reveal their names. Maybe you saw that, but Idid not. What was the story of September 11? Duringfive to six days, and with the aid of the media, theycreated and prepared public opinion so that everyoneconsidered an attack on Afghanistan and Iraq as(their) right.Revisionism concerning World Trade Center bombings isnothing new for Ron Paul. Shortly after the Brooklyn-Jersey City cellof Gamma Al Islamiyya perpetrated the first World Trade Centerbombing this appeared in the Ron Paul Survival Newsletter.The New York BombingIt was only a few days after the World Trade Centerbombing before Mohammed A. Salameh wasarrested. Is he guilty? Who knows? Some peoplethink this is a frame-up by anti-Arab interests. Recallthat shortly after the Kennedy assassination, LeeHarvey Oswald was apprehended and accusationswere made. We’re still sorting that one out. From mypoint of view, it’s hard to believe the perpetratorscould be as stupid as the authorities maintain.We now know what one homemade bomb can do toa large city – one billion dollars of damage. Whetherit was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewishfriend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation bythe Islamic fundamentalists, matters little. The citieshave become centers of violence, whether throughthe daily and routine terrorism of crime, politicalbomb terrorism, or the terrorism of mob behavior asin Los Angeles.228

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThe leader of the Ron Paul Super PAC, its founder, chairmanand treasurer, is Gary Franchi, a promoter of 9/11 revisionistconspiracy theories. As with many other so-called "independent"Super PACs, which can receive unlimited donations outside thenormal rules of campaign finance, the pro-Paul group is operated bypeople with close ties to the candidate. The groups advisory boardmembers include Penny Langford Freeman, Pauls political directorfrom 1998 to 2007, and Joe Becker, chief legal counsel for RonPaul 2008.Franchi has supported the 9/11 Truth Movement, whichsupports the idea that the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,were an inside job to create a pretext for a reduction in Americanliberty with the World Trade Center brought down by a planned U.S.controlled internal demolition, instead of terrorist-controlledairplanes. Franchi founded the Lone Lantern Society (a reference toPaul Revere indicating that foreign enemies are on American soil).The group supports "the birth of freedom and the death of the NewWorld Order," a secretive elite that is supposedly trying to set up aworld government. Lone Lantern has held street demonstrations onthe 11th of every month in Chicago and elsewhere, demanding aninvestigation of 9/11. In New Hampshire in 2008, a video showsFranchi asking Tom Ridge, the former secretary of HomelandSecurity, who was campaigning for Senator John McCain, whetherRidge would support an investigation of the "controlled demolition"of the World Trade Center. Ridge was having none of it, saying, "Ijust dont buy into that. Thats a conspiracy theory that has no basisin fact. Its almost out of the Twilight Zone."According to a 2010 report by the Southern Poverty LawCenter, "Gary Franchi is one of the leading promoters of a resurgentPatriot conspiracy theory that alleges the government is creatingconcentration camps for U.S. citizens." In 2009 he co-wrote and co-produced the video Camp FEMA: American Lockdown, whichclaims that the Federal Emergency Management Agency is creatingconcentration camps on air bases and in vacant buildings to housepolitical dissenters when the federal government proclaims martial229

A. J. WEBERMANlaw. "Your church may have already signed a deal with the devil,"reads promotional material for the film. The film questions whetherCensus data will be used to round up Americans. Clips fromFranchis film on YouTube show Hitler youth marching while thenarrator ominously describes President Obamas plans to expandAmeriCorps and the USA Freedom Corps, the volunteer initiativelaunched by the Bush administration after 9/11.In a videotaped interview with delusionaryconspiracy talk show host Alex Jones, Franchiexplained that at 17 he began to read about"the committee of 300, the Club of Rome, theCouncil of Foreign Relations," and other groupsof the New World Order. He said his parents,thinking he was mentally ill, had him heavilymedicated for 10 years. But he continued hisreading, particularly about the implantation ofRFID microchips by government, and formed the Lone LanternSociety to tell people that "the enemies are here." "Its the truth, itsthe message, thats piercing the darkness," Franchi told Jones."Anything thats done in darkness, anything that is hidden in secretwill be revealed. Its having an impact. People are waking up by themillions, Alex, by the millions! The New World Order does not standa chance."150This is from Ahmadinejad’s UN Speech 2011 to the United Nations:Who used the mysterious September 11thincident asa pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, killing,injuring, and displacing millions in two countries withthe ultimate goal of bringing into its domination theMiddle East and its oil resources? By using theirimperialistic media network which is under theinfluence of colonialism they threaten anyone who150. http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/09/10358155-super-pac-supporting-ron-paul-is-operated-by-a-911-truther?threadId=3341528&commentId=62320690#c62320690230

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIquestions the Holocaust and the September 11thevent with sanctions and military action. Last year,when the need to form a fact-finding team toundertake a thorough investigation concerning thehidden elements involved in September 11thincidentwas brought up; an idea also endorsed by allindependent governments and nations as well as bythe majority in the United States, my country andmyself came under pressure and threat by thegovernment of the United States. Instead ofassigning a fact-finding team, they killed the mainperpetrator and threw his body into the sea. Would itnot have been reasonable to bring to justice andopenly bring to trial the main perpetrator of theincident in order to identify the elements behind thesafe space provided for the invading aircraft to attackthe twin world trade towers? Why should it not havebeen allowed to bring him to trial to help recognizethose who launched terrorist groups and broughtwars and other miseries into the region? Is there anyclassified information that must be kept secret?According to the Iranian Hitler the reason his country isthreatened is not because it is trying to develop an atomic bomb touse to destroy Israel but because he is questioning the Holocaustand September 11th. Osama Bin Laden was killed so that he wouldnot "identify the elements behind the safe space provided for theinvading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers?" Who couldhave provided that "safe airspace?" Could it have been the Israelis,could it have been the Jews or was it Lady Gaga? If this psychopathgets a-hold of nukes he is crazy enough to use them.Who nullified the Breton Woods system by printingtrillions of dollars without the backing of gold reservesor equivalent currency? A move that triggeredinflation worldwide and was intended to prey on theeconomic gains of other nations.231

A. J. WEBERMANThis is pure Lyndon LaRouche, the failed Hitler. When yousee the LaRouchoids in the street they have signs saying REVIVEBRETON WOODS AGREEMENT. The Iranian Hitler got this fromthe failed American Hitler.What is the justification for the presence of hundredsof US military and intelligence bases in different partsof the world, including 268 bases in Germany, 124 inJapan, 87 in South Korea, 83 in Italy, 45 in the UnitedKingdom, and 21 in Portugal? Does this meananything other than military occupation?This is pure Ron Paul, the favorite candidate of the Nazis.The crypto-Nazi that wants cut off all aid to Israel. JDO has been onto Paul for decades as he was a populist hero in the Nazinewspaper, The Spotlight. He is a very clever weasel cloaking hisJew hating in isolationism just as the American Firsters did. Morefrom the same speech:I WANT MY MAHDI!A future that will be built when humanity initiates totrend the path of the divine prophets and therighteous under the leadership of Imam al-Mahdi, theUltimate Savior of mankind and the inheritor to alldivine messengers and leaders and to the puregeneration of our great Prophet. The creation of asupreme and ideal society with the arrival of a perfecthuman being, who is a true and sincere lover of allhuman beings, is the guaranteed promise of Allah.He will come...to lead the freedom and justice loversto eradicate tyranny and discrimination, and promoteknowledge, peace, justice freedom and love acrossthe world. He will present to every single individual allthe beauties of the world and all good things whichbring happiness for humankind.232

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIf the tradition of the Mahdi was authentic, then there wouldhave been some mention of it in the Quran. On the contrary, eventhe word mahdi does not appear in that book! The original legendabout the messianic Imam was adopted by the Shiis from otherreligious communities, to which they added their own details until itreached its present form. Islam needed a messianic figure such asthe other two major religions had so they came up with the storythat an imam disappeared then underwent “a minor occultation”,that is he came halfway back using Imam’s as cutouts, then he wentinto a major occultation which he will remain in until he returns andsets everything straight - meaning everyone adopts shii Islamincluding the Sunnis. “Occult” can mean “to hide or become hiddenor shut off from view” but it can also mean “of or characteristic ofmagical, mystical, or supernatural arts, phenomena, or influences”often connected with Devil worship. Now the key word here ismagical. Magic is unconditionally & absolutely haram / prohibited. Itis a gunahane kabira (greater sin) leading to Hell fire. A person whoindulges in magic & does not repent is punishable by Death in anIslamic society, as it is equivalent to shirk & severely criticized inmany many a hadith"Keep away from the seven destructive sins!" Theysaid, "What are they, O Messenger of Allah?" Heanswered, "Associating partners with Allah;practicing sorcery; taking a life, which Allah hasmade forbidden except for a just cause (according toIslamic Law); eating Riba (usury) eating up anorphans wealth; fleeing from the battle field at thetime of fighting (with the unbelievers); and accusingchaste women, who never think of anything that cantouch their chastity and who are good believers, offornication.So what we have in Shia is a reversion to pre-Islamic timesknown as the time of the jinn.233

A. J. WEBERMANIn September 2004 Paul voted against a commemoration of9/11:Mr. Speaker, I am forced to rise in opposition to thislegislation, I do so despite my desire tocommemorate the horrific attacks on September 11,2001 and again express my sympathy to the familiesof the victims. But don’t be fooled by the label. Thislegislation is no mere commemoration of the eventsof September 11, 2001. Rather, it is page after pageof Congressional self-congratulation. It is page afterpage of praise for policies that have made us nosafer from terrorist attack, but that have certainlymade us much less free at home. Does it not strikeanyone else as a bit unseemly for Congress to becongratulating itself on this solemn occasion? Whatthis legislation does not do is address some of thereal causes of the hatred that lead others to wish toharm us. Why should we bother to understand themotivations of madmen and murderers? It is not tosympathize with them or their cause. It is to ensureour self-preservation. Those who oppose us and whohave attacked us have made it very clear: Theyoppose our foreign policy of interventionism andmeddling, and they oppose our one-sided approachto the Middle East. Therefore, mitigating the angeragainst us could be as simple as returning to theforeign policy recommended by our forefathers. Weshould not be stationing hundreds of thousands ofour troops in more than 100 foreign countries,guarding their borders while our own remain open toterrorist infiltration. We should not be meddling in theinternal affairs of foreign countries, nor should we beinvolving ourselves in foreign conflicts that havenothing to do with the United States. We should notbe sending hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars234

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIoverseas to “build nations” and “export democracy” atthe barrel of a gun.151Paul disguises his Nazism with tirades against totalitarianismand writes:The founders wanted to set a high bar for thegovernment to overcome in order to deprive anindividual of life or liberty. To lower that bar is toendanger everyone. When the bar is low enough toinclude political enemies, our descent intototalitarianism is virtually assured. The PATRIOT Act,as bad as its violation against the Fourth Amendmentwas, was just one step down the slippery slope. Therecently passed National Defense Authorization Actcontinues that slip into tyranny, and in fact,accelerates it significantly. It is no longer limited tomembers of al-Qaeda or the Taliban, but anyoneaccused of substantially supporting such groups orassociated forces. How closely associated, and whatconstitutes substantial support? What if it wasdiscovered that someone who committed a terroristact was once involved with a charity? Or suppose apolitical candidate? Are all donors of that candidateor supporters of that candidate now suspects andsubject to indefinite detainment? Is that charity nowan associated force?152Paul’s agenda is to strengthen any group that hates Jews. Justlike Willis Carto’s Spotlight, Paul wants to let “charitable”organizations like the Holy Land Foundation, which was convicted ofsupporting terrorism, operate freely in America. He wants to see the151. Congressional Record, V. 150, Pt. 13, July 22, 2004 to September 14,2004 page 17847152. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1936:the-ndaa-repeals-more-rights235

A. J. WEBERMANAmerican Muslims elect a pro-terrorist candidate. Paul told this toCongress in November 1999:Sanctions are one thing, but seizures of bank assetsof any related business to the Taliban governmentinfuriates and incites the radicals to violence. Thereis no evidence that this policy serves the interests ofworld peace. It certainly increases the danger to allAmericans as we become the number one target ofterrorists. Conventional war against the United Statesis out of the question, but acts of terrorism, whether itis the shooting down of a civilian airliner or bombinga New York City building, are almost impossible toprevent in a reasonably open society.153Paul was right about bombings of a New York City buildingbeing impossible to prevent in 1999 because there were few anti-terrorism laws in place. Since laws like the PATRIOT Act werepassed there have been no major terrorist incidents within theUnited States. Paul opposed The National Defense AuthorizationAct:The Bill of Rights has no exceptions for really badpeople or terrorists or even non-citizens. It is a keycheck on government power against any person.That is not a weakness in our legal system; it is thevery strength of our legal system. The NationalDefense Authorization Act attempts to justifyabridging the Bill of Rights on the theory that rightsare suspended in a time of war, and the entire UnitedStates is a battlefield in the war on terror. This is avery dangerous development, indeed. Beware.154153. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 21, November 17, 1999 toDecember 3, 1999 page 30043154.http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1936:the-ndaa-repeals-more-rights236

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIPaul wants to give enemy combatants the same rights asAmerican citizens giving them a chance to be acquitted in anAmerican court of law rather than being tried by a military tribunal.Under the guise of protecting Civil Liberties, Paul wants tosecurity strip America by protecting those who leak classifiedinformation so that the US will become more vulnerable to terroristattacks. Paul:It has been charged, by self-proclaimed experts, thatJulian Assange, the internet publisher of thisinformation, has committed a heinous crimedeserving prosecution for treason and execution oreven assassination. But should we not at least askhow the U.S. government can charge an Australiancitizen with treason for publishing U.S. secretinformation that he did not steal?155Paul wishes to make it easier for terrorists to board airplanesrather than to protect people’s rights:The incident of the so-called “underwear bomber” lastChristmas is given as justification for the billions ofdollars the federal government is spending on thenew full-body imaging machines, but a GovernmentAccountability Office study earlier this year concludedthat had these scanners been in use they may nothave detected the explosive material that wasallegedly brought onto the airplane. Additionally,there have been recent press reports calling intoquestion the accuracy and adequacy of thesepotentially dangerous machines. My legislation issimple. It establishes that airport security screenersare not immune from any US law regarding physicalcontact with another person, making images ofanother person, or causing physical harm through theuse of radiation-emitting machinery on another155. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T61RVJbCGHA237

A. J. WEBERMANperson. It means they are subject to the same lawsas the rest of us.156Why the so called underwear bomber?Was the underwear bomber a real person ora figment of the Government’s imagination?Why explosive material that was allegedlybrought onto the airplane? On March 14,2008 Paul made this statement on H.R.3773 - FISA Amendments Act of 2008:Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this latest attemptto undermine our personal liberties and violate theFourth Amendment of the Constitution. This bill willallow the federal government to engage in the bulkcollection of American citizens’ communications. Ineffect, it means that any American may have hiselectronic communications monitored without asearch warrant.As such, the bill clearly violates the FourthAmendment, which states: “The right of the people tobe secure in their persons, houses, papers, andeffects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, butupon probable cause, supported by Oath oraffirmation, and particularly describing the place tobe searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”The assurances in this bill that Americans will nothave their communications monitored without warrantare unconvincing. The bill merely states that thegovernment should do its best to avoid monitoringAmericans if possible. We have seen howmeaningless such qualified prohibitions have been aswe recount the abuses over the past several years.156. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1796&Itemid=60238

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIJust today, we read in the news that the federalgovernment has massively abused its ability tomonitor us by improperly targeting Americansthrough the use of “national security letters.”Apparently some 60 percent of the more than 50,000national security letters targeted Americans, ratherthan foreign terrorists, for surveillance.This is what happens when we begin down theslippery slope of giving up our constitutional rights forthe promise of more security. When we come toaccept that the government can spy on us without acourt order we have come to accept tyranny. I urgemy colleagues to reject this and all legislation thatallows Americans to be spied on without a properlyissued warrant.157FISA wiretaps are authorized by the judiciary in secret toassure their efficacy. Why would a Nazi get so upset about FourthAmendment rights when the Nazis are known for breaking downpeople’s doors without a warrant, searching their home and seizingtheir possessions? Why is Paul upset about communications beingintercepted? Because he wants to see the terrorists succeed. Hewants to hamstring the FBI, NSA and CIA so the terrorists have abetter chance of success. He is hoping they will hit Jewish targets orNew York City, which has a high percentage of Jews living there.Paul shares a common goal with the Islamist terrorists – the murderof every Jew on this planet. It sure seems as if Ron Paul is out toprotect our rights when that is not the object of blocking thislegislation at all. His ultimate goal is a Fifth Reich. Paul commentedon Protect America Act of 2007:Madame Speaker, I rise in opposition to theextension of the Protect America Act of 2007because the underlying legislation violates the US157. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2008-03-31/html/CREC-2008-03-31-pt1-PgE446.htm239

A. J. WEBERMANConstitution. The misnamed Protect America Actallows the US government to monitor telephone callsand other electronic communications of Americancitizens without a warrant. This clearly violates theFourth Amendment, which states:“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but uponprobable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularlydescribing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to beseized.”158On January 30, 2008 Paul commented on a bill to extendthe Protect America Act of 2007 for 30 Days:The Protect America Act sidelines the FISACourt system and places authority over foreignsurveillance in the director of national intelligenceand the attorney general with little if any oversight.While proponents of this legislation have argued thatthe monitoring of American citizens would still requirea court-issued warrant, the bill only requires thatsubjects be "reasonably believed to be outsidethe United States." Further, it does not provide forthe Fourth Amendment protection of Americancitizens if they happen to be on the other end of theelectronic communication where the subject ofsurveillance is a non-citizen overseas.159Paul wants to protect the rights of terrorists even when they areoverseas along with the rights of terrorists living in America who getcalls from terrorists overseas. Paul wants to see the number ofIslamists increase in America: Remarks on Violent Radicalization &Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, HR 1955. This was a bill to158. http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/19004.html159. http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2008_cr/h012908.html240

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIestablish a commission to study homegrown terrorism. It passed theHouse but died in the Senate.There are many causes for concern in HR 1955. Thelegislation specifically singles out the Internet for“facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically basedviolence, and the homegrown terrorism process” inthe United States. Such language may well be thefirst step toward US government regulation of whatwe are allowed to access on the Internet. Are we, forour own good, to be subjected to the kind ofgovernmental control of the Internet that we see inunfree societies? This bill certainly sets us on thatcourse. (12/5/2007)160Ron Paul continually takes the sides of the enemies of America,making excuse after excuse for terrorists. He never mentions thatjihad is one of the pillars of Islam and that even if Israel were wipedoff the face of the map the Islamic Fundamentalists would still hateAmerica for being a Christian country that does not accept Islamand Shar’ia Law.In the Name of Patriotism (Who are the Patriots?) Wefail to realize that the extremists, willing to sacrificetheir own lives to kill their enemies, do so out of asense of weakness and desperation over real andperceived attacks on their way of life, their religion,their country and their natural resources. Without theconventional diplomatic or military means to retaliateagainst these attacks, and an unwillingness of theirown government to address the issue, they resort tothe desperation tactic of suicide terrorism. Theiranger toward their own governments, which theybelieve are co-conspirators with the Americangovernment, is equal to or greater than that directedtoward us. These errors in judgment in understanding160. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul428.html241

A. J. WEBERMANthe motive of the enemy and the constant fear that isgenerated have brought us to this crisis where ourcivil liberties and privacy are being steadily eroded inthe name of preserving national security. We may bethe economic and military giant of the world, but theeffort to stop this war on our liberties here at home inthe name of patriotism, is being lost. (6/6/07)Fighting Terrorism With Big Government - AConvenience or Necessity? Fighting terrorism is atop concern for most Americans. It is understandable,knowing how vulnerable we now are to an attack byour enemies. But striking out against the liberties ofall Americans, with the PATRIOT Act, the FBI, orGuantanamo-type justice will hardly address theproblem. Liberty cannot be enhanced by underminingliberty! It is never necessary to sacrifice liberty topreserve it. It’s tempting to sacrifice liberty for safety,and that is the argument used all too often by thepoliticians seeking more power. But even that is nottrue. History shows that a strong desire for safetyover liberty usually results in less of both. But thatdoes not mean we should ignore the past attacks orthe threat of future attacks that our enemies mightunleash. First, fighting terrorism is a cliché. Terrorismis a technique or a process, and if not properlydefined, the solutions will be hard to find. Terrorism ismore properly defined as an attack by a guerrillawarrior who picks the time and place of the attackbecause he cannot match the enemy withconventional weapons. With too broad a definition ofterrorism, the temptation will be to relinquish toomuch liberty, being fearful that behind every door andin every suitcase lurks a terrorist-planted bomb.Narrowing the definition of terrorism and recognizingwhy some become enemies is crucial.Understanding how maximum security is achieved in242

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIa free society is vital. We have been told that theterrorists hate us for our wealth, our freedom, andour goodness. This war cannot be won if that beliefprevails.161How much of a better way could anyone find to pitch “AllowTerrorism to Return to America” to the American people other than“if you want to be truly free you have to give terrorists some freedomto do their thing.” Paulbots are programmed to quote Ben Franklin:“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safetydeserve neither liberty nor safety.” Safety from biological weapons?Chemical weapons? Radiological weapons? Dirty bombs? Suicidebombers? None of this existed back then and if Franklin was told ofthe casualties of 9/11 he would have been happy to give theGovernment the laws it needed to prevent another 9/11.Ron Paul of Texas in the House of Representatives January 9,2003: Restoring the Second Amendment. Paul might sound like heis defending the Second Amendment but his real motivation is toplace weapons in the hands of terrorists, including semi-automaticweapons that have no sporting value. He also wants to make surethat neo-Nazis and Rightwing militias have access to weapons thatare easily converted to full-auto.Speaker, H.R. 3193 repeals several of the moredraconian citywide Washington, DC, gun restrictionsenacted in 1976. I rise to restore the right thefounding fathers saw as the guarantee of every otherright by introducing the Second AmendmentProtection Act. This legislation reverses the steadyerosion of the right to keep and bear arms byrepealing unconstitutional laws that allow power-hungry federal bureaucrats to restrict the rights oflaw-abiding gun owners.161. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=249&Itemid=60243

A. J. WEBERMANSpecifically, my legislation repeals the five-daywaiting period and the "instant" background check,which enables the federal government to compile adatabase of every gun owner in America. Mylegislation also repeals the misnamed ban on "semi-automatic" weapons, which bans entire class offirearms for no conceivable reason beside the desireof demagogic politicians to appear tough on crime.Finally, my bill amends the Gun Control Act of 1968by deleting the "sporting purposes" test, which allowsthe Treasury Secretary to infringe on secondamendment rights by classifying a firearm (handgun,rifle, and shotgun) as a "destructive device" simplybecause the Secretary believes the gun to be "non-sporting."Thomas Jefferson said "The constitutions of most ofour States assert that all power is inherent in thepeople; ...that it is their right and duty to be at alltimes armed." Jefferson, and all of the Founders,would be horrified by the proliferation ofunconstitutional legislation that prevents law-abidingAmericans from exercising their right and duty tokeep and bear arms. I hope my colleagues will joinme in upholding the Founders vision for a freesociety by cosponsoring the Second AmendmentRestoration Act.162The Founding Fathers never had access to anything but muzzleloaders so how does Paul know how they would react to puttingweapons that can kill scores of people in the hands of today’scitizens, many of whom are Islamic and many of whom are parts ofa permanent criminal underclass that did not exist back then?Another reason Ron Paul wants to repeal gun law is so that Whitecan shoot Black “youth” – a euphemism for “nigger.”162. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=298&Itemid=60244

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIFrom October, l992:Carjacking: A Hip-Hop Thing to DoIf you live in a major city, youve probably alreadyheard about the newest threat to your life and limb,and your family: carjacking. It is the hip-hop thing todo among the urban youth who play unsuspectingwhites like pianos. The youth simply walk up to a carthey like, pull a gun, tell the family to get out, stealtheir jewelry and wallets, and take the car to wreck.Such actions have ballooned in the recent months. Inthe old days, average people could avoid such youthby staying out of bad neighborhoods. Empowered bymedia, police, and political complicity, however, theyouth now roam everywhere looking for cars to stealand people to rob. What can you do? More and moreAmericans are carrying a gun in the car. An ex-cop Iknow advises that if you have to use a gun on ayouth, you should leave the scene immediately,disposing of the wiped off gun as soon as possible.Such a gun cannot, of course, be registered to you,but one bought privately (through the classifieds, forexample). I frankly don’t know what to make of suchadvice but even in my little town of Lake Jackson,Texas, I’ve urged everyone in my family to know howto use a gun in self-defense. For the animals arecoming.Ron Paul November 13, 2002 Oppose The New HomelandSecurity Bureaucracy!Mr. Speaker, when the process of creating aDepartment of Homeland Security commenced,Congress was led to believe that the legislationwould be a simple reorganization aimed at increasingefficiency, not an attempt to expand federal power.Fiscally conservative members of Congress were245

A. J. WEBERMANeven told that the bill would be budget neutral! Yet,when the House of Representatives initiallyconsidered creating a Department of HomelandSecurity, the legislative vehicle almost overnight grewfrom 32 pages to 282 pages - and the cost hadballooned to at least $3 billion. Now we are preparedto vote on a nearly 500-page bill that increasesfederal expenditures and raises troubling civilliberties questions. Adding insult to injury, this billwas put together late last night and introduced onlythis morning. Worst of all, the text of the bill has notbeen made readily available to most members,meaning this Congress is prepared to create amassive new federal agency without even knowingthe details. This is a dangerous and irresponsiblepractice.The Department of Homeland has been able to prevent another9/11 yet Paul opposed its existence on the grounds that it would bejust another Government bureaucracy. What else could he say? -that he opposed it because he wanted to see America take anotherhit like 9/11? How would Ron Paul deal with terrorism?IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJuly 27, 2007Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which wasreferred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. A BILL:To authorize the President to issue letters of marqueand reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracyupon the United States on September 11, 2001, andother similar acts of war planned for the future.Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United States of America in246

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICongress assembled, This Act may be cited as the`Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007.SEC. 2. ISSUANCE OF LETTERS OF MARQUEAND REPRISAL.The President of the United States is authorized andrequested to commission, under officially issuedletters of marque and reprisal, so many of privatelyarmed and equipped persons and entities as, in hisjudgment, the service may require, with suitableinstructions to the leaders thereof, to employ allmeans reasonably necessary to seize outside thegeographic boundaries of the United States and itsterritories the person and property of Osama binLaden, of any al Qaeda co-conspirator, and of anyconspirator with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda whoare responsible for the air piratical aggressions anddepredations perpetrated upon the United States ofAmerica on September 11, 2001, and for anyplanned future air piratical aggressions anddepredations or other acts of war upon the UnitedStates of America and her people.SEC. 3. SECURITY BOND REQUIRED.No letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued bythe President under this Act without requiring theposting of a security bond in such amount as thePresident shall determine is sufficient to ensure thatthe letter be executed according to the terms andconditions thereof.Does anyone really believe that a group of mercenaries wouldhave been capable of effectuating the operation that the Navy Sealspulled-off when they captured Osama? Why the security bond?Does Paul think that Osama might sue the United States if thesoldiers-of-fortune violated his rights?247

A. J. WEBERMANIn 1988 at the University of Houston Paul declared “BringAmerican troops home, abolish the Federal Bureau of Investigationand the Central Intelligence Agency and dismantle every otheragency except the Justice and Defense Departments.”163TheIslamists would love to the FBI dismantled as it continually bringsdown domestic American terrorists with sting operations.If Paul’s constituents were being investigated for terroristactivity and ties to terrorists they would have their Congressmanobject to anti-terrorist laws so that they either would not be unjustlyaccused or so that it would be easier to carry out terrorist attacks.But if you are a Texan and not involved in terrorism or not beingunjustly accused of it why worry about giving the FBI moreinvestigatory power? How is it going to affect you? Ron Paulopposes any programe that will increase America’s security: InDecember 2012 he stated,Earlier this month we learned that the ObamaAdministration is significantly expanding the numberof covert Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) agentsoverseas. From just a few hundred DIA agentsoverseas today, the administration intends toeventually deploy some 1,600 covert agents. Thenature of their work will also shift, away fromintelligence collection and more toward covertactions. This move signals a major change in howthe administration intends to conduct military andparamilitary operations overseas. Unfortunately it isnot a shift toward peace, but rather to an even moredeadly and disturbing phase in the “war on terror.” In2010, I said in a speech that there had been a CIAcoup in this country. The CIA runs the military, thedrone program, and they are in drug trafficking. TheCIA is a secretive government all on its own. Withthis new expanded Defense Intelligence Agency163. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/17/us/now-for-a-real-underdog-ron-paul-libertarian-for-president.html248

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIpresence overseas it will be even worse. Becausethe DIA is operationally under control of thePentagon, direct Congressional oversight of theprogram will be more difficult. Perhaps this is asintended. The CIA will be training the DIA in itsfacilities to conduct operations overseas. Much of thiswill include developing targeting data for thepresident’s expanding drone warfare program.249

A. J. WEBERMANCHAPTER EIGHTRECONSTRUCTIONIST AND DOMINIONISTREPLACEMENT THEOLOGYMost American evangelicals arepre-millennial dispensationalists.They believe that God has a specialplan for the nation of Israel, whichwill play a key role in the end of daysand the return of Christ. A smallersegment of evangelicals holds towhat’s called reformed or covenanttheology, which, tends to teach that in this day the church is whatIsrael was in the Old Testament. In other words, Christians are thenew chosen people. Covenant theologians don’t give Israel anyreligious significance and are much further to the right thanmainstream evangelicals. While dispensationalists believe thatChrist will return imminently and establish a biblical reign on earth,covenant theologians tend to believe its man’s job to create Christ’skingdom before he comes back. The most radical faction ofcovenant theology is called Christian Reconstructionism, amovement founded by R. J. Rushdoony that seeks to turn the Bookof Leviticus into law, imposing the death penalty for gay people,blasphemers, unchaste women, and myriad other sinners.Reconstructionists adhere to the view expressed by Ron Paul at aPastors Forum at Chuck Baldwins Pensacola, Florida church thatChristians are the new "chosen people," and the righteous must rulefor 1,000 years before Jesus will return.164Rushdoony is a racist, sexist, Jew-hating bigot who denies theHolocaust. In Foundations of Social Order he wrote,164.http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/153607/major_ron_paul_supporter_favors_death_penalty_for_gays/?page=entire250

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThe false witness born during World War II withrespect to Germany is especially notable andrevealing. The charge is repeatedly made that sixmillion innocent Jews were slain by the Nazis, andthe figure – and even larger figures – is nowentrenched in the history books. Poncins, insummarizing the studies of the French Socialist, PaulRassinier, himself a prisoner in Buchenwald, states:‘Rassinier reached the conclusion that the number ofJews who died after deportation is approximately1,200,000 and this figure, he tells us, has finally beenaccepted as valid by the Centre Mondial deDocumentation Juive Contemporaine. Likewise henotes that Paul Hilberg, in his study of the sameproblem, reached a total of 896,292 victims. Verymany of these people died of epidemics; many wereexecuted. Did the Nazis actually execute manythousands, tens, or hundred thousands of Jews?Men to whom such murders were nothing had toblow up the figure to millions. Did the doctor performa number of experiments on living men and women?A few sterilized women and a few castrated men andtheir horrified tears and grief are not enough to stirthe sick and jaded tastes of modern man: make himguilty of performing 17,000 such operations. Theevils were all too real: even greater is the evil ofbearing false witness concerning them, because thatfalse witness will produce an even more viciousreality in the next upheaval. Men are now ‘reconciled’to a world where millions are murdered, or are said tobe murdered. What will be required in the way ofaction and propaganda next time?165Ron Paul is a favorite politician of ChristianReconstructionists. Gary North, Rushdoonys son-in-law and star polemicist of the Reconstructionist165. http://racistchurches.wordpress.com/2007/06/12/rj-rushdoony/251

A. J. WEBERMANmovement was a Paul staffer during the Texas congressman’s firstterm and has called him the “mahatma of self-government.” “Thepeople who I know who are big Ron Paul guys are old schoolReconstructionists,” says Ron Paul supporter Brian D. Nolder, thepastor of Christ the Redeemer Church in Pella, Iowa. Rev. Phillip G.Kayser (see photo above), another prominent right-wingReconstructionist Nebraska pastor, endorsed Paul. The campaignissued a press release citing "the enlightening statements he makeson how Ron Pauls approach to government is consistent withChristian beliefs." One of Kaysers "Christian beliefs" was applyingthe death penalty for gay male sex.Ron Pauls has long ties to the Reconstructionist movement,from which the more broadly accepted dominionist strain in right-wing evangelical Christianity flows. When Ron Paul exited the GOPpresidential race in 2008 Ron Paul threw his support to PastorChuck Baldwin, who ran on the ballot of the Constitution Party, sortof the political arm of the Christian Reconstructionists. (Baldwinparts company with Reconstructionists on his idea of how the end-times will go down, but is otherwise well-aligned with theReconstructionist agenda). Founded in 1992 by Howard Phillips, afollower of Rushdoony, the Constitution Party offers this in thepreamble to the party platform:The goal of the Constitution Party is to restoreAmerican jurisprudence to its Biblical foundationsand to limit the federal government to itsConstitutional boundaries.166Ron Paul worked with Howard Phillips in forming a shadowgovernment to monitor the Carter Administration. Paul was theshadow Secretary of Labor.167Howard Phillips, whose conversion toChristianity was inspired by Rushdoony himself routinely refers togays as "sodomites" in his own writings. Rushdoony made theconversion of Jews his special mission. (Phillips is of Jewish166. http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php167. The Morning Record and Journal - Feb 25, 1977252

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIheritage.) At a 2008 rally convened by Ron Paul in Minneapolis inthe shadow of the Republican National Convention, Howard Phillipsappeared as a keynote speaker. Ron Paul has appeared withHoward Phillips at Constitution Party events, and served as thekeynote speaker of the 35th anniversary gala of the ConservativeCaucus, another of Howard Phillips groups.In the 1940s and 1960s, segregationists Strom Thurmond andGeorge Wallace won chunks of the electoral vote for their own thirdparties. (Wallaces vehicle, the American Independent Party, cameunder the Constitution Party tent in 1992.) This is a sample ofConstitution Party thought:We, the members of the American Constitution Party,gratefully acknowledge the blessings of the Lord Godas the Creator, Preserver, and Ruler of the universeand of our nation. We hereby appeal to Him for aid,comfort, guidance and the protection of His DivineProvidence as we work to restore and preserve thisnation as a government of, by, and for the people.Our republic is a nation governed by a constitutionrooted in Biblical law and administered byrepresentatives elected by the people to preserve,protect, and defend it against attacks by all itsenemies, whether from without or within. We affirmthe principles of inherent, unalienable, individualrights upon which these United States of Americawere founded. The sole legitimate function ofgovernment is to secure these rights through thepreservation of domestic tranquility, the maintenanceof a strong national defense, and the promotion ofequal justice for all. The federal government has norole as an instrument of salvation. Salvation is by theblood of Christ and faith in Him by Gods grace.168168. http://www.americanconstitutionparty.com/PlatformDetail.html253

A. J. WEBERMANTogether with Howard Phillips and John Birch Society presidentJohn McManus, Paul has spun a conspiracy theory about animminent threat to U.S. sovereignty under the non-existent NorthAmerican Union, which the three contend is a European Union-styleplan already under way, designed to erase Americas nationalborders and eradicate U.S. currency. Ron Pauls demand for areturn to the gold standard for U.S. currency, as well as his disdainfor the Federal Reserve, align perfectly with the "biblical" monetarypolicy positions espoused by Rushdoony in his book entitledThe Institutes.Members of the Christian Identity Church,also believe they are the chosen people, and notthe Jews, who they have replaced. This is thebasis of Replacement theology. ChristianIdentitys origins can be traced back to thenineteenth century in Great Britain, where a smallcircle of religious thinkers advanced the idea,known as British-Israelism that modernEuropeans were biologically descended from the ancient Israelitesof the Old Testament, specifically, from the Lost Tribes scattered byinvasions of Hittites, Assyrians and Babylonians. The Lost Tribeshad purportedly made their way to Europe, and from themdescended the modern European nationalities. British-Israelismincreasingly advanced the idea, common in anti-Semitic circles inthe early twentieth century, that most Jews were not reallydescendants of ancient Israelites, but were instead descended froman Asiatic people known as the Khazars, who settled near the BlackSea during the Middle Ages. European (Ashkenazic) Jews werethus "false" Israelites who further obscured the fact that it was reallyWhite Europeans who were the "true" Israelites. Every Nazi rag hasa reference to the “Khazar conversion” thanks to Arthur Koestler,who wrote a book entitled The Thirteenth Tribe. Having livedthrough the horrors of World War II Koestler was attempting to showthat Jews were really Aryans, by pointing to the fact that Christiansin Khazikistan had converted to Judaism. So what? They were onlya small portion of the Jewish world population at the time.254

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIUnfortunately Koestler’s desire to purge the Jews of their MiddleEastern heritage was used by the Nazis to attack Jews. One of themost influential British-Israel advocates of this and other anti-Jewishideas was William J. Cameron, editor of the Dearborn Independent,the weekly newspaper published by Henry Ford in the 1920s, andFords press adviser until the 1940s.The key figure in the transformation of British-Israelism intowhat was increasingly called "Christian Identity" was Wesley Swift(1913-1970), a former Methodist minister from Southern California.In the 1940s, Swift started his own church, later known as theChurch of Jesus Christ Christian. He was active in extreme right-wing groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, and developed a closefriendship with the nations most prominent postwar anti-Semite,Gerald L. K. Smith. Because of the activities of Swift, ChristianIdentity increasingly became linked with extreme right-wingideologies.Christian Identity penetrated most of the major Nazimovements. Thanks to Aryan Nations, many neo-Nazis becamebelievers. Klan leaders such as Thomas Robb and Louis Beamadopted the faith, as did some racist skinheads, such as theHammerskins. Christian Identity also found a welcome home inextreme anti-government activism, notably the tax protestmovement, the sovereign citizen movement (descended fromWilliam Potter Gales Posse Comitatus) and the militia movement.The resurgence of right-wing extremism in the 1990s following theRuby Ridge and Waco standoffs further spread Identity beliefs.169Willis Carto has apparently become an adherent of ChristianIdentity. In an article posted on The Barnes Review website entitled,"Is Christianity Relevant?," he claimed that the "present day Jewsare not the descendants of the group celebrated in the OldTestament but as a combination of races in no way connected to it."169. http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/Christian_Identity.asp?xpicked=4&item=Christian_ID255

A. J. WEBERMANIn his address to the segregationist John Birch Societys 50thAnniversary Gala in 2008, Ron Paul spoke in the code he knewwould be understood by Christian Reconstructionists and ChristianIdentitists alike, who have long ties to the Birch Society.Reconstructionists refer to the righteous who reside in a land sweptby evil as "the remnant." (A prominent Christian Reconstructionistpublication is called The Remnant Review). "The remnant holds thetruth together," Paul told the Birchers, "both the religious truth andthe political truth." Paul also used the “remnant” dog whistle term inhis speech to his supporters in Maine after he lost the caucus there.Paul is no fan of Roman Catholicism and in February 2004 hestated:This war started a long time before 9-11. That attackwas just the most dramatic event of the war so far.The Arabs have fought Western crusaders forcenturies, and they have not yet forgotten theEuropean Crusades centuries ago.170On March 28, 2006 in Making the World Safe for Christianity hewrote:The toughest task is analyzing what we do from theirperspective. We should try harder to place ourselvesin the shoes of those who live in the Arab countrieswhere our efforts currently are concentrated. We areoutraged by a Muslim country that would evenconsider the death penalty for a Christian convert.But many Muslims see all that we do as a reflectionof western Christianity, which to them includesEurope and America. They see everything in terms ofreligion.171170. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=249&Itemid=60171. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=182&Itemid=60256

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIn commenting on an immigration bill aimed at keeping CatholicMexicans out of the United States, Paul revealed his fondness forFAIR - Federation for American Immigration Reform – anorganization listed as a hate from by the Southern Poverty LawCenter.There are some elements of this new bill to beapplauded. Measures to require detention of, andexpedited removal of aliens, for example, are a goodstep. Also to be applauded is the requirement for anadditional 250 inspectors at U.S. ports of entry eachyear from 2007 through 2010, although this isunfortunately subject to the availability of funds. Butoverall this bill is a weak substitute for realimmigration and border reform. As the Federation forAmerican Immigration Reform (FAIR) says, H.R.4437 “treats some of the symptoms, it does not, infact, do enough to actually cure the illness.”172At the center of the anti-Mexican immigrant web is thenonprofit Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), themost important organization fueling the backlash againstimmigration. Founded in 1979, FAIR has long been marked by anti-Latino and anti-Catholic attitudes. It has mixed this bigotry with afondness for eugenics, the idea of breeding better humansdiscredited by its Nazi associations. It has accepted $1.2 millionfrom the Pioneer Fund, an infamous foundation. It has employedofficials in key positions who are also members of white supremacistgroups. Recently, it has promoted racist conspiracy theories aboutMexicos secret designs on the American Southwest and analternative theory alleging secret plans to merge the United States,Mexico and Canada. A senior FAIR official sought "advice" from theleaders of a racist Belgian political party. These are Paul’s thoughtson immigration:172. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2005-12-17/html/CREC-2005-12-17-pt1-PgE2596-4.htm257

A. J. WEBERMANHere is a road map for real immigration reform. Firstwe need better enforcement of the laws we’ve got —which plainly call for illegal immigrants to be arrestedand deported and for our borders to be secure.These things are already law, but the executivebranch over the past decades has failed to enforcethem. Congress can pass any law it wants, butunless federal agencies enforce those laws they aremeaningless.Second we need to eliminate the two main magnetsattracting illegal immigrants to illegally enter thecountry, the welfare magnet and the citizenshipmagnet. Failure to address these in an immigrationbill raises questions about achieving real results.That is why I introduced three amendments to thisbill, in the hopes that we can finally do somethingabout the problem of illegal immigration. I introducedan amendment to end so-called “birth-rightcitizenship,” whereby anyone born on U.S. soil isautomatically an American citizen. I introduced anamendment to end the practice of providing U.S.Social Security payments to non-U.S. citizens. Andfinally I introduced an amendment to prohibit illegalaliens from receiving food stamps, student loans, orother federally-provided assistance. Unfortunately,none of my amendments were even allowed to reachthe Floor for a vote.173These ideas go against traditional libertarian thinking. TheLibertarian Party Platform states that Libertarians are prepared towelcome refugees, and the LP works against discriminatory policies.It states that a free market requires the free movement of bothcapital and labor across borders. Older LP Platform stances weremore pro-open borders. The 2004 Platform called for "the173. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2005-12-17/html/CREC-2005-12-17-pt1-PgE2596-4.htm258

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIelimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of theImmigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and adeclaration of full amnesty for all people who have entered thecountry illegally.” This is where Ron Paul’s libertarian cover wouldprove to be a big liability if he applied libertarian ideas consistently.He would be voted out of office by his Texan constituency. Paulstated:I voted in favor of the Border Protection, Anti-terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005and for the SAFE Port Act of 2006. I continue tosupport measures that help secure our borders andthereby make us less vulnerable to future foreignattack.174What happened to Paul’s steadfast rule about the only truefederal crimes being engaging in counterfeiting, treason, or piracy?It would have been too much for his constituents to handle had hevoted against this bill. Paul refused to come to the aid of his fellowChristians who were being slaughtered by Muslims in Dafur.174. http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/un-american.html259

A. J. WEBERMAN260

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICHAPTER NINELUDWIG VON MISES: FASCIST JEWISHECONOMISTIn Time Magazine 2008 Ron Paul made his nominationfor Person of the Year:Amid a horrific financial crisis, all we hear are callsfor more of the money-printing, spending andsubsidies that created this mess. So I choose mygreat teacher, Ludwig von Mises, champion of theAustrian School of economics, who taught us how acentral bank like the Fed causes booms and bustsand how to build prosperity through sound moneyand economic freedom.Ludwig Von Mises taught at the ViennaUniversity from 1913 to 1934, while also servingas a principal economic adviser to the FascistAustrian government during the Austro-fascist regime of Engelbert Dollfuss. ChancellorDollfuss was killed in July 1934, during anattempt by Austrias Nazis to topple the regimeand seize power for Nazi Germany. DespiteDollfuss’ death, the attempt failed and KurtSchuschnigg succeeded as Chancellor and ruled until the demise ofthe regime in 1938. The Austrian state from 1933 to 1938 was notauthoritarian, it was fascist, and the connection between Austrianpan-German identity and the state’s fascistizing policies in themedia, education and population politics can shed light on thepolitics of Von Mises in the 1930s. Austro-fascism was an attempt toturn Austria into a fascist state similar to Franco’s Spain andMussolini’s Italy that failed after the Anschluss, the 1938 Naziannexation of Austria. Ludwig Von Mises was a fascist economistwho opposed labor unions and all progressive Austrian economics.261

A. J. WEBERMANUnemployment grew drastically under the Austrofascist regime toover 25% between 1932 and 1933. In response, the governmentremoved unemployment benefits from the national budget.Additionally, the government created the so-called "Cooperations" ofworkers and enterprisers charged with undermining workersmovements. International trade was restricted and eventuallybanned.In 1934 Mises left for Geneva, Switzerland.This dirt bag who looked like Adolf Hitler knewthat no matter how much he swore allegiance tofascist doctrine the Nazis would exterminate himsimply because he was a Jew. This brought himto his senses. In Switzerland he was a professorat the Graduate Institute of International Studies.In 1940, he immigrated to New York City. He wasa visiting professor at New York University from 1945 until he retiredin 1969, though he was not salaried by the university due to hiscrackpot economic theories. Instead, he earned his living fromfunding by laissez faire economists such as Lawrence Fertig.Had Von Mises not been a Jew he would have been a willingcollaborator with the Nazis. His having to leave his homeland puthim in touch with the true nature of the Nazis and he wrote thefollowing, which however still evidences his own self hatred:If the Jews themselves are to blame for the fact thatthose whose ideal is perpetual war and bloodshed,who worship violence and are eager to destroyfreedom, consider them the most dangerousopponents of their endeavors, it must be because theJews are foremost among the champions of freedom,justice, and peaceful co-operation among nations. Ifthe Jews have incurred the Nazis hatred throughtheir own conduct, it is no doubt because what wasgreat and noble in the German nation, all theimmortal achievements of Germanys past, wereeither accomplished by the Jews or congenial to the262

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIJewish mind. As the parties seeking to destroymodern civilization and return to barbarism have putanti-Semitism at the top of their programs, thiscivilization is apparently a creation of the Jews.Nothing more flattering could be said of an individualor of a group than that the deadly foes of civilizationhave well-founded reasons to persecute them.175Ron Paul’s close associate, Lew Rockwell, is head of the VonMises Institute along with Murray Rothbard a Jew who supportedDavid Duke:Well, they finally got David Duke. But he sure scaredthe bejesus out of them. It took a massive campaignof hysteria, of fear and hate, orchestrated by allwings of the Ruling Elite, from Official right to left,from President Bush and the official Republican Partythrough the New York-Washington-run nationalmedia through the local elites and down to local left-wing activists. It took a massive scare campaign, notonly invoking the old bogey images of the Klan andHitler, but also, more concretely, a virtual threat toboycott Louisiana, to pull out tourists andconventions, to lose jobs by businesses leaving thestate. It took a campaign of slander that resorted toquestioning the sincerity of Dukes conversion toChristianity – even challenging him to name his"official church."The reality of the current system is that it constitutesan unholy alliance of "corporate liberal" Big Businessand media elites, who, through big government, haveprivilege and have caused to rise up a parasiticUnderclass, who, among them all, are looting andoppressing the bulk of the middle and workingclasses in America. Therefore, the proper strategy of175. http://mises.org/etexts/mises/og/chap8.asp263

A. J. WEBERMANlibertarians and paleos is a strategy of "right-wingpopulism," that is: to expose and denounce thisunholy alliance, and to call for getting this preppie-underclass-liberal media alliance off the backs of therest of us: the middle and working classes.176Rothbard’s ideas are quite similar to Dukes with the exception ofsending the Blacks back to Africa and gassing American Jews.A right-wing populist program, then, must concentrateon dismantling the crucial existing areas of State andelite rule, and on liberating the average American fromthe most flagrant and oppressive features of that rule.In short:1. Slash Taxes. All taxes, sales, business, property,etc., but especially the most oppressive politicallyand personally: the income tax. We must worktoward repeal of the income tax and abolition of theIRS.2. Slash Welfare. Get rid of underclass rule byabolishing the welfare system, or, short of abolition,severely cutting and restricting it.3. Abolish Racial or Group Privileges. Abolishaffirmative action, set aside racial quotas, etc., andpoint out that the root of such quotas is the entire"civil rights" structure, which tramples on the propertyrights of every American.4. Take Back the Streets: Crush Criminals. And bythis I mean, of course, not "white collar criminals" or"inside traders" but violent street criminals – robbers,muggers, rapists, and murderers. Cops must beunleashed, and allowed to administer instant176. http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch5.html264

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIpunishment, subject of course to liability when theyare in error.5. Take Back the Streets: Get Rid of the Bums.Again: unleash the cops to clear the streets of bumsand vagrants. Where will they go? Who cares?Hopefully, they will disappear, that is, move from theranks of the petted and cosseted bum class to theranks of the productive members of society.177Rothbard, a leading member of theAmerican Council on Judaism was a Jewwho hated Jews. He said America made agrave mistake when it entered World War II.Rothbard blamed many later problems onthe fact that the United States participated inthe war. He tried to justify Nazi Germany byclaiming Hitler’s actions were defensive.Libertarian Chris Tame witnessed Rothbardclaim the Holocaust was just propagandamade up to justify WW II after the war. That was the line taken byRothbard’s favorite historian178, Harry Elmer Barnes, a prominentmember of the America First Committee who authored Holocaustdenial books published by Noontide Press. As Willis Carto stated,he publishes the Barnes Review, a Holocaust denying rag named inhonor of Harry Elmer Barnes, in lieu of the Institute for HistoricalReview’s magazine.Rothbard wrote and Rockwell disseminated this:177. http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch5.html178. http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard27.html265

A. J. WEBERMANNow revisionism teaches us that this entire myth, soprevalent then and even now about Hitler, and aboutthe Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginningto end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence iseither completely untrue or not entirely the truth. Ifpeople should learn this intellectual fraud aboutHitlers Germany, then they will begin to askquestions, and searching questions, about thecurrent World War III version of the same myth.Nothing would stop the current headlong flight to warfaster, or more surely cause people to begin toreason about foreign affairs once again, after a longorgy of emotion and cliché. The task of revisionismhas been to penetrate beneath these superficialitiesand appearances to the stark realities underneath –realities which show, certainly in this century, theUnited States, Great Britain, and France – the threegreat "democracies" – to be worse than any otherthree countries in fomenting and waging aggressivewar. Realization of this truth would be of incalculableimportance on the current scene.179Paul is constantly quoting this sick, self-hating Jew. In his TexasStraight Talk newsletter in July 2012 he wrote, “As Murray Rothbardput it, "Fractional reserve banks ... create money out of thin air.Essentially they do it in the same way as counterfeiters.Counterfeiters, too, create money out of thin air by printingsomething masquerading as money or as a warehouse receipt formoney. In this way, they fraudulently extract resources from thepublic, from the people who have genuinely earned their money.”Ron Paul, like Rothbard, demonized the Federal Reverse. Paulintroduced a bill to abolish it:Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to stand up forworking Americans by putting an end to themanipulation of the money supply which erodes179. http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard158.html266

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIAmericans standard of living, enlarges biggovernment, and enriches well-connected elites, bycosponsoring my legislation to abolish the FederalReserve. Madame Speaker, I rise to introducelegislation to restore financial stability to Americaseconomy by abolishing the Federal Reserve. Sincethe creation of the Federal Reserve, middle andworking-class Americans have been victimized by aboom-and-bust monetary policy. In addition, mostAmericans have suffered a steadily erodingpurchasing power because of the Federal Reservesinflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden,tax imposed on the American people.180Same old rightwing nonsense that suggested the Fed wassome sort of a conspiracy to benefit the well-connected elites – theJews. The fact that many of its chairmen had been Jews played intothis. Ahmadinejad was also a fan of well-connected elites and onAugust 28, 2007 stated,Zionists are people without any religion. They arelying about being Jewish because religion meansbrotherhood, friendship and respecting other divinereligions. They are an organized minority who haveinfiltrated the world. They are not even a 10,000-strong organization.Congressman Charles Lindberg Sr. opposed the establishmentof the Federal Reserve:The new law will create inflation whenever the trustswant inflation...they can unload the stocks on thepeople at high prices during the excitement and thenbring on a panic and buy them back at lowprices...the day of reckoning is only a few yearsremoved.181180. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VofL1_koRvc267

A. J. WEBERMANWhere would we be without the Fed in the Ron Paul world ofeconomics based on the works of a fascist economist namedLudwig Von Mises? Interest rates would fluctuate wildly. Who wouldcontrol interest rates in a Fed-less world? An unfettered freemarket? A cabal of Wall Street bankers? Congress? You can seethe problems with these scenarios. There would be more bankfailures: The Fed serves as a last-resort lender for strugglingfinancial institutions. Without it, we’d almost certainly see more bankfailures, from Main Street to Wall Street. There would be lesslending: Without the support of the Fed and other safeguards, bankswould be far more conservative in their lending. Fewer people wouldqualify for mortgages, fewer businesses would be funded, and theeconomy would look very different.182Not only does Paul want to getrid of the Fed, he wants to abolish the Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation:THE TROUBLE WITH DEPOSIT INSURANCEThe purpose of reconciliation is to identify suitabletargets for budget reductions in order to reducespending. Therefore, it is quite odd that the FinancialServices Committee would use reconciliation as avehicle to consider the Federal Deposit InsuranceReform Act, as this act could increase the possibilityof future bank failures, and thus increase federalexpenditures. The bill does this by expanding thefederal governments unconstitutional control overthe financial services industry. This bill also raisestaxes on all financial institutions. Therefore, I mustoppose this bill.181. http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/disturbing-the-elite.html182. http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-bargain-hunter/2012/01/23/wes-moss-is-ron-paul-crazy/?cp=1#comment-19580268

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZII primarily object to the provisions in this legislationwhich may increase the premiums assessed onparticipating financial institutions. These "premiums,which are actually taxes, are the premier sources offunds for the Deposit Insurance Fund. This fund isused to bail out banks who experience difficultiesmeeting their commitments to their depositors. Thus,the deposit insurance system transfers liability forpoor management decisions from those who madethe decisions, to their competitors. This systempunishes those financial institutions which followsound practices, as they are forced to absorb thelosses of their competitors. This also compounds themoral hazard problem created whenever governmentsocializes business losses.In the event of a severe banking crisis, Congress willlikely transfer funds from the general revenue into theDeposit Insurance Fund, which could make alltaxpayers liable for the mistakes of a few. Of course,such a bailout would require separate authorizationfrom Congress, but can anyone imagine Congresssaying "No to banking lobbyists pleading for relieffrom the costs of bailing out their weakercompetitors?183Given his antipathy towards FDIC, and theease with which Ron Paul can avoid supportingthis system (by simply withdrawing ones moneyfrom a bank), youd expect Ron Paul to have nocontact with the FDIC banking system, right?Wrong. As shown by Ron Pauls 2010 PresidentialCampaign financial disclosure forms Paul not only uses FDICprotection, but actively maximizes his protection by keeping themaximum amount of money covered in FDIC in one bank, and thenspreading the rest out to a number of other financial institutions. If183. http://www.ronpaulsbrain.com/page/40/269

A. J. WEBERMANPaul was able to abolish the FDIC a massive bank failure could leadto another Depression. Paul’s knows this as well as I do but hewants another Depression so a Nazi can take power and blame theeconomic disaster on the Jews. Paul is conversant with the most farout gold conspiracy theories:Gold Reserve Transparency Act For far too long, theUnited States government has been less thantransparent in releasing information relating to itsgold holdings. Not surprisingly, this secrecy hasgiven rise to a number of theories about the gold atFort Knox and other depositories. Some peoplespeculate that the gold has been involved in goldswaps with foreign governments or bullion banks,others believe that the gold has secretly beenshipped out of Fort Knox and sold, and still othersbelieve that the bars at Fort Knox are actually gold-plated tungsten. Historically, the Treasury and Minthave dismissed these theories, rather thanaddressing these concerns with substantiverebuttals. No one from Congress has been allowed toview the gold at Fort Knox in nearly 40 years, recentphotographs of the gold holdings seem to be hard tocome by, and the Mints and Inspector Generalsaudit statements contain only the bare minimum ofinformation.184Paul’s financial statements indicate that most of his wealth is inthe form of non-numismatic gold coins and stock in gold miningcompanies. With gold at $1700 an ounce Paul must be a very richman today.Another economist favored by Paul is Friedrich A. Hayek.Hayek was a student of Von Mises and worked under him in theAustrian government’s economic section. Hayek traced the rise of184. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1881&Itemid=60270

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIAustrian anti-Semitism to the immigration of “visibly different” Jewsfrom Poland when anti-Semitism in Austria was endemic.When I grew up in Vienna the established Jewishfamilies were a generally respected group and alldecent people would frown upon the occasional anti-Jewish outbursts of a few popular politicians. It wasthe sudden influx of large numbers of Galician andPolish Jews [during World War I] … which in a shortperiod changed the attitude. They were too visiblydifferent to be readily absorbed.185Hayek also claimed that it was “the rise of the violent anti-Semitism which led to Hitler, not the other way around.” Hayek’sfamily might have been secret Jews. He had a second cousin on hismother’s side who was Jewish and he did not return to Austria afterit was annexed by Germany.Before the end of World War II, in 1944, Hayek, who was laterto win the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science, startled theWestern world with a book entitled The Road to Serfdom. Despitethe fact that New Deal economics based on the principles of JohnMaynard Keynes had rescued America from the Great Depressionand the progressive politics that accompanied it gave birth to LendLease and anti-Nazism before Pearl Harbor Hayek formulated thecrackpot theory that these economic and political ideas wereeventually going to turn America into a Nazi country.THE AUTHOR has spent about half his adult life inhis native Austria, in close touch with Germanthought, and the other half in the United States andEngland. In the latter period he has becomeincreasingly convinced that some of the forces whichdestroyed freedom in Germany are also at work here.The very magnitude of the outrages committed by theNational Socialists has strengthened the assurancethat a totalitarian system cannot happen here. But let185. http://archive.mises.org/15808/labor-markets-and-eugenics/271

A. J. WEBERMANus remember that 15 years ago the possibility of sucha thing happening in Germany would have appearedjust as fantastic not only to nine tenths of theGermans themselves but also to the most hostileforeign observer.There are many features which were then regardedas "typically German" which are now equally familiarin America and England, and many symptoms thatpoint to a further development in the same direction:the increasing veneration for the state, the fatalisticacceptance of "inevitable trends," the enthusiasm for"organization" of everything (we now call it"planning").The character of the danger is, if possible, even lessunderstood here than it was in Germany. Thesupreme tragedy is still not seen that in Germany itwas largely people of good will, who, by their socialistpolicies, prepared the way for the forces which standfor everything they detest. Few recognize that therise of fascism and Nazism was not a reactionagainst the socialist trends of the preceding periodbut a necessary outcome of those tendencies. Yet itis significant that many of the leaders of thesemovements, from Mussolini down (and includingLaval and Quisling) began as socialists and ended asfascists or Nazis. In the democracies at present,many who sincerely hate all of Nazismsmanifestations are working for ideals whoserealization would lead straight to the abhorredtyranny. Most of the people whose views influencedevelopments are in some measure socialists. Theybelieve that our economic life should be "consciouslydirected," that we should substitute "economicplanning" for the competitive system. Yet is there agreater tragedy imaginable than that, in our endeavor272

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIconsciously to shape our future in accordance withhigh ideals, we should in fact unwittingly produce thevery opposite of what we have been striving for?No less significant is the intellectual outlook of therank and file in the communist and fascistmovements in Germany before 1933. The relativeease with which a young communist could beconverted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known,best of all to the propagandists of the two parties.The communists and Nazis clashed more frequentlywith each other than with other parties simplybecause they competed for the same type of mindand reserved for each other the hatred of theheretic.186Hayek came out with these anti-New Deal ideas a year beforethe war ended. I believe these ideas were demoralizing to the wareffort as America and the Soviet Union were allies and theimplication here is that there would be no moral difference had weallied ourselves with the Nazis. In 1947 Hayek started the MontPelerin Society with the help of Tea Party backer Charles C. Koch.In February 2012 Paul staged his rally near the nations WorldWar I museum in Missouri, asserting that the U.S. got off trackabout 100 years ago during the era of President Woodrow Wilson,who led the nation through World War I and unsuccessfullyadvocated for the nations involvement in a forerunner of the UnitedNations.Weve slipped away from a true Republic. Now wereslipping into a fascist system where its a combinationof government and big business and authoritarianrule and the suppression of the individual rights ofeach and every American citizen.187186. The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents By Friedrich August Hayek,Bruce Caldwell273

A. J. WEBERMANThis labeling of a liberal economic system as fascist is rightout of Hayek.187. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57380947/paul-u.s--slipping-into-a-fascist-system/274

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICHAPTER TENRON PAUL’S AMERICAAssuming Ron Paul was serious about implementing his socialand political programs what would America be like?GLOBAL WARMINGPresident Ron Paul would not enter into any treaty regardingglobal warming and the rise in the temperature of the earth’ssurface would continue. Paul:There is no convincing scientific evidence that humanrelease of carbon dioxide, methane, or othergreenhouse gases is causing or will, in theforeseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of theEarths atmosphere and disruption of the Earthsclimate. Moreover, there is substantial scientificevidence that increases in atmospheric carbondioxide produce many beneficial effects upon thenatural plant and animal environments of the Earth.275

A. J. WEBERMANThe environmentalists have given us global warminghysteria, based on speculative computer modelsinstead of actual temperature data, to justify a treatyto impose federal and international taxes, rationingand prohibitions on all U.S. carbon-based energysources. (June 4, 2009)Above all, we must never forget our contract with theAmerican people – the Constitution that provides thesole source of legitimacy of our government. ThatConstitution requires that we preserve the basichuman rights of our people – including the right tofreely manufacture, use, and sell energy produced byany means they devise – including nuclear,hydrocarbon, solar, wind, or even bicycle generators."While it is evident that the human right to produceand use energy does not extend to activities thatactually endanger the climate of the Earth uponwhich we all depend, bogus claims about climatedangers should not be used as a justification tofurther limit the American peoples freedom," Paulsaid.188THE ENVIRONMENTPresident Paul would repeal all environmental legislation. Paul:On environment, governments dont have a goodreputation for doing a good job protecting theenvironment. If you look at the extreme of socialismor communism, they were poor environmentalists.Private property owners have a much better record oftaking care of the environment. If you look at thecommon ownership of the lands in the West, theyre188.http://evergreenmagazine.com/web/Senator_to_demand_probe_of_global_warming_fraud_.html276

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZImuch more poorly treated than those that areprivately owned. In a free-market system, nobody ispermitted to pollute their neighbors private property-- water, air, or land. It is very strict.189Here is what Paul had to say about Earth Day.Here are just some of the “achievements” of anenvironmental movement that has flourished bypromoting fantastic enviro-scares, sending outmillions of pieces of semi-hysterical direct mailfundraising letters, peddling junk science, andmaking ever-more-collusive legal deals. A failedEndangered Species Act which, by substituting“ecosystem” control for species protection incentives,has caused thousands of landowners to drive off orexterminate the very species that were supposed tobe protected.A wetlands protection program that has gone fromcontrolling real wetlands to regulating buffer zonesaround tiny “vernal pools” of spring snow melt, andeven lands that have no water on them at all, butfeature “hydric soils.” An air quality program thatdenies permits to dry cleaning plants unless they canprove that their emissions will not cause 300,001instead of the normal 300,000 cancer deaths among1 million people who will live for 70 consecutive yearsnext door to the plant. A “superfund” bill which hassucked billions of dollars out of taxpayers to paylawyers to pursue “potentially responsible parties”instead of actually cleaning up toxic waste sites. Anozone depletion scare whose purported effect —increasing incidence of dangerous ultraviolet B atground level — turned out to be unsupportable by189. Amanda Little, "An interview with Ron Paul about his presidentialplatform on energy and the environment," Grist, 16 Oct. 2007277

A. J. WEBERMANevidence. Ludicrous requirements imposed on thenuclear energy industry, such as requiring massiveconcrete vaults for the storage of old coveralls andair filters whose radioactivity level a few feet from thecontainer is less than the background radiationproduced by ordinary Vermont granite.190Paul would make America a barren land devoid of animal life.There would be less wetlands, more pollution, less cleanup ofpolluted areas, more cancer through a depletion of the ozone layerand less stringent rules regarding the disposal of radioactivematerial. The younger generation must be desperate to get behindsomeone like him who would expose them to higher cancer rates.President Paul would eliminate the DEPARTMENT OFENERGY. The Department of Energy (DOE) is a Cabinet leveldepartment of the United States government concerned with theUnited States policies regarding energy and safety in handlingnuclear material. Its responsibilities include the U.S.’s nuclearweapons program, nuclear reactor production for the United StatesNavy, radioactive waste disposal, and domestic energy production.DOE also sponsors more basic and applied scientific research thanany other US federal agency; most of this is funded through itssystem of United States Department of Energy NationalLaboratories. Are the States going to take over the nuclear safetyfunction or will the DOE become part of the Pentagon where itpolices and oversees itself? Is this function going to be privatized?The DOE has kept things relatively safe. Is it really worth thesavings to put America’s nuclear weapons at risk? Ron Paul knowsthis so what is his hidden agenda here? Possibly to consolidate thePresident’s control over the nuclear arsenal?Next President Ron Paul would eliminate the DEPARTMENTOF EDUCATION. On November 14, 2008 Ron Paul said this in aNew York Times interview:190. 1999 Ron Paul 31:15278

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIFirst, the Constitution does not authorize theDepartment of Education, and the founders neverenvisioned the federal government dictating thoseeducation policies. Second, it is a huge bureaucracythat squanders our money. We send billions ofdollars to Washington and get back less than wesent. The money would be much better off left instates and local communities rather than beingsquandered in Washington. Finally, I think that thesmallest level of government possible best performseducation. Teachers, parents, and local communityleaders should be making decisions about exactlyhow our children should be taught, not Washingtonbureaucrats.The Department of Education has given us the NoChild Left Behind law, massive unfunded mandates,indoctrination, and in some cases, forced medicationof our children with psychotropic drugs. We shouldget rid of all of that and get those choices back in thehands of the people.One of the things the Department ofEducation does is enforcing Public Law 94-142.Before the enactment of Public Law 94-142, thefate of many individuals with disabilities waslikely to be death. Too many individuals lived instate institutions for persons with mentalretardation or mental illness. In 1967, forexample, state institutions were homes foralmost 200,000 persons with significant disabilities. These restrictivesettings provided only minimal food, clothing, and shelter. Too often,retarded persons were merely accommodated until they died.It is the purpose of Public Law 94-142 is to assurethat all handicapped children have available to them,within the time periods specified in section 612(2) (B)279

A. J. WEBERMANa free appropriate public education whichemphasizes special education and related servicesdesigned to meet their unique needs, to assure thatthe rights of handicapped children and their parentsor guardians are protected, to assist States andlocalities to provide for the education of allhandicapped children and to assess and assure theeffectiveness of efforts to educate handicappedchildren.The first people the Nazis killed were retarded people. As partof Action T4, six death institutes were set up in 1940 and 1941across the German Reich under the direction of the branches ofthe Nazi Party, overseen by a specially-created centre for theextermination program, established at Tiergartenstrabe 4, Berlin.These institutes were responsible for gassing 70,000 mentally ill andmentally retarded patients from psychiatric institutions, old people’shomes, nursing homes and hospitals.Additionally, the No Child Left Behind law benefits African-Americans as do other functions of the Department of Education.191President Paul would abolish THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSINGAND URBAN DEVELOPMENT:HUD’s mission is to create strong, sustainable,inclusive communities and quality affordable homesfor all. HUD is working to strengthen the housingmarket to bolster the economy and protectconsumers; meet the need for quality affordablerental homes: utilize housing as a platform forimproving quality of life; build inclusive andsustainable communities free from discrimination;and transform the way HUD does business.This one is an easy one to figure out how getting rid of HUD fitsinto Paul’s hidden agenda. It benefits Blacks who he hates. He191. http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/achieve/nclb-aa.html280

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIwould also get rid of the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR whichencompasses:Bureau of Indian AffairsBureau of Land ManagementBureau of Ocean Energy ManagementBureau of ReclamationBureau of Safety and Environmental EnforcementNational Park ServiceOffice of Surface Mining, Reclamation and EnforcementU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceU.S. Geological SurveyLeave all of this responsibility to corrupt State Legislators andthe entire environment will go to hell. It won’t be long until theNational Parks have been sold off then privatized or developed.President Paul would also abolish the Transportation SecurityAdministration, leaving security at airports and other transportationsystems up to the private sector.GAY RIGHTS281

A. J. WEBERMANHow would gay people fare in Ron Paul’s America? After SashaBaron pretended to come on to Paul, Paul stated, "I was expectingan interview on Austrian economics. So, that didnt turn out thatway. But, by the time he started pulling his pants down, I, What isgoing on here? I ran out of the room. This interview has ended.When this all gets out, Im probably going to have to apologize to mysupporters because I think most of them are going to figure out whyin the world didnt I sock this guy in the nose?"192From the Ron Paulnewsletter:Mass. Legislature Found Only 99% CrazyThe Massachusetts legislature has just passed a “civilrights” law to protect gays from discrimination. Like all civilrights laws, it gives the officially accredited victims specialprivileges, but there is one interesting note. Over theprotests of the gay community, the law excludes fromprotection anyone “whose sexual orientation involvesminor children as the sex object.” Now we know what is192. http://wendyista.blogspot.com/2009/04/ron-paul-wanted-to-punch-sacha-baron.html#ixzz1z0V95Hh3282

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIthe next frontier for “anti-discrimination” laws in TeddyKennedy’s home state.So in Ron Paul’s America gays would be considered precursorsto child molesters. One clue to how President Paul would treat gayscomes from the fact that the Nazis banned homosexual activity asearly as 1935. And in 1936, the Nazi Party established a CentralOffice for Combating Abortion and Homosexuality. In 1941 Hitlerordered the death penalty for any SS and police members foundguilty of homosexual activity. Between 1933 and 1945, the Nazisarrested roughly 100,000 men as homosexuals. Most were sent toprison, but between 5,000 and 15,000 ended up in death camps,where they were forced to wear pink triangles. Most of these menwere murdered. But Ron Paul must maintain his libertariancredentials so he does a balancing act when it comes to gays. Pauldid not support a Constitutional Amendment to define marriage:Mr. Speaker, while I oppose federal efforts toredefine marriage as something other than a unionbetween one man and one woman, I do not believe aconstitutional amendment is either a necessary orproper way to defend marriage.Because of the dangers to liberty and traditionalvalues posed by the unexpected consequences ofamending the Constitution to strip power from thestates and the people and further empowerWashington, I cannot in good conscience support themarriage amendment to the United StatesConstitution. Instead, I plan to continue working toenact the Marriage Protection Act and protect eachstate’s right not to be forced to recognize a same sexmarriage. (9/30/2004)193On the other hand, according to the website OnTheIssues.org,Paul voted against allowing gay adoptions in Washington, D.C.;supported "Dont Ask, Dont Tell;" and said that the Defense of193. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul207.html283

A. J. WEBERMANMarriage Act was "proper." Paul has also stated that hethinks marriage should only be between a man and a woman. Butothers around him can be more frank. Mike Heath, Paul’s Iowa statedirector, is a former board chairman of Americans for Truth aboutHomosexuality, which the Southern Poverty Law Center classifiesas a hate group. Had Paul won the Iowa caucuses, it would haveactually been a triumph for a fundamentalist faction that has untilnow been considered a fringe even on the Christian right. EricRittberg reported that Ron Paul has AIDSaphobia:In 1988, Ron had ahardcore Libertariansupporter, Jim Peron,owner of Laissez FaireBooks in SanFrancisco. Jim set up amagnificent 3-daycampaign swing for usin the SF Bay Area.Jim was what you would call very openly Gay. ButRon thought the world of him. For 3 days we had agreat time trouncing from one campaign event toanother with Jim’s Gay lover. The atmosphere wassimply jovial between the four of us. (As an aside wealso met former Congressman Pete McCloskeyduring this campaign trip). We used Jim’shome/office as a “base.” Ron pulled me aside the firsttime we went there, and specifically instructed me tofind an excuse to excuse him to a local fast foodrestaurant so that he could use the bathroom. He toldme very clearly, that although he liked Jim, he did notwish to use his bathroom facilities. I chided him a bit,but he sternly reacted, as he often did to me, Eric,just do what I say. Perhaps “sternly” is anunderstatement. Ron looked at me directly, and with284

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIa very angry look in his eye, and shouted under hisbreath: “Just do what I say NOW.”194Jim Peron has strong ties to the North American Man Boy LoveAssociation (NAMBLA) and published a pedophile journal calledUnbound out of his San Francisco bookstore (called free forumbooks) which is a pedophile journal. His bookstore in San Franciscowas raided twice by police because of at least one employee’s childmolesting habits and the pedophile literature was confiscated.Peron hosted NAMBLA meetings at his bookstore and the 1stjournal was written in 1987 before Paul went and hung out with himfor three days.The second incident involved one or two otherstaffers many years later at the BBQ in SurfsideBeach. I was not in direct presence of the incident.But another top staffer, and I believe one of oursecretaries, was witness to it. This top stafferadores Ron, but was extremely insulted by hisbehavior, I would even say flabbergasted to thepoint of considering resigning from his staff over it.“Bobby,” a well-known and rather flamboyant andwell-liked gay man in Freeport came to the BBQ. Letme stress Ron likes Bobby personally, and Bobbywas a hardcore campaign supporter. But after hisspeech at the Surfside Pavilion Bobby came up toRon with his hand extended, and according to myfellow staffer, Ron literally swatted his hand away.Some parts of Ron Paul’s newsletter were written from the pointof view of a Doctor interested in quack theories about the AIDSvirus. Paul touted a now discredited theory that AIDS was producedby the United States Army’s Special Weapons Division located atFort Detrick, Maryland:194. http://www.rightwingnews.com/election-2012/statement-from-fmr-ron-paul-staffer-on-newsletters-anti-semitism/285

A. J. WEBERMANAIDS: Something Else We Can Thank GovernmentFor?William C. Douglass, MD, writing in the anti-government medicine Health Freedom News, gives afascinating analysis of AIDS and speculates on itsorigin. I’d like to share his research with you:“There are many viruses that grow in animals, andmany in humans,” he points out, “but most of theviruses that grow in animals don’t affect humans.”For example, “the bovine leukemia virus” is “lethal tocows but not humans.” “The sheep visna virus is alsonon-reactive in man. These deadly viruses are‘retroviruses’ meaning they can change the geneticcomposition of cells they enter.”Dr. Douglass believes that AIDS is a deliberatelyengineered hybrid of these two animal virusescultured in human tissue, and he blames WorldHealth Organization experimentation at Ft. Detrick,Maryland.Ft. Detrick is one of the centers of biological warfareresearch, where federal scientists are engaged indeliberately manufacturing deadly diseases for WorldWar III. Could they have produced AIDS? Could thegovernment have experimented with it in the civilianpopulation, as it did in the 1950s with the LSD, andhad things get out of control? I don’t know, but thesesure are interesting questions.“I have always said,” notes Dr. Douglass, “and ourforefathers told us this, that the greatest threat to thepeople is always the government. Not foreigngovernments, but our own government.”286

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIThis conspiracy theory was invented by theKGB. Operation Infektion was a KGBdisinformation campaign to spread lies that theUnited States Army invented HIV/AIDS as partof a biological weapons research project at FortDetrick, Maryland. The Soviet Union used it toundermine the United States’ credibility, fosteranti-Americanism, isolate America abroad, andcreate tensions between host countries and the U.S. over thepresence of American military bases (which were often portrayed asthe cause of AIDS outbreaks in local populations). According to U.S.State Department analysts, another reason the Soviet Union"promoted the AIDS disinformation may have been its attempt todistract international attention away from its own offensive biologicalwarfare program, which was monitored for decades. The Sovietsdeveloped anthrax, tularemia, plague, cholera and asbotulinumtoxin, enterotoxins and mycotoxins for biological warfarepurposes.”195More on AIDS from the Paul/Carto newsletters:AIDSomaniaThe tactics of the homosexual lobby seem to getmore extreme by the day. Recently, a group invadedCatholic services at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in NewYork City and proceeded to shriek, sound air horns,lie down in the aisles, desecrate the Eucharist, tosscondoms, wave sacrilegious drawings of JesusChrist, and handcuff themselves to the pews.Meanwhile, thousands more screamed outside. I’mnot Catholic, but even aside from the violations ofprivate property involved, I find this morallyoutrageous.The demonstrations were organized by ACT UP: theAids Coalition To Unleash Power because theCatholic Church has lobbied against homosexual195. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_INFEKTION287

A. J. WEBERMANpropaganda in the public schools. Victor Mendolia,spokesman for ACT UP, calls lobbying against suchprograms “criminal.” That is the correct descriptionfor his organization, of course.A well-known Libertarian editor just back from NewYork told me: “The ACT-UP slogan, on stickersplastered all over Manhattan, is ‘Silence = Death.’But shouldn’t it be ‘Sodomy = Death’?”Meanwhile, speaking of acting up, my former church,the Episcopal, has just ordained its first openly gaypriest. “I’m floating on air,” said the Rev. J. RobertWilliams. Among the people attending the ordinationin Newark, New Jersey – conducted by liberal BishopJohn Shelby Spong – were James Skelly, Williams’slive-in companion.President Paul would pass a law making membership in gayorganizations a criminal offense and he would do everything in hispower to prevent gays from being ordained as ministers. PresidentPaul could base this legislation on the alleged contagiousness ofAIDS.Caring for the AIDS patientThe government tells us that AIDS cannot betransmitted "casually." The government also tells usthat it should raise our taxes, and risk our sons forSaudi Arabia. Recently, a non-government physicianwriting in Gene Antonios Healthwatch Report (P. O.Box 90140-264 Arlington, TX 76004, $25 a year)gave some excellent advice "To Those Caring for theAIDS Patient."288

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI1. Wear rubber gloves when handling the clothes,dishes, etc. of the patient.2. Use paper plates and cups and burn themafterwards.3. Boil all his laundry for at least 15 minutes.4. Pour a half cup of Clorox in his bath water beforedraining it.5. Always wipe the toilet seat with a soapy papertowel. Do not put the towel in the toilet, but in a paperbag to be burned.6. No kissing, since AIDS can be transmitted bysaliva.7. No sexual relations, since condoms are far fromfoolproof.8. Do not allow the patient to eat in a restaurant.9. Do not allow the patient to drive or operatemachinery due to mental impairment.How often are these sorts of commonsenseprecautions taken? Not often, because they violatethe government propaganda line, and would beconsidered a hate crime. But they give us an idea ofhow we should actually proceed, instead of havingtax-funded programs to promote the conduct thatcauses AIDS.Another newsletter warned that “the AIDS patient” should notbe allowed to eat in restaurants because “AIDS can be transmittedby saliva,” a strange claim for a physician to make. Paul toldCongress AIDS in a “politically correct disease” -289

A. J. WEBERMANThink of what it would mean if we followed this simplelogic and implemented a Federal social program,similar to the current war on smoking, designed toreduce the spread of AIDS within the gay community.Astoundingly, we have done the opposite by makingAIDS a politically correct disease. There wascertainly a different attitude a hundred years agoregarding those with sexually transmitted diseaseslike syphilis compared to the special status givenAIDS victims today.196According to Paul we have to treat people with AIDS like lepers.If President Paul acted on these crackpot theories he could havegays quarantined so that AIDS, which his Surgeon General found tobe highly contagious, could be eradicated. Gays would be granted“special status” Sonderbehandlung (“special treatment”) which in thelanguage of the Nazis would mean execution,LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS?You want to get rid of drug crime in this country?Fine, lets just get rid of all the drug laws. - Ron Paul(at the 2011 CNN Republican presidential debate).President Paul would legalize all recreational drugs. Repealinglaws against drugs, however, would require Congressional approvalwhich would be highly unlikely. What President Paul could do wouldbe to order his FBI Director not to enforce drug laws and order hisAttorney General not to prosecute violations of these laws. Thiswould be a violation of the law in itself. He could, however, order hisFBI Director to give these laws less priority. But this has alreadytaken place. In 1999 there were a total of 28,192 FBI employees:196. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=510&Itemid=60290

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI11,646 agents and 16,546 support staff. In September 2002, 900new agents were hired. The Counter Terrorism Division wasexpanded, adding 14 new “sections” and “units” specializing intrying to combat terrorism. Five hundred and eighteen agents werereassigned to counter-Islamist operations from within the agency. Ofthem, 400 came from the anti-drug crimes division, 59 were shiftedfrom white-collar crime divisions and another 59 were transferredfrom the violent crime-fighting sections. Indeed, the FBI hastransferred even more agent positions than it originally announcedand has augmented those agents with the short-term assignment ofadditional field agents from drug and other law enforcement areasto work on counterterrorism. Before leaving office former UnitedStates Attorney General John Ashcroft said American lawenforcement agencies have now created a “most wanted list” of 54drug organizations that must be toppled here and abroad, and thisis what they will focus on.After the September 11thattack the number of agents workingnarcotics cases dropped 45%, bank fraud cases dropped 31% andbank robbery investigations dropped 25%. As would be expected,the number of newly opened drug cases has fallen in relation to thedecline in the number of field agent positions allocated to drugenforcement.So, aside from raiding pot dispensaries throughout the country,the FBI is concentrating on fighting the drug gangs and cartels. IfPresident Paul took the FBI heat off these criminal organizationsand ordered his Attorney General not to prosecute them underRICO at the same time drugs were still illegal under State law theMexican Cartels would have a field day and over-run this countryturning it into Little Mexico. How can State Governments fightinternational or even interstate drug cartels?The argument which springs from the criticism of afederalized criminal code and a federal police force isthat states may be less effective than a centralizedfederal government in dealing with those who leave291

A. J. WEBERMANone state jurisdiction for another. Fortunately, theConstitution provides for the procedural means forpreserving the integrity of state sovereignty overthose issues delegated to it via the tenth amendment.The privilege and immunities clause as well as fullfaith and credit clause allow states to exactjudgments from those who violate their state laws.The Constitution even allows the federal governmentto legislatively preserve the procedural mechanismswhich allow states to enforce their substantive lawswithout the federal government imposing itssubstantive edicts on the states. Article IV, Section 2,Clause 2 makes provision for the rendition offugitives from one state to another. While not self-enacting, in 1783 Congress passed an act which didexactly this. There is, of course, a cost imposed uponstates in working with one another rather than relyingon a national, unified police force. At the same time,there is a greater cost to state autonomy andindividual liberty from centralization of policepower.197None-the-less Paulbots believe he would make the southernborder safer by advocating an end to the federal War on Drugs.ABOLISH THE DEAPaul, who voted against a bill honoring the Drug EnforcementAdministration would stop the DEA from actively pursuing drugproducers, distributors, and purchasers by dissolving it in its entiretybecause he believes the DEA is an illegal entity:The IRS and the DEA, with powers illegally giventhem by the Congress and the courts, have prompteda flood of seizures and forfeitures in the last severaldecades without due process and frequently without197. Congressional Record, V. 152, Pt. 15, September 26, 2006 toSeptember 28, 2006 Pge 19834292

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIsearch warrants or probable cause. Victims then arerequired to prove themselves innocent to recover thegoods seized.198The DEA was created with an executive order (much like FEMAand the EPA). If President Paul wanted to end the federal war ondrugs, he could end the DEA. He would not need permission fromcongress to shut it down. Any department that was created with anexecutive order can be abolished without congressional approval.All the President Paul needs to do is sign his name and America willbecome lawless Mexico because state law enforcement would beunable to cope with the Mexican drug cartels that would overrunAmerica.PAUL’S HIDDEN AGENDA IS TO KILL BLACKS: HEROINCannabis is not a drug its toxicity istoo low. It is a herb that will get youabout as high as a cup of coffee will.As far as drugs go there are gooddrugs and bad drugs. Hard, toxicdrugs are a dangerous shortcut tohappiness. They cause euphoria,happiness unwarranted by externalcircumstance, however they can kill, they can induce psychopathicactivity and you can get seriously addicted to them and commitcrimes to obtain them. If they were legal a lot of discontented poorand mentally weak people will turn to them. There would be massivecrack and heroin addiction in the black ghetto community. It is easyto overdose on heroin so assuming it was legal so there would alsobe numerous deaths of African-Americans. This would suit the racistRon Paul just fine. That is why Paul wants no drug enforcement ona federal level and says he would leave it up to the states to decidewhich drug should be legalized. What state is going to legalizeheroin? If one state did decide to legalize heroin junkies from the198. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 94293

A. J. WEBERMANother states will move there or go there to cop. Can you imagine astate where the majority of citizens are junkies? Would the stateflower be an opium poppy? So this is really nonsensical and aimedat people who want to believe anything. Paul made his position onheroin clear during a presidential debate:Q: You say that the federal government should stayout of peoples personal habits, including marijuana,cocaine, even heroin.A: Its an issue of protecting liberty across the board.If you have the inconsistency, then youre really notdefending liberty. We want freedom [including] whenit comes to our personal habits.Q: Are you suggesting that heroin and prostitutionare an exercise of liberty?A: Yes, in essence, if we leave it to the states. Forover 100 years, they were legal. Youre implying if welegalize heroin tomorrow, everyones gonna useheroin. How many people here are going to useheroin if it were legal? I bet nobody! "Oh yeah, I needthe government to take care of me. I dont want touse heroin, so I need these laws!"199Paul was not addressing the Crypts or the Bloods nor a groupof ghetto youth with little opportunity (who wouldn’t admit to wantingto cop some heroin anyway), he was addressing a group of well offwhite people who had come to hear a Presidential debate.Paul claims he does not believe that heroin is bad drug and hasstated:A hundred years ago, a pharmacist openlyadvertised, “Heroin clears the complexion, gives199. http://www.dailypaul.com/163759/best-line-of-the-night-i-need-the-government-to-take-care-of-me-i-dont-want-to-use-heroin-so-i-need-these-laws294

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIbuoyancy to the mind, regulates the stomach and thebowels and is, in fact, a perfect guardian of health.”Obviously this is overstated as a medical panacea,but it describes what it was like not to have hystericalbusybodies undermine our Constitution and wastebillions of dollars on a drug war serving no usefulpurpose. This country needs to wake up! We shouldhave more confidence in citizens making their owndecisions, and decide once again to repeal federalprohibition, while permitting regulation by the statesalone.200President Paul would give the American people the right todestroy themselves with something he himself considers “bad stuff.”This throws some light on the real reason he wants all drugslegalized – to further mess up the lives of people who use them.Evidence of this can be found in Paul’s opposition to free needleexchange and his support of legislation banning it.Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this legislation. Itmakes no sense to pay somebody, pay for freeneedles to do something that is currently illegal. It isvery questionable whether it will do any good. As aphysician, I would have to agree with the oppositionthat a clean needle certainly is better than a dirtyneedle. I do not think there is a question about that.But I do believe that there is a message sent that ifwe provide free needles to do something that we arecondoning or encouraging it. But there is also astrong moral as well as an economic argumentagainst this. What we are talking about here islowering costs of risky behavior. We are saying thatwe will pay for the needles to perform this riskybehavior. But there is another much larger elementthat has not been discussed so far, and that has to200. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=249&Itemid=60295

A. J. WEBERMANdo with the concept that all risky behavior besocialized; that is, through the medical system, it isassumed that those who do not participate in riskybehavior must pay for the costs of the risky behavior,whether it has to do with cigarettes or whether it hasto do with drugs or whether it has to do with any kindof safety. So, therefore, the argument is that we haveto save money in medical care costs by providingfree needles. But there is another position, and that isthat we might suggest that we do not pay for freeneedles and we might even challenge the conceptthat we should not be paying people and taking careof them for risky behavior, whether it is risky sexualbehavior or risky behavior with drugs. I think this isvery clearly the problem, and I do not believe weshould be socializing this behavior because, if we do,we actually increase it. If we lower the cost ofanything, we increase the incidence of its use. So ifthe responsibility does not fall on the individualperforming dangerous behavior, they are more likelyto, and this is just part of it, the idea that we wouldgive them a free needle. But there is a moralargument against this as well. Why should peoplewho do not use drugs or do not participate indangerous sexual procedures and activities have topay for those who do? And this is really the question,and there is no correct moral argument for this. Andthe economic argument is very powerful. It says thatif we lower the cost, we will increase this behavior.So this concept has to be dealt with if we are ever toget to the bottom of this. So, Mr. Speaker, I stronglysupport this legislation.201Paul wants addicts punished for their risky behavior by lettingthem get AIDS and Hepatitis. He argues that if the junkies have topay for their set of works they might kick junk because it is just too201. http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/drugs.html296

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIgosh darn expensive with a family to feed and all. This makes nosense. The reason he supported this bill was to wreak further havocon the Black community.COCAINE AND CRACKPaul’s hidden agenda comes more into focus after reading thenewsletter below:Ron Paul is arguing in favor of crack. He says that crack will notcause psychosis and that the proof is that Marion Barry, Mayor ofWashington, D.C. used crack when he was in office and continuedto function. Of course Marion Barry did not live in the projects onwelfare nor did he live on the streets. The truth is crack is anaddictive drug that produces numerous psychiatric symptoms,syndromes, and disorders. The symptoms include agitation,paranoia, hallucinations, delusions, violence, as well as suicidal andhomicidal thinking. They can be primary to the drugs effect orsecondary to exacerbation of co-morbid psychiatric disorders.Cocaine use during pregnancy can increase the complications ofpregnancy and affect the fetus directly. These crack heads may alsouse other drugs, alcohol, and nicotine, which adversely affect thepregnancy as well. They have an increased rate of miscarriages andplacenta abruption, in which the placenta separates from the wall ofthe uterus and results in stillbirth. There is increasing information297

A. J. WEBERMANthat cocaine may cause birth defects with increased rates in fetaldeath rates, malformation, low birth weights, and behavioralabnormalities. Paul’s hidden agenda here is that Blacks will gocrazy or be stillborn if crack is legalized. Paul is well aware that anumber of ominous trends emerged in the black community in themid-1980s due to crack cocaine. Between 1984 and 1994, thehomicide rate for black males aged 14 to 17 more than doubled,and the homicide rate for black males aged 18 to 24 increasednearly as much. During this period, the black community alsoexperienced an increase weapons arrests and the number ofchildren in foster care. Paul goes on to say the fear of crack issimilar to the unwarranted fear of pot in the 1930’s when one cannotequate the two.Paul thought cocaine was pretty cool too!One hundred years ago, you could buy cocaine in adrugstore. Most Americans would be tremendouslysurprised to realize that for most of our history drugswere not illegal. The first marijuana law was in 1938.And they got around that on the constitutional aspectby just putting a tax on it. So there is a lack of respectfor how we solve our problems, a lack of wisdom onwhat we ought to do, and a lack of concern; and thisis my deep concern as a physician, a lack of concernfor seeing people dying and suffering.202One hundred years ago there were no gangbangers gettingcoked up and dropping hammers on each other and on anyone elsein the Black community caught in the crossfire. Come on, we knowfrom Paul’s newsletters that he is aware of Black crime and the roledrugs play in it. Then Paul expects us to believe that it is hisconcern for “seeing people dying and suffering” that motivates himrather than exactly the opposite.202. http://capitolwords.org/date/2004/03/03/H772-2_honoring-the-men-and-women-of-the-drug-enforcement/298

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIPresident Paul would free non-violent federal drug offenders. Inaddressing Res. 412 Honoring Men And Women Of The DrugEnforcement Administration on March 3, 2004 Paul stated:And then if we look at the prison system, we havecreated a monstrosity. Eighty-four percent, accordingto one study, 84 percent of all Federal prisoners arenonviolent drug prisoners. They go in and they comeout violent. We are still talking about a medicalproblem. We treat alcoholism as a medical problem,but anybody who smokes a marijuana cigarette orsells something, we want to put them in prison. I thinkit is time to stop and reevaluate this.203If you end up in Federal Prison for drugs, it is not just for sellinga bag or two of heroin. There is a myth in this country that U.S.prisons are filled with non-violent drug users. This assertion issimply not true. Actually, only 5 percent of inmates in federal prisonon drug charges are incarcerated for drug possession. Most casesof simple drug possession are simply not prosecuted, unless peoplehave been arrested repeatedly for using drugs. In 1999, forexample, only 2.5 percent of the federal cases argued in DistrictCourts involved simple drug possession. Even the small number ofpossession charges is likely to give an inflated impression of thenumbers. It is likely that a significant percentage of those in prisonon possession charges were people who were originally arrested fortrafficking or another more serious drug crime but plea-bargaineddown to a simple possession charge.204“Non violent drug user” canalso mean heroin and crack dealers who did not get caught withtheir weapons.These evil merchants of death and destruction will be put backin the Black and Hispanic communities to deal their drugs again.Paul just wants them free, not on probation or parole.203. Ibid.204. http://www.justice.gov/dea/demand/speakout/10so.htm299

A. J. WEBERMANPaul also wants to turn gangs loose in the ghetto. On May 11,2005 he voted against the Gang Deterrence and CommunityProtection Act:Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, the Gang Deterrence andCommunity Protection Act, (H.R. 1279), is the latestexample of Congress disregarding its constitutionallimitations in the name of “getting tough on crime.”Gang crime is certainly a serious issue in many partsof the country. However, unless criminal gangs areengaging in counterfeiting, treason, or piracy, thefederal government has no jurisdiction over thecriminal activities of gangs. In fact, by creating newfederal crimes related to gang activities, butunrelated to one of the federal crimes enumerated inthe Constitution, the new federal crimes andenhanced penalties in this bill usurp state and localauthority. Finally, I must oppose this bill because itexpands the Federal death penalty. While I recognizethat nothing in the Constitution forbids Federal, State,or local governments from imposing a death penalty,I have come to the conclusion that a consistent pro-life position requires opposition to any legislationimposing a Federal death penalty for unconstitutionalFederal crimes. Mr. Speaker, I do not advocateFederal action to stop individual States fromimposing a death penalty, I simply opposecompounding the damage done by creating newFederal crimes by making those crimes subject to aFederal death penalty. H.R. 1279 exceedsCongress’s constitutional authority by creating newFederal crimes, thus further burdening the alreadyoverwhelmed Federal judiciary system and takinganother step toward upending our constitutionalsystem by turning the States into administrativedistricts of the Federal Government. This bill alsocreates unwise mandatory minimum sentences,300

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIusurping the sentencing decisions of judges andjuries. Finally, H.R. 1279 raises serious moral issuesby expanding the use of the Federal death penalty.Therefore, I must oppose H.R. 1279 and urge mycolleagues to do same.205Paul defended doctors who ran practices where drugs likeoxycontin were promiscuously prescribed to pill head patients:Doctors are even being punished for the misdeeds oftheir patients. For example, Dr. James Graves wassentenced to more than 60 years for manslaughterbecause several of his patients overdosed on variouscombinations of pain medications and other drugs,including illegal street drugs. As a physician with overthirty years experience in private practice, I find itoutrageous that a physician would be held criminallyliable for a patient’s misuse of medicine.206Florida Assistant State Attorney Russ Edgar stated that Dr.Graves was fully aware that his patients were abusing the drugs,and that a trip to the 55-year-old doctors office was a veritable"tailgate party" for such abusers. By running a "prescription mill," thedoctor was making $500,000 a year, Edgar argued in court. Somuch for Paul’s expertise in law enforcement. So if you takePresident Paul’s desire to see heroin and crack legalized and put ittogether will his support of the racist pigs David Duke and JarrodTaylor and opposition to a clean needle program perhaps you canreally figure out where Paul is coming from.The most bizarre part of Paul’s promise to legalize drugs lies ishis contention that FDR was responsible for marijuana prohibition:But prohibition, obviously, when they passed thatamendment to the Constitution, recognized that the205. http://votesmart.org/public-statement/97395/gang-deterrence-and-community-protection-act-of-2005206. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul157.html301

A. J. WEBERMANCongress could not pass laws. And like I mentionedin 1937, when Roosevelt decided that we shouldattack medical marijuana, that he would do it throughraising taxes. So it is only in recent history that wehave decided that this is a Federal project. Therecord is just not very clear it has been verysuccessful.207Herbert Hoover was president in 1937 not FDR. Mostknowledgeable pot smokers know that it was the racist RepublicanHarry Anslinger (pictured above in the light overcoat overseeing amarihuana seizure) who convinced Congress to make pot illegal.Harry J. Anslinger quotes: “...the primary reason to outlaw marijuanais its effect on the degenerate races.” “Marihuana leads to pacifismand communist brainwashing.” “There are 100,000 total marijuanasmokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos andentertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result frommarijuana usage. This marijuana causes white women to seeksexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.”Anslinger was a creation of the racist, pro-Nazi HooverAdministration as demonstrated by this chronology of his career:207. http://www.ronpaulsbrain.com/1998/05/05/during-debate-on-the-house-resolution-committed-to-combating-illegal-drugs/302

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI 1928 : International Congress against Alcoholism,Antwerp, Belgium 1928 : Conference to Revise Treaty with US, Ottawa,Canada 1929-1930 : Assistant Commissioner of Prohibition 1930-1962 : Commissioner of Federal Bureau ofNarcoticsMEDICAL MARIJUANAWillis Carto called himself a JeffersonianLibertarian: Paul calls himself the same thingand pretends to take a libertarian position onmedical marijuana so that people won’t thinkthat he is a Nazi. This is a lie designed toattract the many people in America who aretired of the War on Drugs. Paul is anadvocate of medical marijuana only because he sees a whole lot ofdiscontented people who are being oppressed just as Hitler saw theGerman’s suffering under the Weimar Republic. He is exploiting thisfor his own ends – he is the only pro-pot candidate who neversmoked marijuana in his life. If Paul were President the only thinghe could do would be to take pot off the DEA’s Schedule One list ofdrugs:(1) Schedule I.—(A) The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse.(B) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medicaluse in treatment in the United States.(C) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or othersubstance under medical supervision.303

A. J. WEBERMANPaul co-sponsored the States Rights to Medical Marijuana Act:Title: To provide for the medical use of marijuana inaccordance with the laws of the various States.Summary: Transfers marijuana from schedule I of theControlled Substances Act to schedule II of such Act.Declares that, in a State in which marijuana may beprescribed or recommended by a physician formedical use under applicable State law, no provisionof the Controlled Substances Act shall prohibit orotherwise restrict:1. The prescription or recommendation of marijuanaby a physician for medical use;2. An individual from obtaining and using marijuanafrom a physicians prescription or recommendation ofmarijuana for medical use; or3. A pharmacy from obtaining and holding marijuanafor the prescription or recommendation of marijuanaby a physician for medical use under applicable Statelaw.4. Prohibits any provision of the Federal Food, Drug,and Cosmetic Act from prohibiting or restricting aState entity from producing or distributing marijuanafor the purpose of its distribution for prescription orrecommendation by a physician in a State in whichmarijuana may be prescribed by a physician formedical use.208On May 11, 2011 he made this statement introducing theIndustrial Hemp Farming Act, HR 1831:Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Industrial HempFarming Act. The Industrial Hemp Farming Act208. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hr2592304

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIrequires the federal government to respect state lawsallowing the growing of industrial hemp. Nine States--Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Montana, NorthDakota, Oregon, Vermont, and West Virginia--allowindustrial hemp production or research in accord withstate laws. However, federal law is standing in theway of farmers in these states growing what may bea very profitable crop. Because of current federal law,all hemp included in products sold in the UnitedStates must be imported instead of being grown byAmerican farmers.209This is what attracts the legalizepot crowd to Paul and I canunderstand it having been one ofthe founders of the Legalize PotMovement back in 1967 along withIrvin Dana Beal who is serving along sentence for possession anddistribution of pot. Many votersknow others who have had to go to jail or prison as a result of thedrug laws, some of whom had serious medical conditions thatingesting or smoking cannabis mitigated. The Paulbots aregenerally skeptical about politician’s campaign promises but arewilling to take Paul at his word when it comes to pot. Anotherproblem is that none of the other presidential candidates includingObama favor decriminalization or legalization. So Paul has co-opteda real issue that he has used to further his main agenda which isracist and genocidal in nature. Would Dr. Paul prescribe medicalmarijuana?Just because I favor the legalization of drugs doesn’tmean I favor using them, of course. As a physician, Iknow they’re bad stuff. – Ron Paul210209. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1863&Itemid=60305

A. J. WEBERMANThe federal war on drugs has proven costly andineffective, while creating terrible, violent crime. But ifyou question policy, you are accused of being pro-drug. That is preposterous. As a physician, father,and grandfather, I abhor drugs. I just know that thereis a better way — through local laws, communities,churches, and families — to combat the very seriousproblem of drug abuse than a massive federal-government bureaucracy. - Ron Paul211Paul has to walk a fine line because the people who put him inoffice are anti-drug:Those who favor strict drug laws should understandthat federal preemption is a double-edged sword. Forexample, if a socially conservative state like Utahwanted to enact harsh drug policies to reflect itscommunity standards, federal law could actuallyprevent the enactment of such policies. When theAmerican people give up state and local authorityover any issue, whether its marijuana, abortion, orgun control, they give up most of their power to affectpolicy. It’s far easier to influence, and holdaccountable, state and local officials. Once thefederal government takes the opposite side of anissue, however, good luck changing things.212This is nonsense. The Federal Government could not preventNew York State from passing the Rockefeller Drug Laws and whosays that the federal government would be motivated in thatdirection?PAUL WOULD DESTROY THE INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY210. http://italkyoubored.wordpress.com/2011/12/19/the-ron-paul-newsletters-ron-paul-paper-trail-ron-paul-political-report-january-1990/211. http://vote-usa.org/issue.aspx?election=us20121106ar&office=uspresident&issue=busillegaldrugs212. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul96.html306

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZISince President Ron Paul the “constitutionalist” opposesseparation of powers America under President Paul would soonbecome a dictatorship:Tell Congress to pass H.R. 958!Congress has the authority under Articles I, III and IVof the Constitution of the United States to set limitson the Supreme Court and lower federal courts inorder to correct abuses of judicial power andcontinuing violations of the Constitution by federalcourts.We the People Act (H.R. 958) says the “TheSupreme Court of the United States and eachFederal court” may not adjudicate any claim involvingthe laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unitof local government relating to the free exercise orestablishment of religion; any claim based upon theright of privacy, including any such claim related toany issue of sexual practices, orientation, orreproduction; or any claim based upon equalprotection of the laws to the extent such claim isbased upon the right to marry without regard to sexor sexual orientation; and that a violation by a justiceor a judge of any of the provisions of the Act shall bean impeachable offense, and a material breach ofgood behavior subject to removal by the President ofthe United States according to rules and proceduresestablished by the Congress.213The United States Constitution Section 1 - Judicial powers – reads:The judicial Power of the United States, shall bevested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferiorCourts as the Congress may from time totime ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the213. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/testvb/archive/index.php/t-19240.html307

A. J. WEBERMANsupreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Officesduring good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times,receive for their Services a Compensation whichshall not be diminished during their Continuance inOffice.So one can only assume that Ron Paul will deem the decisionsthat he does not like as bad behavior and fire the Justices whorendered them. Paul is no constitutionalist – he wants a dictatorship.Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to support, andcosponsor, the Pledge Protection Act (HR 2028),which restricts federal court jurisdiction over thequestion of whether the phrase “under God” shouldbe included in the pledge of allegiance. Local schoolsshould determine for themselves whether or notstudents should say “under God” in the pledge. Thecase finding it is a violation of the First Amendment toinclude the words “under God” in the pledge is yetanother example of federal judges abusing theirpower by usurping state and local governments’authority over matters such as education. Congresshas the constitutional authority to rein in the federalcourts’ jurisdiction and the duty to preserve thestates’ republican forms of governments. Sincegovernment by the federal judiciary undermines thestates’ republican governments, Congress has a dutyto rein in rogue federal judges. I am pleased to seeCongress exercise its authority to protect the statesfrom an out-of-control judiciary. While I will supportthis bill even if the language removing the UnitedStates Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over casesregarding the pledge is eliminated, I am troubled thatsome of my colleagues question whether Congresshas the authority to limit Supreme Court jurisdictionin this case. Both the clear language of the UnitedStates Constitution and a long line of legal308

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIprecedents make it clear that Congress has theauthority to limit the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction.The Framers intended Congress to use the power tolimit jurisdiction as a check on all federaljudges, including Supreme Court judges , who, afterall, have lifetime tenure and are thus unaccountableto the people.214This is a very slippery slope. If Congress were able to limit thejurisdiction of the Supreme Court over cases with which it hadproblems with this would be a first step in destroying the separationof powers clause in the United States Constitution. The Separationof Powers devised by the framers of the Constitution was designedto do one primary thing: to prevent the majority from ruling with aniron fist. Based on their experience, the framers shied away fromgiving any branch of the new government too much power. Theseparation of powers provides a system of shared power knownas Checks and Balances.Three branches are created in the Constitution. The Legislative,composed of the House and Senate. The Executive, composed ofthe President, Vice-President, and the Departments. The Judicial,composed of the federal courts and the Supreme Court. Each ofthese branches has certain powers, and each of these powers islimited, or checked, by another branch. Paul stated: “The Foundersrecognized that one of the chief dangers to liberty was theconcentration of power in a few hands, which is why they carefullydivided power among the three branches.” But the Nazi Paul wantsto throw a monkey wrench into this balance of power and pave theway for a dictatorship in America. When it suits Paul’s hiddenagenda he flushes the constitution right down the toilet.PAUL WOULD PREVENT THE SUPREME COURT FROMRULING ON MATTERS INVOLVING THE SEPARATION OFCHURCH AND STATE214. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=228&Itemid=60309

A. J. WEBERMANIn an 1802 letter to the Danbury (Conn.) Baptist Association,Thomas Jefferson, then president, declared that the Americanpeople through the First Amendment had erected a "wall ofseparation between church and state." Paul, who calls himself aJeffersonian, wants to force the judiciary into breaking down thatwall:In recent years, we have seen numerous abusesof power by Federal courts. Federal judges regularlystrike down state and local laws on subjects such asreligious liberty, sexual orientation, family relations,education, and abortion. This government by Federaljudiciary causes a virtual nullification of the TenthAmendment’s limitations on federal power.Furthermore, when federal judges impose theirpreferred polices on state and local governments,instead of respecting the policies adopted by thoseelected by, and thus accountable to, the people,republican government is threatened. Article IV,section 4 of the United States Constitutionguarantees each state a republican form ofgovernment. Thus, Congress must act when theexecutive or judicial branch threatens the republicangovernments of the individual states. Therefore,Congress has a responsibility to stop Federal judgesfrom running roughshod over state and local laws.The Founders would certainly have supportedcongressional action to reign in Federal judges whotell citizens where they can and can’t place mangerscenes at Christmas.215The founding fathers did not mention God in the Constitution,and the faithful often regarded our early presidents as insufficientlypious. George Washington was a nominal Anglican who rarelystayed for Communion. John Adams was a Unitarian, which215. Congressional Record, V. 153, Pt. 1, January 4, 2007 to January 17,2007 page 374310

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZITrinitarians abhorred as heresy. Thomas Jefferson, denounced asan atheist, was actually a deist who detested organized religion andwho produced an expurgated version of the New Testament with themiracles eliminated. Jefferson and James Madison, a nominalEpiscopalian, were the architects of the Virginia Statute of ReligiousFreedom.Paul wants America to move closer to Republic and fartheraway from democracy. In a tirade to Congress entitled A WiseConsistency on February 11, 2004 Paul proclaimed:We should give up our obsession with democracy,both for ourselves and others, since the dictatorshipof the majority is just as destructive to a minority,especially individual liberty.Paul also wants to strip power from the executive branch: Paulwas the sponsor of H.R. 2655, the Separation of PowersRestoration Act. His legislation would terminate all existing states ofnational emergency and remove from the executive any power todeclare national emergencies; vest power in Congress alone todeclare states of national emergencies; restrict presidential power toissue executive orders by denying them any force of law except asprovided for by Congress; and repeal the 1973 War PowersResolution, which, Paul noted, granted broad war-making authorityto the president. This would make it more difficult to dispatchAmerica troops to Israel and would throw the balance of powerbetween the President, the Commander and Chief, and Congressout of whack.BRING HOME THE TROOPS?Ron Paul is immensely popular among the war-weary Iraq andAfghanistan veterans. This is because they would much rather be ina peacetime army. Hitler was also popular among the war-wearyveterans of World War I. They participated in riots against the Jewsand Communists and made up the majority of the members of theS.A. the Stormtroopers. Paul stated:311

A. J. WEBERMANThe elimination of Osama bin Laden should nowprompt us to bring our troops home from Afghanistanand Iraq. Al Qaeda was never in Iraq and we weresupposedly in Afghanistan to get Osama bin Laden.With bin Laden gone, there is no reason for ourpresence in the region – unless indeed it was allabout oil, nation-building, and remaking the MiddleEast and Central Asia. – Ron Paul216President Ron Paul would bring back approximately 310,000Active Duty personnel from overseas where they can join the morethan one million troops stationed in the United States not countingthe Reserves? What are they going to do in the United States? Willthey rebuild the infrastructure? Nope that would be socialism. Willthey collect their usual paychecks? Paul:We dont need to pay all this money to keep troopsall over the country, 130 countries, 900 bases. Butalso, just think, bringing all the troops home ratherrapidly, they would be spending their money here athome and not in Germany and Japan and SouthKorea, tremendous boost to the economy.217Paul is counting Marine guards and military attaches as part ofa vast expanse of U.S. military power around the globe. But only 11countries actually house more than 1,000 U.S. military personnel.Guess Paul never heard of armed forces personnel spending theirmoney at a PX and living in base housing when they are stationedoverseas? Bringing home the troops may cost taxpayers less but inthe long run they will get much less security for their money, lessbang for the buck. What good will the armed forces do in US?Defend our borders from foreign invasion? Become Storm Troopersat the beck and call of their Commander and Chief, Herr PresidentRon Paul? If Paul ends welfare, unemployment insurance,216. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1860&Itemid=69217. http://lewrockwell.com/vance/vance278.htm312

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIMedicaid, Medicare, and allows U.S. States to bring backsegregation, abolishes the FDIC and Fed he will need more than theNational Guard to suppress an internal rebellion.Okay all the troops return: Will we build more bases to housethem? Will they have to purchase home mortgages or pay rent? Willthis really stimulate the American economy as Paul claims? Willthey eventually get discharged from the Army and into the privatesector in order to save even more money? They will be a drain onthe economy not a boom as their military training is not alwaysapplicable to civilian life. Many would end up homeless, on thestreets.RON PAUL WOULD REVOKE THE FEDERAL LAWS AGAINSTCHILD PROSTITUTIONAs a logical consequence stemming from his belief that thereare only three federal crimes, and assuming Paul really believes it,Ron Paul would do away with the federal laws against prostitution.Here are the laws he would ask Congress to revoke:1) MANN ACT - Only applies if someone pays thetravel costs like an airline ticket and crosses statelines for the purpose of prostitution. It is very rare forthe Feds to go after folks under the Mann Act andusually no one is paying directly for transportation.The law was originally referred to as the “White-SlaveTraffic Act of 1910” and prohibited white slavery. Italso banned the interstate transport of females for“immoral purposes.” Its primary stated intent was toaddress prostitution, immorality, and humantrafficking. The act is better known as the Mann Act,after James Robert Mann, an American lawmaker.2) TRAVEL ACT – The Federal racketeering lawscontain a provision, much loved by prosecutors,commonly known as the “Travel Act” — and moreformally as “Interstate and foreign travel or313

A. J. WEBERMANtransportation in aid of racketeering enterprises.” TheTravel Act makes it a crime to travel in interstatecommerce with the intention of, among other things,promoting, conducting or distributing the proceeds ofunlawful activity (expressly including prostitution), if,after the travel, such an illegal activity is performed. Itwould, for example, be a felony violation of the TravelAct (punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment), totravel across state lines (or aid and abet a prostitutein doing so) for the purpose of promoting or carryingon the business of a prostitution ring; it would,similarly (and separately), violate the Travel Act tosend the prostitute back across state lines todistribute the proceeds of the prostitution.3) The PROTECT ACT specifically implementedseveral amendments in connection with sex tourismand commercial sexual exploitation: (1) in the area ofsex tourism, new provision 2423© makes it sufficientto show that a United States citizen or lawfulpermanent resident traveled abroad and engaged inany illicit sexual conduct with a minor, regardless ofwhat his intentions may have been when he left theUnited States; (2) the addition of 2423(d) specificallyreaches any person who knowingly “arranges,induces, procures, or facilitates the travel” of anindividual they know is traveling for the purpose ofengaging in illicit sexual conduct, when they engagein facilitating the travel for the purpose of commercialadvantage or private financial gain; (3) new provision2423(e) punishes an attempt or conspiracy to violateany of the provisions in 2423; (4) the definitionscontained in 2423(f) broaden the prohibited conductunder the statute to include commercial sex acts (asdefined in 18 U.S.C. § 1591©(1)) with persons under18; and (5) for defendants charged under the sextourism provision, 2423© an affirmative defense was314

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIadded for defendant who “reasonably believed” thatperson who had engaged in the commercial sex actwas 18. The defendant bears the burden of provingthe affirmative defense by a preponderance of theevidence.The PROTECT ACT also changed the sentencingscheme for 18 U.S.C. § 2423. For 18 U.S.C. §2423(a)(traveling for criminal sex act) the maximumsentence was upgraded to 30 years imprisonment.Formerly, the equivalent provision had a maximumsentence of 15 years. A mandatory minimumsentence of 5 years was also enacted. In the revisionto section 2423(b), the maximum sentence was alsoupgraded from 15 to 30 years imprisonment.Paul voted against a bill congratulating the Government ofSouth Africa upon its first two successful convictions for humantrafficking. How are state governments going to fight internationalhuman traffickers? Human trafficking involves an act of recruiting,transporting, transferring, harboring or receiving a person through ause of force, coercion or other means, for the purpose of exploitingthem. Is this what liberty means to Ron Paul, the right to exploitother human beings? Where do Ron Paul’s freedom end and otherpeople’s rights begin?RON PAUL WOULD REVOKE ALL FEDERAL LAWS AGAINSTPORNOGRAPHYWe are bound and determined to write more rulesand regulations dealing with the first and the secondamendment, and I do not see this as a good trend. Itis said today that those who want to undermine thefirst amendment, that it is already established thatpornography is not protected under the firstamendment. And today the goal is to make sure thatthe depiction of violence is not protected under thefirst amendment. But do my colleagues know that the315

A. J. WEBERMANmajor cause of violence in the world throughouthistory have been abuse of religion and the abuse ofphilosophy? So, therefore, the next step will be, if wecan limit the depiction of pornography and thenviolence, be the limitation of the depiction of aphilosophy that deals with religion or politicalsystems such as Communism or other fascism.218RON PAUL WOULD REVOKE ALL FEDERAL LAWS AGAINSTVIRTUAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHYPaul voted against requiring operators of wi-fi networks whodiscover the transmission of child porn and other forms online sexpredation to report it to the government.219Ron Paul defended hisstand in these words:Mr. Speaker, as a parent, grandparent and OB-GYNwho has had the privilege of delivering over 4,000babies, I share the revulsion of all decent people atchild pornography. Those who would destroy theinnocence of children by using them in sexually-explicit material deserve the harshest punishment.However, the Child Obscenity and PornographyPrevention Act (HR 4623) exceeds Congress’constitutional power and does nothing to protect anychild from being abused and exploited bypornographers. Instead, HR 4623 redirects lawenforcement resources to investigations andprosecutions of “virtual” pornography which, bydefinition, do not involve the abuse or exploitation ofchildren. Therefore, HR 4623 may reduce law218. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/appearance/596613881219. Josh Harkinson, Ron Pauls 15 Most Extreme Positions, Mother Jones,May 16, 2011316

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIenforcement’s ability to investigate and prosecutelegitimate cases of child pornography.Legislation outlawing virtual pornography is, to saythe least, of dubious constitutionality. The constitutiongrants the federal government jurisdiction over onlythree crimes: treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. It ishard to stretch the definition of treason,counterfeiting, or piracy to cover sending obscene orpornographic materials over the Internet. Therefore,Congress should leave the issue of whether or not toregulate or outlaw virtual pornography to states andlocal governments.In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I share mycolleagues revulsion at child pornography, I do notbelieve that this justifies expanding the federal policestate to outlaw distribution of pornographic imagesnot containing actual children. I am further concernedby the possibility that passage of HR 4623 will divertlaw enforcement resources away from theprosecution of actual child pornography. HR 4623also represents another step toward thenationalization of all police functions, a dangeroustrend that will undermine both effective lawenforcement and constitutional government. It is forthese reasons that I must oppose this well-intentioned but fundamentally flawed bill. (Ron PaulJune 26, 2002).220Here is one of the laws that President Paul would try toget Congress to revoke or order the Justice Department andthe FBI to give low priority to:8 U.S.C. § 1466A (2008)220. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2002-06-25/pdf/CREC-2002-06-25-pt1-PgH3884.pdf#page=2317

A. J. WEBERMAN§ 1466A. OBSCENE VISUAL REPRESENTATIONSOF THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN(a) In general. Any person who, in a circumstancedescribed in subsection (d), knowingly produces,distributes, receives, or possesses with intent todistribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including adrawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that--(1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicitconduct; and (B) is obscene; or(2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, ofa minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic ormasochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, includinggenital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal,whether between persons of the same or oppositesex; and(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, orscientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so,shall be subject to the penalties provided in section2252A(b)(1) [18 USCS § 2252A(b)(1)], including thepenalties provided for cases involving a priorconviction.Child pornography is an international problem andthere is no way it can be dealt with by local and statepolice departments. State and local governmentscannot make arrests overseas nor have their liaisonsoverseas make arrests. Under a Ron Paul presidencyDreamboard, referenced below would still be inoperation and Michael Childs, 49, of Huntsville, Alabama, (photo onthe left) who sentenced to 30 years in prison, and others like him,would be on the street.WASHINGTON – Attorney General Eric Holderannounced today the unsealing of three indictments318

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIand one complaint charging a total of 72 individualsfor their participation in an international criminalnetwork dedicated to the sexual abuse of childrenand the creation and dissemination of graphic imagesand videos of child sexual abuse throughout theworld. Operation Delego, an ongoing investigationthat was launched in December 2009, targeted the72 charged defendants and more than 500 additionalindividuals around the world for their participation inDreamboard – a private, members-only, onlinebulletin board that was created and operated topromote pedophilia and encourage the sexual abuseof very young children, in an environment designedto avoid law enforcement detection. To date, 52 ofthe 72 charged defendants have been arrested in theUnited States and abroad. Members traded graphicimages and videos of adults molesting children 12years-old and under, often violently, and collectivelycreated a massive private library of images of childsexual abuse.221RON PAUL WOULD REPEAL ALL FEDERAL AGE OF CONSENTLAWS EXCEPT ONERon Paul has stated that there should be no “age of consentlaw” in the federal statutes. But his newsletter espouses a differentview in cases where Black youth is involved:We don’t think a child of 13 should be held as responsibleas a man of 23. That’s true for most people, but blackmales age 13 who have been raised on the streets andwho have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough,scary and culpable as any adult, and should be treated assuch.Aside from this Paul said that it should be OK by federal law fora 24 year old man to convince a 10 year old boy or girl to have sex.221. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/August/11-ag-1001.html319

A. J. WEBERMANWhen pressed on this issue and other similar issues, Paul said thatthe states should have no such laws either! So far we havelegalized prostitution and drugs on a federal level. What if the Statesfollowed suit? A twelve year old girl should be able to live with apimp, sell her body, and use the proceeds to purchase heroin (afterher pimp takes a percentage, that is). Paul told Congress:Mr. Chairman, I rise today in opposition to the ChildProtection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of1998. This bill, if passed, will further expand theauthority of this country’s national police force andfurther “justify” the federal Justice Department’sintrusion into mail, telephone and Internetcommunications.222In a one minute twenty-four second interview with Peter Zottoloshown on YOUTUBE223, Ron Paul says he supports NAMBLA andso does the constitution. Nov 29, 2007COMMENT: Some jackass got pwnd when hisjoke backfired. Dont know what NAMBLA is?It’s The North American Man / Boy Love222. http://capitolwords.org/date/1998/06/11/223. http://videosift.com/video/Does-Ron-Paul-Support-NAMBLA-Well-yes-and-nohttp://digg.com/news/story/Ron_Paul_interview_Paul_supports_NAMBLA320

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIAssociation. Yeah, something tells me RonPaul wont like that.On March 14, 2002 Paul voted against the Federal Penaltiesfor Child Sexual Abuse Act:The bill before us today simply expands Federalpenalties for already existing Federal crimes, anddoes not in any way infringe on the jurisdiction of theStates. However, Mr. Chairman, I would ask mycolleagues to consider whether child sexual abuseshould be a Federal crime at all. The Constitutionspecifies three Federal crimes, namely treason,piracy, and counterfeiting. It is a stretch, to say theleast, to define child abuse as a form of treason,piracy, or counterfeiting. Therefore, perhaps the bestmeans of dealing with child sexual abuse occurringon Federal lands across State lines is to turn thesuspected perpetrator over to the relevant localjurisdiction and allow the local authorities toprosecute the crime.In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, while I believe this is aworthy piece of legislation, I hope someday we willdebate whether expanding Federal crimes (alongwith the use of congressionally mandated mandatoryminimum sentences) is consistent with constitutionalgovernment and fundamental principles of justice.224WOMAN’S RIGHTSThere would be no federal sexual harassment laws under aPaul presidency.In the past several months the airways have beenfilled with Members of Congress relating or restatingtheir fidelity to their oath of office to uphold the224. http://ronpaulquotes.com/chapters/2002-16.html321

A. J. WEBERMANConstitution. That is good, and I am sure it is donewith the best of intentions. But when it comes toexplaining our constitutional responsibility to makesure unconstitutional sexual harassment laws arethoroughly enforced, while disregarding mostpeople’s instincts towards protecting privacy, itseems to be overstating a point, compared to ourapathy toward the usurping of congressional powerto declare and wage war. That is something we oughtto be concerned about.225Like all other drugs GHB, the date rape drug, would be legal:I have extensive experience in the clinical use ofgamma hyudroxy butyric acid (GHB) . . . I have usedthese substances for over ten years on hundreds ofpatients (and have advised thousands through mybooks and articles on the subject). I have not hadone instance reported to me of adverse effects in mypatients. GHB is the safest, most nontoxic sleepinducing substance known. It has a wide range ofother therapeutic uses. The therapeutic threshold forGHB is greater than almost any knownpharmaceutical substance (the LD50 is40–100 timesgreater than the sleep-inducing therapeutic doseof 3–6 grams!). For each of the aforementionedprocedural and substantive reasons, I must againoppose H.R. 2130, the Hillory J. Farias Date-Rape Prevention Drug Act.226GHB is available in odorless, colorless, and tasteless form thatis frequently combined with alcohol and other beverages. GHB hasbeen used to commit sexual assaults due to its ability to sedate andincapacitate unsuspecting victims, preventing them from resistingsexual assault.225. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 84226. http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/pharmaceutical.html322

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIPaul voted against life sentences for rapists and child molestersusing the same tired excuse:Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, the policy behind H.R. 4679,the Lifetime Consequences for Sex Offenders Act, isunobjectionable. Given the high rates of recidivismamong sex criminals, it is certainly legitimate to takesteps to reduce the likelihood that a paroled sexcriminal will commit further crimes. In fact, given thelikelihood that a sex offender will attempt to commitanother sex crime, it is reasonable to ask why rapistsand child molesters are not simply imprisoned forlife? However, Mr. Speaker, questions of the properpunishment for sexual crimes are not issues properlyunder federal jurisdiction. The Constitution grants thefederal government jurisdiction over only threecrimes: treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. It is hardto stretch the definition of treason, counterfeiting, orpiracy to include sex crimes. Therefore, even thoughI agree with the policy behind H.R. 4679, I mustremind my colleagues that the responsibility forinvestigating, prosecuting and punishing sex crimesis solely that of state and local governments.227EUTHANASIAPain Relief Promotion Act of 1999 (H.R. 2260) 27 October1999Being strongly pro-life, I’m convinced that the Roevs. Wade Supreme Court decision of 1973 is one ofthe worst, if not the worst, Supreme Court ruling ofthe 20th century. It has been this institutionalizinginto our legal system the lack of respect for life andliberty that has and will continue to play havoc withliberty and life until it is changed. It has been said by227. http://capitolwords.org/date/2002/06/25/H3871_lifetime-consequences-for-sex-offenders-act-of-200/323

A. J. WEBERMANmany since the early 1970s that any legalization ofabortion would put us on a slippery slope toeuthanasia. I agree with this assessment.228The intention of H.R. 2260 was to repeal the Oregon lawlegalizing euthanasia and make a statement against it. None-the-less Paul opposed it. However, following Paul’s line of reasoningregarding the legalization of drugs if you are going to legalize thesesometimes lethal drugs like heroin why not legalize various poisonslike arsenic, shellfish toxin etc. to so that if you wanted to killyourself (or someone else) you would be at liberty to do so?Additionally, this bill empowers the Attorney Generalto train federal, state, and local law enforcementpersonnel to discern the difference between palliativecare and euthanasia. Most recently, though, it wasthe Attorney General who specifically exempted thephysicians of Oregon from certain provisions of Title21, the very Title this legislation intends to augment.Under the tutelage of the Attorney General, it wouldthus become the federal police officer’s role todetermine at which point deaths from pain medicationconstitute assisted suicide.229Just as in Roe v Wade Paul refused to federalize a crime. Hedid this time after time which makes me wonder why is he so closelywedded to this abstract principle that there are only three federalcrimes? According to Paul “Constitutionally, there are only threefederal crimes. These are treason against the United States, piracyon the high seas, and counterfeiting (and for a short period ofhistory, the manufacture, sale, or transport of alcohol wasconcurrently a federal and state crime).”228. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 19, October 26, 1999 to November3, 1999 page 27069229. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 19, October 26, 1999 to November3, 1999 page 27098324

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIs it worth adhering to these principles when a lack of federalcriminal enforcement is bound to lead to taking the lives of theunborn and elderly and giving dope dealers, rapists, pornographersand child molesters a freer hand? Is this his guiding principle in lifethat there are only three federal crimes and this overrides everythingelse? Isn’t that what the federal legislature does, make laws?ABORTIONRoe vs. Wade Where To From Here? November 20, 2004The 1973 Roe vs. Wade ruling caused great harm intwo distinct ways. First, it legalized abortion at anystage, establishing clearly that the Supreme Courtand the government condoned the cheapening ofhuman life. Second, it firmly placed this crucial issuein the hands of the federal courts and nationalgovernment. The federalization of abortion wasendorsed even by those who opposed abortion.Instead of looking for state-by-state solutions andlimiting federal court jurisdiction, those anxious toprotect life came to rely on federal laws, eroding theconstitutional process. The authors of theConstitution intended for criminal matters and acts ofviolence (except for a few rare exceptions) to bedealt with at the state level. Now, however,conservatives as well as liberals find it acceptable tonationalize issues such as abortion, marriage, prayer,and personal sexual matters — with more federallegislation offered as the only solution. This trend oftransferring power from the states to the federalgovernment compounds our problems — for whenwe lose, it affects all 50 states, and overridingCongress or the Supreme Court becomes far moredifficult than dealing with a single state.230230. http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=218&Itemid=60325

A. J. WEBERMANOf course the anti-abortion groups want federal legislation.Otherwise if you want an abortion all you had to do was go to statewhere it was legal. You could not have the State Police stoppingevery pregnant woman to make sure she was not on her way toanother state to have an abortion. And how could the localauthorities determine if someone were in the early stages ofpregnancy? Would they have to carry around portable sonographicimagers? Paul’s goal is to strip the Federal Government of all itsexpanded powers and return to a confederacy.ANIMAL RIGHTSNow, cruelty to animals, nobody is going to come anddefend cruelty to animals. But quite frankly there willbe times it will be difficult to define. The motivation formost cruelty to animals is because people are sick.This is a mental illness. We are dealing with mentalillness here and we are going to write a Federal lawagainst it. So if somebody, and it was evenmentioned by the proponents of this bill, that peoplelike Ted Bundy delight in this. Yes. These people arepsychopaths. They are nuts. It is an illness. Wecannot pass a law to deal with mental illness. Istrongly object to this approach. We should bethinking not only about the process but of theunintended consequences of passing legislation likethis.231So cruelty to animals is a treatable illness, a mental illness andnot a crime. PETA might disagree.A WAVE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST JEWSUnder President Paul every Jew-hating piece of crap wouldcome out of the woodwork and feel justified attacking Jews andJewish houses of worship, community centers etc.. Ron Paul’s mere231. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/appearance/596529993326

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIcandidacy incited the firebombing of two synagogues in NewJersey. Anthony Graziano threw a firebomb into the home of a rabbiin Rutherford, New Jersey and attacked a synagogue in Paramus,New Jersey. Paulbot Indian Hindu Aakash Dalal was his co-conspirator. On the day of Graziano’s arrest, a letter to the editorsigned by Dalal was published on the web site of the Rutgersstudent newspaper, the Daily Targum:As it happens, Ron Paul accurately predicted the2007-2008 housing crisis in 2002 on the floor of theHouse, while others were oblivious. To empower theFederal Reserve System and to ignore Paul’s ideaswould be irresponsible and illogical. Allowing theFederal Reserve to continue to exist in its currentform is only rewarding failure and incompetence.232The author was Aakash Dalal asophomore majoring in chemistryand biological sciences. Dalalhad been friends with Grazianosince they both attended middleschool in Lodi. Both of these twomaggots joined the RutgersUniversity chapter of a groupcalled the Young Americans forLiberty, which used to be known as Students for Ron Paul. Dalalwho posted a picture of himself with Paul as his Facebook profile,was charged with conspiring with Graziano to commit numerouscriminal acts aimed at Jews: nine counts of aggravated arson,conspiracy to commit aggravated arson, bias intimidation andcriminal mischief. Dalal’s attorney, Chris DiLorenzo, said that Dalalshouldnt be considered an accessory to the synagogue bombingsbecause the Rutgers student was on leave from college, out ofstate, working for Ron Paul in the New Hampshire primaries when232. http://m.dailytargum.com/mobile/opinion/letters_to_editor/federal-reserve-lacks-basic-oversight/article_983c9b24-4642-11e1-bd7e-001a4bcf6878.html327

A. J. WEBERMANthe attacks took place in early January. Graziano was charged withnumerous counts of attempted murder. We can get a look at theRon Paul mentality from Graziano’s Facebook page.The last post on Graziano’s Facebook page was on January24, 2012 by Ck Rafuls. It was a link that said RONPAUL2012 butwent to a story about Graziano’s arrest. Ck advised him “Don’t dropthe soap Jew Killer.” On January 16, 2012 Graziano praised a blackfootball player who said he was going to vote for Paul. Arian Fostermust have thought his first name Aryan Foster. Graziano wrote“Dude, you are an inspiration for…” on Foster’s wall. On January 11,2012 Anthony posted a logo from Bromley Pure Green Tea andwrote, DRINK IT JUST DRINK IT, GREEN TEA DAWG. ANTI-OXIDANTS CLEANSE YOUR BODY FROM PREVIOUS TOXINS.”Meth? January 11, 2012 was when Graziano firebombed theRutherford Rabbi’s home. January 8, 2012 “LIVE FREE OR DIE!RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012!” Graziano posted “RON PAUL2012! On Jew’s Wall on January 2nd.” Jew’s wall was supposed tobe pro-Jewish but was taken over by Jew haters. Graziano wasresponsible for an arson committed in Paramus on January 3, 2012.Graziano threw a bottle containing gasoline at the rear wall ofCongregation KHal Adath Jeshurun, but the resulting fire burnedout quickly. Graziano December 21, 2011: “Do or die. Ride or die(he rode his bike to the attacks). We’ll build and multiply. Spread theword (about Ron Paul) and salute (the new Hitler). Move withoutfear, you are a tiger in the field, staring at prey.” Graziano’s preyturned out to be some little Jewish children and their parents.Graziano’s dad: OK PAUL HAS MY VOTE. Kenny Feola: Ron Paulwinning so far. When told that Paul was winning, Graziano wrote“Yes he is, and obviously certain “people” (certain subhuman Jews)who hang out in certain “establishments” (who are part of the powerstructure) aren’t too happy.” Graziano was "weeks away" fromanother attack because he had submitted paperwork in an attemptto buy a gun before he was arrested.328

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIIn Plano Texas,233a "Ron Paul grassrootscampaign organizer" who, FEC records showdonated heavily to Ron Pauls campaign,Anson Chi , was seriously injured as ahomemade bomb he was carrying (most likelyto a neocon target) accidentally detonated.Anson is well known online at Ron Paul Forums234and evendeveloped a popular website on "How to become a delegate."235On his talk show this week, Adam Vs The Man, Ron PauloidAdam Kokesh read an email from a viewer which said "There is away the nomination can be given to Ron Paul," he readaloud."There is a way to fix the situation we currently face withObama versus Romney. Romney needs to die."236Kokeshresponded that "it sure is tempting isnt it, to think that you couldtake out one life and prevent the deaths of so many others." Kokeshwas contacted by the Secret Service. Douglas Wright, who plottedto blow up a bridge spanning the Cuyahoga River, had Ron Paulliterature in his home. Wright’s indictment read,Wright suggested getting a car that they can driveinto the Federal Reserve Bank with C-4, and blow itup. Upon hearing Wright mention blowing up theFederal Reserve Bank, Baxter advised this is nowhigher scale, and wanted everyone to agree this wasan open discussion. Baxter advised people have233. http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/plano/headlines/20120622-plano-bomb-case-suspect-spoke-of-need-to-slay-the-head-off-in-anti-government-interview.ece234. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?62664-Which-delegate-site-is-right-ours-or-Anson-s&s=a4bcf9cd03b0fe6f8816be06312153d4235. http://www3.webng.com/ronpaul/becomedelegate.html236. http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppinsrosiegray/prominent-ron-paul-supporter-muses-about-assassination329

A. J. WEBERMANbeen attacking banks and the Federal Reserve for along time, and the Federal Reserve has branches allover the country. The group discussed where theFederal Reserve banks were located.237Numerous Ron Paul supporters were present at an OccupyCleveland demonstration against the Fed.238237.http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/Wright_complaint_affadavit_050112.pdf238. http://www.dailypaul.com/181851/lots-of-ron-paul-supporters-at-the-cleveland-fed-thank-you330

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZICHAPTER ELEVENRON PAUL’S FAREWELL SPEECHRon Paul leaves Congress, still the pariah he always was. Nolegislation name after him, any office buildings or bridges. But aslong as he is sentient he is a threat. Paul’s farewell speech toCongress contained the same seemingly innocuous message andthere was only one interesting part:Government use of force to mold social andeconomic behavior at home and abroad has justifiedindividuals using force on their own terms. The factthat violence by government is seen as morallyjustified, is the reason why violence will increasewhen the big financial crisis hits and becomes apolitical crisis as well.Paul hoped for a Depression scale financial crisis so he could rise topower just as Hitler did. From what part of society will the increasein violence come from? From Ron Paul’s Storm troopers.First, we recognize that individuals shouldn’t initiateviolence, then we give the authority to government.Eventually, the immoral use of government violence,when things goes badly, will be used to justify anindividual’s “right” to do the same thing. Neither thegovernment nor individuals have the moral right toinitiate violence against another yet we are movingtoward the day when both will claim this authority. Ifthis cycle is not reversed society will break down.When needs are pressing, conditions deteriorateand rights become relative to the demands and thewhims of the majority. It’s then not a great leap forindividuals to take it upon themselves to use violenceto get what they claim is theirs.331

A. J. WEBERMANPaul is making a convoluted argument for the use of violenceby individuals against the government. Paul blames the governmentfor any violence that may befall it. The Government uses violenceagainst its citizens and so the citizens justifiably resort to violenceagainst the Government, this is the cycle Paul referred to.Then we learn that during a time of economic crisis themajority, also known as the Federal Government will deprive peopleof their rights. If this happens those who are being deprived of theirrights have a right to take up arms against the Federal Government.What all this boils down to is that Ron Paul is a piece of the filththat America has dredged up from its pro-Nazi and isolationist past.In his world, freedom, liberty, and the Constitution wouldn’t exist;tyranny and totalitarianism would reign. It would be the FourthReich. Paul’s connection with the Jew hating pathological genocidalmaniacs of Liberty Lobby, his connection to the Jew hating NazisDavid Duke and Don Black, his defense of Nazi war criminals andHolocaust deniers puts him a class several notches below childmolesters. Many pedophiles will let their victims live, the Nazis donot.332

RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZIABOUT THE AUTHORIn the early 1970’s A. J. Weberman became awidely known counter-culture figure after hewent through Bob Dylan’s garbage. He coinedthe word “Garbology” to describe thejournalistic technique of searching throughtrash for information and called himself agarbologist. He also invented Dylanology -another word he coined – which means thestudy of Bob Dylan’s cryptic poetry. Weberman was the first to makethe connection between Watergaters E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgisand the Kennedy assassination. He was sued by E. Howard Hunt inan effort to shut him up. Hunt later confessed to his son that he waspart of “the big event.” Weberman was able to depose former DCIARichard Helms, CI/SIG head James Angleton, G. Gordon Liddy,Bernard Barker and others. Weberman worked as a researcher forSen. Richard Schweiker, (R-Pa) and as a Congressional researcherfor Cong. Henry Gonzalez (D-San Antonio, Texas). Weberman hasnumerous political arrests including one for having tossed a tomatoat former President Nixon. Weberman, along with I. D. Beal, was thefounder of the Yippie Museum, an educational institution charteredby the Board of Regents of New York State. He is the subject of anaward winning movie entitled The Ballad of A. J. Weberman. Hisrevolutionary circle included John Lennon, Yoko Ono, Jerry Rubin,Abbie Hoffman, David Peel, Tom Forcade, Aron Kay and Phil Ochs.Weberman’s other books are Coup D’Etat in America, the CIA andthe Assassination of JFK co-authored by Michael Canfield, My LifeIn Garbology, The Dylan to English Dictionary, Homothug, TheSecret Life of Rudy Giuliani, The Devil and Bob Dylan and A Historyof Islamist Terrorism in America. He is a Director of the JewishDefense Organization and a non-leader of the Youth InternationalParty.333

RON PAUL THE MOST DANGEROUS NAZI IN AMERICA

by AJ Weberman

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

2 Embeds 66

Statistics