Waste strategy and regulation - 'a UK persepective'

1,053 views
873 views

Published on

Dr. Adam Read – Director Waste Management & Resource Efficiency, AEA

Presentation to the Waste, Recycling Industry Association (QLD) inc
26th October 2012, Brisbane

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,053
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
27
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • EnglandThe key results are:■Household recycling has increased: The proportion of household waste sent for recycling, composting or reuse between October 2010 to September 2011 in England was 42.5%, increasing from 41.5%in the financial year April 2010 and March 2011.■Household waste production has decreased: The generation of household waste continued to decrease between the financial year 2010/11 and the rolling year October 2010 to September 2011, with a 1.4% reduction to 23.1 million tonnes.■Waste generation per person has decreased: The weight of household waste generated in the year October 2010 to September 2011 in England, in kilograms per person, was 443 kg per person. Of this total, 188 kg was recycled, composted or reused whilst 255 kg was not.■Local authority collected waste sent to landfill has declined: The tonnage of local authority collected waste being sent to landfill by local authorities has decreased by 7.6% to 10.5 million tonnes between the financial year 2010/11 and the rolling year October 2010 to September 2011
  • England – voluntary system for destination..
  • EA – enforcement & prosecution policy – key wordsProceeds of Crime requirements
  • EA – enforcement & prosecution policy – key wordsProceeds of Crime requirements
  • The project was commissioned by the European Pathway to Zero WasteFor the last two years the Environment Agency, first in partnership with South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) and then the Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), has been working on their ambitious European Pathway to Zero Waste (EPOW) programme. The programme is supported by the European Commission’s LIFE+ funding stream, helping to demonstrate the route to zero landfilling of all waste streams in the South East of England.The EPOW programme’s current priority is to explore how the development of waste infrastructure can be de-risked and supported through enhanced partnership working.In addressing this priority, AEA has been commissioned to explore barriers to the delivery of business waste and resource processing infrastructure in London and the South East (L&SE) and to identify ways of overcoming these. For this study, business waste includes commercial and industrial waste and construction and demolition waste.
  • Waste strategy and regulation - 'a UK persepective'

    1. 1. Waste Strategy & Regulation ‘a UK perspective’Dr. Adam Read – DirectorWaste Management & Resource Efficiency, AEAPresentation to the Waste , Recycling Industry Association (QLD) inc26th October 2012 A world leading energy and climateBrisbane change consultancy
    2. 2. Presentation scope in 30 minutes …+ Personal welcome+ The legislative framework+ Waste strategy development+ Drivers for change: - Fiscal  Landfill tax - Regulatory  Permitting and exemption regime - Market Development  Quality Protocols+ In summary – what can we learn?+ Open Q&A…. 2
    3. 3. A personal welcome+ Dr Adam Read - Practice Director @ AEA for Waste Management & Resource Efficiency - 18 years of operational expertise - 80 consultants (UK) plus 50 in the US - Former Local Authority Recycling Officer (RB Kensington & Chelsea) - Working with EA on new technologies and infrastructure delivery - Client Manager for WRAP (UK delivery agency) - Designed and rolled out innovative new collection schemes (15 years) - BUT I am not a regulator (this is important – watch this space)+ Acknowledgements - AEA team (my co-authors)  Nia Owen and Maria Vinogradova - My clients for allowing me to ‘share’ their experiences (off record) - The organisers for the invite (thanks Rick & Georgina!) 3
    4. 4. http://www.aeat.comAEA delivers over £90 million annually of energy, environmental,resource efficiency, transportation, and climate policy support andprogram implementation services to:UK Government US Government European Commission International Institutions …. waste management, carbon management, climate change strategies, transport,resource management, life cycle assessment, sustainability, energy efficiency,clean energy, GHG inventories, adaptation, behaviour change …. 4
    5. 5. Our Scope of Services Practice Areas: Expertise: + Air and Environmental Quality  WRATE / Carbon Modeling + Chemical Emergency & Risk  Audits Management  Procurement Support + Energy & Climate Change  Technologies / Cost / Barriers + Enterprise Services  Policy Development + Information Management  Stakeholder Engagement / Communications + Knowledge Management  Service Efficiencies + Sustainable Transport  Knowledge Management & + Resource Efficiency and Waste Transfer Management  Training…. experience at the interface of government, business, and academia 5
    6. 6. EU Policy 6
    7. 7. EU Waste Framework Directive+ Dates back to the 1970s+ Enshrines the waste hierarchy within the WFD Prevention+ Transferred to national law by Preparing for each member state reuse - Enacted through policy / strategy Recycling+ Recent change to prioritise ‘reuse’ Other recovery+ National Waste Management Strategy Dispo sal+ National Waste Minimisation Strategy 7+ Infraction if fail to comply….
    8. 8. Landfill Directive - 2000+ Scaling back of organic material to landfills compared to 1995 … 8
    9. 9. The EU Landfill Directive+ EU Landfill Directive – address landfill’s environmental impacts - BMW reductions required to mitigate fugitive CH4 emissions - Pre-treatment of landfilled materials - Landfill waste acceptance criteria (WACs) - Landfill design, operation, completion and closure requirements+ BMW Landfill targets for the UK - 75% of 1995 level by 2010 - 50% of 1995 level by 2013 - 35% of 1995 level by 2020+ Required all stakeholders to work together - National legislation & policy - Support programmes - Engagement & Education 9 - Collection and Treatment providers
    10. 10. Waste arisings – 2010/11Waste Type Scotland Wales Northern England IrelandMunicipal 3.14 1.63 0.94 26.3Household 2.82 1.39 0.83 23.3C&I* 6.5 3.6 1.3 48.0C&D* 7.6 12.2 1.7 77.4+ Million tonnes per annum 10
    11. 11. The predicted ‘need for change’ … 60 50 Millions tonnes per annum 40 Non-biodegradable Municipal Waste 30 20 Biodegradable Municipal Waste Requiring Diversion 10 Biodegradable Municipal Waste Allowed to Landfill 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 11
    12. 12. What does this mean? + This now includes C&I wastes….. GAME CHANGER! - A major shift in how the UK defines MSW!!!! 12
    13. 13. Implementation of EU Policy & National waste strategy development 13
    14. 14. UK Government+ UK is responsible for reporting to EU on policy progress+ National Administrations set policy and monitor performance - England - Scotland - Wales - Northern Ireland+ Local Government set strategy, deliver services and respond to local ‘demands’ - Funded by UK taxation - Funded by local Council Tax 14 - Elected ‘members’
    15. 15. Implementation … nationally …+ Waste Strategy for England 2007 - Waste Review 2011 (some minor revisions in priorities)+ Scotland Zero Waste Plan 2010+ Wales Towards Zero Waste strategy 2010+ Northern Ireland Waste Strategy 2006 (now under review) 15
    16. 16. “Strategy wars” – political objectives! Policy/ County Strategy Year Recycling Landfill Incineration Government Review of 35% of 1995 Waste Policy in (2011)England 50% by 2020 levels by 2020 England) Waste 2007 (biodegradable) Strategy for England Zero Waste Maximum 5% byScotland 2010 70% by 2025 Plan 2025 Maximum 30% Towards Zero Maximum 5% byWales 2010 70% by 2025 high efficiency Waste 2025 EfW by 2025 Towards 50% by 2020 35% of 1995Northern Resource 2006 (HHW), 60% by levels by 2020Ireland Management 2020 (C&IW) (biodegradable) 16
    17. 17. Levels of ambition England Scotland Wales Targets beyond EU Landfill and Waste Framework Directives    Restrictions on waste managed through  incineration i.e. not just landfill substitution   Enforced source segregation of food waste    Landfill ban considerations /  / Individual authority targets and guidelines on collection systems    17
    18. 18. Divergence? + Wales and Scotland are now clearly leading in terms of waste strategy - Clear centralised leadership - High priority issue - Ambitious targets beyond statutory EU limits + Wales and Scotland have fully embraced Zero Waste as a policy concept - Used as a philosophy to drive change - Zero waste to landfill initially - One Planet Living (Wales) 18 - Carbon mitigation (Scotland)
    19. 19. Does it make a difference??? 1.2 Reduction in MSW Landfilled (% 0f 1 0.8 2001/2 levels) 0.6 England 0.4 Scotland 0.2 Wales 0 + Look at Scotland catching up after strategy… + The proof will come in a couple of years’ time… 19
    20. 20. And the scores are……………………… Municipal Recycling Rates 1. 48% of household waste was recycled and composted in Wales during the financial year 2011-12, representing a 4% increase on the previous year 2. Recycling rate for English councils was 42.5% between October 2010 and September 2011 3. Scotland reached a household waste recycling and composting rate of 40.7% for 2011 20
    21. 21. Fiscal Driver: landfill tax 21
    22. 22. Landfill tax escalator £90+ Landfill becomes £80 unviable as tax increases £70 £60+ Tax is applied before gate fee £50 £40+ Gate fees at landfill c. £50-75/ tonne £30 £20+ Gate fees at EfW plants will be £10 c.£70-£100 / tonne £0 01.10.96 01.04.97 01.04.98 01.04.99 01.04.00 01.04.01 01.04.02 01.04.04 01.04.05 01.04.06 01.04.07 01.04.08 01.04.09 01.04.10 01.04.11 01.04.12 01.04.13 01.04.14 01.04.03+ Landfill stopped making financial sense in 2009-10 Standard Future Inert 22
    23. 23. Impacts! 23
    24. 24. Solutions….. in England 24
    25. 25. UK Regulatory Framework 25
    26. 26. Waste Regulation+ Enforcement: - Environment Agency in England & Wales* - SEPA in Scotland - EPA in Northern Ireland  *Wales is to have its own enforcement body from April 2013+ EU is key driver for legislation: - Waste Framework Directive - Landfill Directive - Producer Responsibility (by material and sector)+ Each member state is responsible for implementing legislation - significant differences in approach across the EU (voluntary vs. mandatory)+ Within the UK each Country is also developing its own approach 26
    27. 27. Increasing focus on C&I wastes … 27
    28. 28. Private sector will invest!+ Recognition that change wouldn’t happen without interference+ Scotland have introduced the Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2012+ Requirements: - Separate collection of metal, plastic, glass, paper and card from 1st January 2014 from all HHs and businesses - Food businesses (except in rural areas) which produce > 50 kg of food waste per week to present that food waste for separate collection from 1st January 2014 - Food businesses (except in rural areas) which produce > 5 kg of food waste per week to present that food waste for separate collection from 1st January 2016+ Regulations also ban the use of non-domestic food waste disposal units, i.e. macerators - avoid food waste being diverted to the sewers! 28
    29. 29. Statutory (mandatory) Targets for MSW+ Wales have introduced statutory recycling targets for MSW under the Waste (Wales) Measure 2010: - 2012-13: 52% …… 2015-16: 58% - 2019-20: 64% ….. 2024-25: 70%+ Waste must have undergone a relevant recovery operation so that it has been reprocessed into a product, material or substance, whether for its original or other purpose to be counted in these targets - e.g. Compost must meet the requirements of Compost QP+ Markets are critical to achieving recycling rates+ Government are part funding quality collection systems - Influence what is happening without mandating solution+ Failure to comply with statutory targets = financial penalties ££ 29
    30. 30. Regulatory Driver – Permitting & Exemption System 30
    31. 31. Environment Agency+ Regulator for England and Wales - risk based approach to regulation+ Executive non-departmental Public Body+ Permits and licenses+ Pollution control+ Research activities+ Data collection+ Staff: 11,500+ Budget: £1.1 billion - £750 million – from Central Government - £350 million – charged income 31
    32. 32. Environmental Permitting Regime+ Any waste operation will normally require an authorisation: Bespoke Permit Standard Risk Permit Exemption+ Environmental permits issued by the Environment Agency+ The waste operation must operate within the controls laid out in the environmental permit+ Types of operation requiring a permit are: - Waste transfer stations - Materials recovery facilities 32 - Incinerators
    33. 33. Risk based regulation+ The theory behind the Environment Agency approach - aim to reduce red tape and help businesses+ Regulate poor performers and complex operations more rigorously!+ Proportionate regulation and enforcement+ Environment Agency offers a range of permits - Standard permits for low risk operations - Exemptions (no license, but on the radar) - Bespoke permits for complex / large operations+ Operator Risk Appraisal: Opra - Charges and inspections are risk-based!+ There is no operating outside the system 33
    34. 34. Closing down the ‘worst’ offenders Closure of most of the 8,000 licensed facilities 34
    35. 35. Standard permit+ Rules are set out in the Standard Rules document so that an applicant will know exactly what they have to comply with before they make an application+ Conditions may include: - Proximity to housing - Nature conservation - Type and quantity of materials accepted+ The application process is simpler and less time consuming as a risk assessment (generic for that type of facility) has already been prepared and the application requirements are reduced+ Application fees for standard permits are cheaper than for bespoke permits, and are determined more quickly 35
    36. 36. Exemptions+ Lower risk activities can operate under an exemption from environmental permitting which must be registered with the Environment Agency, and operated under the controls set+ An exemption from a waste permit can be grated if: - Waste is recovered or disposed of without endangering human health and without using processes or methods which could harm the environment and in particular without  risk to water, air, soil, plants or animals; or  causing nuisance through noise or odours; or  adversely affecting the countryside or places of special interest 36
    37. 37. Exemptions+ Types of operations that can operate under a permit are: - Composting facilities which are processing waste generated on-site - Storage of waste in a secure place - Sorting of scrap metal+ How are new waste operations managed? - New operations normally require an environmental permit - However, ‘low risk solutions’ will be considered by the EA where requiring a permit (no exemption exists) would be disproportionate to the risk posed 37
    38. 38. Bespoke Permits+ Bespoke permit needed if no exemption or standard rules permit is appropriate to your operation+ Application must include detail on control of risk+ Statutory consultation required & determination can take 13 wks+ Charges - permitted sites pay a subsistence fee based on the OPRA (operational risk appraisal) charging scheme, i.e. charges & inspection frequency are risk based - Complexity - Inputs & emissions - Location - Operator management systems & performance+ Enables Environment Agency to regulate poor performers and complex operations more rigorously 38
    39. 39. Enforcement+ Environment Agency enforcement policy aims: - “To stop offending – aim to stop an illegal activity from continuing/occurring; - To restore and/or remediate – aim to put right environmental harm or damage. - To bring under regulatory control – aim to bring an illegal activity into compliance with the law. - Punish and/or deter – to punish an offender and/or deter future offending.” Environment Agency 39
    40. 40. Proceeds of Crime Act+ Allows a Court to deprive convicted offenders of assets gained from crime. But can only be used following a guilty verdict+ EA can: - Ensure environmental crime does not continue - Investigate finances to establish and find hidden profits - Stop the disposal of assets whilst investigations is underway - Present evidence to court for a confiscation order – i.e. how much the offender has to pay. Failure to pay – prison sentence - Remove profits, even if offender serves a jail sentence+ Confiscations in 2011: - Number of on-going financial investigations: 132 - Number of confiscation orders: 26 - Total confiscated: £2.2m - Highest confiscation: £0.9m 40
    41. 41. Driving up standards….Taking out the bad guys leaves thegood guys ready to invest and develop… All good for economic development and resource security! 41
    42. 42. Prosecutions 42
    43. 43. ProsecutionsTypes of illegal waste sites 43
    44. 44. Market Development 44
    45. 45. WRAP+ Government funded organisation+ Aims to help businesses, individuals and communities reap the benefits of reducing waste, developing sustainable products and using resources in an efficient way+ Areas of action: - Preventing food and drink waste - Increasing the resource efficiency of products - Increasing the resource efficiency of construction and refurbishment projects - Improving the collection of materials for recycling and reuse - Helping SMEs to become more resource efficient - Increasing the reuse and recycling of priority products - Recycling organic waste and recovering energy+ Market development is key!! 45
    46. 46. Encouraging waste use as a resource+ What is waste? - “All waste derived materials continue to be a waste until the point at which the beneficial properties are realised”+ When has waste been fully recovered? - Distinct and marketable - Suitable for use - No greater risk to the environment or human health and than the virgin equivalent+ By identifying more and more secondary materials as no longer waste, the industry and the regulator both maximise the value of resources – allowing them to compete with primary materials+ This can only be achieved by the regulator, market developer and industry working together! 46
    47. 47. Quality …+ Is about consistently delivering materials to the marketplace that are - effectively separated to meet customer requirements - compliant with national regulations and policies…. - at a cost that is acceptable 47
    48. 48. Quality Supply Chain Local Authority 48
    49. 49. Quality is a major problem ….+ Increasing concerns about quality from the end markets+ Less guarantees from Chinese & Indian reprocessors+ Returned loads from Indonesia and Brazil+ EA has clamped down on ‘waste’ exports+ UK and EU reprocessors continually setting the ‘bar’ higher in terms of quality and consistency+ Needs additional investment at MRF+ Now looking at evolution of service provision …+ Needs everyone to play their role ….. 49
    50. 50. Pushing up quality …. 50
    51. 51. End of Waste – Evidence based ….+ How can end of waste be demonstrated? - Meeting a Quality Protocol - Through an end of waste submission to the Environment Agency’s End of Waste Panel - Compliance with EU ‘end of waste’ Regulations+ End of waste submission (site specific approach) - Organisations can submit evidence to the EA to demonstrate that the product they manufacture has ceased to be waste+ EU have started to develop end of waste regulations which define criteria for materials to achieve end of waste across all member states - Composts, digestates, RDF (fuels) etc. 51
    52. 52. End of Waste definition+ Operational: End of waste from scrap regulations+ In the pipeline: paper, glass, plastics (recyclate)+ In progress: biodegradable waste subject to biological treatment+ Test: - “the waste has been converted into a distinct and marketable product” - “the processed substance can be used in exactly the same way as a non- waste”, and - “the processed substance can be stored and used with no worse environmental effects when compared to the raw material it is intended to replace” 52
    53. 53. UK Quality Protocols+ Framework which allows user to demonstrate that the product(s) has ceased to be waste Waste ceases to be waste Quality Protocol QUALITY WASTE PRODUCT 53
    54. 54. Quality Protocols+ Sets out the criteria which, if met, mean the product is no longer a waste …+ QP compliant material is free of any further waste permitting - Aggregates from inert waste - Compost - Anaerobic digestate - Biodiesel - Processed fuel oil+ Working well in the UK… stimulating new markets for materials …. Drawing through more feedstock! 54
    55. 55. Compost Quality ProtocolSource-segregated Compost End MarketsBiowaste Product Horticulture Quality (including domestic Protocol applications) Soil-grown horticulture Land restoration & Waste ceases to soft landscaping be waste operations+ Process itself still requires permit / exemption regardless of whether the site is complying with the Compost QP+ Material that doesn’t comply is a waste and so a permit or exemption is needed for its use, and it must be moved in 55 accordance with Duty of Care requirements
    56. 56. Aggregates Quality Protocol Inert C&D Recycled waste aggregate Quality Protocol Waste ceases to be waste+ Impact (year 1): - Landfill diversion 21m tonnes - Landfill disposal savings £158m - Virgin raw material saved 41m tonnes - Increased sales £324m - Cost savings to business £155m 56 - Carbon savings 105,000 tonnes/ £5.5m
    57. 57. European Pathway to Zero Waste (EP0W) + Collaboration: WRAP and EA, funded by EU (Life+) + 8 Work Streams at all levels of the hierarchy – e.g. waste exchange for reuse and infrastructure delivery + AEA project: identifying barriers to infrastructure for business waste - Industry engagement workshops (300 specialists involved) - Bringing together a range of stakeholders – large operators, small operators, industry organisations, advisors, funders - Promoting partnership working + Critical piece of work @ present…. - Identify solutions and potential ‘implementors’ - Report reviewed by Defra to inform its infrastructure position - Good platform for operators to be heard and demonstrate their facilities 57
    58. 58. In summary 58
    59. 59. Changing UK landscape+ UK progresses has been driven by - EU Landfill Directive - Clear Strategy & policy Regulator - Sensible Regulation - Market Development - Infrastructure support - Increasing energy prices Govt Industry - Public demand - Reducing red tape+ This has taken time…. WRAP - Market Development+ All parties have to work together+ We have had to learn some lessons and make some mistakes! 59
    60. 60. You must develop effective delivery tools+ EU Landfill Directive+ Landfill Tax+ Landfill Bans (Scotland)+ Mandatory Recycling Targets (Scotland & Wales)+ Voluntary Agreements e.g. hospitality sector food waste prevention+ Incentives - Renewable Obligation Certificates (ROCs) - Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) - Feed In Tariffs (FITs)+ Business Engagement, Education & Support… - WRAP and ZWS BRE programmes …. 60 - Supporting logistics of collection & reproceesing
    61. 61. Joining up the dots ….+ Landfill Directive could not deliver change in isolation…+ Needed landfill tax to ‘wake things up’ @ all levels - LAs wanted to change & Businesses were feeling the pinch+ Needed technology development to treat new food waste streams - New Technology Demonstrator programme - UK AD policy statement+ Needed new markets for the products of composting / AD - WRAP market development work - R&D, and the Quality Protocols projects - RHI / ROCs for energy production from biogenic materials+ Needs enforcement & regulation - Targeting bad sites, driving up the baseline 61
    62. 62. Next steps in the UK ….+ More focused strategy and specific policy issues - Landfill bans on organics in Scotland - Mandatory collections (target materials)+ More focused support - Green Investment Bank - Business engagement workshops - Waste business support programmes (diversification)+ More market development - Closed loop policies - Green purchasing & Recycled content - Quality protocols+ More appropriate regulation - Driving up quality 62 - Focusing on performance
    63. 63. Building blocks …. Sustainable WM!!!!!What is the pathway for Queensland to consider?+ Good strategy & leadership+ Regulatory framework in tune with the policy agenda+ Appropriate enforcement / compliance+ Market development+ Quality improvement – codes & protocols+ Education & Empowerment of all stakeholders+ Funding to ‘kick start’ initiatives 63
    64. 64. 1 message …..+ Avoid on-going policy uncertainty ….+ How can BUSINESS make fundamental investment decisions? 64
    65. 65. The last slide … Questions ? Dr Adam Read Global Practice Director Waste Management & Resource Efficiency 07968 707 239 adam.read@aeat.co.uk www.aea.co.uk 65

    ×