Presentazione tenuta il 25 settembre 2012 presso Federmanager in occasione dell'evento "Comunicare il valore attraverso Social network e altri strumenti web: Enterprise 2.0"
1. Piano solidale territoriale “Leadership e valore
per la crescita” FDIR 4576
Comunicare il valore attraverso Social network e altri
strumenti web: Enterprise 2.0
Social Enterprise e Creazione di Valore
Dr. Alvaro Busetti
25 settembre 2012
Auditorium Federmanager Roma, Via Ravenna 14 abusetti.wordpress.com
2. Internet = Social ?
>1.5 billion
Number of social networking users globally
80%
Proportion of total online users
who interact with social networks regularly
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
3. Il valore della "social economy"
$900 billion – 1.3 trillion
Annual value that could be unlocked by social technologies in four sectors
2x
Potential value from better enterprise
communication and collaboration compared with
other social technology benefits
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
4. Il WEB come acceleratore dello sviluppo…
"…there is relatively little public debate on
the reasons why some countries have moved
faster and more effectively than others to
harness the Web as an accelerator of
development.
To begin to address this gap, we have
created an Index that combines existing
secondary data with new primary data to
rank countries according to their progress
and use of the Web…"
Fonte: "WEB INDEX 2012" World Wide Web Foundation, Settembre 2012
abusetti.wordpress.com
5. WEB Index 2012: Posizionamento dell'Italia (valori)
Rank Country Web Index
Communications
1 Sweden 100.00 Infrastructure
100.00
2 USA 97.31
3 UK 93.83 80.00
4 Canada 93.42 Institutional
Social Impact
5 Finland 91.88 60.00 Infrastructure
6 Switzerland 90.49
40.00
7 New Zealand 89.15
8 Australia 88.44 20.00
9 Norway 87.76
10 Ireland 87.42 -
11 Singapore 86.14
12 Iceland 86.10 Political Impact Web Use
13 Korea 81.06
14 France 78.93
15 Israel 78.53
16 Germany 74.87
17 Portugal 72.33
18 Spain 72.12
19 Chile 69.55 Economic Impact Web Content
20 Japan 68.56
21 Qatar 60.75
22 Mexico 57.68
23 Italy 56.45
Sweden Italy
24 Brazil 56.30
Fonte: "WEB INDEX 2012" World Wide Web Foundation, Settembre 2012 - elaborazione A. Busetti
abusetti.wordpress.com
6. WEB Index 2012: Posizionamento dell'Italia (rank)
Rank Country Web Index
Communications
1 Sweden 100.00 Infrastructure
2 USA 97.31
3 UK 93.83
4 Canada 93.42 Institutional
Social Impact
5 Finland 91.88 20 Infrastructure
6 Switzerland 90.49
7 New Zealand 89.15 22
8 Australia 88.44 33
9 Norway 87.76
10 Ireland 87.42
29
11 Singapore 86.14 15
12 Iceland 86.10 37
Political Impact Web Use
13 Korea 81.06
14 France 78.93 25
15 Israel 78.53
16 Germany 74.87
17 Portugal 72.33
18 Spain 72.12
Economic Impact Web Content
19 Chile 69.55
20 Japan 68.56
21 Qatar 60.75
22 Mexico 57.68
23 Italy 56.45
Sweden Italy
24 Brazil 56.30
Fonte: "WEB INDEX 2012" World Wide Web Foundation, Settembre 2012 - elaborazione A. Busetti
abusetti.wordpress.com
7. Non è (solo) una questione di infrastruttura…
Economic Impact
100.00 Ireland
Switzerland
90.00 Paesi con peggior indice infrastrutturale Sweden
ma miglior sfruttamento economico della UK
rete (rispetto all'Italia) Canada
USA
80.00 Finland
France
Israel Norway
Germany
Korea
70.00 Singapore
Qatar Japan Australia
New Zealand
Iceland
Chile Spain
India
60.00
Brazil
China Portugal
50.00 Poland
Philippines Mexico Tunisia
Kazakhstan Turkey
South Africa Mauritius
Indonesia Jordan
Thailand Argentina Italy
40.00
Comm. Infrastructure
30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 100.00
Fonte: "WEB INDEX 2012" World Wide Web Foundation, Settembre 2012 - elaborazione A. Busetti
abusetti.wordpress.com
8. Il paese ha un utilizzo del WEB molto disomogeneo…
Fonte: "Fattore Internet" The Boston Consulting Group, Aprile 2011
abusetti.wordpress.com
9. Tuttavia l'internet economy avrà un peso rilevante sul PIL…
Fonte: "Fattore Internet" The Boston Consulting Group, Aprile 2011
abusetti.wordpress.com
10. Benefici ottenibili e catena del valore…
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
11. I benefici aumentano con l'estensione della rete…
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
12. L'origine dei benefici dipende dal settore industriale…
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
13. …come pure i benefici potenziali e la facilità di raggiungimento
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
14. Utilizzo vs Benefici nel tempo
Fonte: "How social technologies are extending the organization" McKinsey Quarterly Novembre 2011
abusetti.wordpress.com
15. Esempio…
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
16. Esempio…
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
17. Collaborazione: per aumentare la produttività…
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
18. …ma dipende dalla natura dell'attività…
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
19. L'impatto può essere importante sulle economie evolute…
Fonte: "The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies"
McKinsey Global Institute, Luglio 2012 abusetti.wordpress.com
20. Una cosa solo per grandi aziende ?
abusetti.wordpress.com
21. In Italia le PMI attive online crescono più in fretta e raggiungono
una clientela più internazionale
Fonte: "Fattore Internet" The Boston Consulting Group, Aprile 2011
abusetti.wordpress.com
22. In Italia, Marketing, Tecnologia e Retail i settori con il maggiore
aumento di posti di lavoro legato al WEB…
Fonte: "Fattore Internet" The Boston Consulting Group, Aprile 2011
abusetti.wordpress.com
23. Il miglioramento del targeting pubblicitario è il primo beneficio per
le PMI online-attive
Fonte: "Fattore Internet" The Boston Consulting Group, Aprile 2011
abusetti.wordpress.com
24. Bibliografia:
Fonti citate:
McKinsey Global Institute (Luglio 2012), The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through
social technologies*
http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/research/technology_and_innovation/the_social_economy
McKinsey Quarterly (Nov. 2011), How social technologies are extending the organization*
http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/How_social_technologies_are_extending_the_organization_2888
The Boston Consulting Group (Apr. 2011), Fattore Internet, l'impatto del web sull'economia Italiana
http://www.fattoreinternet.it/
World Wide Web Foundation (Sett. 2012), WEB INDEX 2012 http://thewebindex.org/data/index/
Altri materiali utili:
Altimeter Group (Feb. 2012), Making the Business Case for Enterprise Social Networking
http://www.altimetergroup.com/2012/02/making-the-business-case-for-enterprise-social-networks.html
McKinsey Quarterly (Dic. 2010), The rise of the networked enterprise*
http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_rise_of_the_networked_enterprise_Web_20_finds_its_payday_2
716
McKinsey Quarterly (Feb. 2011), Rethinking knowledge work: A strategic approach*
http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Rethinking_knowledge_work_A_strategic_approach_2739
* E' richiesta la registrazione al sito abusetti.wordpress.com
25. Grazie per la vostra attenzione !
Alvaro Busetti
alvaro.busetti@gmail.com
http://it.linkedin.com/in/abusetti
http://abusetti.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/ABusetti
http://www.slideshare.net/abusetti
http://www.delicious.com/A.Busetti
http://www.youtube.com/user/AlvaroBusetti
http://www.facebook.com/AlvaroBusetti
abusetti.wordpress.com
Editor's Notes
70% Proportion of companies using social technologies90% Proportion of companies using social technologies that report some business benefit from them28 hours Time each week spent by knowledge workers writing e-mails, searching for information, and collaborating internally
1/3 Share of consumer spending that could be influenced by social shopping3% Share of companies that derive substantial benefit from social technologies across all stakeholders: customers, employees, and business partners20–25% Potential improvement possible in knowledge worker productivity
The Index measures and ranks:Web Readiness: The Index examines the quality and extent of Communications Infrastructure (facilitating connectivity to the Web) and Institutional Infrastructure (policies regulating Web access and skill and educational levels enabling the full benefit of the Web).Web Use: The Index looks both at Web usage within countries (such as the percentage of individuals who use the Internet) and the content available to these Web users .The Impact of the Web: The Index uses social, economic and political indicators to evaluate the impact of the Web on these dimensions. This includes measures of social networks, business internet use and e-participation.Readiness This sub-Index assesses the state of the communications and institutional infrastructure that is needed to be able to access the Web in a country1/5 Communications Infrastructure This component assesses the state and availability of the physical and communications infrastructure that enables access to the Web 1/3Institutional Infrastructure This component assesses the state of the institutional ecosystem - including education, laws and regulations - that enable access to the Web2/3 The Web This sub-index assesses the availability of relevant and useful content, as well as the number of Internet and Web users in a country 1/5Web Use This component assesses the extent of Web use in a country, including by disabled sections of the population 1/2Web Content This component assesses the extent to which relevant and useful content is available on the Web 1/2 Impact This sub-Index assesses the impact and utility of the Web in the political, economic and social dimensions 3/5Social Impact This component assesses the utility of the Web and its impact on health, education and social activities 1/3Economic Impact This component assesses the utility of the Web and its impact on business and the economy 1/3Political Impact This component assesses the utility of the Web and its impact on politics and government 1/3
L'indicatore e-Intensity prende in considerazione:Enablement:◊ Diffusione banda larga, fissa e mobile◊ Imprese con banda larga◊ Velocità di upload and download, fisse◊ Penetrazione smartphoneEngagement:Imprese:◊ Imprese con un sito Internet◊ Percentuale delle imprese che hanno comprato o venduto online◊ Imprese che utilizzano e-learningConsumatori:◊ Utenti Internet / popolazione◊ Nove misure sulla percentuale di popolazione che ha fatto certe attività onlinePubblica Amministrazione:◊ Risultato ricerca U.N. sull'e-government◊ Persone e aziende che hanno interagito online con la pubblica amministrazioneExpenditure:◊ Vendite retail online B2C◊ Totale ricavi online vendite B2B e B2C◊ Spesa pubblicità online
Social network interni, esterni ed ibridi
Value Potentialproxy:R&D intensityMarketing intensityCustomer service intensityInteractionsintensityEase of captureproxy:OpennessReported privacy breachesIntellectualpropertyintensityCompliance officers as percentage of industry employmentIT security spending as percent of IT spendCultureExternalorientation scoreInnovation and learning scoreTransformational IT spend as percentage of IT spendTechnologyTotal IT spend as percentage of revenueSocial toolsadoption score
Interaction workers:include professionals, managers, salespeople, and other business occupations that require complex interactions with other people, independent judgment, and access to information. They perform work that is not standardized, difficult to automate, and often requires extensive education and training.Transaction workers:process information or conduct repetitive transactions that have the potential to be automated (e.g., retail cashiers, bank tellers, and clerks). Production workers:perform physical work to convert materials from one state to another or assemble finished goods and components (e.g., factory and construction workers).