Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Attitudes evaluating and responding to the social world - Analysis
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Attitudes evaluating and responding to the social world - Analysis

135
views

Published on

Published in: Education

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
135
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Submitted To: Ma’am Irum Abbasi Submitted By: Hina Anjum Submitted On: Sept. 27, 2012 CHAPTER 5 2012 ATTITUDES: Evaluating and Responding to the Social World ANALYSIS ( F A C U L T Y O F S O C I A L S C I E N C E S - D E P A R T M E N T O F M E D I A & C O M M U N I C A T I O N S T U D I E S )
  • 2. Attitudes: Evaluating and Responding to the Social World October 12, 2012 A Formal Analysis of ‘Attitudes’ The focus of the present chapter is to understand the role of social learning in attitude formation, persuasion and resistance to persuasion, cognitive dissonance and the role of automatic and controlled or systematic information processing. People analysis of various aspects of the social world refers to attitude. Different people can have different attitudes. Some attitudes are certain and quiet stable and resistant to change while other attitudes nay be relatively unclear, unstable and show considerable variability depending on the situation. Sometimes we compare ourselves with others to determine whether our view of social reality is correct or not. Through social comparison, we tend to adopt the attitudes of those we see as similar to ourselves but not of those we see as dissimilar. There are various factors which affect the strength of relationship between attitudes and behavior. Concern about what others may think of us can limit the extent to which our attitudes and behavior are constant. When we erroneously believe that others have different attitudes than us then it is pluralistic ignorance. This can also limit the extent to which we express our attitudes in public. Some other factors that affect the strength of the relationship between attitudes and behavior relate to the situation in which the attitudes are activated. Efforts to change our attitude through the use of various kinds of message refer to persuasion. Persuasion focused mainly on the source, the message and the audience. “Who says, what to, when, with, what effect?” a persuasion research conducted by Hovland, Janis and Kelley (1953).There are several factors that often increase resistance to persuasion. Reactance---- negative reactions to threats to one’s personal freedom and fore warming---- the knowledge that someone is trying to change our attitudes, often increase resistance to persuasion. We can also maintain our existing attitude by selective avoidance i.e. the tendency to overlook the information that opposes our existing views. We show the greatest resistance to persuasion when we are aware of that we are targets. According to recent research, the people who are ego depleted, they do not differentiate between messages with strong and weak arguments and are equally influenced by both whereas the people who are not ego depleted are influenced only by strong arguments. An unpleasant state that occurs when we notice disagreement between our attitudes and our behavior is cognitive dissonance. When we are minimally persuaded by the external factors to say or do things that are conflicting with our true attitudes refers to dissonance. Stronger reasons produce less attitude change: this is sometimes referred to as the less-leads-to-more effect.