Comparative and Non-Comparative
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Comparative and Non-Comparative

on

  • 2,558 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,558
Views on SlideShare
2,552
Embed Views
6

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
20
Comments
0

1 Embed 6

http://www.slideshare.net 6

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Comparative and Non-Comparative Presentation Transcript

  • 1.  
  • 2. Blended Learning vs. Traditional Classroom Settings: Assessing Effectiveness and Student Perceptions in an MBA Accounting Course Clement C. Chen Flint Keith T. Jones Comparative study: Study title Author:
  • 3. Learners’ perception and performance Compare students’ assessments in accounting class of course effectiveness and overall satisfaction with the course. Comparative study: Type of comparative study Purpose of evaluation :
  • 4. Participants: Master of Business Administration (MBA) students in an accounting class at a university in the Northern United States Comparative study: Participants and evaluation instruments applied:
  • 5. Instruments: a survey was used to compare students enrolled in a traditional in-class section, and another group in a “blended-learning” section in which the primary course delivery method was online, but in which students met in class on a limited number of occasions. Comparative study: Participants and evaluation instruments applied:
  • 6. The results suggest that the two delivery methods were similar in terms of final learning outcomes, but that both may be improved by incorporating aspects of the other. Comparative study: Result:
  • 7. Make meaningful comparisons between two delivery methods. Advantages of the two evaluation strategies Comparative study:
  • 8.
    • The survey was administrated only on one school and involved one MBA course in accounting.
    • Inferences cannot necessarily be made about other courses, institutions and instructors
    Disadvantages of the two evaluation strategies Comparative study:
  • 9. Learning strategies and other factors influencing achievement via web course Author: Shin, Ching-Chun, Tom, John Non - comparative study: Study title
  • 10. Examine how students with different learning styles functioned in World Wide Web-based courses and to determine what factors influenced their learning. Purpose of evaluation : Non - comparative study:
  • 11.
    • Examine how students with different learning styles function Identify the demographic characteristics of the student by learning style
    • Identify how students' learning strategies', patterns of learning, and achievement differed in relation to their learning style
    • Identify relationships among student learning style, learning strategies, patterns of learning, achievement and selected variables. ed in World Wide Web-based courses and to determine what factors influenced their learning.
    Objective of the study Non - comparative study:
  • 12.
    • What do we know about the way students learn through the www?
    • What are the important learning factors in web based courses?
    • Do student learning style, learning strategies and patterns of learning influence learning achievement?
    Question : Non - comparative study:
  • 13. Participants: 99 students at Iowa State University taking two non-major introductory courses Participants and evaluation instruments applied: Non - comparative study:
  • 14. Instruments: An online questionnaire that included a learning strategies scale, a patterns of learning scale, and demographic questions was designed and posted on the Web. A total of 78 students also took the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), a learning styles test. Participants and evaluation instruments applied: Non - comparative study:
  • 15. Results indicated that learning styles, patterns of learning toward Web-based instruction, and student characteristics did not have an effect on Web-based learning achievement. Result: Non - comparative study:
  • 16. They use two evaluation instruments disadvantages: Not all students respond to the instruments used. advantages: Non - comparative study: