Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Improving institutional qa throught student's participation ali

374

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
374
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • In 2009 , ANOSR designed a questionnaire that aimed at identifying most important aspects on different action lines of the Bologna Process: Social Dimension Qualification Framework Employability Recognition of prior studies Mobility Life Long Learning Quality Assurance
  • Since 2005 there was given a government order which stated that each and every HEI has to have in it’s structure a quality assurance commission/ department – presence of at least one student in it.
  • We consider that it should be underlined the difference between the quality control and the elements that deals with quality assurance
  • Transcript

    • 1. Improving Institutional QA throught student's participation Alina GAVRA, ANOSR ASPR International Conference of Psychology Students, 6-9 May, 2010
    • 2. National Alliance of Student Organizations in Romania <ul><li>64 local student organizations </li></ul><ul><li>27 Romanian Universities, from 15 Centres </li></ul><ul><li>Full member of European Student’s Union </li></ul><ul><li>ANOSR and QA </li></ul><ul><li>Since 2005 we have been active in the field of QA contributing in developing a quality culture in Romania </li></ul><ul><li>We have contributed to the realization of the first set of standards and guidelines </li></ul><ul><li>We select applicant students using a set of standards and procedures and we train students in order to perform a further external evaluations. </li></ul><ul><li>We have represented the student’s perspective in ARACIS evaluation made by ESU and ENQA </li></ul><ul><li>We are participating in European Quality Assurance Forum </li></ul>
    • 3. Involving students in quality assurance <ul><li>students are more then ever aware of what they need </li></ul><ul><li>students have a fundamental interest </li></ul><ul><li>the quality of their education affects their academic development and professional careers </li></ul><ul><li>the quality of their education determines their future lives </li></ul><ul><li>t he process of QA is more effective if students are involved </li></ul>
    • 4. Report on the Implementation of Bologna Process 2009 – student perspective <ul><li>Student Organizations Forum 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>23 universities </li></ul>
    • 5. Main Conclusions <ul><li>Students tend not to be regarded as equal partners in educational and decision-making structures </li></ul><ul><li>Not all the universities in Romania involve students in QA departments – 12% of the HEI don’t involve students in internal QA process </li></ul><ul><li>Only 10% of the QA Departments focus on research on social dimension regarding students </li></ul><ul><li>In over 70% of universities students are not involved in any way in curriculum design </li></ul>
    • 6. <ul><li>In 75% HEIs -> Psychology Services, of which < 40 % seem to reach their objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Adaptation of the teaching methods (<50% changed their teaching styles and instruments for SCL improvement) </li></ul><ul><li>Organizations consider that ECTS was implemented just formally </li></ul>
    • 7. National level <ul><li>Improvements regarding students’ feedback on QA & review teams </li></ul><ul><li>improvement on students training in QA domain </li></ul><ul><li>Need for better understanding of QA </li></ul><ul><li>Students should be full and equal members of the ARACIS Council and other relevant bodies of ARACIS. </li></ul><ul><li>Enhancing quality through creating a quality culture </li></ul>
    • 8. <ul><li>Thank You </li></ul><ul><li>for </li></ul><ul><li>your attention! </li></ul>
    • 9.  
    • 10.  
    • 11.  
    • 12.  
    • 13.  
    • 14.  
    • 15.  
    • 16.  

    ×