Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Tracked Landing Gear
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Tracked Landing Gear


Published on …

Our book, "Air-Mech-Strike: Asymmetric Maneuver Warfare for the 21st Century" is now ONLINE for FREE:

Published in: Technology

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Tracked Landing Gear: aircraft that can land anywhere
  • 2. "The ideal troop-carrier combattransport would appear to be a largetransport of the twin-boom type forwhich personnel, artillery, and vehiclescould be dropped. It should have arange of two thousand miles and shouldbe equipped with self-sealing tanks,pilot armor, and a retractable track-laying undercarriage. This last featurewould permit its landing and take-off inpastures and cultivated areas. It wouldthus be able to enter the airhead early inan operation, landing and taking offfrom areas normally suitable only forgliders".---Airborne Warfare by General JamesM. Gavin, 1947
  • 3. Early tracked landing gear aircraft successful in the 1950s! A Retired USAF C-130 pilot writes about the C-82 with tractor gear experiment shown here: "Mike...the C-82 with tractor gear. Only one was produced, but the P-40 Warhawk fighter idea was to reduce the pressure exerted from C-82 Packet 60 psi to 20 psi and EB-50 Heavy Bomber give it the capability to land anywhere." XB-36 Peacemaker Ultra- Heavy Bomber
  • 4. With its initial single-wheel main landing gear, the 265,000 pound gross weight XB- 36 could land at only 3 airfields in the entire United States! “The track on the main landing gear is designed for a maximum average of 57 pounds pressure per square inch on the landing strip, as compared to a pressure of 156 pounds per square inch exerted by the conventional wheel-type gear on a B-36 at the same gross weight.”Tracked XB-36 ongrassy field! Washington, D.C. April 12, 1950. rs/b3-69.htm BOTTOM LINE: tracks can reduce ground pressure over wheels by 2/3ds!
  • 5. Current rubber-tired aircraft cannotjust land anywhere---USAF CombatControl Team members must surveyassault landing zones with DigitalCone Pentrometers to assess soilhardness to support highpressures/weights of USAF aircraft =conservative Joint planners opt forhard runway seizure; targets that arelikely to be heavily defended by theenemy!
  • 6. Joint warfighter requirements for land-anywhere capabilities drives R&D towards unsound hybrid fixed-wing/rotary wing compromise design types that are overly complex, fragile and unsafe... lacking other alternatives... “Hanger Queen” Bad helicopter with too small rotorsBad fixed-wing with too large props “Death Trap”
  • 7. ASB Chairman Michael Bayer told Janes DefenseWeekly:;sz=125x125;tile=3;ord=021601085048?"The ASB found that providing strategic lift from thecontinental USA to intra-theatre staging grounds willcontinue to be the major bottleneck in transportation.Bayer noted that Boeing 747-style aircraft wouldprovide the greatest strategic lift potential becausethey can carry more cargo further than the U.S. AirForces future mainstay Boeing C-17 Globemaster IIItransport aircraft. Noting that because "there is a hugedemand for strategic lift", the ASB recommended thatexpeditionary units plan to send as much equipment aspossible on 747-type aircraft, freeing up scarce spaceon the C-17s."
  • 8. U.S. has over 100 passenger 747s sittingunused in the southwest desert that could beinexpensively converted to nose-loadingcargo types to solve the strategic lift problemand carry Army pre-loaded light trackedvehicles----Boeing On Board Loaders cangive roll-on/roll-off capability---but 747swould have to land at a long concrete runwayIntermediate Staging Base (ISB) to off-loadvehicles that would have to be shuttled in byUSAF C-130s, C-17s and Army helicopters. Details:
  • 9. The Answer: upgrade existing USAF C-130s,C-17s and a force of converted cargo 747swith TRACKED LANDING GEAR SYSTEMS tocreate land-anywhere extreme short-take-offand landing (E/STOL) capabilities so JointPlanners can make virtually any large areainto an assault landing zone!
  • 10. The technology: unlike primitive trackedtechnologies of the 1950s, reinforced aramidfibers (kevlar) and high-strength steelreinforcements can make “band-tracked”landing gear easy to maintain and safe.Unlike the Concorde whose fragile, air-filledtires shredded on take off after running overa sharp object, causing a fiery crash thatkilled 114 innocent people, a tracked landinggear can run-over all kinds of dangerousobjects and bumps without fatal damage YES! NO!
  • 11. C-130 E/STOL versus V-22 V/TOL: which works best? “J” 400 mph 100 mph sling-loads Wheeled Osprey when its flyable and not crashing, barely lifts a 3-ton rubber-tired HMMWV SUV truckTracked Hercules can internally carry then airdrop/airlandlight 92 troops or tanks up to 20 tons, 500 foot Assault LZs