• Save
28 Jan 04 Presidential Briefing: Building U.S. Army Capabilities
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

28 Jan 04 Presidential Briefing: Building U.S. Army Capabilities

  • 213 views
Uploaded on

combatreform.org/PENTOMICARMYAGAIN

combatreform.org/PENTOMICARMYAGAIN

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
213
On Slideshare
212
From Embeds
1
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 1

http://www.combatreform.org 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • This model depicts the anticipated number of days from MOB to RLD for different types of RC units – and was used by FC to assign initial RLDs for mobilizing RC units. Assumptions inherent in a model like this RC unit is C3 – which means that it has the qualified personnel and equipment to accomplish many of its wartime missions. Unit has few personnel who will be initially non-deployable Challenge is to remember that the model does not fit all units and situations. There were units that required adjusted dates because of equipment, personnel and training challenges throughout OIF. Average time from MSAD to validation for ALL units b/t Jan – Apr was 11 days. On station time lengthened mainly due to equipment shortages/maintenance/availability of transport.
  • This model depicts the anticipated number of days from MOB to RLD for different types of RC units – and was used by FC to assign initial RLDs for mobilizing RC units. Assumptions inherent in a model like this RC unit is C3 – which means that it has the qualified personnel and equipment to accomplish many of its wartime missions. Unit has few personnel who will be initially non-deployable Challenge is to remember that the model does not fit all units and situations. There were units that required adjusted dates because of equipment, personnel and training challenges throughout OIF. Average time from MSAD to validation for ALL units b/t Jan – Apr was 11 days. On station time lengthened mainly due to equipment shortages/maintenance/availability of transport.
  • AAODOMM//MAJ BROCK//697-2002/ IN RESPONSE TO THE ACTING CHIEF OF STAFF’S QUESTION FROM THE 28 JUL BALCONY BRIEF, THIS SLIDE PROVIDES INFORMATION ON DEMOBILIZATION FOR RESERVE COMPONENT UNITS DEPLOYED IN SUPPORT OF OIF. A GENERIC TIMELINE IS DEPICTED INDICATING THE PLANNING FACTOR FOR UNITS REDEPLOYING FROM THE CENTCOM AOR.   THE DEMOBILIZATION PROCESS STARTS WHEN A UNIT IS RELEASED BY THE TACTICAL COMMANDER AND BEGINS MOVEMENT TO KUWAIT. CONTINUING WITH THE REDEPLOYMENT TO CONUS, THROUGH THE MOB STATION AND HOME STATION PROCESSING, THE PROCESS ENDS WHEN UNIT PERSONNEL TERMINATE ACCRUED LEAVE AND ARE RELEASED FROM ACTIVE DUTY. FORSCOM REGAINS CONTROL OF UNITS UPON THEIR ARRIVAL AT THE MOB STATION WHERE THE UNIT IS PLACED ON A DEMOBILIZATION ORDER. BASED UPON A ONE-YEAR MOBILIZATION, THE TIME NECESSARY IS BETWEEN 56 TO 73 DAYS . THE PROCESS INCLUDES 5 TO 7 DAYS TO DISENGAGE FROM THE TACTICAL ENVIRONMENT; 10 TO 25 DAYS FOR REDEPLOYMENT; 8 DAYS OUT-PROCESSING AT THE MOB STATION; 3 DAYS AT HOME STATION; AND UP TO 30 DAYS OF ACCRUED LEAVE.

Transcript

  • 1. Draft Working Papers Draft Working PapersBuilding Army Capabilities President Bush 28 January 2004 Draft Working Papers
  • 2. Draft Working Papers Where We Are HeadedCurrent Combat Capability Increased Combat Capability Active Component Active Component 10 Division Headquarters 10 Division Headquarters 33 Brigades 48 Brigade Combat Teams (BCT) Building Enhanced Capabilities For a Joint Expeditionary Army Army National Guard Army National Guard 8 Division Headquarters 8 Division Headquarters15 Enhanced Separate Brigades 22 Enhanced Separate Brigades Draft Working Papers
  • 3. Draft Working Papers Adapting Army Structure  Restructuring the Force 100K+ of change… divesting Cold War headquarters and structure to enhance Global War on Terrorism capability  Creating a Modular Army “Brigade based”…more responsive, enables Joint and expeditionary capabilities  Stabilizing the Force Increases unit cohesion & stability, and provides predictability for Soldiers & familiesMost Significant Army Restructuring in the Past 50 Years Draft Working Papers
  • 4. Draft Working Papers Building Capabilities Timeline 33 BDES 36 BDES 39 BDES 43 BDES 48 BDES OEF 5 OEF 6 OEF 7 OEF 8Current FY 04 OIF 2 FY 05 OIF 3 FY 06 OIF 4 FY 07 OIF 5 FY 08-11 1 2 +10 BDES +5 BDES Increase light infantry capabilities…minimize command & control and fixed costs FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08-11 Cost by FY: $1.2 Bil $1.6 Bil $3.1 Bil $4.0 Bil $10.2 Bil Total: $20.1 BilOEF – Operation Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan)OIF – Operation Iraqi Freedom Draft Working Papers Decision Points 4a
  • 5. Draft Working Papers Way Ahead• Continue executive wartime authorities and funding to allowthe Army to build up to 15 AC brigades and 7 RC brigades• Allow the Army to exceed their authorized strength by up to30,000 over the next 4 years in order to accomplish this• Continue to seek additional internal efficiencies withinexisting Army strength• Develop a legislative strategy and begin notifications of keycongressional leaders• Coordinate a Public Affairs rollout Draft Working Papers
  • 6. BACKUP
  • 7. Draft Working Papers Adapting Army Structure Restructuring the Force Decrease Increase36 - Field Artillery Battalions 149 - Military Police units10 - Air Defense Battalions 16 - Transportation units11 - Engineer Battalions 100K+ of Change 9 - Petroleum/Water Distribution units19 - Armor Battalions FY 04 - 0965 - Ordnance (Battalion- 8 - Civil Affairs unitsTms) 4 - Psychological Operations units … etc. 11 - Biological Detection Company … etc. – Divesting Cold War structure to enable GWOT capability – Relieve stress on High Demand / Low Density units – Improve readiness and deployability of units – Execute Military to Civilian ConversionsMost Significant Army Restructuring in the Past 50 Years Draft Working Papers
  • 8. Draft Working Papers Force RestructureACTIVE COMPONENT RESERVE COMPONENT 607K Force Structure Reflects 52K Overstructure 482.4K End Strength 555K TTHS TTHS End Strength Operational Army Restructure Force Force Restructure Structure Structure Allowance Allowance Institutional Army Institutional Army Draft Working Papers
  • 9. Draft Working Papers Force Structure Construct Title 32 Responsibilities Joint and Expeditionary Capabilities Strategic Responsiveness RC AC - AC provides expeditionary capability 4 - 24 Hours Deploys within - RC provides responsive HLD/HLS 30 Days Required = CS/CSS CS/CSS Authorized* Organizational symbology is illustrative Depth Required to Support Campaign Campaigningand is NOT an all inclusive depiction of Qualities Quality Armyorganizational requirements. AC/RC Depth (Depth for Forward - Reflects capabilities required, both AC and RC, Presence Rotations) to provide the Joint Force Commander the campaign quality force necessary to achieve operational and strategic objectives and to CS CSS conduct sustained land operations RC/AC (Homeland Security/Homeland Defense) Reflects those capabilities, primarily resident in the RC, which provide the depth necessary to Home Land Security & Depth defend the Homeland and conduct Stability and (NBC, Transportation, Military Police, Engineers, Aviation . . . ) Support Operations (SASO) Reflects the portion of the Army responsible for Generating Force and Institutional Army Organizing, Training, Equipping, Manning, Deploying, Supplying, Servicing, Mobilizing, Demobilizing, Administering, and Maintaining Draft Working Papers
  • 10. Draft Working Papers Ground Force Rotation Plan: OIF & OEF Dec 03 Jul 04 Sep 03 Dec 03 Mar 04 Jul 04 Oct 04 Jan 05 OIF1 OIF2 1st Armored 1 2 Division 39th eSB 3 2/82nd Abn 2nd LCR TF 82nd Airborne 3 1 1 3rd ACR 4th Infantry Division 2 3 2 30th eSB 173rd Abn SBCT # 1 3 101st Air Assault 2 X eSB equiv 1 (6 x In Bn’s) 53rd (-) 76th (-) XX XX UK / Polish 81st eSB Divisions CJTF 180 HQ OEF/PRT 1 -Div HQ, 2 x BCT equiv 3 (7 x Light Infantry Bn’s) 9 month II rotation Romania 12 month rotation ANA BDE (-) 2 (-)01/04/13 23:12 Draft Working Papers 10
  • 11. Reserve Component Unit Active Draft Working Papers Duty Time Lines eSB Post-Mobilization Period RSO&I OIF Employment Period LeaveMOB 4.5 16.5 18 Months Months Months CS/CSS EAD/EAC Post-Mob RSO&I OIF Employment Period Leave LeaveMOB 1.5 13.5 15 Months Months Months Draft Working Papers
  • 12. Draft Working Papers Post-Mobilization Period Comparison eSB RIP Individual/Collective Training LV MRX Load/Move RSO&I EmployMob 4.5 Months CS/CSS EAD/EAC RIP Ind/col Tng Load/Move RSO&I Employ Mob 1.5 Months Draft Working Papers
  • 13. Combat Support and Service Support Draft Working Papers Mobilization/Deployment Model MOB AG / FI / JA / MH / PA RLD – Ready Load Date Date 23 Days RLD EAD – Earliest Arrival Soldier Date Travel Maint 1-Year LAD – Latest Arrival Date Individual Retrain HS – Home Station HS SRP Training Collective - Section PCI BOG SRP – Soldier Readiness 3 1 7 Days 8 Days 1 1 2 Processing Days Day Day Days PCI – Pre-Combat CM / EN / MI / MP / OD / QM / SC / TC Inspection MOB 36 Days RLD Date Equip Travel Prep Individual 1-Year HS SRP Training Collective Training - Company Load BOG 3 1 6 Days 21 Days 5 Days Day Days• Typical timeline for air movement is 2 days after RLD for EAD, & a 3 day window from EAD to LAD• Typical timeline for sea movement 25 – 34 days after RLD for EAD, & a 7 day window from EAD to LAD Draft Working Papers
  • 14. Draft Working Papers Combat Arms Mobilization/Deployment ModelMOB CO RLDDate 36 Days Travel Individual Equip RLD – Ready Load Date Training Prep 1-Year EAD – Earliest Arrival HS Collective SRP Load BOG Date 3 1 6 21 Days 5 LAD – Latest Arrival Date Days Days Days HS – Home StationMOB BN RLD SRP – Soldier ReadinessDate Processing 75 Days PCI – Pre-Combat Equip Travel Individual Collective prep 1-Year Inspection HS SRP Training Training MRE load BOG 3 1 10 Days 42 Days 12 Days 7 Days DaysMOB BDE RLDDate 120 Days Equip Travel Individual Collective prep HS SRP Training Training MRE load 1-Year 3 1 15 Days 73 Days 21 Days BOG 7 Days Days Draft Working Papers
  • 15. Draft Working Papers Redeployment/Demobilization Model JCS REDEPLOYMENT ORDER DEMOBILIZATION MOVEMENT ORDER VALIDATED BY TRANSCOM 5 – 7 DAYS 10 – 12 DAYS < 10 DAYS < 3 DAYS +/- 30 DAYS BOG ENDS0 5-7 15-19 25-29 28-32 58-62 MISSION IN THEATER MOB STATION HOME STATION ACCRUED RELEASE PREP & REDEPLOY DE-MOB ACTIVITY DE-MOB ACTIVITY LEAVE- DISENGAGE - ASSEMBLE AT - DECOMPRESSION (5 DAYS) - MOVE TO HOME PORT MARSHALLING STATION- RELEASE - RETURN CIF/CDE ISSUE AREAFROM - EQUIP - LEAVE (DECISION TO TAKETACTICAL - PROCESS FOR RE- OR GET PAID) INVENTORY &CMDR DEPLOYMENT MAINTENANCE - MEDICAL (SCREEN/PHYSICAL) REFRAD SOLDIERS - ORDERS TO DE- - MOB STATION - DD-214 INDIVIDUAL DEMOB UNITS - PER & EQPT - EQPT RECEPTION PLAN - MTOE SHIPPING PLAN - CTA - MEDICAL PRE- - SENSITIVE ITEM SCREENING ACCOUNTABILITY - INITIAL DCS TASKS Draft Working Papers
  • 16. Draft Working Papers Building Capabilities Timeline 33 BDES 36 BDES 39 BDES 43 BDES 48 BDES OEF 5 OEF 6 OEF 7 OEF 8Current FY 04 OIF 2 FY 05 OIF 3 FY 06 OIF 4 FY 07 OIF 5 FY 08-11 +10 BDES +5 BDES 1 2 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Total 1 LT BCT R/O ABN BCT 2 LT BCT 1 LT BCT 5 New BCTs 2 AASLT IN Bns 6 LT IN Bns 2 LT IN Bns 1 ABN BCT 16 LT IN Bns 2 LT IN Bns 2 ABN IN Bns 6 LT IN Bns 2 ABN IN Bns 2 AASLT IN Bns FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08-11Cost by FY: $1.2 Bil $1.6 Bil $3.1 Bil $4.0 Bil $10.2 BilTotal: $20.1 Bil Draft Working Papers Decision Points 4
  • 17. Draft Working Papers Use of Temporary Authority 43 48 Bdes Bdes 510K 1 2 39 ?? 500K Bdes 36 Bdes 490K482.4K Balancing Force Structure Echelon Above Division/Corps Global Basing Joint Theater Infrastructure FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Cost by FY: $1.2 Bil $1.6 Bil $3.1 Bil $4.0 Bil $2.8 Bil $2.7Bil $2.1 Bil $2.1 Bil Total: $20.1 Bil Draft Working Papers Decision Points 4b
  • 18. Facing Pages
  • 19. Adapting Army Structure (Facing Page)• The Army is divesting Cold War structure to enable GWOT capability• Multi-phase process over the length of the POM – AC/RC rebalancing for changes in Defense Strategy, Force Sizing Construct and GWOT challenges – RC High Demand conversions to deployment mitigate stress – Creation of a Trainees, Transients, Holdees & Students (TTHS) for RC – to improve unit personnel readiness – All deployable AC units to ALO 1 – improving unit readiness by ensuring organizations have the soldiers necessary to accomplish their war-time missions – Reduce stress on current, High Demand AC units – improving overall depth in AC structure to meet anticipated, long-term High Demand requirements (SFG, CA, PSYOP, MP) – 100% deployable units – accomplished through force stabilization and leveraged changes to force structure, as required
  • 20. Building Capabilities Timeline (Facing Page) What do you get for your money? 39 Brigades 43 Brigades 48 Brigades• Reduces Warfight Operational Risk • Greater capabilities for GWOT • Forward postured for rapid response• Restores strategic flexibility for GWOT • Reduces warfight Operational Risk • Fully supports 1:3 rotational posture• Allow re-establishment of DRB • Strategic Flex for Contingencies • Operating Force depth to meet CPG• Combat Forces < 1:3 rotation ratio • Allows Army to build Modular Bdes required capabilities• Retain 12 month combat tour length • Enables Transformation to meet • Provides stabilized forces for• Impacts Transformation to meet Future Challenges continued transformation to Future Future Challenges • Option to cancel Stop Loss Force Total Cost for Additional Bdes: $20.1 B Costs include Equipping, Training, Manpower, Sustainment, Base Operations Facilities, etc.
  • 21. Force Restructure (Facing Page)• Trainees, Transients, Holdees and Students (TTHS) – Creates an 81K account in the reserve component by reducing the over structure and investing those personnel into the TTHS account• End state – AC/RC force structure… “Relevant and Ready”
  • 22. Force Structure Construct (Facing Page)• The “Iceberg” chart graphically depicts the Army’s Force Sizing methodology – The “tip of the Iceberg” reflects the requirement for responsive, expeditionary forces, both AC and RC, to support the Joint Force Commander and provide the immediate response capabilities necessary to defend the Homeland – The center portion of the chart reflects the requirement for AC and RC structure to provide the depth necessary to support a Campaign quality Army – The Generating Force reflects the Institutional portion of the Army that Organizes, Trains, Equips, Mans, Deploys, Supplies, Services, Mobilizes, Demobilizes, Administers, and Maintains the Army (Title 10 functions)