View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new iOS app!Introducing SlideShare for AndroidExplore all your favorite topics in the SlideShare appGet the SlideShare app to Save for Later — even offline
View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new Android app!View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new iOS app!
Presented by: Andrew Kramer, CPA Fraud; A New Age of Risk for Contractors
Forensic Accounting and Investigative Services Fraud prevention Internal control review Fraud awareness training Pre-employment background checks Fraud detection Fraud scheme detection Interviews and interrogation Fraud investigation Asset theft investigation Partnership malfeasance investigations Documentation of fraud occurrence Litigation support
Trends in Fraud Economy and fraud have an indirect relationship. Increase in fraud occurrences since economic crisis began in 2008. Scheme with the greatest increase in occurrence: Theft of company property. Embezzlement and expense account fraud More fraud occurrences due to the economy will be found at a later date. Median duration of all fraud schemes is 18 months. Institute of Internal Auditors, “Knowledge Alert; Emerging Trends in Fraud Risks, 2010”
Trends in Fraud Most frauds are uncovered by: Tips (40.2%) Management review (15.4%) Internal audit (13.9%) Small organizations (>100 employees): Suffer the greatest percentage of frauds. Median fraud scheme loss of $155,000. Most common schemes: Billing Check tampering Corruption Skimming Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, “Report to the Nation, 2010”
Fraud Trends in the Construction Industry Median fraud loss is $200,000 Out of the construction cases polled: Corruption (45.5%) Use of influence that violates duty of due care to employer. Billing (29.9%) Payments are issued for fraudulent invoices of goods or services, invoices with inflated prices, personal expenses. Check tampering (18.2%) Checks are intercepted, forged, or altered. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, “Report to the Nation, 2010”
Fraud Trends in the Construction Industry Skimming (15.6%) Employee steals Cash from an organization before it is recorded in the accounting system. Non-cash Theft (15.6%) Employee steals or misuses non-cash assets of the organization. Expense Reimbursements (13.0%) Employee requests reimbursement for personal, fictitious, or inflated business expenses. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, “Report to the Nation, 2010”
Four Elements of Fraud Hidden (concealed) Intentional; violates the employee’s fiduciary duty to the company The perpetrator receives a benefit Costs the employing organization assets, revenue, etc.
The Fraud Triangle Opportunity Rationalization Financial Pressure
The Fraud Triangle; Pressure Causes an employee to commit fraud High amounts of debt Family medical costs Housing market pressures Bad investment decisions Addiction Problems Drugs, alcohol, gambling Lavish lifestyle Poor economy = greater pressure on employees Pressure Fraud Occurrence Economy
The Fraud Triangle; Rationalization Means of justifying the fraudulent act. Low employee morale can result in a rationalization to commit fraud. Low employee morale is often linked to theft more often than low pay is linked to theft. “The boss can afford it.” “I’m not hurting anyone.” “I’ll pay this back.” “They owe me.” “No one will notice if this is gone.”
The Fraud Triangle; Opportunity Ability for an employee to commit a fraud. Employee exploits job duties and responsibilities. Weak internal controls Poor oversight Abuse of decision making authority Opportunity is the factor most able to be changed by the organization.
Fraud Prevention Eliminate Opportunity Increase the perception of detection People rarely commit fraud if they think they will be caught. Implement strong internal controls
Increasing Perception of Detection “Tone at the Top” Managers need to communicate that they are serious about fraud detection and prevention Employee Education Internal controls for monitoring employees Company fraud (ethics) policy
Increasing Perception of Detection Proactive policies Surveillance Fraud assessment questioning Mandatory vacations Surprise audits Vigorously pursue dishonest acts Implement fraud hotline With hotline: Median Loss: $100,000 Duration of fraud: 13 months Without hotline: Median Loss: $245,000 Duration of fraud: 20 months
Internal controls Segregation of duties: Authorization Recording (Record keeping) Custody of assets Proper procedures for authorization Adequate documents and records Physical control over assets and records Independent checks on performance
Internal controls Develop policies and procedures Demand compliance by employees Enforce punishment for violations Complete pre-employment background investigations of employees Safeguard company assets Utilize employee dishonesty insurance
Case Study 1 Perpetrator Project Manager Victim Company Construction Company Fraud Scheme: False Invoices/Check Interception Facilitation A. Spescia and “A.J. Splescian” Loss: $2.8 Million
Case Study 2 Perpetrator Bookkeeper Victim Company Construction Company Fraud Scheme: Fraudulent Disbursements Loss: $333,103.30
Case Example 3 Perpetrator Divisional Merchandising Manager Victim Company Home Improvement Retailer Fraud Scheme Acceptance of Bribes Facilitation No quote/bid requirements Loss: $2.5 Million
What can you do NOW? Improve perception of detection: Implement a fraud policy. Decide what fraud is and the consequences of committing fraud. Communicate policy to employees. Employ a fraud hotline or anonymous reporting system. Check if insurance policy covers acts of employee dishonesty. If not, look into the cost/benefit of adding coverage.
What can you do NOW? Implement internal controls: Segregation of duties: Cash receipts Separate cash handling and record keeping. Deposit receipts ASAP. Reconcile deposit slips to deposit receipts. Segregation of duties: Cash payments Separate authorization, custody, record keeping. Require a check to invoice review when manually signing checks. Review cancelled checks during bank reconciliation.
What can you do NOW? Implement internal controls: Segregation of duties: Payroll Separate inputting information into system and running payroll. Periodic review of employee listing. Compare addresses to vendor listing. Look for non-current employees.
Contact Information Andrew Kramer 1850 North Central Ave, Suite 400. Phoenix, AZ 85004 602-264-8604 firstname.lastname@example.org