Week 1 Sound and Vision  - Video and Installation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Week 1 Sound and Vision - Video and Installation

on

  • 372 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
372
Views on SlideShare
372
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Week 1 Sound and Vision  - Video and Installation Week 1 Sound and Vision - Video and Installation Presentation Transcript

  • Video and InstallationWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • • Installation and video art, two areas of artistic practice, whose core ideas and core terms still ghost contemporary discussions of new media (specifically ideas around interactivity, immersion, active spectatorship etc. )Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • The Roots of Video and Installation art The Threat of New MediaWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Kenneth Noland, Gift 1961-2Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • The singular viewer in solitary, quiet meditation• “The ideal modernist spectator was a disembodied eye, lifted out of the flux of life in time and history, apprehending the resolved (‘significant) aesthetic form in a moment of instantaneity” Paul WoodWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Ideology of the Modernist White CubeWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • THE MODERNIST BREAKDOWNWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • THE MODERNIST BREAKDOWN • “If I could sum up the shift that occurred in art and criticism in 1967, it would be the widespread assault on the dogma of Modernism as an exclusively optical, art-for-art’s sake, socially detached, formalist phenomenon that inevitably tended toward abstraction’ • Barbara Rose, The Critical Terrain of High Modernism 8Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Installation and Video Art 9Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Surrealism Dada Pop Pop • Marcel Duchamp, Installation for the exhibition of First Papers of Surrealism, 1942 Happenings Kaprow wasn’t installing anything to be looked at..but something to be played in, participated in by visitors who then became co-creators.Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Main staircase and fresco painted by Tiepolo. Wurzburg, Bavaria, GermanyWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Popular Gesamtkunstwerk aka total art work 12Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Minimalism ‘For the first time, I was forced to recognise the entire space, and the people in it..Until Minimalism, I had been taught , or taught myself, to look only within a frame; with Minimalism the frame broke, or at least stretched’ Vito Acconci Robert Morris Installation at the Green Gallery (1963)Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • The Feedback Loop 14Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • 15Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • 16Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Installation Art • The viewers focus is shifted from individual autonomous art objects (on walls or plinths) to the context within which artworks are exhibited. • Installations employ a range of materials. They are hybrid, adaptable artworks, allowing artists to use a variety of forms, many of which traditionally would have been seen as incompatible (sculpture and painting and video etc.) . • The form of the installation rejects technical specialism (deskilling). • Installations are temporary in nature. • Installations frequently invite and encourage a narrative reading.Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Feminism and Installation Installation art’s multi-perspectivalism was viewed as emancipatory and in contrast to single-point perspective, which in its centring of the viewer in a position of mastery was for feminists marked by patriarchal power relations. • Judy Chicago Dinner Party 1974 San Francisco Museum of • “This discourse of decentring has Modern Art had particularly influence on the writing of art critics sympathetic to feminist and postcolonial One of the first openly female- theory, who argue that fantasies centered art installations, Womanhouse - a series of fantasy of ‘centring’ perpetuated by environments exploring the various dominant ideology are personal meanings and gender masculinist, racist and construction of domestic space - was created by students of the Feminist conservative; this is because Art Program along with a number of there is no one ‘right’ way of local Los Angeles, CA artists, first conceived by Paula Harper and looking at the world, nor any spearheaded by Judy Chicago and privileged place from which such Miriam Schapiro. judgements can be made.” (Bishop, C, Installation Art, p 13)Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • The decentred viewerWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • 20Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • The Active Spectator • To see yourself seeing. To engender a critical, self conscious, reflexsive attitude to the activity of looking at art in a space. • An active viewer - directly addressed. The interdependence of the work of art and the viewer : • “the active nature of the viewer’s role within [installations], and the importance of first hand experience , came to be regarded as an empowering alternative to the pacifying effects of mass-media.” (Bishop Installation Art) •Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Active Spectatorship “This activation is, moreover, regarded as emmancipatory, since it is analogous to the viewers engagement in the world. A transitive relationship therefore comes to be implied between ‘activated spectatorship’ and active engagement in the social political arena’ (Bishop, C, Installation Art, pg. 11) 22Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • It is common in installation art to remark that the viewer completes the work. Their presence is essential to the functioning of the work, - they ‘activate’ the work through their literal presence in the space. 23Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • "The main actor in the total installation, the main centre toward which everything is addressed, for which everything is intended, is the viewer." Ilya Kabakov On the Total InstallationWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • History of video art • Late sixties - early video cameras appear on university campuses - they are large and bulky. • Naim June Paik uses Sony Portapak Camera • Early history closely connected to recording of performance - camera is stationary • Key first generation video artists or artists using video -Dan Graham, John Baldessari, Joan Jonas, Martha Rosler,Bruce Nauman, William Wegman, Vito Acconci....Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Video Art • A time based medium. • Experiencing the changing patterns of form of video over time is frequently a central aspect of its character. • In theory an infinitely reproducible, non auratic medium. The hope that technological innovation would lead to democratic transformation in the production and consumption of art. Another instance of the dematerialisation of the art Martha Rosler “Semiotics of the Kitchen” object - and anti-form. • The exhibition of video is fluid - from large scale projections filling a space, to single free standing works on domestic monitors. It is a migrant medium.Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • • Video art frequently positions itself in a ‘dialogue’ with mainstream television or film. • An interventionist practice - not only did it have the potential to reach far bigger audiences, it also had the possibility of offering a critique of the values and forms of commercial, mainstream TV and film- to turn TV /film against itself • A deconstruction of the mechanisms of manipulation, seduction and the resulting ‘rituals of passive consumption / one way transmission’. • A form capable of offering alternative narratives in alternative spaces http://www.ubu.com/film/acconci.html • A new form. No artistic or critical history.Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • “From it’s beginnings in the 1970’s counter culture, artists’ video and film has sidestepped the hypnotizing conditions of narrative cinema precisely in order to critique the dominant culture’s most thoroughly passivizing entertainment genre.” Brandon Taylor Art TodayWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Martha Rosler • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zSA9Rm2PZA&feature=related 30Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Laurie Anderson • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SirOxIeuNDE • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hhm0NHhCBg 31Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Bruce Nauman, Violent Incident, 1986, video, installation, Tate Gallery, London.Wednesday, 19 September 2012
  • Bruce Nauman “ANTHRO/SOCIO 1991. Projection on three walls and six monitors - the head screams “Feed Me, Help Me / Anthropology..Help Me / Hurt Me / Sociology…” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxmm16gqRis&feature=relatedWednesday, 19 September 2012
  • “ Whereas for McLuhan media such as books and cinema are not truly interactive, for Manovich quite the reverse is true: they are more interactive (higher in participation) than digital media forms precisely because they demand us to create a mental accompaniment. Manovich, [..] sees media such as painting, books and cinema as succeeding by depriving our senses of high level or complete information. They work because the demand us to fill in the gaps in visual or audio narratives and to construct our own readings, images or even dialogues through interaction with the medium in question. “ pg. 91 new media 34Wednesday, 19 September 2012