Department of Business Administration
Faculty of Management Studies & Research
Aligarh Muslim University
A report for Business Law & Ethics (MBA 1C12)
Dr. Bilal Mustafa Khan
March 15, 2013
Definition: “The exclusive right given by law for a certain term of years to an author,
composer etc. (or his assignee) to print, publish and sell copies of his original work” (oxford
Scope of protection in the Copyright Act,1957
The Copyright Act, 1957 protects original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works and
cinematograph films and sound recordings from unauthorized uses. Unlike the case with
patents, copyright protects the expressions and not the ideas. There is no copyright in an
Copyright subsists throughout India in the following classes of works:
o Original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works;
o Cinematograph films; and
o Sound recordings.
An artistic work means-
o a painting, a sculpture, a drawing (including a diagram, map, chart or plan),
an engraving or a photograph, whether or not any such work possesses
o a work of architecture; and
o any other work of artistic craftsmanship.
"Musical work" means a work consisting of music and includes any graphical notation of
such work but does not include any words or any action intended to be sung, spoken or
performed with the music. A musical work need not be written down to enjoy copyright
"Sound recording" means a recording of sounds from which sounds may be produced
regardless of the medium on which such recording is made or the method by which the
sounds are produced. A phonogram and a CD-ROM are sound recordings.
"Cinematograph film" means any work of visual recording on any medium produced through
a process from which a moving image may be produced by any means and includes a sound
recording accompanying such visual recording and "cinematograph" shall be construed as
including any work produced by any process analogous to cinematography including video
"Government work" means a work which is made or published by or under the direction or
o the government or any department of the government
o any legislature in India, and
o any court, tribunal or other judicial authority in India.
"Indian work" means a literary, dramatic or musical work,
o the author of which is a citizen of India; or
o which is first published in India; or
o the author of which, in the case of an unpublished work is, at the time of the
making of the work, a citizen of India.
Authorship and Ownership
Copyright protects the rights of authors, i.e., creators of intellectual property in the form of
literary, musical, dramatic and artistic works and cinematograph films and sound recordings.
First owner of copyright
Ordinarily the author is the first owner of copyright in a work.
Who is an author?
In the case of a literary or dramatic work the author, i.e., the person who creates
In the case of a musical work, the composer.
In the case of a cinematograph film, the producer.
In the case of a sound recording, the producer.
In the case of a photograph, the photographer.
In the case of a computer generated work, the person who causes the work to be
The rights vary according to the class of work.
In the case of a literary work (except computer programme), copyright means the exclusive
To reproduce the work
To issue copies of the work to the public
To perform the work in public
To communicate the work to the public.
To make cinematograph film or sound recording in respect of the work
permission to use the work. This also serves as a hindrance to those who purposely try and
take a defence that the infringer was not aware of the fact that the work is copyrighted
Assignment of Copyright
The owner of the copyright in an existing work or the prospective owner of the copyright in a
future work may assign to any person the copyright either wholly or partially and either
generally or subject to limitations and either for the whole term of the copyright or any part
Period of assignment
If the period of assignment is not stated, it shall be deemed to be five years from the date of
Note. The moral rights are independent of the author’s copyright and remains with him even
after assignment of the copyright
Renewal of Copyright
Works copyrighted between January 1, 1964 and December 31, 1977 are affected by the
1992 Amendment. Renewal registration for these works was made optional by this
amendment, and a second term was automatically secured.
The 1992 amending legislation (Public Law 102-307) secures the second term for works
copyrighted between January 1, 1964, and December 31, 1977 without a renewal
registration requirement. This system is also referred to as an "opt-out" system because it
provides for copyright protection even if it is not requested by the author of a work. However,
if a copyright originally secured before January 1, 1964, was not renewed at the proper time,
protection would have expired at the end of the 28th calendar year of the copyright.
Eligibility to Claim Renewal
The law specifies the persons who are eligible to claim Renewal Copyright. Apart from
anonymous works, the following are eligible to claim renewal:
1. The author, if living
2. The widow or widower of the author or the children or both, if the author is dead.
3. If there are no immediate family members, and there is a will, then the author’s
executors can claim renewal.
4. If there is no immediate family or will, the next of kin may claim the copyright.
A copyright proprietor or owner may claim renewal in only the following cases:
1. Posthumous work
2. Periodical, cyclopedic, or composite work
3. Work copyrighted by a corporate entity
4. Work made for hire
Counterfeiting to Copyright
For example the production of certain brand bags by putting a false label, and sold at low
prices. While these models have never been created by the company which owns the mark.
These are copies of articles, similar to the original under a different name
Infringement "mixed :
It’s the most famous forgery, because often the media, where the copy for both the model
and brand. The luxury goods sector is the most common victim: Fake Louis Vuitton bags or
Rolex watches for instance.
Infringement of copyright and copyright:
This is a copy of a creation, a project, text, song, film script, the content of a website, but
also a program, music, system, d a business plan.
The following are some of the commonly known acts involving infringement of copyright:
i. Making infringing copies for sale or hire or selling or letting
them for hire;
ii. Permitting any place for the performance of works in public
where such performance constitutes infringement of copyright;
iii. Distributing infringing copies for the purpose of trade or to such
an extent so as to affect prejudicially the interest of the owner
of copyright ;
iv. Public exhibition of infringing copies by way of trade; and
v. Importation of infringing copies into India.
Civil remedies for copyright infringement
A copyright owner can take legal action against any person who infringes the copyright in the
work. The copyright owner is entitled to remedies by way of injunctions, damages and
The District Court concerned has the jurisdiction in civil suits regarding copyright
Remedies in the case of groundless threat to legal proceedings
Where any person claiming to be the owner of copyright in any work, by circulars,
advertisements or otherwise, threatens any other person with any legal proceedings or
liability in respect of an alleged infringement of copyright, any person aggrieved thereby may
institute a declaratory suit that the alleged infringement to which the threats related was not
in fact an infringement of any legal rights of the person making such threats and may in any
such suit –
a. obtain an injunction against the continuance of such threats; and
b. recover such damages, if any, as he has sustained by reason of such threats.
Is copyright infringement a criminal offence?
Yes. Any person who knowingly infringes or abets the infringement of the copyright in any
work commits criminal offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act.
Punishments for a criminal offence under the copyright law
The minimum punishment for infringement of copyright is imprisonment for six months with
the minimum fine of Rs. 50,000/-. In the case of a second and subsequent conviction the
minimum punishment is imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. one lakh.
Is copyright infringement a cognizable offence?
Any police officer, not below the rank of a sub inspector, may, if he is satisfied that an
offence in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work has been, is being, or is likely
to be committed, seize without warrant, all copies of the work and all plates used for the
purpose of making infringing copies of the work, wherever found, and all copies and plates
so seized shall, as soon as practicable be produced before a magistrate.
Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright
Idea-expression dichotomy and the merger doctrine
The idea-expression divide differentiates between ideas and expression, and states that
copyright protects only the original expression of ideas, and not the ideas themselves. This
principle, first clarified in the 1879 case of Baker v. Selden, has since been codified by
the Copyright Act of 1976 at 17 U.S.C. § 102(b).
The first-sale doctrine and exhaustion of rights
Copyright law does not restrict the owner of a copy from reselling legitimately obtained
copies of copyrighted works, provided that those copies were originally produced by or with
the permission of the copyright holder. It is therefore legal, for example, to resell a
copyrighted book or CD. In the United States this is known as the first-sale doctrine, and was
established by the courts to clarify the legality of reselling books in second-hand bookstores.
Some countries may have parallel importation restrictions that allow the copyright holder to
control the aftermarket. This may mean for example that a copy of a book that does not
infringe copyright in the country where it was printed does infringe copyright in a country into
which it is imported for retailing. The first-sale doctrine is known as exhaustion of rights in
other countries and is a principle which also applies, though somewhat differently,
to patent and trademark rights. It is important to note that the first-sale doctrine permits the
transfer of the particular legitimate copy involved. It does not permit making or distributing
In addition, copyright, in most cases, does not prohibit one from acts such as modifying,
defacing, or destroying his or her own legitimately obtained copy of a copyrighted work, so
long as duplication is not involved. However, in countries that implement moral rights, a
copyright holder can in some cases successfully prevent the mutilation or destruction of a
work that is publicly visible.
Fair use and fair dealing
Copyright does not prohibit all copying or replication. In the United States, the fair use
doctrine, codified by the Copyright Act of 1976 as 17 U.S.C. Section 107, permits some
copying and distribution without permission of the copyright holder or payment to same. The